Optimal dose of combined rocuronium and cisatracurium during minor surgery: A randomized trial

Woo Young Park, Jae Chan Choi, Hey Jeong Yun, Yeong Gwan Jeon, Gisoon Park, Jong Bum Choi, Woo Young Park, Jae Chan Choi, Hey Jeong Yun, Yeong Gwan Jeon, Gisoon Park, Jong Bum Choi

Abstract

Background: Combined rocuronium and cisatracurium have synergistic effects. We investigated whether reduced doses are effective during coadministration, by monitoring neuromuscular relaxation during surgery.

Methods: This randomized, controlled clinical trial was registered at https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02495038" title="See in ClinicalTrials.gov">NCT02495038). The participants were 81 patients scheduled for elective mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty. Participants were assigned to groups, including the intubating dose group (Group I, n = 27; combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium), the small reduction group (Group S, n = 27; dose reduced by 10% of each ED95), or the large reduction group (Group L, n = 27; dose reduced by 20% of each ED95). Drugs were administered to patients and a timer was started using TOF-Watch monitoring. TOF (train-of-four) was monitored at the ulnar nerve, at a setting of 2 Hz/12 s. We recorded the time to TOF ratio = 0 (onset), time to first TOF ratio > 25% (duration 25%), and TOF 25-75% (recovery index) under total intravenous anesthesia. One-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analyses (α = 0.05, β = 0.2).

Results: There were no significant demographic differences between groups. Group L had a longer duration to onset (mean ± standard deviation, 399.3 ± 147.8 seconds) and shorter duration 25% (39.4 ± 6.8 minutes) compared to Group I (212.8 ± 56.0 s and 51.3 ± 8.47 minutes, respectively) and Group S (230.7 ± 60.6 s and 47.9 ± 10.7 minutes, respectively). There were no other significant differences between groups.

Conclusion: Our findings contribute to determining clinically effective combinations of rocuronium and cisatracurium, as well as to predicting the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the synergistic effects. We suggest that reducing doses of both drugs by approximately 10% of their respective ED95 values is sufficient to maintain neuromuscular relaxation during minor surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time to TOF ratio = 0 (onset). TOF = train-of-four. I = intubating dose group. S = small reduction group. L = large reduction group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time to first TOF ratio > 25% (duration 25%). TOF = train-of-four.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time to TOF 25–75% (recovery index). TOF = train-of-four.

References

    1. Lee H, Jeong S, Choi C, et al. Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol. Korean J Anesthesiol 2013;64:34–9.
    1. Lighthall GK, Jamieson MA, Katolik J, Brock-Utne JG. A comparison of the onset and clinical duration of high doses of cisatracurium and rocuronium. J Clin Anesth 1999;11:220–5.
    1. Leykin Y, Pellis T, Lucca M, Gullo A. Intubation conditions following rocuronium: influence of induction agent and priming. Anaesth Intensive Care 2005;33:462–8.
    1. Mak PH, Irwin MG. The effect of cisatracurium and rocuronium on cisatracurium precurarization and the priming principle. J Clin Anesth 2004;16:83–7.
    1. Leykin Y, Pellis T, Lucca M, et al. The pharmacodynamic effects of rocuronium when dosed according to real body weight or ideal body weight in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg 2004;99:1086–9.
    1. Breslin DS, Jiao K, Habib AS, et al. Pharmacodynamic interactions between cisatracurium and rocuronium. Anesth Analg 2004;98:107–10.
    1. Kim KS, Chun YS, Chon SU, Suh JK. Neuromuscular interaction between cisatracurium and mivacurium, atracurium, vecuronium or rocuronium administered in combination. Anaesthesia 1998;53:872–8.
    1. Liu M, Dilger JP. Synergy between pairs of competitive antagonists at adult human muscle acetylcholine receptors. Anesth Analg 2008;107:525–33.
    1. Zeidan A, Nahle N, Maaliki H, Baraka A. Cisatracurium or rocuronium versus rocuronium-cisatracurium combination. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2006;18:879–86.
    1. Naguib M, Samarkandi AH, Ammar A, et al. Comparative clinical pharmacology of rocuronium, cisatracurium, and their combination. Anesthesiology 1998;89:1116–24.
    1. Donati F, Plaud B. Rocuronium-cisatracurium combinations. Anesthesiology 1999;91:587–8.
    1. Miller DR, Wherrett C, Hull K, et al. Cumulation characteristics of cisatracurium and rocuronium during continuous infusion. Can J Anaesth 2000;47:943–9.
    1. Cammu G, de Baerdemaeker L, den Blauwen N, et al. Postoperative residual curarization with cisatracurium and rocuronium infusions. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002;19:129–34.
    1. Hans P, Welter P, Dewandre PY, et al. Recovery from neuromuscular block after an intubation dose of cisatracurium and rocuronium in lumbar disc surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2004;55:129–33.
    1. de Morais BS, de Castro CH, Teixeira VC, Pinto AS. Residual neuromuscular block after rocuronium or cisatracurium. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2005;55:622–30.
    1. Flockton EA, Mastronardi P, Hunter JM, et al. Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine. Br J Anaesth 2008;100:622–30.
    1. Barrio J, Errando CL, San Miguel G, et al. Effect of depth of neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth 2016;34:197–203.
    1. Donati F, Brull SJ. More muscle relaxation does not necessarily mean better surgeons or “the problem of muscle relaxation in surgery”. Anesth Analg 2014;119:1019–21.
    1. Fassbender P, Geldner G, Blobner M, et al. Clinical predictors of duration of action of cisatracurium and rocuronium administered long-term. Am J Crit Care 2009;18:439–45.
    1. Lin SP, Chang KY, Chen YJ, et al. Priming with rocuronium to accelerate the onset time of cisatracurium during intubation. J Chin Med Assoc 2009;72:15–9.
    1. Kopman AF, Zank LM, Ng J, Neuman GG. Antagonism of cisatracurium and rocuronium block at a tactile train-of-four count of 2: should quantitative assessment of neuromuscular function be mandatory? Anesth Analg 2004;98:102–6.
    1. Amin AM, Mohammad MY, Ibrahim MF. Comparative study of neuromuscular blocking and hemodynamic effects of rocuronium and cisatracurium under sevoflurane or total intravenous anesthesia. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2009;20:39–51.
    1. Kopman AF, Kopman DJ, Ng J, Zank LM. Antagonism of profound cisatracurium and rocuronium block: the role of objective assessment of neuromuscular function. J Clin Anesth 2005;17:30–5.
    1. Belmont MR, Lien CA, Quessy S, et al. The clinical neuromuscular pharmacology of 51W89 in patients receiving nitrous oxide/opioid/barbiturate anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995;82:1139–45.
    1. Naguib M. Neuromuscular effects of rocuronium bromide and mivacurium chloride administered alone and in combination. Anesthesiology 1994;81:388–95.
    1. Kim YB, Sung TY, Yang HS. Factors that affect the onset of action of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. Korean J Anesthesiol 2017;70:500–10.
    1. Adamus M, Gabrhelik T, Marek O. Influence of gender on the course of neuromuscular block following a single bolus dose of cisatracurium or rocuronium. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008;25:589–95.
    1. van Kralingen S, van de Garde EM, Knibbe CA, et al. Comparative evaluation of atracurium dosed on ideal body weight vs. total body weight in morbidly obese patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011;71:34–40.
    1. Motamed C, Menad R, Farinotti R, et al. Potentiation of mivacurium blockade by low dose of pancuronium. Anesthesiology 2003;98:1057–62.
    1. Paul M, Kindler CH, Fokt RM, et al. Isobolographic analysis of non-depolarising NMBAs interactions at their receptor site. Eur J Pharmacol 2002;438:35–43.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir