The Myosuit: Bi-articular Anti-gravity Exosuit That Reduces Hip Extensor Activity in Sitting Transfers
Kai Schmidt, Jaime E Duarte, Martin Grimmer, Alejandro Sancho-Puchades, Haiqi Wei, Chris S Easthope, Robert Riener, Kai Schmidt, Jaime E Duarte, Martin Grimmer, Alejandro Sancho-Puchades, Haiqi Wei, Chris S Easthope, Robert Riener
Abstract
Muscle weakness-which can result from neurological injuries, genetic disorders, or typical aging-can affect a person's mobility and quality of life. For many people with muscle weakness, assistive devices provide the means to regain mobility and independence. These devices range from well-established technology, such as wheelchairs, to newer technologies, such as exoskeletons and exosuits. For assistive devices to be used in everyday life, they must provide assistance across activities of daily living (ADLs) in an unobtrusive manner. This article introduces the Myosuit, a soft, wearable device designed to provide continuous assistance at the hip and knee joint when working with and against gravity in ADLs. This robotic device combines active and passive elements with a closed-loop force controller designed to behave like an external muscle (exomuscle) and deliver gravity compensation to the user. At 4.1 kg (4.6 kg with batteries), the Myosuit is one of the lightest untethered devices capable of delivering gravity support to the user's knee and hip joints. This article presents the design and control principles of the Myosuit. It describes the textile interface, tendon actuators, and a bi-articular, synergy-based approach for continuous assistance. The assistive controller, based on bi-articular force assistance, was tested with a single subject who performed sitting transfers, one of the most gravity-intensive ADLs. The results show that the control concept can successfully identify changes in the posture and assist hip and knee extension with up to 26% of the natural knee moment and up to 35% of the knee power. We conclude that the Myosuit's novel approach to assistance using a bi-articular architecture, in combination with the posture-based force controller, can effectively assist its users in gravity-intensive ADLs, such as sitting transfers.
Keywords: Myosuit; anti-gravity; assistance; exomuscle; exosuit; muscle-activity; textile; wearable.
Figures
References
- Ades P. A., Ballor D. L., Ashikaga T., Utton J. L., Nair K. S. (1996). Weight training improves walking endurance in healthy elderly persons. Ann. Int. Med. 124, 568–572.
- Anderson F. C., Pandy M. G. (2003). Individual muscle contributions to support in normal walking. Gait Posture 17, 159–169. 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00073-5
- Asbeck A. T., Dyer R. J., Larusson A. F., Walsh C. J. (2013). Biologically-inspired soft exosuit, in IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics:[Proceedings] Vol. 2013 (Seattle, WA: ), 6650455.
- Asbeck A. T., Rossi S. M. M. D., Galiana I., Ding Y., Walsh C. J. (2014). Stronger, smarter, softer: next-generation wearable robots. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 21, 22–33. 10.1109/MRA.2014.2360283
- Asbeck A. T., Schmidt K., Galiana I., Wagner D., Walsh C. J. (2015). Multi-joint soft exosuit for gait assistance, in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (Seattle, WA: ), 6197–6204.
- Awad L. N., Bae J., O'Donnell K., De Rossi S. M. M., Hendron K., Sloot L. H., et al. . (2017). A soft robotic exosuit improves walking in patients after stroke. Sci. Transl. Med. 9:aai9084. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aai9084
- Bae J., De Rossi S. M. M., O'Donnell K., Hendron K. L., Awad L. N., Dos Santos T. R. T., et al. (2015). A soft exosuit for patients with stroke: Feasibility study with a mobile off-board actuation unit, in IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) (Singapore: ), 131–138.
- Barbeau H., Ladouceur M., Norman K. E., Pépin A., Leroux A. (1999). Walking after spinal cord injury: evaluation, treatment, and functional recovery. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80, 225–235.
- Bartenbach V., Schmidt K., Naef M., Wyss D., Riener R. (2015). Concept of a soft exosuit for the support of leg function in rehabilitation, in IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (Singapore: ), 125–130.
- Bravata D. M., Smith-Spangler C., Sundaram V., Gienger A. L., Lin N., Lewis R., et al. . (2007). Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA 298, 2296–2304. 10.1001/jama.298.19.2296
- Brown-Triolo D. L., Roach M. J., Nelson K., Triolo R. J. (2002). Consumer perspectives on mobility: implications for neuroprosthesis design. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 39:659.
- Elftman H. (1966). Biomechanics of muscle, with particular application to studies of gait. J. Bone Joint Surg. 48, 363–377.
- Erlichman J., Kerbey A., James W. (2002). Physical activity and its impact on health outcomes. paper 1: the impact of physical activity on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: an historical perspective. Obes. Rev. 3, 257–271. 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2002.00077.x
- Esquenazi A., Talaty M., Packel A., Saulino M. (2012). The rewalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatory function to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 91, 911–921. 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318269d9a3
- Federici S., Meloni F., Bracalenti M., De Filippis M. L. (2015). The effectiveness of powered, active lower limb exoskeletons in neurorehabilitation: a systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation 37, 321–340. 10.3233/NRE-151265
- Grimmer M., Seyfarth A. (2014). Mimicking human-like leg function in prosthetic limbs, in Neuro-Robotics, ed Artemiadis P. (Tempe, AZ: Springer; ), 105–155.
- Gross M., Stevenson P., Charette S., Pyka G., Marcus R. (1998). Effect of muscle strength and movement speed on the biomechanics of rising from a chair in healthy elderly and young women. Gait Posture 8, 175–185.
- Günther M., Sholukha V., Keßler D., Wank V., Blickhan R. (2003). Dealing with skin motion and wobbling masses in inverse dynamics. J. Mech. Med. Biol. 3, 309–335. 10.1142/S0219519403000831
- He H., Kiguchi K. (2007). A study on emg-based control of exoskeleton robots for human lower-limb motion assist, in IEEE 6th International Special Topic Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine (Tokyo: ), 292–295.
- Heinemann A., Magiera-Planey R., Schiro-Geist C., Gimines G. (1987). Mobility for persons with spinal cord injury: an evaluation of two systems. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 68, 90–93.
- Holgate M. A., Sugar T. G., Bohler A. W. (2009). A novel control algorithm for wearable robotics using phase plane invariants, in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (Kobe: ), 3845–3850.
- Jin S., Iwamoto N., Hashimoto K., Yamamoto M. (2017). Experimental evaluation of energy efficiency for a soft wearable robotic suit. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 25, 1192–1201. 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2613886
- Junius K., Moltedo M., Cherelle P., Rodriguez-Guerrero C. D., Vanderborght B., Lefeber D. (2017). Biarticular elements as a contributor to energy efficiency: biomechanical review and application in bio-inspired robotics. Bioinspir. Biomim. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1088/1748-3190/aa806e
- Kalache A., Kickbusch I. (1997). A global strategy for healthy ageing. World Health 50, 4–5.
- Kilicarslan A., Prasad S., Grossman R. G., Contreras-Vidal J. L. (2013). High accuracy decoding of user intentions using eeg to control a lower-body exoskeleton, in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE (Osaka: ), 5606–5609.
- Murtagh E. M., Murphy M. H., Boone-Heinonen J. (2010). Walking–the first steps in cardiovascular disease prevention. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 25, 490–496. 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32833ce972
- Pukeliene V., Starkauskiene V. (2011). Quality of life: factors determining its measurement complexity. Eng. Econ. 22, 147–156. 10.5755/j01.ee.22.2.311
- Quinlivan B., Lee S., Malcolm P., Rossi D. M., Grimmer M., Siviy C., et al. (2017). Assistance magnitude versus metabolic cost reductions for a tethered multiarticular soft exosuit. Sci. Robot. 2:eaah4416 10.1126/scirobotics.aah4416
- Quintero H. A., Farris R. J., Goldfarb M. (2011). Control and implementation of a powered lower limb orthosis to aid walking in paraplegic individuals, in IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) (Zurich: ), 1–6.
- Roebroeck M., Doorenbosch C., Harlaar J., Jacobs R., Lankhorst G. (1994). Biomechanics and muscular activity during sit-to-stand transfer. Clin. Biomech. 9, 235–244.
- Schalock R. L. (2004). The concept of quality of life: what we know and do not know. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 48, 203–216. 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00558.x
- Schmidt K., Riener R. (2017). Maxx: mobility assisting textile exoskeleton that exploits neural control synergies, in Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation II, eds Ibáñez J., González-Vargas J., Azorín J. M., Akay M., Pons J. L. (Segovia: Springer; ), 539–543.
- Sekhon L. H., Fehlings M. G. (2001). Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 26, S2–S12. 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00002
- Talbot L. A., Metter E. J., Fleg J. L. (2000). Leisure-time physical activities and their relationship to cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy men and women 18-95 years old. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 32, 417–425. 10.1097/00005768-200002000-00024
- Tudor-Locke C., Schuna J. M., Barreira T. V., Mire E. F., Broyles S. T., Katzmarzyk P. T., et al. . (2013). Normative steps/day values for older adults: nhanes 2005–2006. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 68, 1426–1432. 10.1093/gerona/glt116
- Villarreal D. J., Gregg R. D. (2014). A survey of phase variable candidates of human locomotion, in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE (Chicago, IL: ), 4017–4021.
- Winter D. A. (1984). Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: variability and compensating effects. Hum. Mov. Sci. 3, 51–76.
- Winter D. A. (2009). Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 4th Edn. Waterloo, ON: Wiley.
Source: PubMed