Statistical analysis plan for the POLAR-RCT: The Prophylactic hypOthermia trial to Lessen trAumatic bRain injury-Randomised Controlled Trial

Jeffrey Presneill, Dashiell Gantner, Alistair Nichol, Colin McArthur, Andrew Forbes, Jessica Kasza, Tony Trapani, Lynnette Murray, Stephen Bernard, Peter Cameron, Gilles Capellier, Olivier Huet, Lynette Newby, Stephen Rashford, Jeffrey V Rosenfeld, Tony Smith, Michael Stephenson, Dinesh Varma, Shirley Vallance, Tony Walker, Steve Webb, D James Cooper, POLAR investigators and the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group, Jeffrey Presneill, Dashiell Gantner, Alistair Nichol, Colin McArthur, Andrew Forbes, Jessica Kasza, Tony Trapani, Lynnette Murray, Stephen Bernard, Peter Cameron, Gilles Capellier, Olivier Huet, Lynette Newby, Stephen Rashford, Jeffrey V Rosenfeld, Tony Smith, Michael Stephenson, Dinesh Varma, Shirley Vallance, Tony Walker, Steve Webb, D James Cooper, POLAR investigators and the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group

Abstract

Background: The Prophylactic hypOthermia to Lessen trAumatic bRain injury-Randomised Controlled Trial (POLAR-RCT) will evaluate whether early and sustained prophylactic hypothermia delivered to patients with severe traumatic brain injury improves patient-centred outcomes.

Methods: The POLAR-RCT is a multicentre, randomised, parallel group, phase III trial of early, prophylactic cooling in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury, conducted in Australia, New Zealand, France, Switzerland, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. A total of 511 patients aged 18-60 years have been enrolled with severe acute traumatic brain injury. The trial intervention of early and sustained prophylactic hypothermia to 33 °C for 72 h will be compared to standard normothermia maintained at a core temperature of 37 °C. The primary outcome is the proportion of favourable neurological outcomes, comprising good recovery or moderate disability, observed at six months following randomisation utilising a midpoint dichotomisation of the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE). Secondary outcomes, also assessed at six months following randomisation, include the probability of an equal or greater GOSE level, mortality, the proportions of patients with haemorrhage or infection, as well as assessment of quality of life and health economic outcomes. The planned sample size will allow 80% power to detect a 30% relative risk increase from 50% to 65% (equivalent to a 15% absolute risk increase) in favourable neurological outcome at a two-sided alpha of 0.05.

Discussion: Consistent with international guidelines, a detailed and prospective analysis plan has been developed for the POLAR-RCT. This plan specifies the statistical models for evaluation of primary and secondary outcomes, as well as defining covariates for adjusted analyses and methods for exploratory analyses. Application of this statistical analysis plan to the forthcoming POLAR-RCT trial will facilitate unbiased analyses of these important clinical data.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00987688 (first posted 1 October 2009); Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12609000764235 . Registered on 3 September 2009.

Keywords: Cooling; Critical care; Hypothermia; Outcome; Randomised controlled trials; Traumatic brain injury.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics and regulatory approvals of the protocol and related documents were obtained before commencing the trial at each site according to state or national legislation. The list of responsible ethics committees is provided in Additional file 8. The study protocol has been updated on several occasions, with each amendment receiving further ethics and regulatory approval. Version 9 is current from 11 July 2017.

Unconscious patients with severe TBI will not be able to provide informed consent; therefore, this trial uses a deferral of consent procedure. Informed consent will be obtained from each patient’s legal surrogate for data collection as soon as reasonably possible and appropriate after injury. Patients who recover sufficient cognition to understand an explanation of the trial will additionally be asked to consent to continuation in the trial and the use of their data in the trial, if this is required under the ethics committee approval conditions. In France, patients may be enrolled under an ‘Emergency clause’. More details of the trial protocol and participating hospitals are available from the trial registration site [48] as well as from the published study protocol [7].

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SPIRIT figure

References

    1. Nichol AD, Higgins AM, Gabbe BJ, Murray LJ, Cooper DJ, Cameron PA. Measuring functional and quality of life outcomes following major head injury: common scales and checklists. Injury. 2011;42:281–287. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.047.
    1. Myburgh JA, Cooper DJ, Finfer SR, Venkatesh B, Jones D, Higgins A, et al. Epidemiology and 12-month outcomes from traumatic brain injury in Australia and New Zealand. J Trauma. 2008;64:854–862. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180340e77.
    1. Bernard SA, Buist M. Induced hypothermia in critical care medicine: a review. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:2041–2051. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000069731.18472.61.
    1. Nichol AD, Trapani T, Murray L, Vallance S, Cooper DJ. Hypothermia in patients with brain injury: the way forward? Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:405–407. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70085-0.
    1. Cooper DJ, Nichol A, Presneill J. Hypothermia for intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1384.
    1. Andrews PJ, Sinclair HL, Rodriguez A, Harris BA, Battison CG, Rhodes JK, et al. Hypothermia for intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2403–2412. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507581.
    1. Nichol A, Gantner D, Presneill J, Murray L, Trapani T, Bernard S, et al. Protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial of early and sustained prophylactic hypothermia in the management of traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Resusc. 2015;17:92–100.
    1. Crompton EM, Lubomirova I, Cotlarciuc I, Han TS, Sharma SD, Sharma P. Meta-analysis of therapeutic hypothermia for traumatic brain injury in adult and pediatric patients. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:575–583. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002205.
    1. Lewis SR, Evans DJ, Butler AR, Schofield-Robinson OJ, Alderson P. Hypothermia for traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;9:CD001048.
    1. Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(Suppl 1):S1–106.
    1. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, French J, Myburgh J, Norton R, et al. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2247–2256. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040232.
    1. The Safe Study Investigators Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:874–884. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067514.
    1. Cooper DJ, Myles PS, McDermott FT, Murray LJ, Laidlaw J, Cooper G, et al. Prehospital hypertonic saline resuscitation of patients with hypotension and severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;291:1350–1357. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.11.1350.
    1. International conference on harmonisation E6(R1); Guideline for good clinical practice. . Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
    1. Monash University Clinical Informatics and Data Management Unit (CIDMU). . Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Br Med J. 2010;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
    1. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Br Med J. 2010;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
    1. Chan A, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, et al. Spirit 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200–207. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
    1. International conference on harmonisation E9; statistical principles for clinical trials. . Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
    1. International conference on harmonisation E3; Structure and content of clinical study reports. . Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
    1. Imbens GW, Rubin DB. Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences: An introduction. 1. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
    1. Bernard SA, Smith K, Cameron P, Masci K, Taylor DM, Cooper DJ, et al. Induction of prehospital therapeutic hypothermia after resuscitation from nonventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:747–753. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182377038.
    1. Bernard SA, Nguyen V, Cameron P, Masci K, Fitzgerald M, Cooper DJ, et al. Prehospital rapid sequence intubation improves functional outcome for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252:959–965. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181efc15f.
    1. Stata Corporation . Stata: Release 11.1. 2010.
    1. Teasdale GM, Pettigrew LE, Wilson JT, Murray G, Jennett B. Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:587–597. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.587.
    1. EQ-5D-3L a standardized non-disease specific instrument to describe and value health-related quality of life. . Accessed 06 Nov 2017.
    1. Ware J, Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–233. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
    1. Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hebert P. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. Br Med J. 2002;325:652–654. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7365.652.
    1. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013.
    1. Roozenbeek B, Lingsma HF, Perel P, Edwards P, Roberts I, Murray GD, et al. The added value of ordinal analysis in clinical trials: an example in traumatic brain injury. Crit Care. 2011;15:R127. doi: 10.1186/cc10240.
    1. Ananth CV, Kleinbaum DG. Regression models for ordinal responses: a review of methods and applications. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26:1323–1333. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.6.1323.
    1. Peterson B, Harrell FE., Jr Partial proportional odds models for ordinal response variables. J R Stat Soc: Ser C: Appl Stat. 1990;39:205–217.
    1. Marschner IC, Gillett AC. Relative risk regression: reliable and flexible methods for log-binomial models. Biostatistics. 2012;13:179–192. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr030.
    1. Kovalchik SA, Varadhan R, Fetterman B, Poitras NE, Wacholder S, Katki HA. A general binomial regression model to estimate standardized risk differences from binary response data. Stat Med. 2013;32:808–821. doi: 10.1002/sim.5553.
    1. Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Van Berkum CM, Eisenberg H, Jane JA, et al. The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9(Suppl 1):S287–S292.
    1. Guideline on adjustment for baseline covariates. . Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
    1. Vittinghoff E, Glidden DV, Shiboski SC, McCulloch CE. Regression methods in biostatistics: linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models. In: Statistics for biology and health. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2012. p. XX, 512.
    1. Brant R. Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics. 1990;46:1171–1178. doi: 10.2307/2532457.
    1. Grambsch PM, Therneau TM. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika. 1994;81:515–526. doi: 10.1093/biomet/81.3.515.
    1. Spritzler J, DeGruttola VG, Pei L. Two-sample tests of area-under-the-curve in the presence of missing data. Int J Biostat. 2008;4:Article 1. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1068.
    1. Hernan MA, Robins JM. Per-protocol analyses of pragmatic trials. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1391–1398. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsm1605385.
    1. Lin JY, Have TRT, Elliott MR. Longitudinal nested compliance class model in the presence of time-varying noncompliance. J Am Stat Assoc. 2008;103:462–473. doi: 10.1198/016214507000000374.
    1. Jennison C, Turnbull BW. Group sequential methods with applications to clinical trials. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2000.
    1. Cytel Inc . East 6.4. 2016.
    1. SAS Institute Inc . SAS software. 2017.
    1. Stata Corporation . Stata Statistical Software: Release 14.2. 2016.
    1. The Prophylactic Hypothermia Trial to Lessen Traumatic Brain Injury (POLAR-RCT). . Accessed 17 Apr 2017.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir