New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Long-Term Outcome: A Population-Based Nationwide Study From the SWEDEHEART Registry

Amar Taha, Susanne J Nielsen, Lennart Bergfeldt, Anders Ahlsson, Leif Friberg, Staffan Björck, Stefan Franzén, Anders Jeppsson, Amar Taha, Susanne J Nielsen, Lennart Bergfeldt, Anders Ahlsson, Leif Friberg, Staffan Björck, Stefan Franzén, Anders Jeppsson

Abstract

Background The long-term impact of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after coronary artery bypass grafting and the benefit of early-initiated oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with POAF are uncertain. Methods and Results All patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting without preoperative atrial fibrillation in Sweden from 2007 to 2015 were included in a population-based study using data from 4 national registries: SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies), National Patient Registry, Dispensed Drug Registry, and Cause of Death Registry. POAF was defined as any new-onset atrial fibrillation during the first 30 postoperative days. Cox regression models (adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, and medication) were used to assess long-term outcome in patients with and without POAF, and potential associations between early-initiated OAC and outcome. In a cohort of 24 523 patients with coronary artery bypass grafting, POAF occurred in 7368 patients (30.0%), and 1770 (24.0%) of them were prescribed OAC within 30 days after surgery. During follow-up (median 4.5 years, range 0‒9 years), POAF was associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.18 [95% CI, 1.05‒1.32]), any thromboembolism (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral arterial embolism) (aHR 1.16, 1.05‒1.28), heart failure hospitalization (aHR 1.35, 1.21‒1.51), and recurrent atrial fibrillation (aHR 4.16, 3.76‒4.60), but not with all-cause mortality (aHR 1.08, 0.98‒1.18). Early initiation of OAC was not associated with reduced risk of ischemic stroke or any thromboembolism but with increased risk for major bleeding (aHR 1.40, 1.08‒1.82). Conclusions POAF after coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with negative prognostic impact. The role of early OAC therapy remains unclear. Studies aiming at reducing the occurrence of POAF and its consequences are warranted.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04045665.

Keywords: CABG; oral anticoagulation therapy; postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Conflict of interest statement

Jeppsson reports personal fees from Boehringer‐Ingelheim, XVIVO and LFB, outside the submitted work. Taha reports personal fees from Bayer outside the submitted work. Friberg and Bergfeldt reports personal fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report.

Figures

Figure 1. Flow chart of included and…
Figure 1. Flow chart of included and excluded patients.
CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; OAC, oral anticoagulant; and POAF, postoperative atrial fibrillation.
Figure 2. The adjusted cumulative incidence of…
Figure 2. The adjusted cumulative incidence of all‐cause mortality, ischemic stroke, recurrent atrial fibrillation and hospitalization for heart failure, in 24 553 patients with CABG with (blue line) and without (red line) new‐onset postoperative atrial fibrillation.
The hazard ratios are adjusted for patient characteristics, comorbidities, CHA2DS2‐VASc score, year of surgery and medications. A detailed list of the variables used for adjustment is shown in Table S3. AF indicates atrial fibrillation; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; and POAF, postoperative atrial fibrillation.
Figure 3. The annual proportion of early‐initiated…
Figure 3. The annual proportion of early‐initiated oral anticoagulation during 2007 to 2015 in patients with new‐onset postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Figure 4. The proportion of patients with…
Figure 4. The proportion of patients with new‐onset postoperative atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulation at different time points after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Figure 5. Oral anticoagulation therapy at different…
Figure 5. Oral anticoagulation therapy at different time points after discharge in all patients with new‐onset postoperative atrial fibrillation and anticoagulant therapy initiated within 30 days after coronary artery bypass grafting (n=1714 at 30 days).

References

    1. Filardo G, Damiano RJ Jr, Ailawadi G, Thourani VH, Pollock BD, Sass DM, Phan TK, Nguyen H, da Graca B. Epidemiology of new‐onset atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart. 2018;104:985–992.
    1. Shen J, Lall S, Zheng V, Buckley P, Damiano RJ Jr, Schuessler RB. The persistent problem of new‐onset postoperative atrial fibrillation: a single‐institution experience over two decades. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:559–570.
    1. Zaman AG, Archbold RA, Helft G, Paul EA, Curzen NP, Mills PG. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a model for preoperative risk stratification. Circulation. 2000;101:1403–1408.
    1. Anderson E, Dyke C, Levy JH. Anticoagulation strategies for the management of postoperative atrial fibrillation. Clin Lab Med. 2014;34:537–561.
    1. Villareal RP, Hariharan R, Liu BC, Kar B, Lee VV, Elayda M, Lopez JA, Rasekh A, Wilson JM, Massumi A. Postoperative atrial fibrillation and mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:742–748.
    1. Kaw R, Hernandez AV, Masood I, Gillinov AM, Saliba W, Blackstone EH. Short‐ and long‐term mortality associated with new‐onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:1305–1312.
    1. Maisel WH, Rawn JD, Stevenson WG. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:1061–1073.
    1. Greenberg JW, Lancaster TS, Schuessler RB, Melby SJ. Postoperative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: a persistent complication. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52:665–672.
    1. Thoren E, Wernroth ML, Christersson C, Grinnemo KH, Jideus L, Stahle E. Compared with matched controls, patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) have increased long‐term AF after CABG, and POAF is further associated with increased ischemic stroke, heart failure and mortality even after adjustment for AF. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109:1232–1242.
    1. Kosmidou I, Chen S, Kappetein AP, Serruys PW, Gersh BJ, Puskas JD, Kandzari DE, Taggart DP, Morice MC, Buszman PE, et al. New‐onset atrial fibrillation after PCI or CABG for left main disease: the EXCEL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:739–748.
    1. El‐Chami MF, Kilgo P, Thourani V, Lattouf OM, Delurgio DB, Guyton RA, Leon AR, Puskas JD. New‐onset atrial fibrillation predicts long‐term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1370–1376.
    1. Ahlsson A, Fengsrud E, Bodin L, Englund A. Postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery carries an eightfold risk of future atrial fibrillation and a doubled cardiovascular mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:1353–1359.
    1. Gialdini G, Nearing K, Bhave PD, Bonuccelli U, Iadecola C, Healey JS, Kamel H. Perioperative atrial fibrillation and the long‐term risk of ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2014;312:616–622.
    1. Lee SH, Kang DR, Uhm JS, Shim J, Sung JH, Kim JY, Pak HN, Lee MH, Joung B. New‐onset atrial fibrillation predicts long‐term newly developed atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft. Am Heart J. 2014;167:593–600.e1.
    1. Butt JH, Xian Y, Peterson ED, Olsen PS, Rorth R, Gundlund A, Olesen JB, Gislason GH, Torp‐Pedersen C, Kober L, et al. Long‐term thromboembolic risk in patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3:417–424.
    1. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014;130:e199–e267.
    1. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2893–2962.
    1. Al‐Khatib SM, Hafley G, Harrington RA, Mack MJ, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED, Califf RM, Kouchoukos NT, Alexander JH. Patterns of management of atrial fibrillation complicating coronary artery bypass grafting: results from the PRoject of Ex‐vivo Vein graft ENgineering via Transfection IV (PREVENT‐IV) Trial. Am Heart J. 2009;158:792–798.
    1. Thorén E, Hellgren L, Ståhle E. High incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22:176–180.
    1. Vikholm P, Ivert T, Nilsson J, Holmgren A, Freter W, Ternstrom L, Ghaidan H, Sartipy U, Olsson C, Granfeldt H, et al. Validity of the swedish cardiac surgery registry. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;27:67–74.
    1. Bjorklund E, Nielsen SJ, Hansson EC, Karlsson M, Wallinder A, Martinsson A, Tygesen H, Romlin BS, Malm CJ, Pivodic A, et al. Secondary prevention medications after coronary artery bypass grafting and long‐term survival: a population‐based longitudinal study from the SWEDEHEART registry. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:1653–1661.
    1. The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare . Quality of data and reporting procedures. . Accessed January 24, 2020.
    1. Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, Feychting M, Kim JL, Reuterwall C, Heurgren M, Olausson PO. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:450.
    1. Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015;34:3661–3679.
    1. Israel CW, Gronefeld G, Ehrlich JR, Li YG, Hohnloser SH. Long‐term risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation as documented by an implantable monitoring device: implications for optimal patient care. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:47–52.
    1. Savelieva I, Camm AJ. Clinical relevance of silent atrial fibrillation: prevalence, prognosis, quality of life, and management. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000;4:369–382.
    1. Kotecha D, Piccini JP. Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: what should we do? Eur Heart J. 2015;36:3250–3257.
    1. Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. A population‐based study of the long‐term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20‐year follow‐up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Med. 2002;113:359–364.
    1. Carlisle MA, Fudim M, DeVore AD, Piccini JP. Heart failure and atrial fibrillation, like fire and fury. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7:447–456.
    1. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor‐based approach: the Euro Heart Survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137:263–272.
    1. Friberg L, Rosenqvist M, Lip GY. Evaluation of risk stratification schemes for ischaemic stroke and bleeding in 182 678 patients with atrial fibrillation: the Swedish Atrial Fibrillation cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1500–1510.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir