Impact of universal testing and treatment on sexual risk behaviour and herpes simplex virus type 2: a prespecified secondary outcomes analysis of the HPTN 071 (PopART) community-randomised trial

Ethan Wilson, Deborah Donnell, Timothy Skalland, Sian Floyd, Ayana Moore, Nomtha Bell-Mandla, Justin Bwalya, Nkatya Kasese, Rory Dunbar, Kwame Shanaube, Barry Kosloff, Oliver Laeyendecker, Yaw Agyei, Graeme Hoddinott, Peter Bock, Sarah Fidler, Richard Hayes, Helen Ayles, HPTN 071 (PopART) Study Team, Ethan Wilson, Deborah Donnell, Timothy Skalland, Sian Floyd, Ayana Moore, Nomtha Bell-Mandla, Justin Bwalya, Nkatya Kasese, Rory Dunbar, Kwame Shanaube, Barry Kosloff, Oliver Laeyendecker, Yaw Agyei, Graeme Hoddinott, Peter Bock, Sarah Fidler, Richard Hayes, Helen Ayles, HPTN 071 (PopART) Study Team

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive HIV prevention strategies have raised concerns that knowledge of interventions to reduce risk of HIV infection might mitigate an individual's perception of risk, resulting in riskier sexual behaviour. We investigated the prespecified secondary outcomes of the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial to determine whether a combination HIV prevention strategy, including universal HIV testing and treatment, changed sexual behaviour; specifically, we investigated whether there was evidence of sexual risk compensation.

Methods: HPTN 071 (PopART) was a cluster-randomised trial conducted during 2013-18, in which we randomly assigned 21 communities with high HIV prevalence in Zambia and South Africa (total population, approximately 1 million) to combination prevention intervention with universal antiretroviral therapy (ART; arm A), prevention intervention with ART provided according to local guidelines (universal since 2016; arm B), or standard of care (arm C). The trial included a population cohort of approximately 2000 randomly selected adults (aged 18-44 years) in each community (N=38 474 at baseline) who were followed up for 36 months. A prespecified secondary objective was to evaluate the impact of the PopART intervention compared with standard of care on herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) and sexual behaviour (N=20 422 completed final visit). Secondary endpoints included differences in sexual risk behaviour measures at 36 months and were assessed using a two-stage method for matched cluster-randomised trials. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials. gov, number NCT01900977.

Findings: The PopART intervention did not substantially change probability of self-reported multiple sex partners, sexual debut, or pregnancy in women at 36 months. Adjusted for baseline community prevalence, reported condomless sex was significantly lower in arm A versus arm C (adjusted prevalence ratio 0·80 [95% CI 0·64-0·99]; p=0·04) but not in arm B versus arm C (0·94 [0·76-1·17]; p=0·55). 3-year HSV-2 incidence was reduced in arm B versus arm C (adjusted risk ratio 0·76 [95% CI 0·63-0·92]; p=0·010); no significant change was shown between arm A versus arm C (0·89 [0·73-1·08]; p=0·199).

Interpretation: We found little evidence of any change in sexual behaviour owing to the PopART interventions, and reassuringly for public health, we saw no evidence of sexual risk compensation. The findings do not help to explain the differences between the two intervention groups of the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial.

Funding: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Institutes of Health, the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, and the Medical Research Council UK.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests HA and DD report on behalf of the entire study team, grant funding from: the NIH, the international initiative for impact evaluation (3ie), the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (also reflected in Acknowledgments). HA reports membership in the technical review panel for the Global Fund. NB-M is a member on the HPTN Ethics Working Group. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Enrolment and follow-up of outcome-specific cohorts Arm A=combination prevention intervention with universal antiretroviral therapy. Arm B= combination prevention intervention with antiretroviral therapy provided according to local guidelines (universal since 2016). Arm C=standard of care. HSV-2=herpes simplex virus type 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Community-level mean prevalence of HSV-2 and self-reported sexual risk (A) Self-reported multiple sex partners, condomless last sex, and HSV-2-positive status among participants in arm A, arm, B, and arm C at baseline (at enrolment). (B) Self-reported multiple sex partners, condomless last sex, HSV-2 incidence, sexual debut during the HPTN 071 (PopART) study, and current pregnancy among participants in arm A, arm B, and arm C at month 36. HSV-2 incidence is cumulative over 3 years, among participants who were HSV-2 negative at baseline. HSV-2=herpes simplex virus type 2.

References

    1. UNAIDS UNAIDS DATA 2020. 2020.
    1. Hayes RJ, Donnell D, Floyd S, et al. Effect of universal testing and treatment on HIV Incidence—HPTN 071 (PopART) N Engl J Med. 2019;381:207–218.
    1. Hayes R, Ayles H, Beyers N, et al. HPTN 071 (PopART): rationale and design of a cluster-randomised trial of the population impact of an HIV combination prevention intervention including universal testing and treatment—a study protocol for a cluster randomised trial. Trials. 2014;15:57.
    1. Cassell MM, Halperin DT, Shelton JD, Stanton D. Risk compensation: the Achilles' heel of innovations in HIV prevention? BMJ. 2006;332:605–607.
    1. Eaton LA, Kalichman S. Risk compensation in HIV prevention: implications for vaccines, microbicides, and other biomedical HIV prevention technologies. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2007;4:165–172.
    1. Eaton LA, Cain DN, Agrawal A, Jooste S, Udemans N, Kalichman SC. The influence of male circumcision for HIV prevention on sexual behaviour among traditionally circumcised men in Cape Town, South Africa. Int J STD AIDS. 2011;22:674–679.
    1. Gao Y, Yuan T, Zhan Y, et al. Association between medical male circumcision and HIV risk compensation among heterosexual men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9:e932–e941.
    1. Giguère K, Béhanzin L, Guédou FA, et al. PrEP use among female sex workers: no evidence for risk compensation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82:257–264.
    1. Guest G, Shattuck D, Johnson L, et al. Changes in sexual risk behavior among participants in a PrEP HIV prevention trial. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35:1002–1008.
    1. Hoornenborg E, Coyer L, van Laarhoven A, et al. Change in sexual risk behaviour after 6 months of pre-exposure prophylaxis use: results from the Amsterdam pre-exposure prophylaxis demonstration project. AIDS. 2018;32:1527–1532.
    1. Marcus JL, Glidden DV, Mayer KH, et al. No evidence of sexual risk compensation in the iPrEx trial of daily oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis. PLoS One. 2013;8
    1. Gray GE, Metch B, Churchyard G, et al. Does participation in an HIV vaccine efficacy trial affect risk behaviour in South Africa? Vaccine. 2013;31:2089–2096.
    1. Macphail CL, Sayles JN, Cunningham W, Newman PA. Perceptions of sexual risk compensation following posttrial HIV vaccine uptake among young South Africans. Qual Health Res. 2012;22:668–678.
    1. Painter JE, DiClemente RJ, Jimenez L, Stuart T, Sales JM, Mulligan MJ. Exploring evidence for behavioral risk compensation among participants in an HIV vaccine clinical trial. Vaccine. 2017;35:3558–3563.
    1. Crepaz N, Hart TA, Marks G. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and sexual risk behavior: a meta-analytic review. JAMA. 2004;292:224–236.
    1. Kaye DK, Kakaire O, Osinde MO, Lule JC, Kakande N. The impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy on high-risk behaviour of HIV-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;7:436–447.
    1. Legemate EM, Hontelez JAC, Looman CWN, de Vlas SJ. Behavioural disinhibition in the general population during the antiretroviral therapy roll-out in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 2017;22:797–806.
    1. Eldridge S, Kerry S. John Wiley; Chichester: 2012. A practical guide to cluster randomised trials in health services research.
    1. Hayes RJ, Moulton LH. 2nd edn. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 2017. Cluster randomised trials.
    1. James C, Harfouche M, Welton NJ, et al. Herpes simplex virus: global infection prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull World Health Organ. 2020;98:315–329.
    1. Mujugira A, Magaret AS, Celum C, et al. Daily acyclovir to decrease herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) transmission from HSV-2/HIV-1 coinfected persons: a randomized controlled trial. J Infect Dis. 2013;208:1366–1374.
    1. Bradley J, Floyd S, Piwowar-Manning E, et al. Sexually transmitted bedfellows: exquisite association between HIV and herpes simplex virus type 2 in 21 communities in southern Africa in the HIV prevention trials network 071 (PopART) study. J Infect Dis. 2018;218:443–452.
    1. Omori R, Nagelkerke N, Abu-Raddad LJ. HIV and herpes simplex virus type 2 epidemiological synergy: misguided observational evidence? A modelling study. Sex Transm Infect. 2018;94:372–376.
    1. Celum C, Wald A, Hughes J, et al. Effect of aciclovir on HIV-1 acquisition in herpes simplex virus 2 seropositive women and men who have sex with men: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371:2109–2119.
    1. Watson-Jones D, Weiss HA, Rusizoka M, et al. Effect of herpes simplex suppression on incidence of HIV among women in Tanzania. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1560–1571.
    1. Schaefer R, Gregson S, Benedikt C. Widespread changes in sexual behaviour in eastern and southern Africa: challenges to achieving global HIV targets? Longitudinal analyses of nationally representative surveys. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019;22
    1. Bond V, Hoddinott G, Viljoen L, Simuyaba M, Musheke M, Seeley J. Good health and moral responsibility: key concepts underlying the interpretation of treatment as prevention in South Africa and Zambia before rolling out universal HIV testing and treatment. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016;30:425–434.
    1. Coates TJ, Kulich M, Celentano DD, et al. Effect of community-based voluntary counselling and testing on HIV incidence and social and behavioural outcomes (NIMH Project Accept; HPTN 043): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e267–e277.
    1. Tiwari R, Wang J, Han H, et al. Sexual behaviour change following HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa