The effectiveness of an electronic pain management programme for the working population with chronic pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Shuk Kwan Tang, Mimi Mun Yee Tse, Sau Fong Leung, Theofanis Fotis, Shuk Kwan Tang, Mimi Mun Yee Tse, Sau Fong Leung, Theofanis Fotis

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain is highly prevalent in the working population. People tend to attempt self-initiated treatments to manage their pain. The self-efficacy of behavioural change is a suitable model for guiding the development of an electronic pain management programme (ePain). The aim in this study is to develop ePain and to evaluate its effectiveness at improving pain self-efficacy, reducing pain intensity and negative emotions, and increasing quality of life.

Methods: This study will be a randomized controlled trial. ePain will take the form of a 6-week online pain management programme. Participants will be aged 15 years or above, have chronic pain, and be employed. They must complete the baseline questionnaire and will be randomized into intervention and control groups. They will receive notifications to encourage their participation in ePain and complete the evaluation questionnaires. They will complete the process evaluation at week 3, the post assessment at week 6, and the follow-up assessment at week 12. The study will focus on pain self-efficacy; pain situations; negative emotions including levels of depression, anxiety, and stress; and quality of life. The participants' opinions of ePain will be collected as feedback. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis and generalized estimating equations will be used to investigate the time-averaged difference and differences at each follow-up time.

Discussion: The study will provide information about the pain situations of online users in the working population. The participants will benefit from improvements in pain self-efficacy, pain situations, emotional status, and quality of life. The study will illustrate whether online learning is an effective intervention for improving the pain self-efficacy of the working population.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03718702. Registered on 23 October 2018.

Keywords: Chronic pain; Electronic pain management programme; Pain management; Working population; eHealth; ePain.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Data collection procedure for the study. ePain electronic pain management programme
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments

References

    1. Census and Statistics Department. Terms and definitions. Hong Kong SAR: Census and Statistics Department; 2012 [cited 2016 July 31]. Available from: .
    1. International Association for the Study of Pain. IASP Taxonomy—IASP 2014 [cited 2014 August 11]. Available from: .
    1. International Association for the Study of Pain. Classification of chronic pain, second edition (revised) 2012 [cited 2014 August 12]. Available from: .
    1. Tang SK, Tse MMY, Leung SF, Fotis T. Prevalence of pain in working population in Hong Kong: an online survey. 20th East Asian Forum of Nursing Scholars; Hong Kong SAR; 9 & 10 March 2017.
    1. Chung JWY, Wong TKS. Prevalence of pain in a community population. Pain Med. 2007;8(3):235–242.
    1. Wong WS, Fielding R. Prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain in the general population of Hong Kong. J Pain. 2011;12(2):236–245.
    1. Ohayon MM, Stingl JC. Prevalence and comorbidity of chronic pain in the German general population. J Psychiatr Res. 2012;46(4):444–450.
    1. Kennedy J, Roll JM, Schraudner T, Murphy S, McPherson S. Prevalence of persistent pain in the U.S. adult population: new data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. J Pain. 2014;15(10):979–984.
    1. Lerman FS, Rudich FZ, Brill FS, Shalev FH, Shahar FG. Longitudinal associations between depression, anxiety, pain, and pain-related disability in chronic pain patients. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(3):333–341.
    1. Gerrits MJGM, Van Oppen WJP, Van Marwijk WJHH, Penninx EB, Van Der Horst EH. Pain and the onset of depressive and anxiety disorders. Pain. 2014;155(1):53–59.
    1. Lindegård A, Larsman P, Hadzibajramovic E, Ahlborg G. The influence of perceived stress and musculoskeletal pain on work performance and work ability in Swedish health care workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014;87(4):373–379.
    1. Ortego G, Villafañe JH, Doménech-García V, Berjano P, Bertozzi L, Herrero P. Is there a relationship between psychological stress or anxiety and chronic nonspecific neck–arm pain in adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2016;90:70–81.
    1. Sibille KT, Langaee T, Burkley B, Gong Y, Glover TL, King C, et al. Chronic pain, perceived stress, and cellular aging: an exploratory study. Mol Pain. 2012;8(1):12.
    1. Paananen M, Taimela S, Auvinen J, Tammelin T, Zitting P, Karppinen J. Impact of self-reported musculoskeletal pain on health-related quality of life among young adults. Pain Med. 2011;12(1):9–17.
    1. Strine TW, Hootman JM, Chapman DP, Okoro CA, Balluz L. Health-related quality of life, health risk behaviors, and disability among adults with pain-related activity difficulty. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(11):2042–2048.
    1. Dueñas M, Ojeda B, Salazar A, Mico JA, Failde I. A review of chronic pain impact on patients, their social environment and the health care system. J Pain Res. 2016;9(1):457–467.
    1. Ng FJK, Tsui LS, Chan SW. Prevalence of common chronic pain in Hong Kong adults. Clin J Pain. 2002;18(5):275–281.
    1. Chen PP, Chen J, Gin T, Ma M, Fung KC, Woo KH, et al. Out-patient chronic pain service in Hong Kong: prospective study. Hong Kong Med J. 2004;10(3):150–155.
    1. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469–2475.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215.
    1. Gallagher M.W. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. 2012. Self-Efficacy; pp. 314–320.
    1. Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health. 1998;13(4):623–649.
    1. Shao JH, Chang AM, Edwards H, Shyu YIL, Chen SH. A randomized controlled trial of self-management programme improves health-related outcomes of older people with heart failure. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(11):2458–2469.
    1. Vinkers C, Adriaanse M, Kroese F, Ridder D. Efficacy of a self-management intervention for weight control in overweight and obese adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Behav Med. 2014;37(4):781–792.
    1. Wu S-FV, Kao M-J, Wu M-P, Tsai M-W, Chang W-W. Effects of an osteoarthritis self-management programme. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(7):1491–1501.
    1. World Health Organization. e-Health: World Health Organization; 2017 [cited 2017 March 28]. Available from: .
    1. Alpay LL, Henkemans OB, Otten W, Rövekamp TAJM, Dumay ACM. E-health applications and services for patient empowerment: directions for best practices in The Netherlands. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16(7):787–791.
    1. Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res. 2001;3(2):e20.
    1. Ball MJ, Lillis J. E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. Int J Med Inform. 2001;61:1–10.
    1. Ruehlman SL, Karoly SP, Enders SC. A randomized controlled evaluation of an online chronic pain self management program. Pain. 2012;153(2):319–330.
    1. Williams AD, Kuper JD, Segar JM, Mohan JN, Sheth JM, Clauw JD. Internet-enhanced management of fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2010;151(3):694–702.
    1. Heinrich E, de Nooijer J, Schaper NC, Schoonus-Spit MHG, Janssen MAJ, de Vries NK. Evaluation of the web-based Diabetes Interactive Education Programme (DIEP) for patients with type 2 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(2):172–178.
    1. Lewis JR. IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 1995;7(1):57–78.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO's cancer pain ladder for adults. World Health Organization; 2016 [cited 2016 October 11]. Available from: .
    1. Seo JY, Kim MY. The effects of aromatherapy on dysmenorrhea, menstrual pain, anxiety, and depression in nursing students. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2008;20(5):756–764.
    1. Sritoomma N, Moyle W, Cooke M, O’dwyer S. The effectiveness of Swedish massage with aromatic ginger oil in treating chronic low back pain in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 2014;22(1):26–33.
    1. Casanelia L, Stelfox D. Foundations of massage. 3. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone; 2010.
    1. Australian Pain Management Association. How to: relaxation, meditation and deep breathing Australia; 2015 [cited 2017 February 9]. Available from: .
    1. Civil Service Bureau. Retirement Hong Kong SAR: Civil Service Bureau; 2017 [cited 2017 July 18]. Available from: .
    1. Nicholas MK. The Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain. 2007;11(2):153–163.
    1. Lim SH, Chen PP, Wong CMT, Gin SFT, Wong SFE, Chan SFI, et al. Validation of the Chinese Version of Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(4):918–923.
    1. Wang SX, Mendoza RT, Gao SS-Z, Cleeland SC. The Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-C): its development and use in a study of cancer pain. Pain. 1996;67(23):407–416.
    1. Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2004;5(2):133–137.
    1. Psychology Foundation of Australia. Overview of the DASS and its uses 2018 [updated 26 July 2018; cited 2019 September 4]. Available from: .
    1. Gloster AT, Rhoades HM, Novy D, Klotsche J, Senior A, Kunik M, et al. Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 in older primary care patients. J Affect Disord. 2008;110(3):248–259.
    1. Moussa M, Lovibond P, Laube R. Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the short Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS21). Report for New South Wales Transcultural Mental Health Centre. Sydney, NSW: Cumberland Hospita; 2001.
    1. Leung K, Wong W, Tay M, Chu M, Ng S. Development and validation of the interview version of the Hong Kong Chinese WHOQOL-BREF. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(5):1413–1419.
    1. Harper A, Power M. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28(3):551–558.
    1. Streiner DL. Last observation carried forward. In Encyclopedia of Research Design. Salkind NJ. eds. London: SAGE; 2010. 10.4135/9781412961288.n211.
    1. Hamer Robert M., Simpson Pippa M. Last Observation Carried Forward Versus Mixed Models in the Analysis of Psychiatric Clinical Trials. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2009;166(6):639–641.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir