Early treatment-related neutropenia predicts response to palbociclib

Nicholas P McAndrew, Mark A Dickson, Amy S Clark, Andrea B Troxel, Mark H O'Hara, Christopher Colameco, Maryann Gallager, Kristi Gramlich, Kelly Zafman, David Vaughn, Gary K Schwartz, Peter J O'Dwyer, Angela DeMichele, Nicholas P McAndrew, Mark A Dickson, Amy S Clark, Andrea B Troxel, Mark H O'Hara, Christopher Colameco, Maryann Gallager, Kristi Gramlich, Kelly Zafman, David Vaughn, Gary K Schwartz, Peter J O'Dwyer, Angela DeMichele

Abstract

Background: Palbociclib is highly active in oestrogen-receptor positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer, but neutropenia is dose limiting. The goal of this study was to determine whether early neutropenia is associated with disease response to single-agent palbociclib.

Methods: Blood count and disease-response data were analysed from two Phase 2 clinical trials at different institutions using single-agent palbociclib: advanced solid tumours positive for retinoblastoma protein and advanced liposarcoma. The primary endpoint was PFS. The primary exposure variable was the nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC) during the first two cycles of treatment.

Results: One hundred and ninety-six patients (61 breast, 135 non-breast) were evaluated between the two trials. Development of any grade neutropenia was significantly associated with longer median PFS in both the breast cancer (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.74, p = 0.010) and non-breast cancer (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.85, p = 0.006) cohorts. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was significantly associated with prolonged PFS in the non-breast cohort (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.85, p = 0.006) but not in the breast cohort (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.51-1.47, p = 0.596). Multivariate analysis yielded similar results.

Conclusions: Treatment-related neutropenia in the first two cycles was significantly and independently associated with prolonged PFS, suggesting that neutropenia may be a useful pharmacodynamic marker to guide individualised palbociclib dosing.

Clinical trials registration information: Basket Trial: NCT01037790; Sarcoma Trial: NCT01209598.

Conflict of interest statement

N.P.M. received research funding from Novartis and Daiichi Sankyo; advisory board honorarium from Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, and Genomic Health; consulting honorarium from Daiichi Sankyo and Novartis; travel accommodation from TRIO, Daiichi Sankyo, and Roche, as well as speaking honorarium from Novartis. M.A.D. has received research funding from Pfizer, Eli-Lilly, and AADi, along with providing consultation and advisory to Pfizer and Celgene. A.S.C. has received research funding from Novartis. D.V. received research funding from Merck, Astellas, and Genetech, along with providing consultation and sitting on the advisory board to Merck. M.H.O. received research support from Eli Lilly, BMS, and Celldex and received Honoraria from Astra Zeneca, along with providing consultation to Karyopharm and Exelixis. P.J.O. has received research funding from Amgen, Bayer, BBI Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Five Prime Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics, along with providing consultation and advising to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Five Prime Therapeutics, Forty Seven, and Genentech. A.D. has received research funding from Novartis, Pfizer, Genentech, Calithera, and Menarini, along with providing consultation to Contact Therapeutics, Pfizer, Novartis, and Calithera. All remaining authors have declared no conflict of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1. Nadir ANC in cycles 1–2…
Fig. 1. Nadir ANC in cycles 1–2 vs PFS weeks—Cox predicted relative hazard values.
Spearman’s rho = −0.4073 (p < 0.001). HR 1.22 (95% CI 1.13–1.32).
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier survival by cycle 1–2…
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier survival by cycle 1–2 maximum grade neutropenia.
a All patients. Grade 0: (reference); median PFS 6.0 weeks. Grade 1: HR 0.65 (0.40–1.07), p = 0.092; median PFS 8.1 weeks. Grade 2: HR 0.60 (0.40–0.90), p = 0.014; median PFS 15.6 weeks. Grade 3: HR 0.49 (0.33–0.74), p = 0.001; median PFS 19.4 weeks. Grade 4: HR 0.19 (0.06–0.62), p = 0.006; median PFS 60.0 weeks. Overall log-rank p = 0.002. b Breast patients. Grade 0: (reference); median PFS 5.0 weeks. Grade 1: HR 0.30 (0.05–1.56), p = 0.152; median PFS 13.9 weeks. Grade 2: HR 0.27 (0.10–0.75), p = 0.012; median PFS 16.3 weeks. Grade 3: HR 0.33 (0.12–0.87), p = 0.024; median PFS 19.4 weeks. Grade 4: HR 0.05 (0.01–0.52), p = 0.011; median PFS 25.4 weeks. Overall log-rank p = 0.028. c Non-breast patients. Grade 0: (reference); median PFS 6.0 weeks. Grade 1: HR 0.73 (0.43–1.23), p = 0.232; median PFS 8.0 weeks. Grade 2: HR 0.66 (0.41–1.06), p = 0.083; median PFS 15.6 weeks. Grade 3: HR 0.46 (0.28–0.75), p = 0.002; median PFS 18.0 weeks. Grade 4: HR 0.20 (0.02–1.17), p = 0.071; median PFS 60.0 weeks. Overall log-rank p = 0.013.
Fig. 3. Kaplan-Meier survival by cycle 1–2…
Fig. 3. Kaplan-Meier survival by cycle 1–2 any grade or grade 3–4 neutropenia (breast patients).
a Any grade neutropenia. Grade 0: (reference); median PFS 5.0 weeks. Grade 1–4: HR 0.29 (95% CI 0.11–0.74), p = 0.010; median PFS 17.3 weeks. b Grade 3–4 neutropenia. Grade 0–2: (reference); median PFS 12.7 weeks. Grade 3–4: HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.51–1.47), p = 0.596; median PFS 20.7 weeks.

References

    1. Salkeni MA, Hall SJ. Metastatic breast cancer: endocrine therapy landscape reshaped. Avicenna J. Med. 2017;7:144–152. doi: 10.4103/ajm.AJM_20_17.
    1. Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, Jones S, Im S-A, Gelmon K, et al. Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:1925–1936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607303.
    1. Turner NC, Ro J, André F, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, et al. Palbociclib in hormone-receptor–positive advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;373:209–219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505270.
    1. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap Y-S, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, et al. Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:1738–1748. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609709.
    1. George W, Sledge J, Toi M, Neven P, Sohn J, Inoue K, Pivot X, et al. MONARCH 2: abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017;35:2875–2884. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7585.
    1. Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, Fasching PA, Laurentiis MD, Im S-A, et al. Phase III randomized study of ribociclib and fulvestrant in hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-3. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018;36:2465–2472. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9909.
    1. Dickler MN, Tolaney SM, Rugo HS, Cortés J, Diéras V, Patt D, et al. MONARCH 1, a phase II study of abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor, as a single agent, in patients with refractory HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:5218. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0754.
    1. Im SA, Lu YS, Bardia A, Harbeck N, Colleoni M, Franke F, et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;381:307–316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903765.
    1. Slamon, D. J., Neven, P., Chia, S., Fasching, P. A., De Laurentiis, M., Im, S. A. et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 514–524 (2020).
    1. Sledge, G. W., Toi, M., Neven, P., Sohn, J., Inoue, K., Pivot, X. et al. The effect of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant on overall survival in hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy-MONARCH 2: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 6, 116–124 (2019).
    1. Turner NC, Slamon DJ, Ro J, Bondarenko I, Im SA, Masuda N, et al. Overall survival with palbociclib and fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:1926–1936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810527.
    1. Costa R, Costa RB, Talamantes SM, Helenowski I, Peterson J, Kaplan J, et al. Meta-analysis of selected toxicity endpoints of CDK4/6 inhibitors: palbociclib and ribociclib. Breast. 2017;35:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.05.016.
    1. Colleoni M, Sun Z, Price KN, Karlsson P, Forbes JF, Thürlimann B, et al. Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer during 24 years of follow-up: results from the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials I to V. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:927–935. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3504.
    1. Hu W, Sung T, Jessen BA, Thibault S, Finkelstein MB, Khan NK, et al. Mechanistic Investigation of bone marrow suppression associated with palbociclib and its differentiation from cytotoxic chemotherapies. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:2000–2008. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1421.
    1. Clark AS, Karasic TB, DeMichele A, et al. Palbociclib (pd0332991)—a selective and potent cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor: a review of pharmacodynamics and clinical development. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:253–260. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4701.
    1. Flaherty KT, LoRusso PM, DeMichele A, Abramson VG, Courtney R, Randolph SS, et al. Phase I, dose-escalation trial of the oral cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor PD 0332991, administered using a 21-day schedule in patients with advanced cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;18:568. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0509.
    1. Dickson MA, Schwartz GK, Keohan M, et al. Progression-free survival among patients with well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma treated with cdk4 inhibitor palbociclib: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:937–940. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0264.
    1. Vaughn DJ, Hwang W-T, Lal P, Rosen MA, Gallagher M, O’Dwyer PJ. Phase 2 trial of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in patients with retinoblastoma protein-expressing germ cell tumors. Cancer. 2015;121:1463–1468. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29213.
    1. DeMichele A, Clark AS, Tan KS, Heitjan DF, Gramlich K, Gallagher M, et al. CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (PD0332991) in Rb+ advanced breast cancer: phase II activity, safety, and predictive biomarker assessment. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015;21:995–1001. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2258.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur. J. Cancer. 2009;45:228–247.
    1. McPherson, R. & Pincus, M. Table A5-9 Hematology. Henry’s Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods 23rd edn (Elsevier, St. Louis, 2017).
    1. Dudley WN, Wickham R, Coombs N. An introduction to survival statistics: Kaplan-Meier analysis. J. Adv. Pract. Oncol. 2016;7:91–100.
    1. Sedgwick, P. Cox proportional hazards regression. BMJ347, f4919 (2013).
    1. Verma S, Bartlett CH, Schnell P, DeMichele AM, Loi S, Ro J, et al. Palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative advanced metastatic breast cancer: detailed safety analysis from a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III study (PALOMA-3) Oncologist. 2016;21:1165–1175. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0097.
    1. Sun W, O’Dwyer PJ, Finn RS, Ruiz-Garcia A, Shapiro GI, Schwartz GK, et al. Characterization of neutropenia in advanced cancer patients following palbociclib treatment using a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation approach. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017;57:1159–1173. doi: 10.1002/jcph.902.
    1. Im SA, Mukai H, Park IH, Masuda N, Shimizu C, Kim SB, et al. Palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line therapy in postmenopausal asian women with metastatic breast cancer: results from the phase III, randomized PALOMA-2 Study. J. Glob. Oncol. 2019;5:1–19. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.11000.
    1. Iwata H, Im S-A, Masuda N, Im Y-H, Inoue K, Rai Y, et al. PALOMA-3: phase III trial of fulvestrant with or without palbociclib in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on prior endocrine therapy—safety and efficacy in Asian patients. J. Glob. Oncol. 2017;3:289–303. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.008318.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir