Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analysis of Venetoclax + Obinutuzumab in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Phase 1b Study and Phase 3 CLL14 Trial

Divya Samineni, Leonid Gibiansky, Bei Wang, Shweta Vadhavkar, Richa Rajwanshi, Maneesh Tandon, Arijit Sinha, Othman Al-Sawaf, Kirsten Fischer, Michael Hallek, Ahmed Hamed Salem, Chunze Li, Dale Miles, Divya Samineni, Leonid Gibiansky, Bei Wang, Shweta Vadhavkar, Richa Rajwanshi, Maneesh Tandon, Arijit Sinha, Othman Al-Sawaf, Kirsten Fischer, Michael Hallek, Ahmed Hamed Salem, Chunze Li, Dale Miles

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to investigate pharmacokinetics (PK) and exposure-response parameters of the 400 mg once-daily venetoclax dose regimen in combination with obinutuzumab, which was approved for the first-line (1L) treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) based on data from the phase 3 CLL14 study and the phase 1b dose-finding GP28331 study.

Methods: Parameter estimates and uncertainty, which were estimated by a previously developed population PK (popPK) model, were used as informative priors for this analysis. They were re-estimated, and then used to evaluate additional covariate effects, describe venetoclax PK when administered with obinutuzumab, and provide empirical Bayes estimates of PK parameters and exposure. Exposure-progression-free survival (PFS) and exposure-safety relationships were assessed using data from CLL14, with steady-state nominal venetoclax exposure (CmeanSS,nominal) as the predictor variable. Exposure-safety analyses were conducted using logistic regression for selected treatment-emergent grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Dose intensities were summarized by tertiles of CmeanSS,nominal.

Results: PK data from 274 patients (CLL14, n = 194; GP28331, n = 80) were included. The final model provided good fit of the observed data. Obinutuzumab co-administration, history of prior treatments, and disease severity at baseline had no appreciable influence on venetoclax steady-state exposure. No significant correlations were observed between venetoclax exposure and PFS, or between venetoclax exposure and the probability of treatment-emergent grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia, grade ≥ 3 infections, and SAEs. Median dose intensities for venetoclax and obinutuzumab remained similar across venetoclax exposure tertiles.

Conclusion: PopPK and exposure-efficacy, exposure-safety, and exposure-tolerability analyses support the 400 mg once-daily venetoclax dose plus obinutuzumab for 1L treatment in patients with CLL.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers NCT02242942 and NCT02339181.

Keywords: Cancer; Drug safety; Effectiveness; Pharmacokinetics.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prediction-corrected VPC using the final popPK model to predict the observed data for CLL14 (a) and GP28331 (b). CI confidence interval, h hours, popPK population pharmacokinetics, VPC visual predictive check. Points are prediction-corrected venetoclax concentrations plotted vs. time after most recent venetoclax dose. The lines show median (red), and the 5th and 95th percentiles (blue) of the prediction-corrected venetoclax concentrations. The shaded regions show the 90% CIs on these quantities obtained by simulations. The simulated values were computed from 500 trials with dosing, sampling, and the covariate values of the analysis dataset
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to progression (investigator data). Exposure groups correspond to quartiles of CmeanSS,nominal. CmeanSS,nominal nominal exposure at steady state, PFS progression-free survival
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Logistic regression analyses of exposure-safety relationships for treatment-emergent grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (a), grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia (b), grade ≥ 3 infections (c), and SAEs (d). CI confidence interval, glm generalized linear models, QD once-daily, SAE serious adverse event. The red solid line and blue shaded area represent the logistic regression model prediction and 90% CI of predictions, respectively. Points show exposure of individual patients with events (p = 1) and without events (p = 0). Black squares and vertical black lines show observed fraction of patients with events in each exposure group and 90% CI for these fractions. Dashed vertical lines show bounds of exposure groups. Blue line and point indicate point estimate and 95% coverage interval of steady-state exposure following 400 mg QD doses, respectively. p value is provided by glm() function
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Venetoclax (a) and obinutuzumab (b) dose intensity vs. venetoclax exposure. CmeanSS,nominal nominal exposure at steady state. Circles correspond to individual dose intensity values. CmeanSS,nominal was used as a measure of exposure. The bold red lines are the LOWESS (local weighted scatterplot smoothing) trend lines. Median values are designated by black lines in the center of the blue boxes. Boxes indicate the interquartile range (IQR). Whiskers represent 1.5 × IQR

References

    1. Eichhorst B, Robak T, Montserrat E, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020;32:23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.019.
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387.
    1. Hallek M. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment. Am J Hematol. 2017;92:946–965. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24826.
    1. Freise KJ, Jones AK, Eckert D, et al. Impact of venetoclax exposure on clinical efficacy and safety inpatients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56:515–523. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0453-9.
    1. Parikh A, Gopalakrishnan S, Freise KJ, et al. Exposure–response evaluations of venetoclax efficacy and safety in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018;59:871–879. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1361024.
    1. Davids MS, Roberts AW, Seymour JF, et al. Phase I first-in-human study of venetoclax in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:826–833. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.4320.
    1. Seymour JF, Kipps TJ, Eichhorst E, et al. Venetoclax-rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1107–1120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713976.
    1. Deng R, Gibianksy L, Lu T, et al. Exposure-response analysis of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: pooled results from a phase 1b study and the phase 3 MURANO study. Leuk Lymph. 2020;61:56–65. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1657575.
    1. VENCLEXTA™: highlights of prescribing information. VENCLEXTA™ (venetoclax) tablets, for oral use. Initial US Approval: 2016. Revised: June 2018. North Chicago, IL, USA: AbbVie Inc.
    1. Mössner E, Brunker P, Moser S, et al. Increasing the efficacy of CD20 antibody therapy through the engineering of a new type of anti-CD20 antibody with enhanced direct and immune effector cell-mediated B-cell cytotoxicity. Blood. 2010;115:4393–4402. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-225979.
    1. Patz M, Isaeva P, Forcob N, et al. Comparison of the in vitro effects of the anti-CD20 antibodies rituximab and GA101 on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells. Br J Haematol. 2010;152:295–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08428.x.
    1. Goede V, Fischer K, Busch R, et al. Obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1101–1110. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1313984.
    1. Goede V, Fischer K, Dyer MJS, et al. Overall survival benefit of obinutuzumab over rituximab when combined with chlorambucil in patients with chronic lymphoytic leukemia and comorbidities: final survival analysis of the CLL11 study [EHA 2018 Abstract S151] HemaSphere. 2018;2(S1):30.
    1. Fischer K, Al-Sawaf O, Bahlo J, et al. Venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2225–2236. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815281.
    1. Al-Sawaf O, Zhang C, Tandon M, et al. Venetoclax plus obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL14): follow-up results from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1188–1200. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30443-5.
    1. Al-Sawaf O, Zhang C, Tandon M, et al. Fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab for previously untreated chronic lymhocyti leukemia: follow-up of efficacy and safety results from the multicenter, open-label, randomised phase 3 CLL14 trial [EHA 2020 Abstract S155] HemaSphere. 2020;4(S1):30.
    1. Flinn IW, Gribben JG, Dyer MJS, et al. Phase 1b study of venetoclax-obinutuzumab in previously untreated and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2019;133:2765–2775. doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-01-896290.
    1. Salem AH, Hu B, Freise KJ, et al. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between venetoclax, a selective BCL-2 inhibitor, and warfarin in healthy volunteers. Clin Drug Investig. 2017;37:303–309. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0485-9.
    1. Liu H, Michmerhuizen MJ, Lao Y, Wan K, et al. Metabolism and disposition of a novel B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor venetoclax in humans and characterisation of its unusual metabolites. Drug Metab Dispos. 2017;45:294–305. doi: 10.1124/dmd.116.071613.
    1. Jones AK, Freise KJ, Agarwal SK, Humerickhouse RA, Wong SL, Salem AH. Clinical predictors of venetoclax pharmacokinetics in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a pooled population pharmacokinetic analysis. AAPS J. 2016;18:1192–1202. doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-9927-9.
    1. Beal S, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann A, Bauer RJ. NONMEM user’s guides (1989–2011) Ellicott City: Icon Development Solutions; 2011.
    1. Stilgenbauer S, Eichhorst B, Schetelig J, et al. Venetoclax in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia with 17p deletion: a multicenter, open-label phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:768–778. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30019-5.
    1. Salem AH, Dunbar M, Agarwal SK. Pharmacokinetics of venetoclax in patients with 17p deletion chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Anticancer Drugs. 2017;28:911–914. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000522.
    1. Deng R, Gibianksy L, Lu T, et al. Bayesian population model of the pharmacokinetics of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the phase III MURANO study. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2019;58:1621–1634. doi: 10.1007/s40262-019-00788-8.
    1. Agarwal SK, Salem AH, Danilov AV, et al. Effect of ketoconazole, a strong CYP3A inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor, in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83:846–854. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13175.
    1. Freise KJ, Shebley M, Salem AH. Quantitative prediction of the effect of CYP3A inhibitors and inducers on venetoclax pharmacokinetics using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;57:796–804. doi: 10.1002/jcph.858.
    1. Freise KJ, Hu B, Salem AH. Impact of ritonavir dose and schedule on CYP3A inhibition and venetoclax clinical pharmacokinetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;74:413–421. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2403-3.
    1. Agarwal SK, DiNardo CD, Potluri J, et al. Management of venetoclax-posaconazole interaction in acuter myeloid leukemia patients: evaluation of dose adjustments. Clin Ther. 2017;39:359–367. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.01.003.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir