Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Point-of-Care Bedside Lung Ultrasound Examination Advanced Trial Protocol (PoCBLUEPlus)

25 mars 2015 mis à jour par: Hong Liu, Nanjing Medical University

A Prospective, Multi-center, Open-label and Double-blind, Standard-controlled, Non-inferiority, Diagnostic Study of Lung Ultrasound for Management of Mechanical Ventilation in Neonatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the availability and diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care bedside lung ultrasound examination in management of mechanical ventilation in neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a critical condition requiring dynamic evaluation and interventions. Point-of-care bedside lung ultrasound examination (PoC-BLUE) is a noninvasive, readily available imaging modality that can complement physical and clinical evaluation.

At any time, most neonates and infants with ARDS in medical intensive care units (ICUs) require mechanical ventilation, making it one of the most frequently used critical care technologies. However, difficulties with regard to the accurate diagnosis of ARDS before administration of mechanical ventilation, dynamic monitoring of treatment effects during administration of mechanical ventilation, and decision-making of timing in weaning from mechanical ventilation, are often encountered in the majority neonates and infants who require mechanical ventilation.

Hence, techniques that expedite and advance the knowledge of the administration of mechanical ventilation should have an important clinical significance in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of ARDS.

Preliminary researches have suggested that BLUE has a high diagnostic accuracy in patients with acute respiratory failure, and has the potential to quantify the rate and degree of diaphragm thinning during mechanical ventilation, which may be useful to predict extubation success or failure during either spontaneous breathing (SB) or pressure support (PS) trials.

Unfortunately, few studies focus on the availability of PoC-BLUE in management of mechanical ventilation in neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome. Also, they call into question the possible association of the demographic and clinical confounders with the diagnostic accuracy of PoC-BLUE for diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis of ARDS in the whole process of mechanical ventilation.

Given that a considerable need for a timely and dynamic diagnosis of severe condition and therapy evaluation during mechanical ventilation has been triggered to integrate the currently available bulk of knowledge and information, the objective of this study is to investigate the availability and diagnostic accuracy of PoC-BLUE Plus protocol in management of mechanical ventilation in ARDS.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

1000

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

1 jour à 1 mois (Enfant)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All infants who present to the ICU with respiratory symptoms suspicious for ARDS, according to Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Consensus Recommendations From the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference, which is proposed by The Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group.
  • In whom the treating Collaborative Review Groups of Poc-BLUE-Plus protocol believe would benefit from diagnostic imaging.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants who arrive at the ICU with a previously performed chest radiography
  • Unstable infants with life-threatening injuries who require ongoing resuscitation

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Diagnostique
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Lung Ultrasound
In infants allocated to this arm Lung ultrasound for detection of ARDS will be performed before chest radiography.
Lung ultrasound evaluation is performed after clinical assessment and before chest radiography
Autres noms:
  • Bedside Ultrasonography System
Comparateur actif: Chest Radiography
In infants allocated to this arm chest radiography will be performed for the detection of indirect signs of ARDS without ultrasound evaluation.
Chest Radiography is performed after clinical evaluation without using ultrasound assessment.
Autres noms:
  • Chest X-ray System

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound in Neonatal ARDS
Délai: Accuracy will be measured at the end of clinical evaluation in the ICU, an expected average of 4 days
Accuracy of lung ultrasound and chest radiography will be measured using as gold standard the independent evaluation of the entire medical records by two expert emergency physicians blinded to the lung ultrasound results and radiographic reports (digitalized chest radiography images will be available).
Accuracy will be measured at the end of clinical evaluation in the ICU, an expected average of 4 days

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound in the Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Délai: Accuracy will be measured at the end of clinical evaluation in the ICU, an expected average of 4 days
Accuracy of lung ultrasound and chest radiography will be measured using as gold standard the independent evaluation of the entire medical records by two expert emergency physicians blinded to the lung ultrasound results and radiographic reports (digitalized chest radiography images will be available).
Accuracy will be measured at the end of clinical evaluation in the ICU, an expected average of 4 days
Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound in the Weaning of Ventilatory Support
Délai: Accuracy will be measured at the end of clinical evaluation in the ICU, an expected average of 4 days
Accuracy of lung ultrasound and chest radiography will be measured using as gold standard the independent evaluation of the entire medical records by two expert emergency physicians blinded to the lung ultrasound results and radiographic reports (digitalized chest radiography images will be available).
Accuracy will be measured at the end of clinical evaluation in the ICU, an expected average of 4 days

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 mars 2014

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 mars 2015

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 mars 2015

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

22 mars 2015

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

25 mars 2015

Première publication (Estimation)

31 mars 2015

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

31 mars 2015

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

25 mars 2015

Dernière vérification

1 mars 2015

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner