Adjunctive use of physostigmine salicylate (Anticholium®) in perioperative sepsis and septic shock: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, monocentric trial (Anticholium® per Se)

Johannes B Zimmermann, Nadine Pinder, Thomas Bruckner, Monika Lehmann, Johann Motsch, Thorsten Brenner, Torsten Hoppe-Tichy, Stefanie Swoboda, Markus A Weigand, Stefan Hofer, Johannes B Zimmermann, Nadine Pinder, Thomas Bruckner, Monika Lehmann, Johann Motsch, Thorsten Brenner, Torsten Hoppe-Tichy, Stefanie Swoboda, Markus A Weigand, Stefan Hofer

Abstract

Background: Severe sepsis and septic shock remain a major challenge, even in modern intensive care. In Germany, about 68,000 patients die annually because of septic diseases, characterized by a complex systemic inflammatory response. Causal treatment of the underlying infection is essential for successful management of sepsis, but the course can be positively influenced by supportive and adjuvant measures. The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAP) represents a new approach to adjunctive therapy of septic diseases and can be pharmacologically activated by the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine (Anticholium®). Promising effects can be found in several in vitro and in vivo models of sepsis, such as a reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines and improved survival.

Methods: Anticholium® per Se is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, monocentric trial to assess whether the CAP can be transferred from bench to bedside. In this pilot study, 20 patients with perioperative sepsis and septic shock as a result of intra-abdominal infection are enrolled. According to randomization, participants are treated with physostigmine salicylate (verum group) or 0.9% sodium chloride (placebo group) for up to 5 days. The mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score during treatment and subsequent intensive care of up to 14 days is used as surrogate outcome (primary endpoint). Secondary outcome measures include 30- and 90-day mortality. An embedded pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics study investigates plasma concentrations of physostigmine and its metabolite eseroline. Further analyses will contribute to our understanding of the role of various cytokines in the pathophysiology of human sepsis. A computer-generated list is used for block randomization.

Discussion: This randomized, controlled, monocentric trial investigates for the first time the adjunctive use of physostigmine (Anticholium®) in patients with perioperative sepsis and septic shock and may be a pivotal step toward the clinical use in this indication.

Trial registration: EudraCT Number: 2012-001650-26 (entered 14 August 2012), ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03013322 (registered on 1 Jan 2017).

Keywords: Antilirium; Cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway; Cholinesterase inhibitor; Continuous administration; Critically ill; Eserine; Eseroline; Intra-abdominal infection; Physostigma venenosum; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The clinical trial protocol and the corresponding documents have been approved by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) and the Ethics Committee, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University (AFmu-447/2012).

The members of the study group must inform eligible patients, both orally and in writing in an intelligible form about its nature, significance, and implications. Before participants can be enrolled in Anticholium® per Se, they must consent to participation in writing. For potential trial participants who are incapable there is a locally established procedure [29].

If a legal guardian already exists, they are duly informed in accordance with the regulations and subsequently consent to participation in writing. If no legal guardian exists, participants are enrolled in the clinical trial after a near family member has been informed about its nature, significance, and implications and has agreed to participation in the study mindful of the interest of the patient concerned (also by telephone). In summary proceedings, the designation of a legal guardian is begun at the district court. If no near family member is available, participants are enrolled after a guardianship judge has been informed about its nature, significance, and has agreed to participation in the study mindful of the interest of the patient concerned (also by telephone). A near family member is appointed legal guardian as earlier as possible; they are duly informed in accordance with the regulations and subsequently consent to participation in writing (delayed consent). In any case, informed consent of study participants is sought retrospectively once they are capable of giving consent again.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

JBZ, NP, TBru, ML, JM, TBre, THT and SS declare no competing interests. MAW and SH have served as speakers for and SH has received tangible means (reagents and a device for cholinesterase measurement) from Dr. Franz Köhler Chemie GmbH.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Fleischmann C, Thomas-Rueddel DO, Hartmann M, Hartog CS, Welte T, Heublein S, Dennler U, Reinhart K. Hospital incidence and mortality rates of sepsis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016;113:159–66.
    1. Borovikova LV, Ivanova S, Zhang M, Yang H, Botchkina GI, Watkins LR, Wang H, Abumrad N, Eaton JW, Tracey KJ. Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates the systemic inflammatory response to endotoxin. Nature. 2000;405:458–62. doi: 10.1038/35013070.
    1. Hofer S, Eisenbach C, Lukic IK, Schneider L, Bode K, Brueckmann M, Mautner S, Wente MN, Encke J, Werner J, et al. Pharmacologic cholinesterase inhibition improves survival in experimental sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:404–8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0B013E31816208B3.
    1. Beilin B, Bessler H, Papismedov L, Weinstock M, Shavit Y. Continuous physostigmine combined with morphine-based patient-controlled analgesia in the postoperative period. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:78–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00548.x.
    1. Dejager L, Pinheiro I, Dejonckheere E, Libert C. Cecal ligation and puncture: the gold standard model for polymicrobial sepsis? Trends Microbiol. 2011;19:198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.01.001.
    1. Triggle DJ, Mitchell JM, Filler R. The pharmacology of physostigmine. CNS Drug Rev. 1998;4:87–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.1998.tb00059.x.
    1. Dr. Franz Köhler Chemie GmbH. SmPC (Fachinformation) Anticholium® Injektionslösung. 2011.
    1. Asthana S, Raffaele KC, Berardi A, Greig NH, Haxby JV, Schapiro MB, Soncrant TT. Treatment of Alzheimer disease by continuous intravenous infusion of physostigmine. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1995;9:223–32. doi: 10.1097/00002093-199509040-00009.
    1. Furey ML, Pietrini P, Alexander GE, Mentis MJ, Szczepanik J, Shetty U, Greig NH, Holloway HW, Schapiro MB, Freo U. Time course of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects of physostigmine assessed by functional brain imaging in humans. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2000;66:475–81. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(00)00186-6.
    1. Roberts JA, Lipman J. Pharmacokinetic issues for antibiotics in the critically ill patient. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:840–51. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181961bff.
    1. De Paepe P, Belpaire FM, Buylaert WA. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations when treating patients with sepsis and septic shock. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41:1135–51. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200241140-00002.
    1. Pinder N, Zimmermann JB, Hofer S, Brenner T, Weigand MA, Gubbe U, Hoppe-Tichy T, Swoboda S. Revival of physostigmine - a novel HPLC assay for simultaneous determination of physostigmine and its metabolite eseroline designed for a pharmacokinetic study of septic patients. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:1259–64. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0834.
    1. Worek F, Baumann M, Pfeiffer B, Aurbek N, Thiermann H. Mobiler cholinesterase-schnelltest zur felddiagnostik einer organophosphat-exposition im vollblut. Wehrmedizinische Monatsschrift. 2011;4.
    1. Lichtenstern C, Zimmermann JB, Rahbari NN, Uhle F, Kerber S, Weismuller K, Hofer S, Walter V, Bruckner T, Weitz J, Weigand MA. Patients suffering due to complicated peritonitis may not benefit from splenectomy: clinical data from a retrospective study. J Surg Res. 2011;167:e345–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.10.021.
    1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes. Treatment allocation in controlled trials: why randomise? BMJ. 1999;318:1209. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7192.1209.
    1. Reinhart K, Brunkhorst FM, Bone HG, Bardutzky J, Dempfle CE, Forst H, Gastmeier P, Gerlach H, Grundling M, John S, et al. Prevention, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of sepsis: 1st revision of S-2k guidelines of the German Sepsis Society (Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V. (DSG)) and the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinare Vereinigung fur Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI)) Ger Med Sci. 2010;8:Doc14.
    1. GCP Ordinance (GCP-Verordnung, GCP-V). 2004. . Accessed 14 Oct 2016.
    1. ICH E2A: International Conference on Harmonisation Tripartite Guideline: clinical safety data management: definitions and standards for expedited reporting. 1994. . Accessed 14 Oct 2016.
    1. ICH E6(R1): International Conference on Harmonisation Tripartite Guideline: Good Clinical Practice. 1996. . Accessed 14 Oct 2016.
    1. World Medical Association World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
    1. Medicinal Products Act (Arzneimittelgesetz, Gesetz über den Verkehr mit Arzneimitteln, AMG). 1976. . Accessed 14 Oct 2016.
    1. Federal Data Protection Act (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz, BDSG). 1990. . Accessed 14 Oct 2016.
    1. Paraskeva A, Papilas K, Fassoulaki A, Melemeni A, Papadopoulos G. Physostigmine does not antagonize sevoflurane anesthesia assessed by bispectral index or enhances recovery. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:569–72. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200203000-00017.
    1. Petersson J, Gordh TE, Hartvig P, Wiklund L. A double-blind trial of the analgesic properties of physostigmine in postoperative patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1986;30:283–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1986.tb02414.x.
    1. Kesecioglu J, Rupreht J, Telci L, Dzoljic M, Erdmann W. Effect of aminophylline or physostigmine on recovery from nitrous oxide-enflurane anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991;35:616–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1991.tb03359.x.
    1. Paraskeva A, Staikou C, Diamadis M, Siafaka I, Fassoulaki A. Anesthesia with 1.5 minimum alveolar concentration sevoflurane is not altered by physostigmine as measured by bispectral and clinical indices. J Clin Anesth. 2005;17:581–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.03.005.
    1. Rohm KD, Riechmann J, Boldt J, Schollhorn T, Piper SN. Do patients profit from physostigmine in recovery from desflurane anaesthesia? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:278–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01238.x.
    1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Recommendations: Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. . Accessed 14 Oct 2016.
    1. Steiner T, Walter-Sack I, Taupitz J, Hacke W, Strowitzki T. Ethical and legal aspects of including patients unable to consent in acute therapy studies. Example of a medication study for the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage--the Heidelberg procedure. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008;133:787–92. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1075648.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir