Comparing counselling alone versus counselling supplemented with guided use of a well-being app for university students experiencing anxiety or depression (CASELOAD): protocol for a feasibility trial

Emma Broglia, Abigail Millings, Michael Barkham, Emma Broglia, Abigail Millings, Michael Barkham

Abstract

Background: University counselling services face a unique challenge to offer short-term therapeutic support to students presenting with complex mental health needs and in a setting which suits the academic timetable. The recent availability of mobile phone applications (apps) offers an opportunity to supplement face-to-face therapy and has the potential to reach a wider audience, maintain engagement between therapy sessions, and enhance therapeutic outcomes. The present study, entitled Counselling plus Apps for Students Experiencing Levels of Anxiety or Depression (CASELOAD), aims to explore the feasibility of supplementing counselling with guided use of a well-being app.

Methods/design: Forty help-seeking university students (aged 18 years and over) with symptoms of moderate anxiety or depression will be recruited from a University Counselling Service (UCS) in the United Kingdom (UK). Participants will be recruited via counsellors who provide the initial clinical assessment and who determine treatment allocation to one of two treatments on the basis of client-treatment fit. The two conditions comprise (1) counselling alone (treatment as usual/TAU) or (2) counselling supplemented with guided use of a well-being app (enhanced intervention). Trained counsellors will deliver up to six counselling sessions in each treatment arm across a 6-month period, and the session frequency will be decided by client-counsellor discussion. Assessments will occur at baseline, every counselling session, post-intervention (3 months after consent) and follow-up (6 months after consent). Assessments will include clinical measures of anxiety, depression, psychological functioning, specific mental health concerns (e.g. academic distress and substance misuse), resilience and therapeutic alliance. The usage, acceptability, feasibility and potential implications of combining counselling with guided use of the well-being app will be assessed through audio recordings of counselling sessions, telephone interviews with participants, focus groups with counsellors and counsellor notes.

Discussion: This study will inform the design of a randomised pilot trial and a definitive trial which aim to improve therapy engagement, reduce dropout and enhance clinical outcomes of student counselling.

Trial registration: ISRCTN55102899.

Keywords: Acceptability; Anxiety; Augmented therapy; Behaviour monitoring; Counselling; Depression; Feasibility; Student mental health; Well-being app.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow diagram for CASELOAD feasibility trial
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SPIRIT diagram displaying schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments of the CASELOAD feasibility trial

References

    1. Osborne M. Policy and practice in widening participation: a six country comparative study of access as flexibility. Int J Lifelong Ed. 2003;22:43–58. doi: 10.1080/02601370304826.
    1. Holm-Hadulla RM, Koutsoukou-Argyraki A. Mental health of students in a globalized world: prevalence of complaints and disorders, methods and effectivity of counseling, structure of mental health services for students. Ment Health Prev. 2015;3:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.mhp.2015.04.003.
    1. Mohr DC, Burns MN, Schueller SM, Clarke G, Klinkman M. Behavioral intervention technologies: evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013;35:332–8. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.008.
    1. Clarke G, Yarborough BJ. Evaluating the promise of health IT to enhance/expand the reach of mental health services. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013;35:339–44. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.013.
    1. Kitzrow MA. The mental health needs of today’s college students: challenges and recommendations. NASPA J. 2003;41:167–81. doi: 10.2202/0027-6014.1310.
    1. Eisenberg D, Golberstein E, Gollust SE. Help-seeking and access to mental health care in a university student population. Med Care. 2007;45:594–601. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31803bb4c1.
    1. Randall EM, Bewick BM. Exploration of counsellors’ perceptions of the redesigned service pathways: a qualitative study of a UK university student counselling service. Br J Guid Couns. 2015;44:86–98. doi: 10.1080/03069885.2015.1017801.
    1. Krägeloh CU, Czuba KJ, Billington DR, Kersten P, Siegert RJ. Using feedback from patient-reported outcome measures in mental health services: a scoping study and typology. Psychiatric Serv. 2015;66:224–41. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400141.
    1. Kendrick T, El-Gohary M, Stuart B, Gilbody S, Churchill R, Aiken L, Bhattacharya A, Gimson A, Brütt AL, Jong K, Moore M. Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2016
    1. Swan M. Health 2050: the realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. J Perinat Med. 2012;2:93–118.
    1. McCrone P. Cost-effectiveness of the computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;185:55–62. doi: 10.1192/bjp.185.1.55.
    1. Barak A, Hen L, Boniel-Nissim M, Shapira N. A comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions. J Technol Hum Serv. 2008;26:109–60. doi: 10.1080/15228830802094429.
    1. Cavanagh K, Millings A. (Inter) personal computing: the role of the therapeutic relationship in e-mental health. J Contemp Psychother. 2013;43:197–206. doi: 10.1007/s10879-013-9242-z.
    1. Hill A, Roth T. Competences required to deliver effective counselling in further education. BACP. 2016. . Accessed 3 Nov 2016.
    1. Barkham M, Bewick B, Mullin T, Gilbody S, Connell J, Cahill J, Mellor-Clark J, Richards D, Unsworth G, Evans C. The CORE-10: a short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies. Couns Psychother Res. 2013;13:3–13. doi: 10.1080/14733145.2012.729069.
    1. Barkham M, Margison F, Leach C, Lucock M, Mellor-Clark J, Evans C, McGrath G. Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measures. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69:184–96. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.184.
    1. Locke BD, Buzolitz JS, Lei PW, Boswell JF, McAleavey AA, Sevig TD, Hayes JA. Development of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms-62 (CCAPS-62) J Couns Psychol. 2011;58:97–109. doi: 10.1037/a0021282.
    1. Broglia E, Millings A, Barkham M. The Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS‐62): Acceptance, feasibility, and initial psychometric properties in a UK student population, Clin Psychol Psychother. 2016. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2070
    1. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. JAMA. 1999;282:1737–44. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737.
    1. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1092–7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
    1. Campbell-Sills L, Stein MB. Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. J Trauma Stress. 2007;20:1019–28. doi: 10.1002/jts.20271.
    1. Connor KM. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) Depress Anxiety. 2003;18:76–82. doi: 10.1002/da.10113.
    1. Waller R, Gilbody S. Barriers to the uptake of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. Psychol Med. 2009;39:705–12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708004224.
    1. Luxton DD, McCann RA, Bush NE, Mishkind MC, Reger GM. mHealth for mental health: integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Prof Psychol Res Prac. 2011;42:505–12. doi: 10.1037/a0024485.
    1. Schaper L, Pervan G. A model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;130:91–101.
    1. Lutz W, Leon SC, Martinovich Z, Lyons JS, Stiles WB. Therapist effects in outpatient psychotherapy: a three-level growth curve approach. J Couns Psychol. 2007;54:32–9. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.54.1.32.
    1. Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire: psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Prog Plan. 1982;5:233–7. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-X.
    1. Hatcher RL, Gillaspy JA. Development and validation of a revised short version of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychother Res. 2006;16:12–25. doi: 10.1080/10503300500352500.
    1. Satu E, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir