Clinical Trial Page

Summary
EudraCT Number:2004-004106-25
Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:EOP 1011E
National Competent Authority:Germany - BfArM
Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
Trial Status:Completed
Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2005-01-06
Trial results View results
A. Protocol Information
A.1Member State ConcernedGermany - BfArM
A.2EudraCT number2004-004106-25
A.3Full title of the trial
A Phase II randomised, dose-ranging, double-masked, multi-center trial, in parallel groups, to determine the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of intravitreous injections of pegaptanib sodium compared to sham injection for 30 weeks in patients with recent vision loss due to macular edema secondary to CRVO
A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
N/A
A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberEOP 1011E
A.5.1ISRCTN (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial) NumberN/A
A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan Information not present in EudraCT
A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
B. Sponsor Information
B.Sponsor: 1
B.1.1Name of Sponsor(OSI) Eyetech, Inc
B.1.3.4CountryUnited States
B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
B.4.1Name of organisation providing support
B.4.2Country
B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
B.5.1Name of organisation
B.5.2Functional name of contact point
D. IMP Identification
D.IMP: 1
D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
D.2.1.1.1Trade name Macugen
D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderPfizer Ltd
D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationEuropean Union
D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
D.3 Description of the IMP
D.3.2Product code EYE001
D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection
D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravitreal use
D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
D.3.8INN - Proposed INNPegaptanib Sodium
D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeEYE001
D.3.10 Strength
D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
D.3.10.3Concentration number0.3
D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
The IMP is a:
D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
D.IMP: 2
D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
D.3 Description of the IMP
D.3.1Product nameN/A
D.3.2Product code EYE001
D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection
D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravitreal use
D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
D.3.8INN - Proposed INNPegaptanib Sodium
D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeEYE001
D.3.10 Strength
D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
D.3.10.3Concentration number1
D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
The IMP is a:
D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
D.8 Information on Placebo
E. General Information on the Trial
E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
Exudative Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
MedDRA Classification
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
E.1.2Version 8
E.1.2Level LLT
E.1.2Classification code 10025411
E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
E.2 Objective of the trial
E.2.1Main objective of the trial
To determine the safety , efficacy and pharmacokinetics of intravitreous injections of pegaptanib sodium compared to sham injections for 30 weeks in patients with recent vision loss due to macular edema secondary to CRVO.

The primary objective is to compare visual acuity (measured by ETDRS protocol) in eyes administered pegaptanib sodium 1mg or 0.3mg vs. sham when given every 6 weeks for 5 doses. The primary endpoint is at 30 weeks after 5 treatments. The final study visit is at 52 weeks
E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
N/A
E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
E.3Principal inclusion criteria
Ophthalmic Criteria CRVO
1.CRVO must have occurred within 6 months from Baseline. The date of occurrence is defined as the date of first visual symptoms leading to a diagnosis of CVRO. The study site will collect evidence documenting the date of first visual symptoms from the referring clinic or ophthalmologist for inclusion in the patient site chart. Evidence may be an Emergency Room sheet or clinical note.

2.CRVO patients must have macular edema determined by OCT. Central retinal thickness is measured by the center point value, and must equal or exceed 250µm at Baseline and Day 0. In order to assure reasonable quality, the standard deviation for the center point value must be ≤10% of the center point value. For instance, if the center point value is 250µm, the standard deviation must be ≤ 25 µm for the value to have reliability.

3.Best corrected visual acuity in the study eye, using ETDRS protocol, must be between 65 and 20 letters inclusive on the ETDRS chart (corresponding to between approximately 20/50 to 20/400 Snellen equivalents), and better than , or equal to 35 letters (approx. 20/200) in the fellow eye.

General Criteria
1.Clear ocular media and adequate pupillary dilatation to permit good quality stereoscopic fundus photography, angiography, and APD assessment.

2.Intraocular pressure of 21mm Hg, or less. Patients with stable glaucoma or ocular
hypertension treated with no more than 2 medications may be enrolled as long as the baseline IOP is 21 mmHg or less. The medication regimen must be stable for 3 months prior to enrollment.

3.Patients without systemic hypertension or with stable, treated systemic hypertension are permitted to enter the study. The resting, sitting blood pressure (BP) must be ≤140 systolic AND ≤90 diastolic. The medication regimen for stable systemic hypertension should be unchanged for the past 30 days. RVO may also be the first sign of systemic hypertension. Patients with untreated systemic hypertension may enter the study once they have been stabilized on anti-hypertensive medication for 30 days, and their resting, sitting BP is ≤140 systolic and ≤90 diastolic.

4.Performance Status ≤2 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) / World Health Organization (WHO) scale. Limited vision should not be used as a criteria for determining performance status.

5.Normal electrocardiogram (ECG), or clinically non-significant changes.

6.Women must be using effective contraception, be post-menopausal for at least 12 months prior to study entry, or surgically sterile. All women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at baseline and negative urine pregnancy tests immediately prior to each injection and use two effective forms of contraception during the study and for at least 60 days following the last dose of pegaptanib sodium.

7.Adequate haematological function: haemoglobin ≥ 10g/dl; platelet count ≥ 130 x 109/l; WBC ≥3.8 x 109/l.

8.Adequate liver function: serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dl; SGOT/ALT, SGPT/AST, GGT and alkaline phosphatase within 2 x ULN.

9.Adequate renal function: serum creatinine ≤ 2.5 mg/dl, BUN within 2.5 x ULN.

10.Written informed consent.

11.Ability to return for all study visits.
E.4Principal exclusion criteria
Patients will not be eligible for the study if any of the following criteria are presented systemically, or in the study eye:

1.Presence of signs of old BRVO or CRVO in the study eye or any other retinal vascular disease including diabetic retinopathy.

2.Brisk APD in the study eye is excluded. APD and vision less than 20/400 are associated with ischemic CRVO, in which vision may not improve despite resolution of macular edema or capillary non-perfusion.

3.Vitreous hemorrhage except breakthrough hemorrhage from intraretinal hemorrhage.

4.The investigator should be confident that central vision is not limited by macular intaretinal hemorrhage, but us limited by macular edema.

5.Evidence of any neovascularization involving the iris, disc or retina.

6.Prior PRP or sector scatter photocoagulation. (Prophylactic scatter or PRP is not permitted. PRP is allowed on study for newly developing iris neovascularization of ≥2 clock hours, any angle neovascularization, or any retinal neovascularization that the investigator feels must be treated with panretinal or sector photocoagulation). Investigators are urged to use the CVOS protocol for criteria and methods for panretinal photocoagulation.

7.Presence of any abnormality that is likely to confound assessment of visual acuity improvement in eyes in which macular edema resolves, or improves, such as:

- Epiretinal membrane
- Signs of vitreoretinal traction confirmed by OCT, or seen clinically within 1 disc
diameter of the center of the macula.
- Presence of chorioretinal or retinal pigment epithelial atrophy involving the
center of the macula.
- Hard exudates at the center of the macula severe enough to preclude
improvement in visual acuity even withy resolution of macular edema (a large plaque or organized mound of hard exudate).

8.Patients who have received systemic, intravitreous, or subtenons’s corticosteroids for ophthalmic conditions are excluded.

9.Any prior treatment with an investigational agent or procedure to treat RVO in the study eye, i.e. hemodilution, choroidoretinal anastomosis, radial optic neurotomy, anticoagulation with heparin, streptokinase or tPA.

10.Treatment with investigational agents for any condition during the past 60 days for any other condition.

11.Significant media opacities, including cataract, which might interfere with visual acuity, assessment of toxicity or fundus photography. Patients should not be entered if there is likelihood that they will require cataract surgery within the following 1 year.

12.Any intraocular surgery with the exception of cataract surgery within 12 months of study entry. Cataract surgery is excluded within 3 months of study entry. YAG posterior capsulotomy is excluded within 3 months of study entry.

13.Previous posterior vitrectomy or scleral buckling surgery.

14.History of retinal detachment or surgery for retinal detachment.

15.Myopia of >8 diopters, or axial length > 25mm.

16.Intraocular pressure exceeding 21 mm Hg at baseline in the study eye.

17.Any of the following underlying systemic diseases including:

- History or evidence of severe cardiac disease, e.g NYHA Functional Class III or
IV, clinical or medical history of unstable angina, acute coronary syndrome,
myocardial infraction, or revasularization procedure within 6 months prior to
baseline, or ventricular tachyarrythmias requiring ongoing treatment.
- History (previous surgery or amputation), or evidence (symptoms of claudication) of clinically significant peripheral vascular disease.
- Clinically significant impaired renal function (serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dl or post renal transplant or receiving dialysis).
- Clinically significant impaired hepatic function.
- Stroke (within 12 months of study entry).
- Chronic or recurrent ocular ot periocular infection (including any history of ocular Herpes Simplex or Herpes Zoster infection).
- Acute infection of ocular or peri-ocular adnexa in past 3 months.
- Any major surgical procedure within one month of study entry.

18.Previous radiation to the head in the region of the study eye.

19.Known serious allergies to the fluorescein dye used in angiography, or to the components of pegaptanib sodium formulation.

E.5 End points
E.5.1Primary end point(s)
The primary efficacy endpoint is:

1.The proportion of treated eyes gaining ≥15 letters of visual acuity from baseline up to 30 weeks for each dose group.

Secondary vision related efficacy endpoints are:

1. Mean change in VA from baseline up to week 30 for each dose group.
2. VA data over time – a repeated measure analysis which utilizes all the VA data over time will be preformed to compare between sham and each dose group.
3. The proportion of treated eyes losing ≥ 15 letters of visual acuity from baseline up to 30 weeks for each dose group.
4. The proportion of treated eyes with vision better than or equal to 65 letters (better than approximately 20/50) at 30 weeks for each dose group.
5. The proportion of treated eyes with vision better than or equal to 35 letters (better than approximately 20/200) at 30 weeks for each dose group.

Other endpoints are:

1. Difference in change from baseline mean OCT center point value between sham and 0.3 mg at 30 weeks and between sham and 1 mg at 30 weeks.
2. OCT data over time – a repeated measure analysis which utilizes all of the OCT center point values over time will be performed to compare between sham and each dose group.
3. The proportion of eyes developing retinal or iris neovascularization post baseline before week 30 for each dose group.
4. The proportion of eyes requiring laser photocoagulation at any time post baseline before week 30 for each dose group.
5. The change in mean area of macular edema determined from fluorescein angiography at 30 weeks for each dose group.
6. The change in mean are of capillary non-perfusion determined from fluorescein angiography at 30 weeks for each dose group.
7. The change in mean center point retinal thickness as determined by grading of the colour photographs for each dose group.
8. Population pharmacokinetics will be assessed in patients participating in this trial

The most important measure of macular edema determined by OCT is the center point value. In addition, a center subfield value will also be calculated, which measures thickness in a regional area, rather than at the point of fixation. Descriptive statistics will be used to evaluate the effect of pegaptanib sodium or sham on center point and center subfield values. Safety assessments will include clinical and laboratory adverse events, and will be analyzed in terms of their incidence, severity, type and relationship to the study drug.
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
E.6Scope of the trial
E.6.1Diagnosis No
E.6.2Prophylaxis No
E.6.3Therapy No
E.6.4Safety Yes
E.6.5Efficacy Yes
E.6.6Pharmacokinetic Yes
E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
E.6.8Bioequivalence No
E.6.9Dose response No
E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
E.6.13Others No
E.7Trial type and phase
E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
E.7.1.3Other No
E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) Yes
E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) No
E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
E.8 Design of the trial
E.8.1Controlled Yes
E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
E.8.1.2Open Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.1.3Single blind Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
E.8.1.6Cross over Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.1.7Other Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.2.2Placebo Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.2.3Other Yes
E.8.2.3.1Comparator description
SHAM Injection
E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned4
E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA5
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
52 WEEKS
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years1
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months6
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years1
E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months6
F. Population of Trial Subjects
F.1 Age Range
F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
F.1.1.1In Utero No
F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
F.2 Gender
F.2.1Female Yes
F.2.2Male Yes
F.3 Group of trial subjects
F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
F.3.2Patients Yes
F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception For clinical trials recorded in the database before the 10th March 2011 this question read: "Women of childbearing potential" and did not include the words "not using contraception". An answer of yes could have included women of child bearing potential whether or not they would be using contraception. The answer should therefore be understood in that context. This trial was recorded in the database on 2005-01-06. Yes
F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
F.3.3.4Nursing women No
F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
F.3.3.7Others No
F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
F.4.1In the member state2
F.4.2 For a multinational trial
F.4.2.1In the EEA 9
F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 90
G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2005-02-18
N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2005-03-31
P. End of Trial
P.End of Trial StatusCompleted
P.Date of the global end of the trial2006-09-05
3
Subscribe