Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Point-of-Care Bedside Lung Ultrasound Examination Advanced Trial Protocol (PoCBLUEPlus)

25 de marzo de 2015 actualizado por: Hong Liu, Nanjing Medical University

A Prospective, Multi-center, Open-label and Double-blind, Standard-controlled, Non-inferiority, Diagnostic Study of Lung Ultrasound for Management of Mechanical Ventilation in Neonatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the availability and diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care bedside lung ultrasound examination in management of mechanical ventilation in neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a critical condition requiring dynamic evaluation and interventions. Point-of-care bedside lung ultrasound examination (PoC-BLUE) is a noninvasive, readily available imaging modality that can complement physical and clinical evaluation.

At any time, most neonates and infants with ARDS in medical intensive care units (ICUs) require mechanical ventilation, making it one of the most frequently used critical care technologies. However, difficulties with regard to the accurate diagnosis of ARDS before administration of mechanical ventilation, dynamic monitoring of treatment effects during administration of mechanical ventilation, and decision-making of timing in weaning from mechanical ventilation, are often encountered in the majority neonates and infants who require mechanical ventilation.

Hence, techniques that expedite and advance the knowledge of the administration of mechanical ventilation should have an important clinical significance in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of ARDS.

Preliminary researches have suggested that BLUE has a high diagnostic accuracy in patients with acute respiratory failure, and has the potential to quantify the rate and degree of diaphragm thinning during mechanical ventilation, which may be useful to predict extubation success or failure during either spontaneous breathing (SB) or pressure support (PS) trials.

Unfortunately, few studies focus on the availability of PoC-BLUE in management of mechanical ventilation in neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome. Also, they call into question the possible association of the demographic and clinical confounders with the diagnostic accuracy of PoC-BLUE for diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis of ARDS in the whole process of mechanical ventilation.

Given that a considerable need for a timely and dynamic diagnosis of severe condition and therapy evaluation during mechanical ventilation has been triggered to integrate the currently available bulk of knowledge and information, the objective of this study is to investigate the availability and diagnostic accuracy of PoC-BLUE Plus protocol in management of mechanical ventilation in ARDS.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

1000

Fase

  • No aplica

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

1 día a 1 mes (Niño)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All infants who present to the ICU with respiratory symptoms suspicious for ARDS, according to Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Consensus Recommendations From the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference, which is proposed by The Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group.
  • In whom the treating Collaborative Review Groups of Poc-BLUE-Plus protocol believe would benefit from diagnostic imaging.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants who arrive at the ICU with a previously performed chest radiography
  • Unstable infants with life-threatening injuries who require ongoing resuscitation

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Diagnóstico
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Lung Ultrasound
In infants allocated to this arm Lung ultrasound for detection of ARDS will be performed before chest radiography.
Lung ultrasound evaluation is performed after clinical assessment and before chest radiography
Otros nombres:
  • Bedside Ultrasonography System
Comparador activo: Chest Radiography
In infants allocated to this arm chest radiography will be performed for the detection of indirect signs of ARDS without ultrasound evaluation.
Chest Radiography is performed after clinical evaluation without using ultrasound assessment.
Otros nombres:
  • Chest X-ray System

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound in Neonatal ARDS
Periodo de tiempo: Accuracy will be measured at the end of clinical evaluation in the ICU, an expected average of 4 days
Accuracy of lung ultrasound and chest radiography will be measured using as gold standard the independent evaluation of the entire medical records by two expert emergency physicians blinded to the lung ultrasound results and radiographic reports (digitalized chest radiography images will be available).
Accuracy will be measured at the end of clinical evaluation in the ICU, an expected average of 4 days

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound in the Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Periodo de tiempo: Accuracy will be measured at the end of clinical evaluation in the ICU, an expected average of 4 days
Accuracy of lung ultrasound and chest radiography will be measured using as gold standard the independent evaluation of the entire medical records by two expert emergency physicians blinded to the lung ultrasound results and radiographic reports (digitalized chest radiography images will be available).
Accuracy will be measured at the end of clinical evaluation in the ICU, an expected average of 4 days
Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound in the Weaning of Ventilatory Support
Periodo de tiempo: Accuracy will be measured at the end of clinical evaluation in the ICU, an expected average of 4 days
Accuracy of lung ultrasound and chest radiography will be measured using as gold standard the independent evaluation of the entire medical records by two expert emergency physicians blinded to the lung ultrasound results and radiographic reports (digitalized chest radiography images will be available).
Accuracy will be measured at the end of clinical evaluation in the ICU, an expected average of 4 days

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de marzo de 2014

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2015

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2015

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

22 de marzo de 2015

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

25 de marzo de 2015

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

31 de marzo de 2015

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

31 de marzo de 2015

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

25 de marzo de 2015

Última verificación

1 de marzo de 2015

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir