Should routine assessment of anastomotic integrity be undertaken using radiological contrast swallow after oesophagectomy with intra-thoracic anastomosis? Best evidence topic (BET)

Abstract

Thoracic anastomotic leak is associated with significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. Routine contrast oesophagograms are consequently employed by a number of centres to routinely screen for this complication yet there exists little consensus as to if and when this assessment should occur. We have demonstrated within this BestBET analysis of five level IV case series that routine contrast oesophagograms lack adequate sensitivity or positive predictive value to be effective as screening tools, with leaks often arising clinically prior to scheduled routine assessment. We additionally demonstrate the significant risk of aspiration associated with contrast swallow use. The use of contrast swallow studies as diagnostic tools in patients for whom a leak is considered likely on the basis of clinical examination is nevertheless supported by relatively greater negative predictive values and specificity reported within the literature. There is additional evidence to support the use of CT imaging with oral contrast and endoscopic assessment of the anastomosis as valuable tools to assess for anastomotic integrity.

Keywords: Anastomotic leak; Contrast examination; Imaging; Oesophageal surgery; Oesophagectomy; Thoracic.

Copyright © 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.