Assessment of the efficacy of SERI osteotomy for hallux valgus correction

Talal Almalki, Raheef Alatassi, Ahmad Alajlan, Khalid Alghamdi, Abdullah Abdulaal, Talal Almalki, Raheef Alatassi, Ahmad Alajlan, Khalid Alghamdi, Abdullah Abdulaal

Abstract

Background: SERI (Simple, Effective, Rapid, and Inexpensive) osteotomy is an accepted minimally invasive distal first metatarsal osteotomy performed to correct hallux valgus (HV). In the absence of reports of efficacy of the SERI technique in the Middle East, we studied 1-year outcomes of SERI osteotomy performed at our hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: We reviewed the medical charts of patients aged 20 to 60 years who underwent SERI osteotomy for HV between August 2013 and September 2016 and identified 29 patients, 2 (6.9%) men and 27 (93.1%) women, who met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Patients' clinical and operative characteristics were examined, their pre- and postoperative (1-year) radiographic measurements were compared, and the occurrence of any postoperative complication/event was noted.

Result: Patients' mean age was 34.9 ± 13.6 years. Six patients (20.7%) were treated for severe HV. Mean operation time was 11.1 ± 2.3 min. Four patients (13.8%) reported postoperative pain. No revision surgery was done. Congruency of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint increased significantly, documented in only 4 patients (13.8%) preoperatively but in 17 (58.6%) at 1 year. The mean hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) were significantly decreased at 1 year. The HVA normalized in 20 patients (69.0%), the IMA normalized in 25 patients (86.2%), but the DMAA normalized in only 4 patients (13.8%). The number of patients with sesamoid subluxation decreased from 29 (100%) to 13 (44.8%).

Conclusion: Our study data indicate that SERI osteotomy reliably reduces a wide spectrum of HV deformities and it is a safe procedure with very minimal complications.

Trial registration: This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the following reference number: NCT03669900 .

Keywords: Complications; Congruency; Correction surgery; Hallux valgus; Outcomes; Radiography; SERI; Sesamoid.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We reviewed outcomes of surgery performed for hallux valgus in a series of patients under approval granted by our institutional review board in accordance with the National Committee of Bio Ethics (NCBE) guidelines. Reference number: 18–265 – 30. IRB approval number: H-01-R-069.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for publication. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Anteroposterior radiographs of a patient’s left foot obtained before surgical correction of the hallux valgus (a, left panel) and 1 year after the surgery (b, right panel)

References

    1. Hallux valgus. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. . Accessed 20 July 2018.
    1. Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B. Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:21.
    1. Roddy E, Zhang W, Doherty M. Prevalence and associations of hallux valgus in a primary care population. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(6):857–862.
    1. Robinson AH, Limbers JP. Modern concepts in the treatment of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(8):1038–1045.
    1. Giannini S, Cavallo M, Faldini C, Luciani D, Vannini F. The SERI distal metatarsal osteotomy and scarf osteotomy provide similar correction of hallux valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(7):2305–2311.
    1. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Marinozzi A, Denaro V. Hallux valgus: effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgery. A systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2010;97(1):149–167.
    1. Giannini S, Ceccarelli F, Bevoni R, Vannini F. Hallux valgus surgery: the minimally invasive bunion correction (SERI) Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;2(1):11–20.
    1. Bosch P, Wanke S, Legenstein R. Hallux valgus correction by the method of Bosch: a new technique with a seven-to-ten-year follow-up. Foot Ankle Clin. 2000;5(3):485–498.
    1. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Oliva F, Denaro V, Coppola C. Bosch osteotomy and scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction. Orthop Clin N Am. 2009;40(4):515–524.
    1. Maffulli N, Oliva F, Coppola C, Miller D. Minimally invasive hallux valgus correction: a technical note and a feasibility study. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2005;14(4):193–198.
    1. Oliva F, Longo UG, Maffulli N. Minimally invasive hallux valgus correction. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:525–30.
    1. Wu GB, Yang YF, Yu GR, Li B. Comment on Giannini et al.: a minimally invasive technique for surgical treatment of hallux valgus: simple, effective, rapid, inexpensive (SERI) Int Orthop. 2014;38(3):671–672.
    1. Giannini S, Vannini F, Faldini C, Bevoni R, Nanni M, Leonetti D. The minimally invasive hallux valgus correction (SERI) Interact Surg. 2007;2(1):17–23.
    1. Giannini S, Faldini C, Nanni M, Di Martino A, Luciani D, Vannini F. A minimally invasive technique for surgical treatment of hallux valgus: simple, effective, rapid, inexpensive (SERI) Int Orthop. 2013;37(9):1805–1813.
    1. Wagner E, Ortiz C, Torres K, Contesse I, Vela O, Zanolli D. Cost effectiveness of different techniques in hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;22(4):259–264.
    1. Trnka HJ, Krenn S, Schuh R. Minimally invasive hallux surgery: a critical review of the evidence. Int Orthop. 2013;37(9):1731–1735.
    1. Lin YC, Cheng YM, Chang JK, Chen CH, Huang PJ. Minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy for mild-to-moderate hallux valgus deformity. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2009;25(8):431–437.
    1. Moscadini S, Moscadini G. Hallux valgus correction in young patients with minimally invasive technique. In: Waddell J, editor. The role of osteotomy in the correction of congenital and acquired disorders of the skeleton. Croatia: InTech; 2012. pp. 235–260.
    1. Thordarson D, Ebramzadeh E, Moorthy M, Lee J, Rudicel S. Correlation of hallux valgus surgical outcome with AOFAS forefoot score and radiological parameters. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(2):122–127.
    1. Baumhauer JF, Nawoczenski DA, DiGiovanni BF, Wilding GE. Reliability and validity of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgery clinical rating scale: a pilot study for the hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(12):1014–1019.
    1. Nery C, Coughlin MJ, Baumfeld D, Ballerini FJ, Kobata S. Hallux valgus in males – part 2: radiographic assessment of surgical treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(5):636–644.
    1. Catanese D, Popowitz D, Gladstein AZ. Measuring sesamoid position in hallux valgus. When is the sesamoid axial view necessary? Foot Ankle Spec. 2014;7(8):457–459.
    1. Shima H, Okuda R, Yasuda T, Jotoku T, Kitano N, Kinoshita M. Radiographic measurements in patients with hallux valgus before and after proximal crescentic osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(6):1369–1376.
    1. Coughlin MJ, Freund E. The reliability of angular measurements in hallux valgus deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22(5):369–379.
    1. Easley ME, Trnka HJ. Current concepts review: hallux valgus part 1: pathomechanics, clinical assessment, and nonoperative management. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(5):654–659.
    1. Magnan B, Pezzè L, Rossi N, Bartolozzi P. Percutaneous distal metatarsal osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(6):1191–1199.
    1. Mathavan G, Gaskell L, Pillai A, Thinesh VS, Pravin DC. Minimal invasive hallux valgus surgery: myth or magic. A systematic review. Orthop Rheumatol Open Access J. 2015;1:1–8.
    1. Magnan B, Bondi M, Mezzari S, Bonetti I, Samaila E. Minimally invasive surgery of the forefoot: current concept review. Int J Clin Med. 2013;4(6):11–19.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa