Comparative CT with stress manoeuvres for diagnosing distal isolated tibiofibular syndesmotic injury in acute ankle sprain: a protocol for an accuracy- test prospective study

João Carlos Rodrigues, Alexandre Leme Godoy Santos, Marcelo Pires Prado, José Felipe Marion Alloza, Renato Amaral Masagão, Laercio Alberto Rosemberg, Durval do Carmo Santos Barros, Adham do Amaral E Castro, Marco Kawamura Demange, Mario Lenza, Mario Ferretti, João Carlos Rodrigues, Alexandre Leme Godoy Santos, Marcelo Pires Prado, José Felipe Marion Alloza, Renato Amaral Masagão, Laercio Alberto Rosemberg, Durval do Carmo Santos Barros, Adham do Amaral E Castro, Marco Kawamura Demange, Mario Lenza, Mario Ferretti

Abstract

Introduction: Although several imaging options are available for diagnosing syndesmotic injury, a fundamental question that guides treatment remains unanswered. Syndesmotic instability is still challenging to diagnose correctly, and syndesmotic disruption and true syndesmotic instability should be differentiated. Currently, imaging tests quickly diagnose severe syndesmotic instability but have difficulty in diagnosing mild and moderate cases. This study aims to investigate which strategy among an existing CT index test and two new add-on CT index tests with stress manoeuvres more accurately diagnoses syndesmotic instability. The secondary objective is to investigate the participants' disability outcomes by applying the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire.

Methods and analyses: This study of a diagnostic accuracy test will consecutively select individuals older than 18 years with a clinical diagnosis of a suspected acute syndesmotic injury. Three strategies of the CT index test (one in the neutral position and two with stress) will examine the accuracy using MRI as the reference standard. The external rotation and dorsiflexion of the ankle will guide the stress manoeuvres. A comparison of measurements between the injured syndesmosis and the uninjured contralateral side of the same individual will investigate the syndesmotic instability, by evaluating the rotational and translational relationships between the fibula and tibia. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and likelihood analyses will compare the diagnostic accuracies of the strategies.

Ethics and dissemination: The Internal Review Board and the Einstein Ethics Committee approved this study (registered number 62100016.5.0000.0071). All participants will receive an oral description of the study's aim, and the choice to participate will be free and voluntary. Participants will be enrolled after they sign the written informed consent form, including the terms of confidentiality. The results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals and social media.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04095598; preresults).

Keywords: computed tomography; diagnostic radiology; foot & ankle; magnetic resonance imaging; musculoskeletal disorders; orthopaedic sports trauma.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical pathway for the syndesmosis study. CTSM, CT with stress manoeuvres.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A, B, C and D images represent the axial views of a normal syndesmosis 1 cm proximal to the tibial plafond with six measures (A–F) and one angle (A1). Image (E) depicts the reference line on the tibial plafond and (F) the corresponding second angle (A2) measured.

References

    1. Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, et al. . Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int 1998;19:653–60. 10.1177/107110079801901002
    1. Boytim MJ, Fischer DA, Neumann L. Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 1991;19:294–8. 10.1177/036354659101900315
    1. van Dijk CN, Longo UG, Loppini M, et al. . Conservative and surgical management of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016;24:1217–27. 10.1007/s00167-016-4017-1
    1. van Dijk CN, Longo UG, Loppini M, Maltese L, Denaro V, Ciuffreda M, et al. . Classification and diagnosis of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016;24:1200–16. 10.1007/s00167-015-3942-8
    1. Krähenbühl N, Weinberg MW, Davidson NP, et al. . Imaging in syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review. Skeletal Radiol 2018;47:631–48. 10.1007/s00256-017-2823-2
    1. Beumer A, Valstar ER, Garling EH, et al. . External rotation stress imaging in syndesmotic injuries of the ankle: comparison of lateral radiography and radiostereometry in a cadaveric model. Acta Orthop Scand 2003;74:201–5. 10.1080/00016470310013969
    1. Hamard M, Neroladaki A, Bagetakos I, et al. . Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography for syndesmosis injury diagnosis compared to conventional computed tomography. Foot Ankle Surg 2020;26:265-272. 10.1016/j.fas.2019.03.006
    1. Krähenbühl N, Bailey TL, Weinberg MW, et al. . Is load application necessary when using computed tomography scans to diagnose syndesmotic injuries? A cadaver study. Foot Ankle Surg 2020;26:3–4. 10.1016/j.fas.2019.02.002
    1. Oae K, Takao M, Naito K, et al. . Injury of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: value of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology 2003;227:155–61. 10.1148/radiol.2271011865
    1. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Yang H, et al. . Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int 1997;18:693–8. 10.1177/107110079701801103
    1. Ahn T-K, Choi S-M, Kim J-Y, et al. . Isolated syndesmosis diastasis: computed tomography scan assessment with arthroscopic correlation. Arthroscopy 2017;33:828–34. 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.009
    1. Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Altman DG, Gatsonis CA, Levine D, et al. . STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open 2016;6:e012799. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799
    1. Nault M-L, Hébert-Davies J, Laflamme G-Y, et al. . CT scan assessment of the syndesmosis: a new reproducible method. J Orthop Trauma 2013;27:638–41. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318284785a
    1. LaMothe JM, Baxter JR, Karnovsky SC, et al. . Syndesmotic injury assessment with lateral imaging during stress testing in a cadaveric model. Foot Ankle Int 2018;39:479–84. 10.1177/1071100717745660
    1. Nault M-L, Gascon L, Hébert-Davies J, et al. . Modification of distal tibiofibular relationship after a mild Syndesmotic injury. Foot Ankle Spec 2017;10:133–8. 10.1177/1938640016668235
    1. Takao M, Ochi M, Oae K, et al. . Diagnosis of a tear of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. The role of arthroscopy of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:324–9. 10.1302/0301-620x.85b3.13174
    1. Lubberts B, Guss D, Vopat BG, et al. . The arthroscopic syndesmotic assessment tool can differentiate between stable and unstable ankle syndesmoses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020;28:193–201. 10.1007/s00167-018-5229-3
    1. Ferkel RD, Small HN, Gittins JE. Complications in foot and ankle arthroscopy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001:89–104. 10.1097/00003086-200110000-00010
    1. Carlson MJ, Ferkel RD. Complications in ankle and foot arthroscopy. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2013;21:135–9. 10.1097/JSA.0b013e31828e5c6c
    1. Sharif B, Welck M, Saifuddin A. MRI of the distal tibiofibular joint. Skeletal Radiol 2020;49:1–17. 10.1007/s00256-019-03260-7
    1. Moreira TS, Magalhães LdeC, Silva RD, et al. . Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the foot and ankle ability measure questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil 2016;38:2479–90. 10.3109/09638288.2015.1137979
    1. Eechaute C, Vaes P, Van Aerschot L, et al. . The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007;8:6. 10.1186/1471-2474-8-6
    1. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, et al. . Evidence of validity for the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int 2005;26:968–83. 10.1177/107110070502601113

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir