Effect of Head Position on MACEI of Sevoflurane in Children With Obstructive Airway (MACEI)
10 mai 2018 mis à jour par: Jingjie Li, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Effect of Head Position on Minimum Alveolar Concentration of Endotracheal Intubation（MACEI）of Sevoflurane in Children With Obstructive Airway
Children scheduled for tonsillectomy surgery were recruited into the study.
General anesthesia was induced with 8% sevoflurane inhaled with 8 l.min-1 of oxygen via mask, followed by adjustment of inspired sevoflurane to the target concentration based on the result in previous patient at which laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were attempted and maintained for 12 min.
All responses to tracheal intubation were assessed.
At the end of the procedure, sevoflurane was titrated to the target concentration, which was kept constant for 12 min before a standard stimulus was applied to determine whether the children was awake.
The Dixon's 'up and down'method was used to determine progression of subsequent concentrations.The aim of this study was to determine whether the minimum alveolar concentration of endotracheal intubation（MACEI）of sevoflurane in children with obstructive airway are different from that observed in normal children.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Inconnue
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
38 patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II aged 2-8 years undergoing tonsillectomy surgery were randomized to either the patient's head in the neutral position or 30 degree rotated lateral position.
All patients were preoxygenated using 100% oxygen with a normal tidal volumen for 3 min.
The circuit was primed with sevoflurane 8% at a fresh gas flow of 8 Litre/min （L/min） for 1 min.
Anaesthesia was induced with inhaled sevoflurane up to 5% in oxygen via facemask with fresh gas flow at 6 L/min.After loss of consciousness, the inspired concentration of sevoflurane was maintained 10-12min a predetermined end-tidal concentration.
A single experienced anaesthetist in the use of endotracheal devices inserted the devices according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Neuromuscular blocking agents and other intravenous anesthetics were not given.
One nurse, who was blinded to the anaesthetic concentration, classified responses by the patient to tracheal intubation as either "movement" or "not movement".
Assesment was made for jaw relaxation and graded with intubation score.
The sum of intubation scores >4 was defined as a failure of insertion.
The end-tidal (ET) sevoflurane concentration used for each patient was determined using the Dixon's up-and-down method.
The ratio of the end-tidal to predetermined end-tidal concentrations was maintained at 0.95-1.0
for at least 10 minutes to establish equilibration before device insertion was attempted.
The first patient received a 5.0% sevoflurane concentration and the step size of increase/decrease was 0.5%.
If the endotracheal device insertion was successful, sevoflurane concentration for the next patient was decrease by 0.5%.
If not, sevoflurane concentration was increased by the same amount for the next patient.
For their comfort, patients experiencing movement received a 2 mg/kg bolus dose of propofol,fentanyl 2.0ug/kg and rocuronium 0.6mg/kg.If the endotracheal device insertion was successful,fentanyl 2.0ug/kg and rocuronium 0.6mg/kg was also administered.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Anticipé)
38
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Shanghai
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, Chine
- Shanghai9 Hospital
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
2 ans à 8 ans (Enfant)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- class I or II
- children aged 2-8 years
- children with obstruction airway under general anesthesia undergoing tonsillectomy surgery
- signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a history of adverse reactions to sevoflurane
- Patients with a potentially difficult airway (Mallampati III or IV, a limited mouth opening and/or cervical spine disease)
- Patients with reactive airway disease
- Signs of upper respiratory infection
- Violate experimental scheme
- refused to participate
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Autre
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Double
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: 30 degree rotated lateral position
19 patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II aged 2-8 years undergoing tonsillectomy surgery were randomized to the head in 30 degree rotated lateral position.
The end-tidal (ET) sevoflurane concentration used for each patient was determined using the Dixon's up-and-down method.
The ratio of the end-tidal to predetermined end-tidal concentrations was maintained at 0.95-1.0
for at least 10 minutes to establish equilibration before device insertion was attempted.
The first patient received a 5.0% sevoflurane concentration and the step size of increase/decrease was 0.5%.
|
38 patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II aged 2-8 years undergoing tonsillectomy surgery were randomized to either the patient's head in the neutral position or 30 degree rotated lateral position.
The end-tidal (ET) sevoflurane concentration used for each patient was determined using the Dixon's up-and-down method.
The ratio of the end-tidal to predetermined end-tidal concentrations was maintained at 0.95-1.0
for at least 10 minutes to establish equilibration before device insertion was attempted.
The first patient received a 5.0% sevoflurane concentration and the step size of increase/decrease was 0.5%.
Autres noms:
|
|
Comparateur actif: neutral position
19 patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II aged 2-8 years undergoing tonsillectomy surgery were randomized to the head in the neutral position.The end-tidal (ET) sevoflurane concentration used for each patient was determined using the Dixon's up-and-down method.
The ratio of the end-tidal to predetermined end-tidal concentrations was maintained at 0.95-1.0
for at least 10 minutes to establish equilibration before device insertion was attempted.
The first patient received a 5.0% sevoflurane concentration and the step size of increase/decrease was 0.5%.
|
38 patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II aged 2-8 years undergoing tonsillectomy surgery were randomized to either the patient's head in the neutral position or 30 degree rotated lateral position.
The end-tidal (ET) sevoflurane concentration used for each patient was determined using the Dixon's up-and-down method.
The ratio of the end-tidal to predetermined end-tidal concentrations was maintained at 0.95-1.0
for at least 10 minutes to establish equilibration before device insertion was attempted.
The first patient received a 5.0% sevoflurane concentration and the step size of increase/decrease was 0.5%.
Autres noms:
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of endotracheal intubation
Délai: The sevoflurane concentration is obtained when tracheal intubated immediately.
|
To compare the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of endotracheal intubation required for different head position in children with obstructive airway.
|
The sevoflurane concentration is obtained when tracheal intubated immediately.
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
intubation score
Délai: The intubation score is obtained when tracheal intubation was inserted immediately.
|
One nurse, who was blinded to the anaesthetic concentration, classified responses by the patient to tracheal intubation as either "movement" or "not movement".
Assesment was made for jaw relaxation and graded with intubation score.
The sum of intubation scores >4 was defined as a failure of insertion.
|
The intubation score is obtained when tracheal intubation was inserted immediately.
|
|
blood pressure include systolic and diastolic in mmHg
Délai: Baseline and every 1 minutes until 10 minutes after insertion of the endotracheal intubation.
|
To compare the evolution of blood pressure include systolic and diastolic during different head position group.
|
Baseline and every 1 minutes until 10 minutes after insertion of the endotracheal intubation.
|
|
heart rate in bpm
Délai: Baseline and every 1 minutes until 10 minutes after insertion of the endotracheal intubation.
|
To compare the evolution of heart rate during different head position group.
|
Baseline and every 1 minutes until 10 minutes after insertion of the endotracheal intubation.
|
|
bispectral index（BIS）, number from 100 (awake) to 40-60(anesthetic status)
Délai: Baseline and every 1 minutes until 10 minutes after insertion of the endotracheal intubation.
|
To compare the evolution of of bispectral index values during different head position group.
|
Baseline and every 1 minutes until 10 minutes after insertion of the endotracheal intubation.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Les enquêteurs
- Chaise d'étude: Li Jing Jie, M.D., Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Publications et liens utiles
La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.
Publications générales
- Thwaites A, Edmends S, Smith I. Inhalation induction with sevoflurane: a double-blind comparison with propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Apr;78(4):356-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.4.356.
- Tanaka S, Tsuchida H, Nakabayashi K, Seki S, Namiki A. The effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and enflurane on hemodynamic responses during an inhaled induction of anesthesia via a mask in humans. Anesth Analg. 1996 Apr;82(4):821-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199604000-00025.
- Yasuda N, Lockhart SH, Eger EI 2nd, Weiskopf RB, Liu J, Laster M, Taheri S, Peterson NA. Comparison of kinetics of sevoflurane and isoflurane in humans. Anesth Analg. 1991 Mar;72(3):316-24. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199103000-00007.
- Wajima Z, Inoue T, Yoshikawa T, Imanaga K, Ogawa R. Changes in hemodynamic variables and catecholamine levels after rapid increase in sevoflurane or isoflurane concentration with or without nitrous oxide under endotracheal intubation. J Anesth. 2000;14(4):175-9. doi: 10.1007/s005400070001.
- Goff MJ, Arain SR, Ficke DJ, Uhrich TD, Ebert TJ. Absence of bronchodilation during desflurane anesthesia: a comparison to sevoflurane and thiopental. Anesthesiology. 2000 Aug;93(2):404-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200008000-00018.
- Helbo-Hansen S, Ravlo O, Trap-Andersen S. The influence of alfentanil on the intubating conditions after priming with vecuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1988 Jan;32(1):41-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1988.tb02685.x.
- Makkar JK, Ghai B, Bhardwaj N, Wig J. Minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane with fentanyl for laryngeal mask airway removal in anesthetized children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Apr;22(4):335-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03712.x. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
1 janvier 2018
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
1 janvier 2018
Achèvement de l'étude (Anticipé)
31 octobre 2018
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
30 avril 2018
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
10 mai 2018
Première publication (Réel)
11 mai 2018
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
11 mai 2018
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
10 mai 2018
Dernière vérification
1 mai 2018
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 2018-15-T15
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
INDÉCIS
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .