Supportive accountability: a model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions

David C Mohr, Pim Cuijpers, Kenneth Lehman, David C Mohr, Pim Cuijpers, Kenneth Lehman

Abstract

The effectiveness of and adherence to eHealth interventions is enhanced by human support. However, human support has largely not been manualized and has usually not been guided by clear models. The objective of this paper is to develop a clear theoretical model, based on relevant empirical literature, that can guide research into human support components of eHealth interventions. A review of the literature revealed little relevant information from clinical sciences. Applicable literature was drawn primarily from organizational psychology, motivation theory, and computer-mediated communication (CMC) research. We have developed a model, referred to as "Supportive Accountability." We argue that human support increases adherence through accountability to a coach who is seen as trustworthy, benevolent, and having expertise. Accountability should involve clear, process-oriented expectations that the patient is involved in determining. Reciprocity in the relationship, through which the patient derives clear benefits, should be explicit. The effect of accountability may be moderated by patient motivation. The more intrinsically motivated patients are, the less support they likely require. The process of support is also mediated by the communications medium (eg, telephone, instant messaging, email). Different communications media each have their own potential benefits and disadvantages. We discuss the specific components of accountability, motivation, and CMC medium in detail. The proposed model is a first step toward understanding how human support enhances adherence to eHealth interventions. Each component of the proposed model is a testable hypothesis. As we develop viable human support models, these should be manualized to facilitate dissemination.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Model of Supportive Accountability

References

    1. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11. v7e11
    1. Christensen H, Mackinnon A. The law of attrition revisited. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e20. v8i3e20
    1. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Farrer L. Adherence in internet interventions for anxiety and depression. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1194. v11i2e13
    1. Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, Cox DJ, Kovatchev BP, Gonder-Frederick LA. A behavior change model for internet interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Aug;38(1):18–27. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9133-4.
    1. Andersson G, Cuijpers P. Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009 Dec;38(4):196–205. doi: 10.1080/16506070903318960.917833314
    1. Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an Internet weight loss program. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(15):1620–5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.15.1620. 166/15/1620
    1. Mohr DC. Telemental health: reflections on how to move the field forward. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2009;16(3):343–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01172.x.
    1. Danaher BG, Seeley JR. Methodological issues in research on web-based behavioral interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Aug;38(1):28–39. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9129-0.
    1. Kazantizis N, Whittington C, Dattilio F. Meta-analysis of homework effects in cognitive behavioral therapy: a replication and extension. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2010;17:144–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01204.x.
    1. Titov N, Andrews G, Davies M, McIntyre K, Robinson E, Solley K. Internet treatment for depression: a randomized controlled trial comparing clinician vs. technician assistance. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e10939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010939.
    1. Ogrodniczuk JS, Joyce AS, Piper WE. Strategies for reducing patient-initiated premature termination of psychotherapy. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2005;13(2):57–70. doi: 10.1080/10673220590956429.H532L71705R38697
    1. Wierzbicki M, Pekarik G. A meta-analysis of psychotherapy dropout. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 1993;24:190–195. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.24.2.190.
    1. Hansen NB, Lambert MJ. An evaluation of the dose-response relationship in naturalistic treatment settings using survival analysis. Ment Health Serv Res. 2003 Mar;5(1):1–12.
    1. Elkin I, Shea MT, Watkins JT, Imber SD, Sotsky SM, Collins JF, Glass DR, Pilkonis PA, Leber WR, Docherty JP. National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. General effectiveness of treatments. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):971–82.
    1. DeRubeis RJ, Hollon SD, Amsterdam JD, Shelton RC, Young PR, Salomon RM, O'Reardon JP, Lovett ML, Gladis MM, Brown LL, Gallop R. Cognitive therapy vs medications in the treatment of moderate to severe depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;62(4):409–16. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.409. 62/4/409
    1. Mohl PC, Martinez D, Ticknor C, Huang M, Cordell L. Early dropouts from psychotherapy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1991 Aug;179(8):478–81.
    1. Lambert MJ. Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. 5th edition. New York, NY: Wiley; 2004.
    1. Clarke G, Eubanks D, Reid E, Kelleher C, O'Connor E, DeBar LL, Lynch F, Nunley S, Gullion C. Overcoming Depression on the Internet (ODIN) (2): a randomized trial of a self-help depression skills program with reminders. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(2):e16. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.2.e16. v7i2e16
    1. Warmerdam L, van Straten A, Twisk J, Riper H, Cuijpers P. Internet-based treatment for adults with depressive symptoms: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(4):e44. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1094. v10i4e44
    1. Mohr DC, Duffecy J, Jin L, Ludman EJ, Lewis A, Begale M, McCarthy M. Multimodal e-mental health treatment for depression: a feasibility trial. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(5):e48. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1370. v12i5e48
    1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd edition. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2002.
    1. Lerner JS, Tetlock PE. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychol Bull. 1999 Mar;125(2):255–75.
    1. Spek V, Cuijpers P, Nyklícek I, Riper H, Keyzer J, Pop V. Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2007 Mar;37(3):319–28. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706008944.S0033291706008944
    1. Fry JP, Neff RA. Periodic prompts and reminders in health promotion and health behavior interventions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e16. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1138. v11i2e16
    1. Knaevelsrud C, Maercker A. Internet-based treatment for PTSD reduces distress and facilitates the development of a strong therapeutic alliance: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2007;7:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-7-13. 1471-244X-7-13
    1. Adams JS. Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1965. Inequity in social exchange; pp. 267–299.
    1. Konow J. Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. American Economic Review. 2000;90(4):1072–1091. doi: 10.1257/aer.90.4.1072.
    1. Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S, Nygren P, Walker M, Norris S, Hersh W. Barriers and Drivers of Health Information Technology Use for the Elderly, Chronically Ill, and Underserved. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.
    1. Ordóñez LD, Schweitzer ME, Galinsky AD, Bazerman MH. Goals gone wild: the systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School; 2009. [2011-02-07]. .
    1. Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1957.
    1. Tetlock PE, Skitka L, Boettger R. Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Oct;57(4):632–40.
    1. Checkland K, Marshall M, Harrison S. Re-thinking accountability: trust versus confidence in medical practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Apr;13(2):130–5.
    1. Enzle ME, Anerson SC. Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993;64(2):257–266. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.257.
    1. Tyler TR. The psychology of legitimacy: a relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1997;1(4):323–45. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4.
    1. Keijsers GP, Schaap CP, Hoogduin CA. The impact of interpersonal patient and therapist behavior on outcome in cognitive-behavior therapy. A review of empirical studies. Behav Modif. 2000 Apr;24(2):264–97.
    1. Devlin AS, Donovan S, Nicolov A, Nold O, Packard A, Zandan G. "Impressive?" Credentials, family photographs, and the perception of therapist qualities. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2009;29:503–512. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.008.
    1. Brehm S, Brehm JW. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1981.
    1. Fogg BJ. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 2003.
    1. Rieh SY, Danielson DR. Credibility: a multidisciplinary framework. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 2007;41(1):307–364. doi: 10.1002/aris.2007.1440410114.
    1. Walther JB, Parks MR. Knapp ML, Daly JA, editors. Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Thousand Oaks , CA: SAGE Publications; 2002. Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: computer-mediated communication and relationships; pp. 529–563.
    1. Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 1979;16:252–260.
    1. Beckner V, Vella L, Howard I, Mohr DC. Alliance in two telephone-administered treatments: relationship with depression and health outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Jun;75(3):508–12. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.3.508.2007-07856-016
    1. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York, NY: Plenum; 1985.
    1. Michalak J, Klappheck MA, Kosfelder J. Personal goals of psychotherapy patients: the intensity and “why” of goal-motivated behavior and their implications for the therapeutic process. Psychotherapy Research. 2004;14:193–209. doi: 10.1093/ptr/kph017.
    1. Donker T, Griffiths KM, Cuijpers P, Christensen H. Psychoeducation for depression, anxiety and psychological distress: a meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2009;7:79. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-7-79. 1741-7015-7-79
    1. Ryan RM, Connell JP. Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Nov;57(5):749–61.
    1. Volpp KG, John LK, Troxel AB, Norton L, Fassbender J, Loewenstein G. Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008 Dec 10;300(22):2631–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.804. 300/22/2631
    1. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull. 1999 Nov;125(6):627–68.
    1. Ryan RM. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: an extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982;43(3):450–461. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450.
    1. Culnan MJ, Markus ML. Jablin FM, Putnam LL, Roberts KH, Porter LW, editors. Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1987. Information technologies; pp. 420–443.
    1. Lenhart A, Arafeh S, Smith A. Writing, technology and teens. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & Americal Life Project; 2008. Apr 24, [2011-02-01]. .
    1. Lea M, Spears R. Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 1991;34:283–301. doi: 10.1016/0020-7373(91)90045-9.
    1. Hancock JT, Dunham PJ. Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited: an analysis of the breadth and intesity of impressions. Communication Research. 2001;28(3):325–347. doi: 10.1177/009365001028003004.
    1. Tidwell LC, Walther JB. Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research. 2002;28(3):317–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x.
    1. Scissors LE, Gill AJ, Geraghty K, Gergle D. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery; 2009. In CMC we trust: the role of similarity.
    1. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology. 2001;27:415–444. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
    1. Walther JB, Slovacek C, Tidwell LC. Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long-term and short-term virtual teams. Communication Research. 2001;28:105–134. doi: 10.1177/009365001028001004.
    1. Walther JB, Bazarova NN. Validation and application of electronic propinquity theory to computer-mediated communication in groups. Communication Research. 2008;35:622–645. doi: 10.1177/0093650208321783.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir