Rivaroxaban With or Without Aspirin in Patients With Heart Failure and Chronic Coronary or Peripheral Artery Disease

Kelley R Branch, Jeffrey L Probstfield, John W Eikelboom, Jackie Bosch, Aldo P Maggioni, Richard K Cheng, Deepak L Bhatt, Alvaro Avezum, Keith A A Fox, Stuart J Connolly, Olga Shestakovska, Salim Yusuf, Kelley R Branch, Jeffrey L Probstfield, John W Eikelboom, Jackie Bosch, Aldo P Maggioni, Richard K Cheng, Deepak L Bhatt, Alvaro Avezum, Keith A A Fox, Stuart J Connolly, Olga Shestakovska, Salim Yusuf

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease and history of heart failure (HF) are at high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. We explored the effects of rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in these patients.

Methods: The COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) randomized 27 395 participants with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease to rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg daily, rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily alone, or aspirin 100 mg alone. Patients with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV HF or left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) <30% were excluded. The primary major adverse cardiovascular events outcome comprised cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding using modified International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Investigators recorded a history of HF and EF at baseline, if available. We examined the effects of rivaroxaban on major adverse cardiovascular events and major bleeding in patients with or without a history of HF and an EF <40% or ≥40% at baseline.

Results: Of the 5902 participants (22%) with a history of HF, 4971 (84%) had EF recorded at baseline, and 12% had EF <40%. Rivaroxaban and aspirin had similar relative reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events compared with aspirin in participants with HF (5.5% versus 7.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.86) and those without HF (3.8% versus 4.7%; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.93; P for interaction 0.28) but larger absolute risk reduction in those with HF (HF absolute risk reduction 2.4%, number needed to treat=42; no HF absolute risk reduction 1.0%, number needed to treat=103). The primary major adverse cardiovascular events outcome was not statistically different between those with EF <40% (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.55-1.42) and ≥40% (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98; P for interaction 0.36). The excess hazard for major bleeding was not different in participants with HF (2.5% versus 1.8%; HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.88-2.09) than in those without HF (3.3% versus 1.9%; HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.45-2.21; P for interaction 0.26). There were no significant differences in the primary outcomes with rivaroxaban alone.

Conclusions: In patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease and a history of mild or moderate HF, combination rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone produces similar relative but larger absolute benefits than in those without HF.

Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01776424.

Keywords: aspirin; cardiovascular diseases; coronary artery disease; heart failure; peripheral artery disease; randomized controlled trial; rivaroxaban.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier cumulative hazard rates.A, Composite outcome of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. B, Death from any cause. C, Major bleeding, by heart failure status at baseline and treatment with rivaroxaban plus aspirin or aspirin alone. Events were tabulated as time to first event. HF indicates heart failure.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Clinical trial events in patients with HF and CAD or PAD treated with rivaroxaban with or without aspirin. Comparison of total event rates for primary end point, their components, and noncardiovascular death in COMMANDER HF (A Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Reducing the Risk of Death, Myocardial Infarction, or Stroke in Participants with Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease Following an Episode of Decompensated Heart Failure) and in patients in the COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) with HF, by left ventricular ejection fraction category. Multiple events could occur in a single patient. ACS indicates acute coronary syndrome; ASA, aspirin; ATLAS ACS-2, Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects With Acute Coronary Syndrome; CAD, coronary artery disease; CV, cardiovascular; EF, ejection fraction; HF, heart failure; PAD, peripheral artery disease; and Riva, rivaroxaban.

References

    1. Ambrosy AP, Fonarow GC, Butler J, Chioncel O, Greene SJ, Vaduganathan M, Nodari S, Lam CSP, Sato N, Shah AN, et al. The global health and economic burden of hospitalizations for heart failure: lessons learned from hospitalized heart failure registries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1123–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.053.
    1. Zannad F, Anker SD, Byra WM, Cleland JGF, Fu M, Gheorghiade M, Lam CSP, Mehra MR, Neaton JD, Nessel CC, et al. COMMANDER HF Investigators. Rivaroxaban in patients with heart failure, sinus rhythm, and coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1332–1342. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808848.
    1. Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Bosch J, Dagenais GR, Hart RG, Shestakovska O, Diaz R, Alings M, Lonn EM, Anand SS, et al. COMPASS Investigators. Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in stable cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1319–1330. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709118.
    1. Bosch J, Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Bruns NC, Lanius V, Yuan F, Misselwitz F, Chen E, Diaz R, Alings M, et al. Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of participants in the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) Trial. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:1027–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.06.001.
    1. Shah KS, Xu H, Matsouaka RA, Bhatt DL, Heidenreich PA, Hernandez AF, Devore AD, Yancy CW, Fonarow GC. Heart failure with preserved, borderline, and reduced ejection fraction: 5-year outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:2476–2486. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.074.
    1. Cleland JGF, Findlay I, Jafri S, Sutton G, Falk R, Bulpitt C, Prentice C, Ford I, Trainer A, Poole-Wilson PA. The Warfarin/Aspirin Study in Heart Failure (WASH): a randomized trial comparing antithrombotic strategies for patients with heart failure. Am Heart J. 2004;148:157–164.
    1. Cokkinos DV, Haralabopoulos GC, Kostis JB, Toutouzas PK HELAS Investigators. Efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in chronic heart failure: the HELAS study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2006;8:428–432. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2006.02.012.
    1. Homma S, Thompson JL, Pullicino PM, Levin B, Freudenberger RS, Teerlink JR, Ammon SE, Graham S, Sacco RL, Mann DL, et al. WARCEF Investigators. Warfarin and aspirin in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1859–1869. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1202299.
    1. Massie BM, Collins JF, Ammon SE, Armstrong PW, Cleland JG, Ezekowitz M, Jafri SM, Krol WF, O’Connor CM, Schulman KA, et al. WATCH Trial Investigators. Randomized trial of warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in patients with chronic heart failure: the Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure (WATCH) trial. Circulation. 2009;119:1616–1624. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.801753.
    1. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE, Jr, Colvin MM, Drazner MH, Filippatos GS, Fonarow GC, Givertz MM, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation. 2017;136:e137–e161. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000509.
    1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Falk V, González-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC [published correction appears in Eur Heart J. 2018;39:860]. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129–2200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128.
    1. McMurray JJV, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Böhm M, Dickstein K, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gomez-Sanchez MA, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology: developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC [published correction appears in Eur Heart J. 2013;34:158]. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1787–1847.
    1. Greenberg B, Neaton JD, Anker SD, Byra WM, Cleland JGF, Deng H, Fu M, La Police DA, Lam CSP, Mehra MR, et al. Association of rivaroxaban with thromboembolic events in patients with heart failure, coronary disease, and sinus rhythm: a post hoc analysis of the COMMANDER HF trial [published online April 24, 2019]. JAMA Cardiol. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1049. .
    1. Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, Bassand JP, Bhatt DL, Bode C, Burton P, Cohen M, Cook-Bruns N, Fox KA, et al. ATLAS ACS 2–TIMI 51 Investigators. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:9–19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112277.
    1. Korjian S, Braunwald E, Daaboul Y, Mi M, Bhatt DL, Verheugt FWA, Cohen M, Bode C, Burton P, Plotnikov AN, et al. Usefulness of rivaroxaban for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome in patients with history of congestive heart failure (from the ATLAS-ACS-2 TIMI-51 Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2018;122:1896–1901. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.08.034.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir