Bi-modal stimulation in the treatment of tinnitus: a study protocol for an exploratory trial to optimise stimulation parameters and patient subtyping

Shona D'Arcy, Caroline Hamilton, Stephen Hughes, Deborah A Hall, Sven Vanneste, Berthold Langguth, Brendan Conlon, Shona D'Arcy, Caroline Hamilton, Stephen Hughes, Deborah A Hall, Sven Vanneste, Berthold Langguth, Brendan Conlon

Abstract

Introduction: Tinnitus is the perception of sound in the absence of a corresponding external acoustic stimulus. Bimodal neuromodulation is emerging as a promising treatment for this condition. The main objectives of this study are to investigate the relevance of interstimulus timing and the choices of acoustic and tongue stimuli for a proprietary bimodal (auditory and somatosensory) neuromodulation device, as well as to explore whether specific subtypes of patients are differentially responsive to this novel intervention for reducing the symptoms of chronic tinnitus.

Methods and analysis: This is a two-site, randomised, triple-blind, exploratory study of a proprietary neuromodulation device with a pre-post and 12-month follow-up design. Three different bimodal stimulation parameter sets will be examined. The study will enrol 342 patients, split 80:20 between two sites (Dublin, Ireland and Regensburg, Germany), to complete 12 weeks of treatment with the device. Patients will be allocated to one of three arms using a stepwise stratification according to four binary categories: tinnitus tonality, sound level tolerance (using loudness discomfort level of <60 dB SL as an indicator for hyperacusis), hearing thresholds and presence of a noise-induced audiometric profile. The main indicators of relative clinical efficacy for the three different parameter sets are two patient-reported outcomes measures, the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and the Tinnitus Functional Index, after 12 weeks of intervention. Clinical efficacy will be further explored in a series of patient subtypes, split by the stratification variables and by presence of a somatic tinnitus. Evidence for sustained effects on the psychological and functional impact of tinnitus will be followed up for 12 months. Safety data will be collected and reported. A number of feasibility measures to inform future trial design include: reasons for exclusion, completeness of data collection, attrition rates, patient's adherence to the device usage as per manufacturer's instructions and evaluation of alternative methods for estimating tinnitus impact and tinnitus loudness.

Ethics and dissemination: This study protocol is approved by the Tallaght Hospital/St. James's Hospital Joint Research Ethics Committee in Dublin, Ireland, and by the Ethics Committee of the University Clinic Regensburg, Germany. Findings will be disseminated to relevant research, clinical, health service and patient communities through publications in peer-reviewed and popular science journals and presentations at scientific and clinical conferences.

Trial registration number: The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02669069) Pre-results.

Keywords: bi-modal stimulation; neuromodulation; tinnitus.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: SD, CH, SH, and BC are employees and shareholders of the Sponsor. BL, SV and DAH act as paid consultants for the Sponsor.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Anticipated flow of participants through the TENT-A study. TENT-A, Treatment Evaluation of Neuromodulation for Tinnitus.

References

    1. Lockwood AH, Salvi RJ, Burkard RF. Tinnitus. N Engl J Med 2002;347:904–10. 10.1056/NEJMra013395
    1. Eggermont JJ, Roberts LE. The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci 2004;27:676–82. 10.1016/j.tins.2004.08.010
    1. Hoare DJ, Kowalkowski VL, Kang S, et al. . Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials examining tinnitus management. Laryngoscope 2011;121:1555–64. 10.1002/lary.21825
    1. Hoare DJ, Edmondson-Jones M, Sereda M, et al. . Amplification with hearing aids for patients with tinnitus and co-existing hearing loss. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;1:CD010151.
    1. Langguth B, De Ridder D. Tinnitus: therapeutic use of superficial brain stimulation. Handb Clin Neurol 2013;116:441–67. 10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00036-X
    1. Vanneste S, De Ridder D. Noninvasive and invasive neuromodulation for the treatment of tinnitus: an overview. Neuromodulation 2012;15:350–60. 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00447.x
    1. Krames ES, Peckham PH, Rezai AR, et al. . What is neuromodulation? : Krames ES, Peckham PH, Rezai AR, Neuromodulation. San Diego: Academic Press, 2009:3–8.
    1. De Ridder D, Song JJ, Vanneste S. Frontal cortex TMS for tinnitus. Brain Stimul 2013;6:355–62. 10.1016/j.brs.2012.07.002
    1. Folmer RL, Theodoroff SM, Casiana L, et al. . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for chronic tinnitus: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;141:716 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.1219
    1. Rabau S, Van Rompaey V, Van de Heyning P. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation in addition to tinnitus retraining therapy for treatment of chronic tinnitus patients: a study protocol for a double-blind controlled randomised trial. Trials 2015;16:514 10.1186/s13063-015-1041-2
    1. De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Kovacs S, et al. . Transcranial magnetic stimulation and extradural electrodes implanted on secondary auditory cortex for tinnitus suppression. J Neurosurg 2011;114:903–11. 10.3171/2010.11.JNS10197
    1. Hamilton C, D’Arcy S, Pearlmutter BA, et al. . An investigation of feasibility and safety of bi-modal stimulation for the treatment of tinnitus: an open-label pilot study. Neuromodulation 2016;19:832–7. 10.1111/ner.12452
    1. Shore S, Marks K, Martel DT, et al. . Auditory-Somatosensory Stimulation Alleviates Tinnitus in Human Subjects. Baltimore: Proc. ARO 40th Annual Mid-winter meeting, 2017.
    1. De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Engineer ND, et al. . Safety and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for the treatment of tinnitus: a case series. Neuromodulation 2014;17:170–9. 10.1111/ner.12127
    1. Kreuzer PM, Landgrebe M, Resch M, et al. . Feasibility, safety and efficacy of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in chronic tinnitus: an open pilot study. Brain Stimul 2014;7:740–7. 10.1016/j.brs.2014.05.003
    1. Lehtimäki J, Hyvärinen P, Ylikoski M, et al. . Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in tinnitus: a pilot study. Acta Otolaryngol 2013;133:378–82. 10.3109/00016489.2012.750736
    1. Engineer ND, Riley JR, Seale JD, et al. . Reversing pathological neural activity using targeted plasticity. Nature 2011;470:101–4. 10.1038/nature09656
    1. Kreuzer PM, Landgrebe M, Husser O, et al. . Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation: retrospective assessment of cardiac safety in a pilot study. Front Psychiatry 2012;3:70 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00070
    1. Koehler SD, Shore SE. Stimulus timing-dependent plasticity in dorsal cochlear nucleus is altered in tinnitus. J Neurosci 2013;33:19647–56. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2788-13.2013
    1. Markovitz CD, Smith BT, Gloeckner CD, et al. . Investigating a new neuromodulation treatment for brain disorders using synchronized activation of multimodal pathways. Sci Rep 2015;5:9462 10.1038/srep09462
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586.
    1. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, et al. . Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983.
    1. Kvaal K, Ulstein I, Nordhus IH, et al. . The spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI): the state scale in detecting mental disorders in geriatric patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005;20:629–34. 10.1002/gps.1330
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98.
    1. Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the tinnitus handicap inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:143–8. 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007
    1. Meikle MB, Henry JA, Griest SE, et al. . The tinnitus functional index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus. Ear and Hearing 2012;33:153–76.
    1. Fackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, et al. . Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res 2016;335:220–35. 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.009
    1. Henry JA, Meikle MB. Psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;11:138–55.
    1. Henry JA, James KE, Owens K, et al. . Auditory test result characteristics of subjects with and without tinnitus. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009;46:619 10.1682/JRRD.2008.11.0157
    1. Adamchic I, Langguth B, Hauptmann C, et al. . Psychometric Evaluation of Visual Analog Scale for the Assessment of Chronic Tinnitus. Am J Audiol 2012;21:215 10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0010)
    1. Somatic LRA. craniocervical) tinnitus and the dorsal cochlear nucleus hypothesis. Am. J. Otolaryngol 1999;20:351–62.
    1. Zeman F, Koller M, Figueiredo R, et al. . Tinnitus handicap inventory for evaluating treatment effects: which changes are clinically relevant? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;145:282–7. 10.1177/0194599811403882
    1. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 1975;31:103–15. 10.2307/2529712
    1. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. . The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010;19:539–49. 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
    1. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
    1. Schafer JL. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. CRC press, 1997.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000251 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000251
    1. Hall DA, Haider H, Kikidis D, et al. . Toward a global consensus on outcome measures for clinical trials in tinnitus: report from the first international meeting of the COMiT Initiative, November 14, 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Trends Hear;2015:2331216515580271.
    1. Hall DA, Haider H, Szczepek AJ, et al. . Systematic review of outcome domains and instruments used in clinical trials of tinnitus treatments in adults. Trials 2016;17:270 10.1186/s13063-016-1399-9
    1. Landgrebe M, Azevedo A, Baguley D, et al. . Methodological aspects of clinical trials in tinnitus: A proposal for an international standard. J Psychosom Res 2012;73:112–21. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.05.002

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir