Fully integrated wearable impedance cytometry platform on flexible circuit board with online smartphone readout

Abbas Furniturewalla, Matthew Chan, Jianye Sui, Karan Ahuja, Mehdi Javanmard, Abbas Furniturewalla, Matthew Chan, Jianye Sui, Karan Ahuja, Mehdi Javanmard

Abstract

We present a wearable microfluidic impedance cytometer implemented on a flexible circuit wristband with on-line smartphone readout for portable biomarker counting and analysis. The platform contains a standard polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic channel integrated on a wristband, and the circuitry on the wristband is composed of a custom analog lock-in amplification system, a microcontroller with an 8-bit analog-to-digital converter (ADC), and a Bluetooth module wirelessly paired with a smartphone. The lock-in amplification (LIA) system is implemented with a novel architecture which consists of the lock-in amplifier followed by a high-pass filter stage with DC offset subtraction, and a post-subtraction high gain stage enabling detection of particles as small as 2.8 μm using the 8-bit ADC. The Android smartphone application was used to initiate the system and for offline data-plotting and peak counting, and supports online data readout, analysis, and file management. The data is exportable to researchers and medical professionals for in-depth analysis and remote health monitoring. The system, including the microfluidic sensor, microcontroller, and Bluetooth module all fit on the wristband with a footprint of less than 80 cm2. We demonstrate the ability of the system to obtain generalized blood cell counts; however the system can be applied to a wide variety of biomarkers by interchanging the standard microfluidic channel with microfluidic channels designed for biomarker isolation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Custom-built analog architecture for impedance cytometry with off-the shelf hardware. a System block diagram of cytometer-readout architecture. b Lateral view of microfluidic channel, where R represents channel resistance, ΔR is variable resistance from particle flow, and CD is double-layer capacitance
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Wearable cytometry system on flexible PCB with integrated microfluidic PDMS chip, microcontroller, and BLE readout to smartphone (not shown)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Top view of 30 μm microfluidic PDMS channel pore with sheep blood cells shown flowing across electrodes
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Screenshots from our custom Android application of a splash screen b live data plot and peak count with buttons to initiate sampling, save the measurement, and plot history data
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Screenshots from video and cellphone recorded during experiment, combining the optical microscopic view of the sensor and the digital data plotted on the smartphone as human RBC flows past the electrodes from a–d
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Data exported from smartphone application, measured through wearable LIA with PBS only a and 3 μm polystyrene beads b and sheep blood cells flowing through 50 μm PDMS channel c and human blood cells flowing through 30 μm channel for 30 s d. e Results from figure c data shown on smartphone application
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Selected data plotted to MATLAB from 10-minute experiment with human blood cells flowing through a 30-μm-wide channel during an experiment with a duration of 10 min a without modification b after applying a Butterworth band-pass filter using the Signal Processing Toolbox. The red dashed line represents the negative threshold voltage of −0.2 V, and the green dashed line appears for peaks which included in the final count
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Total optical microscopic count vs. digital system count from 10-minute experiment with human blood cells

References

    1. Ozcan A. Mobile phones democratize and cultivate next-generation imaging, diagnostics and measurement tools. Lab. Chip. 2014;14:3187–3194. doi: 10.1039/C4LC00010B.
    1. Shinbane JS, Saxon LA. Digital monitoring and care: virtual medicine. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2016;26:722–730. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2016.05.007.
    1. Pantelopoulos A, Bourbakis NG. A survey on wearable sensor-based systems for health monitoring and prognosis. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C. Appl. Rev. 2010;40:1–12. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2009.2032660.
    1. Market, M. A. Portable medical devices market worth $20 billion by 2018 (MarketsandMarkets, Pune, 2013)
    1. Diaz KM, et al. Fitbit?: An accurate and reliable device for wireless physical activity tracking. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015;185:138–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.038.
    1. Gao W, et al. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature. 2016;529:509–514. doi: 10.1038/nature16521.
    1. Emaminejad S, et al. Autonomous sweat extraction and analysis applied to cystic fibrosis and glucose monitoring using a fully integrated wearable platform. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:201701740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701740114.
    1. Sempionatto JR, et al. Eyeglasses based wireless electrolyte and metabolite sensor platform. Lab. Chip. 2017;17:1834–1842. doi: 10.1039/C7LC00192D.
    1. Kim DH, Ghaffari R, Lu N, Rogers JA. Flexible and stretchable electronics for biointegrated devices. Annu Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2012;14:113–128. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150018.
    1. Mitchell P. Microfluidics—downsizing large-scale biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001;19:717–721. doi: 10.1038/90754.
    1. Koh A, et al. A soft, wearable microfluidic device for the capture, storage, and colorimetric sensing of sweat. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016;8:366ra165. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2593.
    1. Mostafalu P, et al. A toolkit of thread-based microfluidics, sensors, and electronics for 3D tissue embedding for medical diagnostics. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2016;2:16039. doi: 10.1038/micronano.2016.39.
    1. Buttarello M, Plebani M. Automated blood cell counts: state of the art. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2008;130:104–116. doi: 10.1309/EK3C7CTDKNVPXVTN.
    1. Green R, Wachsmann-Hogiu S. Development, history, and future of automated cell counters. Clin. Lab. Med. 2015;35:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2014.11.003.
    1. Pitsillides CM, et al. Cell labeling approaches for fluorescence-based in vivo flow cytometry. Cytom. Part A. 2011;79:758–765. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.21125.
    1. Herzenberg LA, et al. The history and future of the Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter and flow cytometry: a view from Stanford. Clin. Chem. 2002;48:1819–1827.
    1. Cheung KC, Berardino MDi, Schade-kampmann G, Hebeisen M. Microfluidic impedance-based flow cytometry. Cytometry A. 2010;77(7):648–666. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20910.
    1. Emaminejad S, Talebi S, Davis RW, Javanmard M. Multielectrode sensing for extraction of signal from noise in impedance cytometry. IEEE Sens. J. 2015;15:2715–2716.
    1. Mok J, Mindrinos MN, Davis RW, Javanmard M. Digital microfluidic assay for protein detection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:2110–2115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323998111.
    1. Javanmard M, Davis RW. A microfluidic platform for electrical detection of DNA hybridization. Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2011;154:22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2010.03.067.
    1. Saleh OA, Sohn LL, Introduction I. Coulter counter. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2001;72:4449–4452. doi: 10.1063/1.1419224.
    1. Stanford Research Systems. About Lock-In Amplifiers, Application Note #3 (Stanford Research Systems, California, 1999)
    1. Talukder N, et al. A portable battery powered microfluidic impedance cytometer with smartphone readout: towards personal health monitoring. Biomed. Micro. 2017;19:36. doi: 10.1007/s10544-017-0161-8.
    1. Palmblad J, Nilsson CC, Höglund P, Papadaki HA. How we diagnose and treat neutropenia in adults. Expert Rev. Hematol. 2016;9:479–487. doi: 10.1586/17474086.2016.1142867.
    1. Hou HW, et al. Rapid and label-free microfluidic neutrophil purification and phenotyping in diabetes mellitus. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:29410. doi: 10.1038/srep29410.
    1. Sasso La, Aran K, Guan Y, Ündar A, Zahn JD. Continuous monitoring of inflammation biomarkers during simulated cardiopulmonary bypass using a microfluidic immunoassay device—a pilot study. Artif. Organs. 2013;37:E9–E17. doi: 10.1111/aor.12021.
    1. Gawad S, Schild L, Renaud PH. Micromachined impedance spectroscopy flow cytometer for cell analysis and particle sizing. Lab. Chip. 2001;1:76–82. doi: 10.1039/b103933b.
    1. Tan SH, Nguyen N, Chua C. Oxygen plasma treatment for reducing hydrophobicity of a sealed polydimethylsiloxane microchannel. Biomicrofluidics. 2010;4(3):1–9. doi: 10.1063/1.3466882.
    1. Chawla K, et al. A novel low-friction surface for biomedical applications: Modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) with polyethylene glycol (PEG)-DOPA-lysine. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2009;90A:742–749. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32141.
    1. Yu ZTF, Aw Yong KM, Fu J. Microfluidic blood cell sorting: Now and beyond. Small. 2014;10:1687–1703. doi: 10.1002/smll.201302907.
    1. Axis K. Peak Fitting in XPS. Casa XPS 2006: 1–29.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa