The $5 man: the underground economic response to a large cigarette tax increase in New York City

Donna Shelley, M Jennifer Cantrell, Joyce Moon-Howard, Destiny Q Ramjohn, Nancy VanDevanter, Donna Shelley, M Jennifer Cantrell, Joyce Moon-Howard, Destiny Q Ramjohn, Nancy VanDevanter

Abstract

Objectives: We examined the mechanisms by which living in a disadvantaged minority community influences smoking and illegal cigarette sale and purchasing behaviors after a large cigarette tax increase.

Methods: Data were collected from 14 focus groups (n=104) that were conducted during the spring of 2003 among Blacks aged 18 years and older living in New York City.

Results: A large tax increase led to what focus group participants described as a pervasive illegal cigarette market in a low-income minority community. Perceived pro-smoking community norms, a stressful social and economic environment, and the availability of illegal cigarettes worked together to reinforce smoking and undermine cessation.

Conclusions: Although interest in quitting was high, bootleggers created an environment in which reduced-price cigarettes were easier to access than cessation services. This activity continues to undermine the public health goals of the tax increase.

References

    1. Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE The Economics of Smoking. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1999.
    1. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Top combined state-local cigarette tax rates. Available at: . Accessed on February 15, 2006.
    1. Frieden TR, Mostashari F, Kerker BD, Miller N, Hajat A, Frankel M. Adult tobacco use levels after intensive tobacco control measures: New York City, 2002–2003. Am J Public Health. 2005;95: 1016–1023.
    1. Guart A. Burning issues steam the apple—butt-leggers sell illicit cigs under cops’ noses. New York Post. August 18, 2002;9.
    1. Denny L. Where Corner Tobacconists sell from the sidewalk. New York Times. September 21, 2003;sect 14:5.
    1. Cigarette smoking among adults–United States, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53: 427–431.
    1. Cigarette smoking among adults–United States, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54: 1121–1124.
    1. Bang KM, Kim JH. Prevalence of cigarette smoking by occupation and industry in the United States. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40:233–239.
    1. Barbeau EM, Krieger N, Soobader MJ. Working class matters: socioeconomic disadvantage, race/ethnicity, gender, and smoking in NHIS 2000. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:269–278.
    1. Giovino GA. Epidemiology of tobacco use in the United States. Oncogene. 2002;21:7326–7340.
    1. Winkleby MA, Cubbin C. Racial/ethnic disparities in health behaviors: a challenge to current assumptions. In: Anderson NA, Bulatao RA, Cohen B, eds. Critical Perspectives on Racial and Ethnic Differences in Health in Later Life. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004:450–483.
    1. Tobacco Use Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups–African-Americans, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Ga: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1998.
    1. Graham H. Promoting health against inequality: using research to identify targets for intervention—a case study of women and smoking. Health Educ J. 1998;57:292–302.
    1. Stead M, MacAskill S, MacKintosh AM, Reece J, Eadie D. “It’s as if you’re locked in”: qualitative explanations for area effects on smoking in disadvantaged communities. Health Place. 2001;7:333–343.
    1. Wetter DW, Cofta-Gunn L, Fouladi RT, et al. Understanding the associations among education, employment characteristics, and smoking. Addict Behav. 2005; 30:905–914.
    1. Laws MB, Whitman J, Bowser DM, Krech L. Tobacco availability and point of sale marketing in demographically contrasting districts of Massachusetts. Tob Control. 2002. Jun;11 Suppl 2:ii71–3.
    1. Barbeau EM, Wolin KY, Naumova EN, Balbach E. Tobacco advertising in communities: associations with race and class. Prev Med. 2005. Jan;40(1):16–22.
    1. Diez Roux AV, Merkin SS, Hannan P, Jacobs DR, Kiefe CI. Area characteristics, individual-level socioeconomic indicators, and smoking in young adults: the coronary artery disease risk development in young adults study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:315–326.
    1. Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G. Smoking and deprivation: are there neighbourhood effects? Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:497–505.
    1. Reijneveld SA. Neighbourhood socioeconomic context and self reported health and smoking: a secondary analysis of data on seven cities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:935–942.
    1. Cockerham WC. Health lifestyle theory and the convergence of agency and structure. J Health Soc Behav. 2005;46:51–67.
    1. Wiltshire S, Bancroft A, Amos A, Parry O. “They’re doing people a service”—qualitative study of smoking, smuggling, and social deprivation. BMJ. 2001;323:203–207.
    1. First Annual Independent Evaluation of New York’s Tobacco Control Program: Final Report. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 2004.
    1. Second Annual Independent Evaluation of New York’s Tobacco Control Program, 2005. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 2005.
    1. Hyland A, Bauer JE, Li Q, et al. Higher cigarette prices influence cigarette purchase patterns. Tob Control. 2005;14:86–92.
    1. Hyland A, Higbee C, Bauer JE, Giovino GA, Cummings KM. Cigarette purchasing behaviors when prices are high. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004;10: 497–500.
    1. King G, Mallett RK, Kozlowski LT, Bendel RB. African Americans’ attitudes toward cigarette excise taxes. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:828–834.
    1. Fagan P, King G, Lawrence D, et al. Eliminating tobacco-related health disparities: directions for future research. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:211–217.
    1. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.
    1. Diez-Roux AV, Northridge ME, Morabia A, Bassett MT, Shea S. Prevalence and social correlates of cardiovascular disease risk factors in Harlem. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:302–307.
    1. Fullilove RE, Fullilove MT, Northridge ME, et al. Risk factors for excess mortality in Harlem. Findings from the Harlem Household Survey. Am J Prev Med. 1999;16(suppl 3):22–28.
    1. Northridge ME, Morabia A, Ganz ML, et al. Contribution of smoking to excess mortality in Harlem. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:250–258.
    1. Morgan DL. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1997.
    1. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications; 1985.
    1. Muhr T. Atlas.ti Short User’s Guide. Berlin, Germany: Scientific Software; 1997.
    1. Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998.
    1. Warner KE. The economics of tobacco: myths and realities. Tob Control. 2000;9:78–89.
    1. Wilson N, Thomson G, Tobias M, Blakely T. How much downside? Quantifying the relative harm from tobacco taxation. J Epidemiol Community HealthI. 2004; 58:451–454.
    1. Wilson N, Thomson G. Tobacco taxation and public health: ethical problems, policy responses. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:649–659.
    1. Remler DK. Poor smokers, poor quitters, and cigarette tax regressivity. Am J Public Health. 2004;94: 225–229.
    1. Emery S, White MM, Gilpin EA, Pierce JP. Was there significant tax evasion after the 1999 50 cent per pack cigarette tax increase in California? Tob Control. 2002;11:130–134.
    1. White VM, Gilpin EA, White MM, Pierce JP. How do smokers control their cigarette expenditures? Nicotine Tob Res. 2005;7:625–635.
    1. Curry SJ, Wagner EH, Cheadle A, et al. Assessment of community-level influences on individuals’ attitudes about cigarette smoking, alcohol use, and consumption of dietary fat. Am J Prev Med. 1993;9: 78–84.
    1. Sorensen G, Barbeau E, Hunt MK, Emmons K. Reducing social disparities in tobacco use: a social-contextual model for reducing tobacco use among blue-collar workers. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94:230–239.
    1. Hennessey Lavery S, Smith ML, Esparza AA, Hrushow A, Moore M, Reed DF. The community action model: a community-driven model designed to address disparities in health. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95:611–616.
    1. Lew R. APPEAL: fighting for social justice in tobacco control among Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders through leadership and capacity building. Pac Health Dialog. 2004;11:239–242.
    1. Pobutsky AM, Pordell P, Yamashita B, et al. Community based participatory approaches to address health disparities in Hawai’i: recent applications in cancer prevention, detection and treatment programs. Pac Health Dialog. 2004;11:183–190.
    1. Schulz AJ, Zenk S, Odoms-Young A, et al. Healthy eating and exercising to reduce diabetes: exploring the potential of social determinants of health frameworks within the context of community-based participatory diabetes prevention. Am J Public Health. 2005;95: 645–651.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa