Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations: study protocol for a phase IIB randomized controlled trial

Shirin Kalimuddin, Rachel Phillips, Mihir Gandhi, Nurun Nisa de Souza, Jenny G H Low, Sophia Archuleta, David Lye, Thuan Tong Tan, Shirin Kalimuddin, Rachel Phillips, Mihir Gandhi, Nurun Nisa de Souza, Jenny G H Low, Sophia Archuleta, David Lye, Thuan Tong Tan

Abstract

Background: Vancomycin is the standard first-line treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. However, recent consensus guidelines recommend that clinicians consider using alternative agents such as daptomycin when the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration is greater than 1 ug/ml. To date however, there have been no head-to-head randomized trials comparing the safety and efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the treatment of such infections. The primary aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of daptomycin versus vancomycin in the treatment of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (greater than or equal to 1.5 ug/ml) in terms of reducing all-cause 60-day mortality.

Methods/design: The study is designed as a multicenter prospective open label phase IIB pilot randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants will be inpatients over 21-years-old with a positive blood culture for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration of greater than or equal to 1.5 ug/ml. Randomization into intervention or active control arms will be performed with a 1:1 allocation ratio. We aim to recruit 50 participants over a period of two years. Participants randomized to the active control arm will receive vancomycin dose-while those randomized to the intervention arm will receive daptomycin. Participants will receive a minimum of 14 days study treatment.The primary analysis will be conducted on the intention-to-treat principle. The Fisher's exact test will be used to compare the 60-day mortality rate from index blood cultures (primary endpoint) between the two treatment arms, and the exact two-sided 95% confidence interval will be calculated using the Clopper and Pearson method. Primary analysis will be conducted using a two sided alpha of 0.05.

Discussion: If results from this pilot study suggest that daptomycin shows significant efficacy in the treatment of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations, we aim to proceed with a larger scale confirmatory study. This would help guide clinicians and inform practice guidelines on the optimal treatment for such infections.

Trial registration: The trial is listed on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01975662, date of registration: 29 October 2013).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study schematic. Vancomycin will be dosed intravenously at 15 mg/kg Q12h with appropriate dose adjustments by a pharmacist in patients with a creatinine clearance of less than 50 ml/min. Trough levels will be monitored pre-third or fourth dose (inclusive of doses received prior to study enrolment) and doses will be adjusted accordingly by a pharmacist to achieve a trough level of 15 to 20 ug/ml. Subsequently, vancomycin trough levels will be monitored at least every seven days (+/-three days) but additional levels may be required for dose titration at the discretion of the pharmacist or the managing physician.

References

    1. Hsu LY, Tan TY, Jureen R, Koh TH, Krishnan P, Lin RTP, Tee NWS, Tambyah PA. Antimicrobial drug resistance in Singapore hospitals. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1944–1947.
    1. Soriano A, Martinez JA, Mensa J, Marco F, Almela M, Moreno-Martinez A, Sanchez F, Munoz I, de Anta MT J, Soriano E. Pathogenic significance of methicillin resistance for patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:368–373.
    1. Cosgrove SE, Sakoulas G, Perencevich EN, Schwaber MJ, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y. Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:53–59.
    1. Pada SK, Ding Y, Hsu LY, Earnest A, Lee TE, Yong HC, Jureen R, Fisher D. Economic and clinical impact of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in Singapore: a matched case–control study. J Hosp Infect. 2010;78:36–40.
    1. Sakoulas G, Mollering RC Jr. Increasing antibiotic resistance among methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:S360–S367.
    1. Jacob JT, DiazGranados CA. High vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration and clinical outcomes in adults with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17:e93–e100.
    1. van Hal SJ, Lodise TP, Paterson DL. The clinical significance of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in Staphylococcus aureus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:755–771.
    1. Soriano A, Marco F, Martinez J, Pisos E, Almela M, Dimova VP, Alamo D, Ortega M, Lopez J, Mensa J. Influence of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration on the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:193–200.
    1. Sakoulas G, Moise-Broder PA, Shentag J, Forrest A, Moellering RC Jr, Eliopoulos GM. Relationship of MIC and bacteriacidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. J Clin Microb. 2004;42:2398–2402.
    1. Hidayat LK, Hsu DI, Quist R, Shriner KA, Wong-Beringer A. High dose vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: efficacy and toxicity. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2138–2144.
    1. Lodise TP, Graves J, Evans A, Graffunder E, Helmecke M, Lomaestro BM, Stellrecht K. Relationship between vancomycin MIC and failure among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia treated with vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:3315–3320.
    1. Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotshcafer JC, Moellering RC Jr, Craig WA, Billeter M, Dalovisio JR, Levine DP. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult-patients: a consensus review of the American society of Health-system Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of American and the Society of Infectious Disease Pharmacists. Am J Heath Syst Pharm. 2009;66:82–98.
    1. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, Kaplan SL, Karchmer AW, Levine DP, Murray BE, J Rybak M, Talan DA, Chambers HF. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the management of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in children and adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:1–38.
    1. Fowler VG, Boucher HW, Corey GR, Abrutyn E, Karchmer AW, Rupp ME, Levine DP, Chambers HF, Tally FP, Vigliani GA, Cabell CH, Link AS, DeMeyer I, Filler SG, Zervos M, Cook P, Parsonnet J, Bernstein JM, Price CS, Forrest GN, Fätkenheuer G, Gareca M, Rehm SJ, Brodt HR, Tice A, Cosgrove SE. Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteraemia and endocarditis caused by staphylococcus aureus. NEJM. 2006;355:653–665.
    1. Rehm SJ, Boucher H, Levine D, Campion M, Eisenstein BI, Vigliani GA, Corey GR, Abrutyn E. Daptomycin versus vancomycin plus gentamicin for the treatment of bacteraemia and endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus: subset analysis of patients infected with methicillin-resistant isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;62:1413–1421.
    1. Moore CL, Osaki-Kiyan P, Haque NZ, Perry MB, Donabedian S, Zervos MJ. Daptomycin versus vancomycin for bloodstream infections due to methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus with a high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration: a case–control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:51–58.
    1. Cheng CW, Hsu PC, Yang CC, Chang HJ, Siu LK, Wu TL, Huang CT, Lee MH. Influence of early daptomycin therapy on treatment outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations. Int J Antimcrob Agents. 2013;41:293.
    1. Murray KP, Zhao J, Davis SL. Early use of daptomycin versus vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with vancomycin MIC > 1 mg/ml: a matched cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1562–1569.
    1. Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler VG Jr, Ryan T, Bashore T, Corey GR. Proposed modifications to the duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:633–638.
    1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.
    1. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Stevens LA, Zhang YL, Hendriksen S, Kusek JW, Van Lente F. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:247–254.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. USA: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2010.
    1. Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering RC, Craig WA, Billeter M, Dalovisio JR, Levine DP. Vancomycin therapeutic guidelines: a summary of consensus recommendations from the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the American Society of Health – System Pharmacists, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:325–327.
    1. Fiqueroa DA, Mangini E, Amodio-Groton M, Vardianos B, Melchert A, Fana C, Wehbeh W, Urban CM, Segal-Maurer S. Safety of high-dose intravenous daptomycin treatment: three-year cumulative experience in a clinical program. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:177–180.
    1. Benvenuto M, Benziger DP, Yankeley S, Vigliani G. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of daptomycin at doses up to 12 milligrams per kilogram of body weight once daily in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:3245–3249.
    1. Kullar R, Davis SL, Levine DP, Zhao JJ, Crank CW, Segreti J, Sakoulas G, Cosgrove SE, Rybak MJ. High dose daptomycin for treatment of complicated gram-positive infections: A large, multicentre retrospective study. Pharmacother. 2001;31:527–536.
    1. Simon R, Wittes RE, Ellenburg RS. Randomized phase II clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep. 1985;69:1375–1381.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir