Evaluation of the clinical cardiac safety of pemigatinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor, in participants with advanced malignancies

Xiaohua Gong, Tao Ji, Xiang Liu, Xuejun Chen, Swamy Yeleswaram, Xiaohua Gong, Tao Ji, Xiang Liu, Xuejun Chen, Swamy Yeleswaram

Abstract

Pemigatinib is a potent inhibitor of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family of receptors that is approved for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangements. Data from a first-in-human clinical study were used to assess the potential for pemigatinib to produce clinically significant effects on heart rate (HR) and cardiac repolarization (QTc). A central tendency analysis for electrocardiogram (ECG) outliers and a plasma concentration-QTc analysis were conducted to assess cardiac safety in the first-in-human pemigatinib study (FIGHT-101; NCT02393248). The study included 113 participants who received at least one dose of pemigatinib as monotherapy and had at least one pair of plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) and ECG data points collected. Timed 12-lead ECGs were performed within 15 min of PK blood draws. The ECG parameters for each dose group in the study varied within expectations for patients with advanced malignancies. Categorical analysis of QT interval corrected for HR by Fridericia's method did not reveal dose dependence in the incidence of outliers, and the results of the central tendency and concentration-QTc analyses did not suggest a dose- or concentration-dependent drug effect. Least squares mean change from baseline in HR was small and did not indicate a clinically relevant effect on HR, and no effect was observed on cardiac conduction as assessed by PR and QRS intervals. In conclusion, pemigatinib does not exhibit any clinically significant prolongation of QTc or dose-dependent changes in HR. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02393248.

Keywords: cardiac safety; early phase; oncology.

© 2021 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Scatterplot of observed pemigatinib plasma concentrations and ΔQTcF overlaid with a LOESS line and 90% CI. CI, confidence interval; LOESS, locally estimated scatterplot smoothing; ΔQTcF, change from baseline QT interval corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's method
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Model‐predicted ΔQTcF (mean and 90% confidence interval) overlaid with observed mean ΔQTcF (mean and 90% confidence interval) across deciles of pemigatinib plasma concentrations. ΔQTcF, change from baseline in QT interval corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's method

References

    1. Liu PCC, Koblish H, Wu L, et al. INCB054828 (pemigatinib), a potent and selective inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3, displays activity against genetically defined tumor models. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0231877.
    1. PEMAZYRE™ (pemigatinib) tablets, for oral use [prescribing information]. Incyte Corporation. April 2020. Accessed April 8, 2021.
    1. Ji T, Lihou C, Asatiani E, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pemigatinib, a potent and selective inhibitor of FGFR 1, 2, and 3, in patients with advanced malignancies. Mol Cancer Ther. 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract C071.
    1. Pemazyre: European Public Assessment Report – Summary of Product Characteristics. Accessed May 28, 2021.
    1. Incyte announces approval of Pemazyre® (pemigatinib) in Japan for the treatment of patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC) with a fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusion gene, worsening after cancer chemotherapy [press release]. Wilmington, DE: Incyte Corporation; March 23, 2021. Accessed July 13, 2021.
    1. FDA Guidance for Industry: E14 Clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for non‐antiarrhythmic drugs. October 2005. Accessed April 7, 2021.
    1. FDA Guidance for Industry: E14 Clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for non‐antiarrhythmic drugs – questions and answers (R3), 2015. Published June 2017. Accessed April 7, 2021.
    1. Garnett C, Bonate PL, Dang Q, et al. Scientific white paper on concentration‐QTcF modeling. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2018;45:383‐397. Erratum in J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2018;45:399.
    1. Kenward MG, Roger JH. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics. 1997;53:983‐997.
    1. Cleveland WS. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc. 1979;74:829‐836.
    1. Ferber G, Zhou M, Dota C, et al. Can bias evaluation provide protection against false‐negative results in QT studies without a positive control using exposure‐response analysis? J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;57:85‐95.
    1. Gong X, Darpo B, Xue H, et al. Evaluation of clinical cardiac safety of itacitinib, a JAK1 inhibitor, in healthy participants. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2020;9:677‐688.
    1. Harding SD, Sharman JL, Faccenda E, et al. The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2019: updates and expansion to encompass the new guide to IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D1091‐D1106. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1121
    1. Alexander SPH, Kelly E, Mathie A, et al. The Concise Guide to Pharmacology 2021/22: catalytic receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2021;178:S264‐S312.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995;346:1085‐1087.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir