HIV protease inhibitor use during pregnancy is associated with decreased progesterone levels, suggesting a potential mechanism contributing to fetal growth restriction

Eszter Papp, Hakimeh Mohammadi, Mona R Loutfy, Mark H Yudin, Kellie E Murphy, Sharon L Walmsley, Rajiv Shah, Jay MacGillivray, Michael Silverman, Lena Serghides, Eszter Papp, Hakimeh Mohammadi, Mona R Loutfy, Mark H Yudin, Kellie E Murphy, Sharon L Walmsley, Rajiv Shah, Jay MacGillivray, Michael Silverman, Lena Serghides

Abstract

Background: Protease inhibitor (PI)-based combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is administered during pregnancy to prevent perinatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. However, PI use has been associated with adverse birth outcomes, including preterm delivery and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births. The mechanisms underlying these outcomes are unknown. We hypothesized that PIs contribute to these adverse events by altering progesterone levels.

Methods: PI effects on trophoblast progesterone production were assessed in vitro. A mouse pregnancy model was used to assess the impact of PI-based cART on pregnancy outcomes and progesterone levels in vivo. Progesterone levels were assessed in plasma specimens from 27 HIV-infected and 17 HIV-uninfected pregnant women.

Results: PIs (ritonavir, lopinavir, and atazanavir) but not nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors reduced trophoblast progesterone production in vitro. In pregnant mice, PI-based cART but not dual-NRTI therapy was associated with significantly lower progesterone levels that directly correlated with fetal weight. Progesterone supplementation resulted in a significant improvement in fetal weight. We observed lower progesterone levels and smaller infants in HIV-infected women receiving PI-based cART, compared with the control group. In HIV-infected women, progesterone levels correlated significantly with birth weight percentile.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that PI use in pregnancy may lead to lower progesterone levels that could contribute to adverse birth outcomes.

Keywords: HIV; lopinavir; low birth weight; pregnancy; progesterone; protease inhibitors; small for gestational age.

© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Protease inhibitors decrease trophoblast progesterone production in vitro. A, BeWo cells, a human cytotrophoblast cell line, were treated for 24 hours with 10 times the minimal effective dose (see Methods) of zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC), nevirapine (NVP), ritonavir (RTV), atazanavir (ATV), darunavir (DRV), or lopinavir (LPV). B, BeWo cells were treated for 24 hours with combinations of ZDV plus 3TC and RTV-boosted ATV (ATV/r), DRV (DRV/r), or LPV (LPV/r). Control cells (Ctr) were treated with dimethyl sulfoxide at a final concentration of <0.1%. Cells incubated in hypoxic conditions (1% oxygen; Hyp) were used as a positive control. Progesterone levels were measured by competitive enzyme immunoassay and were corrected for the number of cells per well. Progesterone levels are expressed as percentage of the median control value. Data displayed are means±standard errors of the mean for 3–6 independent experiments. *P < .05 and **P < .01 for comparisons of each value with the control, by analysis of variance with the Dunnett post hoc test.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mouse plasma progesterone levels are decreased in protease inhibitor (PI)–exposed pregnant mice and correlated with fetal weight. Mated mice were exposed to either Combivir alone (zidovudine plus lamivudine; dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NRTI]), Combivir plus Kaletra (ritonavir-boosted lopinavir; PI based combination antiretroviral therapy [PI-cART]), or water as a control (Ctr) by gavage once daily starting on gestational day 1. A, The percentage of fetuses that were viable (light grey), nonviable (as assessed by pedal reflex) (white), or resorbed (dark grey) for each treatment group is shown. χ2 analysis yielded the following findings: Ctr vs PI-cART, P < .001; dual NRTI vs PI-cART, P < .01; and Ctr vs dual NRTI, P = not significant. B, Average fetal weight per litter. C, Average placenta weight per litter. D, Progesterone levels in maternal plasma. Levels normalized to the control median are shown. In panels B, C, and D, data are shown as box and whisker plots, with medians, interquartile ranges, and ranges. Statistical comparisons were assessed by the Kruskal–Wallis test with the Dunn post hoc test. Data in panels A–D were acquired from the same experiment with 10 values for the Ctr group, 8 for the PI-cART group, and 8 for the dual NRTI group. Experiments were repeated 2 times. *P < .05, **P < .01, and ***P < .001. E, Progesterone levels were plotted against the average fetal weight per litter for the PI-cART group. Correlation was assessed by Spearman r. Trend line was calculated by linear regression analysis. Data represent 17 values from 3 combined experiments.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Progesterone supplementation partially reverses protease inhibitor (PI)–induced fetal weight defect. Mated mice were exposed to Combivir plus Kaletra (PI based combination antiretroviral therapy [PI-cART]) or water as a control (Ctr) by gavage once daily starting on gestational day 1 (GD1). Mice were then injected subcutaneously with either 0.5 mg progesterone (P4) suspended in corn oil or corn oil as a control on GD1, GD5, GD9, and GD13. All fetal and placenta parameters were assessed on GD15. A, Percentage of fetuses that were viable (light grey), nonviable (as assessed by pedal reflex; white), or resorbed (dark grey) for each treatment group is shown. χ2 analysis yielded the following findings: Ctr vs PI-cART, P < .001; PI-cART vs PI-cART + P4, P = not significant; and Ctr vs PI-cART + P4, P < .05. B, Average fetal weight per litter. C, Average placental weight per litter. Data were acquired from the same experiment, with 8 values for the Ctr, 10 for the PI-cART group, and 11 for the PI-cART + P4 group. Experiments were repeated once. *P < .05, **P < .01, and ***P < .001, by the Kruskal–Wallis test with the Dunn post hoc test.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Progesterone levels are lower in protease inhibitor (PI)–exposed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected pregnant women and correlated with birth weight percentile. A, Plasma progesterone assessed by enzyme immunoassay in plasma specimens obtained during gestational weeks (GW) 25–28 from 17 HIV-negative and 27 HIV-infected pregnant women. B, Progesterone levels in 22 HIV-infected women receiving PI-based combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and 5 receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)–based cART. C, Correlation between birth weight percentile and progesterone levels in 22 HIV-infected women receiving PI-based cART. All data are shown as scatterplots with median values. Statistical comparisons were made using the Mann–Whitney test. Correlation was assessed by Spearman r.

References

    1. Chen JY, Ribaudo HJ, Souda S, et al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and adverse birth outcomes among HIV-infected women in Botswana. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:1695–705.
    1. Machado ES, Hofer CB, Costa TT, et al. Pregnancy outcome in women infected with HIV-1 receiving combination antiretroviral therapy before versus after conception. Sex Transm Infect. 2009;85:82–7.
    1. Ekouevi DK, Coffie PA, Becquet R, et al. Antiretroviral therapy in pregnant women with advanced HIV disease and pregnancy outcomes in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. AIDS. 2008;22:1815–20.
    1. Wimalasundera RC, Larbalestier N, Smith JH, et al. Pre-eclampsia, antiretroviral therapy, and immune reconstitution. Lancet. 2002;360:1152–4.
    1. Townsend CL, Cortina-Borja M, Peckham CS, Tookey PA. Antiretroviral therapy and premature delivery in diagnosed HIV-infected women in the United Kingdom and Ireland. AIDS. 2007;21:1019–26.
    1. Powis KM, Kitch D, Ogwu A, et al. Increased risk of preterm delivery among HIV-infected women randomized to protease versus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based HAART during pregnancy. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:506–14.
    1. Newell M-L, Bunders MJ. Safety of antiretroviral drugs in pregnancy and breastfeeding for mother and child. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2013;8:503–9.
    1. López M, Hernàndez S, Morén C, et al. Perinatal outcomes, mitochondrial toxicity and apoptosis in HIV-treated pregnant women and in-utero-exposed newborn. AIDS. 2012;26:419–28.
    1. Kourtis AP, Schmid CH, Jamieson DJ, Lau J. Use of antiretroviral therapy in pregnant HIV-infected women and the risk of premature delivery: a meta-analysis. AIDS. 2007;21:607–15.
    1. Townsend C, Schulte J, Thorne C, et al. Antiretroviral therapy and preterm delivery-a pooled analysis of data from the United States and Europe. BJOG. 2010;117:1399–410.
    1. de Vincenzi I Kesho Bora Study Group. Triple antiretroviral compared with zidovudine and single-dose nevirapine prophylaxis during pregnancy and breastfeeding for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 (Kesho Bora study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:171–80.
    1. Ross AC, Leong T, Avery A, et al. Effects of in utero antiretroviral exposure on mitochondrial DNA levels, mitochondrial function and oxidative stress. HIV Med. 2012;13:98–106.
    1. Fiore S, Newell M-L, Trabattoni D, et al. Antiretroviral therapy-associated modulation of Th1 and Th2 immune responses in HIV-infected pregnant women. J Reprod Immunol. 2006;70:143–50.
    1. Meis PJ, Klebanoff M, Thom E, et al. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2379–85.
    1. Morris RK, Oliver EA, Malin G, Khan KS, Meads C. Effectiveness of interventions for the prevention of small-for-gestational age fetuses and perinatal mortality: a review of systematic reviews. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:143–51.
    1. Wahabi HA, Abed Althagafi NF, Elawad M, Al Zeidan RA. Progestogen for treating threatened miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 CD005943.
    1. Walch KT, Huber JC. Progesterone for recurrent miscarriage: truth and deceptions. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;22:375–89.
    1. Schmouder VM, Prescott GM, Franco A, Fan-Havard P. The rebirth of progesterone in the prevention of preterm labor. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47:527–36.
    1. Norwitz ER, Caughey AB. Progesterone supplementation and the prevention of preterm birth. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011;4:60–72.
    1. Andany N, Loutfy MR. HIV protease inhibitors in pregnancy: pharmacology and clinical use. Drugs. 2013;73:229–47.
    1. Tseng A, Hills-Nieminen C. Drug interactions between antiretrovirals and hormonal contraceptives. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2013;9:559–72.
    1. Vogler MA, Patterson K, Kamemoto L, et al. Contraceptive efficacy of oral and transdermal hormones when co-administered with protease inhibitors in HIV-1-infected women: pharmacokinetic results of ACTG trial A5188. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55:473–82.
    1. Simon A, Warszawski J, Kariyawasam D, et al. Association of prenatal and postnatal exposure to lopinavir-ritonavir and adrenal dysfunction among uninfected infants of HIV-infected mothers. JAMA. 2011;306:70–8.
    1. Foisy MM, Yakiwchuk EMK, Chiu I, Singh AE. Adrenal suppression and Cushing's syndrome secondary to an interaction between ritonavir and fluticasone: a review of the literature. HIV Med. 2008;9:389–96.
    1. Lorello G, la Porte C, Pilon R, Zhang G, Karnauchow T, MacPherson P. Discordance in HIV-1 viral loads and antiretroviral drug concentrations comparing semen and blood plasma. HIV Med. 2009;10:548–54.
    1. Anderson PL, Kakuda TN, Kawle S, Fletcher CV. Antiviral dynamics and sex differences of zidovudine and lamivudine triphosphate concentrations in HIV-infected individuals. AIDS. 2003;17:2159–68.
    1. Ray JG, Sgro M, Mamdani MM, et al. Birth weight curves tailored to maternal world region. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34:159–71.
    1. Bahn RS, Worsham A, Speeg KV, Ascoli M, Rabin D. Characterization of steroid production in cultured human choriocarcinoma cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1981;52:447–50.
    1. Chougrani I, Luton D, Matheron S, Mandelbrot L, Azria E. Safety of protease inhibitors in HIV-infected pregnant women. HIV AIDS (Auckl) 2013;5:253–62.
    1. Lambert JS, Else LJ, Jackson V, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of lopinavir/ritonavir in pregnancy. HIV Med. 2011;12:166–73.
    1. Salas SP, Marshall G, Gutiérrez BL, Rosso P. Time course of maternal plasma volume and hormonal changes in women with preeclampsia or fetal growth restriction. Hypertension. 2006;47:203–8.
    1. van Marthens E, Zamenhof S, Firestone C. The effect of progesterone on fetal and placental development in normal and protein-energy-restricted rats. Nutr Metab. 1979;23:438–48.
    1. Wallace JM, Bourke DA, Da Silva P, Aitken RP. Influence of progesterone supplementation during the first third of pregnancy on fetal and placental growth in overnourished adolescent ewes. Reproduction. 2003;126:481–7.
    1. Mark PJ, Smith JT, Waddell BJ. Placental and fetal growth retardation following partial progesterone withdrawal in rat pregnancy. Placenta. 2006;27:208–14.
    1. Dodd J, Jones L, Flenady V, Cincotta R, Crowther C. Prenatal administration of progesterone for preventing preterm birth in women considered to be at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7 CD004947.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir