Randomized phase 3 efficacy and safety trial of proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar MYL-1401H in the prophylactic treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

Cornelius F Waller, Gopinath M Ranganna, Eduardo J Pennella, Christopher Blakeley, Miguel H Bronchud, Leonard A Mattano Jr, Oleksandr Berzoy, Nataliia Voitko, Yaroslav Shparyk, Iryna Lytvyn, Andriy Rusyn, Vasil Popov, István Láng, Katrin Beckmann, Rajiv Sharma, Mark Baczkowski, Mudgal Kothekar, Abhijit Barve, Cornelius F Waller, Gopinath M Ranganna, Eduardo J Pennella, Christopher Blakeley, Miguel H Bronchud, Leonard A Mattano Jr, Oleksandr Berzoy, Nataliia Voitko, Yaroslav Shparyk, Iryna Lytvyn, Andriy Rusyn, Vasil Popov, István Láng, Katrin Beckmann, Rajiv Sharma, Mark Baczkowski, Mudgal Kothekar, Abhijit Barve

Abstract

Pegfilgrastim is indicated for reducing the duration of neutropenia and incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. Here, safety and efficacy of MYL-1401H, a proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar, were investigated as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group equivalence trial of MYL-1401H vs European Union-sourced reference pegfilgrastim. Patients with newly diagnosed stage II/III breast cancer eligible to receive (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks for 6 cycles were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to 6 mg of MYL-1401H or reference pegfilgrastim 24 h (+ 2-h window after the first 24 h) after the end of chemotherapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 (i.e., days with absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 0.5 × 109/L). Mean (standard deviation (SD)) duration of severe neutropenia in MYL-1401H and reference pegfilgrastim groups was 1.2 days (0.93) and 1.2 days (1.10), respectively. The 95% CI for least squares mean difference (- 0.285, 0.298) was within the predefined equivalence range of ± 1 day. Secondary endpoints, including grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (frequency, 91% and 82% for MYL-1401H and reference pegfilgrastim, respectively), time to ANC nadir (mean (SD), 6.2 (0.98) and 6.3 (1.57) days), and duration of post-nadir recovery (mean (SD), 1.9 (0.85) and 1.7 (0.91) days) were comparable. Overall safety profiles of the study drugs were comparable. MYL-1401H demonstrated equivalent efficacy and similar safety to reference pegfilgrastim and may be an equivalent option for reducing incidence of neutropenia. ( ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02467868; EudraCT, 2014-002324-27).

Keywords: Biosimilar; Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; Febrile neutropenia; Pegfilgrastim.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

CF Waller and MH Bronchud are consultants/advisory board members for Mylan. GM Ranganna, EJ Pennella, K Beckmann, M Baczkowski, and A Barve are paid employees of Mylan and may hold stock with the company. C Blakeley is a paid employee of Worldwide Clinical Trials. LA Mattano Jr. has served as a consultant for Alexion, Mylan, Novartis, and Pfizer and may hold stock with Pfizer. R Sharma was a paid employee of Mylan at the time of analysis and may hold stock with the company. M Kothekar is a paid employee of Biocon Research Ltd. and may hold stock with the company. All remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Statement of informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean ANC over time by treatment in cycle 1 (PP population). ANC absolute neutrophil count, PP per protocol

References

    1. Blackstone EA, Joseph PF. The economics of biosimilars. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013;6:469–478.
    1. Mellstedt H, Niederwieser D, Ludwig H. The challenge of biosimilars. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:411–419. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm345.
    1. Chopra R, Lopes G. Improving access to cancer treatments: the role of biosimilars. J Glob Oncol. 2017;2016:008607.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration (2015) Scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product: guidance for industry. . Accessed 16 August 2018
    1. European Medicines Agency (2014) Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: non-clinical and clinical issues. . Accessed 16 August 2018
    1. Raedler LA. Zarxio (filgrastim-sndz): first biosimilar approved in the United States. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016;9:150–154.
    1. NEUPOGEN . prescribing information. Thousand Oaks: Amgen Inc; 2016.
    1. Minghetti P, Rocco P, Cilurzo F, Vecchio LD, Locatelli F. The regulatory framework of biosimilars in the European Union. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.08.001.
    1. Kuderer NM. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Res. 2011;157:127–143. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7073-2_8.
    1. Dale DC. Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients. Drugs. 2002;62(suppl 1):1–15. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262001-00001.
    1. Blackwell K, Semiglazov V, Krasnozhon D, Davidenko I, Nelyubina L, Nakov R, Stiegler G, Singh P, Schwebig A, Kramer S, Harbeck N. Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1948–1953. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv281.
    1. del Giglio A, Eniu A, Ganea-Motan D, Topuzov E, Lubenau H. XM02 is superior to placebo and equivalent to Neupogen in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia and the incidence of febrile neutropenia in cycle 1 in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:332. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-332.
    1. Gascon P, Fuhr U, Sörgel F, Kinzig-Schippers M, Makhson A, Balser S, Einmahi S, Muenzberg M. Development of a new G-CSF product based on biosimilarity assessment. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1419–1429. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp574.
    1. Waller CF, Semiglazov VF, Tjulandin S, Bentsion D, Chan S, Challand R. A phase III randomized equivalence study of biosimilar filgrastim versus Amgen filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for breast cancer [erratum appears in Onkologie 2010;33(12):725] Onkologie. 2010;33:504–511.
    1. Klastersky J, de Naurois J, Rolston K, Rapoport B, Maschmeyer G, Aapro M, Herrstedt J, for ESMO Guidelines Committee Management of febrile neutropaenia: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:v111–v118. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw325.
    1. Smith TJ, Bohlke K, Lyman GH, Carson KR, Crawford J, Cross SJ, Goldberg JM, Khatcheressian JL, Leighl NB, Perkins CL, Somlo G, Wade JL, Wozniak AJ, Armitage JO. Recommendations for the use of WBC growth factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3199–3212. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3488.
    1. Holmes FA, Jones SE, O'Shaughnessy J, Vukelja S, George T, Savin M, Richards D, Glaspy J, Meza L, Cohen G, Dhami M, Budman DR, Hackett J, Brassard M, Yang BB, Liang BC. Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:903–909. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf130.
    1. Waller CF, Tiessen RG, Lawrence TE, Shaw A, Liu MS, Sharma R, Baczkowski M, Kothekar MA, Micales CE, Barve A, Ranganna GM, Pennella EJ. A pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics equivalence trial of the proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar, MYL-1401H, versus reference pegfilgrastim. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144:1087–1095. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2643-3.
    1. Cleeland CS (2009) The Brief Pain Inventory. . Accessed 16 August 2018
    1. Holmes FA, O'Shaughnessy JA, Vukelja S, Jones SE, Shogan J, Savin M, Glaspy J, Moore M, Meza L, Wiznitzer I, Neumann TA, Hill LR, Liang BC. Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:727–731. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.727.
    1. Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J, Galid A, Guillem V, Gascon P, Siena S, Lalisang RI, Samonigg H, Clemens MR, Zani V, Liang BC, Renwick J, Piccart M, for the International Pegfilgrastim 749 Study Group A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:29–35. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg019.
    1. European Medicines Agency (2005) Guideline on the choice of the non-inferiority margin. . Accessed 16 August 2018
    1. Blackwell K, Donskih R, Jones CM, Nixon A, Vidal MJ, Nakov R, Singh P, Schaffar G, Gascón P, Harbeck N. A comparison of proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 and reference pegfilgrastim for the prevention of neutropenia in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy: pegfilgrastim randomized oncology (supportive care) trial to evaluate comparative treatment (PROTECT-2), a phase III, randomized, double-blind trial. Oncologist. 2016;21:789–794. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0011.
    1. Harbeck N, Lipatov O, Frolova M, Udovitsa D, Topuzov E, Ganea-Motan DE, Nakov R, Singh P, Rudy A, Blackwell K. Randomized, double-blind study comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2016;12:1359–1367. doi: 10.2217/fon-2016-0016.
    1. Lambertini M, Del Mastro L, Bellodi A, Pronzato P. The five "Ws" for bone pain due to the administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs) Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;89:112–128. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.08.006.
    1. Neulasta . prescribing information. Thousand Oaks: Amgen Inc; 2016.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir