Fully integrated wearable impedance cytometry platform on flexible circuit board with online smartphone readout
Abbas Furniturewalla, Matthew Chan, Jianye Sui, Karan Ahuja, Mehdi Javanmard, Abbas Furniturewalla, Matthew Chan, Jianye Sui, Karan Ahuja, Mehdi Javanmard
Abstract
We present a wearable microfluidic impedance cytometer implemented on a flexible circuit wristband with on-line smartphone readout for portable biomarker counting and analysis. The platform contains a standard polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic channel integrated on a wristband, and the circuitry on the wristband is composed of a custom analog lock-in amplification system, a microcontroller with an 8-bit analog-to-digital converter (ADC), and a Bluetooth module wirelessly paired with a smartphone. The lock-in amplification (LIA) system is implemented with a novel architecture which consists of the lock-in amplifier followed by a high-pass filter stage with DC offset subtraction, and a post-subtraction high gain stage enabling detection of particles as small as 2.8 μm using the 8-bit ADC. The Android smartphone application was used to initiate the system and for offline data-plotting and peak counting, and supports online data readout, analysis, and file management. The data is exportable to researchers and medical professionals for in-depth analysis and remote health monitoring. The system, including the microfluidic sensor, microcontroller, and Bluetooth module all fit on the wristband with a footprint of less than 80 cm2. We demonstrate the ability of the system to obtain generalized blood cell counts; however the system can be applied to a wide variety of biomarkers by interchanging the standard microfluidic channel with microfluidic channels designed for biomarker isolation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
- Ozcan A. Mobile phones democratize and cultivate next-generation imaging, diagnostics and measurement tools. Lab. Chip. 2014;14:3187–3194. doi: 10.1039/C4LC00010B.
- Shinbane JS, Saxon LA. Digital monitoring and care: virtual medicine. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2016;26:722–730. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2016.05.007.
- Pantelopoulos A, Bourbakis NG. A survey on wearable sensor-based systems for health monitoring and prognosis. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C. Appl. Rev. 2010;40:1–12. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2009.2032660.
- Market, M. A. Portable medical devices market worth $20 billion by 2018 (MarketsandMarkets, Pune, 2013)
- Diaz KM, et al. Fitbit?: An accurate and reliable device for wireless physical activity tracking. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015;185:138–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.038.
- Gao W, et al. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature. 2016;529:509–514. doi: 10.1038/nature16521.
- Emaminejad S, et al. Autonomous sweat extraction and analysis applied to cystic fibrosis and glucose monitoring using a fully integrated wearable platform. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:201701740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701740114.
- Sempionatto JR, et al. Eyeglasses based wireless electrolyte and metabolite sensor platform. Lab. Chip. 2017;17:1834–1842. doi: 10.1039/C7LC00192D.
- Kim DH, Ghaffari R, Lu N, Rogers JA. Flexible and stretchable electronics for biointegrated devices. Annu Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2012;14:113–128. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150018.
- Mitchell P. Microfluidics—downsizing large-scale biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001;19:717–721. doi: 10.1038/90754.
- Koh A, et al. A soft, wearable microfluidic device for the capture, storage, and colorimetric sensing of sweat. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016;8:366ra165. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2593.
- Mostafalu P, et al. A toolkit of thread-based microfluidics, sensors, and electronics for 3D tissue embedding for medical diagnostics. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2016;2:16039. doi: 10.1038/micronano.2016.39.
- Buttarello M, Plebani M. Automated blood cell counts: state of the art. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2008;130:104–116. doi: 10.1309/EK3C7CTDKNVPXVTN.
- Green R, Wachsmann-Hogiu S. Development, history, and future of automated cell counters. Clin. Lab. Med. 2015;35:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2014.11.003.
- Pitsillides CM, et al. Cell labeling approaches for fluorescence-based in vivo flow cytometry. Cytom. Part A. 2011;79:758–765. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.21125.
- Herzenberg LA, et al. The history and future of the Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter and flow cytometry: a view from Stanford. Clin. Chem. 2002;48:1819–1827.
- Cheung KC, Berardino MDi, Schade-kampmann G, Hebeisen M. Microfluidic impedance-based flow cytometry. Cytometry A. 2010;77(7):648–666. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20910.
- Emaminejad S, Talebi S, Davis RW, Javanmard M. Multielectrode sensing for extraction of signal from noise in impedance cytometry. IEEE Sens. J. 2015;15:2715–2716.
- Mok J, Mindrinos MN, Davis RW, Javanmard M. Digital microfluidic assay for protein detection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:2110–2115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323998111.
- Javanmard M, Davis RW. A microfluidic platform for electrical detection of DNA hybridization. Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2011;154:22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2010.03.067.
- Saleh OA, Sohn LL, Introduction I. Coulter counter. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2001;72:4449–4452. doi: 10.1063/1.1419224.
- Stanford Research Systems. About Lock-In Amplifiers, Application Note #3 (Stanford Research Systems, California, 1999)
- Talukder N, et al. A portable battery powered microfluidic impedance cytometer with smartphone readout: towards personal health monitoring. Biomed. Micro. 2017;19:36. doi: 10.1007/s10544-017-0161-8.
- Palmblad J, Nilsson CC, Höglund P, Papadaki HA. How we diagnose and treat neutropenia in adults. Expert Rev. Hematol. 2016;9:479–487. doi: 10.1586/17474086.2016.1142867.
- Hou HW, et al. Rapid and label-free microfluidic neutrophil purification and phenotyping in diabetes mellitus. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:29410. doi: 10.1038/srep29410.
- Sasso La, Aran K, Guan Y, Ündar A, Zahn JD. Continuous monitoring of inflammation biomarkers during simulated cardiopulmonary bypass using a microfluidic immunoassay device—a pilot study. Artif. Organs. 2013;37:E9–E17. doi: 10.1111/aor.12021.
- Gawad S, Schild L, Renaud PH. Micromachined impedance spectroscopy flow cytometer for cell analysis and particle sizing. Lab. Chip. 2001;1:76–82. doi: 10.1039/b103933b.
- Tan SH, Nguyen N, Chua C. Oxygen plasma treatment for reducing hydrophobicity of a sealed polydimethylsiloxane microchannel. Biomicrofluidics. 2010;4(3):1–9. doi: 10.1063/1.3466882.
- Chawla K, et al. A novel low-friction surface for biomedical applications: Modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) with polyethylene glycol (PEG)-DOPA-lysine. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2009;90A:742–749. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32141.
- Yu ZTF, Aw Yong KM, Fu J. Microfluidic blood cell sorting: Now and beyond. Small. 2014;10:1687–1703. doi: 10.1002/smll.201302907.
- Axis K. Peak Fitting in XPS. Casa XPS 2006: 1–29.
Source: PubMed