Study to Test the Efficacy of Periarticular Levo Bupivicaine Injection Following Primary Hip Arthroplasty
16 aprile 2010 aggiornato da: Orthopaedic Research and Innovation Foundation, Ireland
A Double Blind Randomized Control Trial on the Efficacy of Periarticular Levo Bupivicaine Injection Following Primary Hip Arthroplasty
The hypothesis of this study is that isolated use of local periarticular levobupivicaine injection during primary hip arthroplasty would improve post-operative pain control.
Patients were randomised in the operating room to receive either a periarticular infiltration, or a placebo consisting of Saline.
Morphine and analgesic consumption was recorded for each patient, while the modified McGill pain scale was used to determine the adequacy of analgesia and the benefit of the peri-articular infiltration.
91 patients were recruited, with 45 patients in the treatment group and 46 controls.
The results were assessed after one year, once all the information from both treatment groups was collected.
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Completato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
The efficacy of periarticular injections during total knee arthroplasty is well established but there is little published data on their effect in primary hip arthroplasty.
We hypothesized that isolated use of local periarticular levobupivicaine injection during primary hip arthroplasty would improve post-operative pain control.
A double blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial on patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty was performed.
Patients were randomised in theatre to receive either a periarticular infiltration of 150mg levobupivicaine in 60mls of 0.9% Saline, or a placebo consisting of 60mls 0.9% Saline.
Morphine and analgesic consumption was recorded for each patient, while the modified McGill pain scale was used to determine the adequacy of analgesia and the benefit of the peri-articular infiltration.
91 patients were recruited, with 45 patients in the treatment group and 46 controls.
The results were assessed after one year, once all the information from both treatment groups was collected.
Tipo di studio
Interventistico
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
91
Fase
- Fase 4
Contatti e Sedi
Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Finglas
-
Dublin, Finglas, Irlanda, Dublin 11
- Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital
-
-
Santry
-
Dublin, Santry, Irlanda, Dublin 9
- Orthopaedic Research and Innovation Foundation
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)
Accetta volontari sani
No
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Tutto
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Consecutive patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis only were included in this study after giving informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with cognitive impairment, neurological disorders, advanced liver or renal impairment, known ischemic heart disease, a previous diagnosis of a pain syndrome or any post-operative surgical or medical complications were excluded.
Piano di studio
Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Trattamento
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Doppio
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparatore attivo: Levobupivacaine
Levobupivacaine is indicated for local anaesthesia including infiltration, nerve block, ophthalmic, epidural and intrathecal anaesthesia in adults; and infiltration analgesia in children
|
The treatment group received 150mg of levobupivicaine in 60mls of 0.9% saline.
This was injected intra-operatively through the medial and anterior capsular spaces in the region of the obturator and femoral nerves and also around the short rotators and gluteus maximus in the region of the inferior and superior gluteal nerves.
The timing of this was after insertion of the acetabular component.
10mls was then infiltrated around the tensor fascia lata and subcutaneously prior to closing the wound.
|
|
Comparatore placebo: Saline
Saline (also saline solution) is a general term referring to a sterile solution of sodium chloride (NaCl, more commonly known as salt) in water but is only sterile when it is placed intravenously, otherwise, a saline solution is a salt water solution.
|
The placebo group received 60mls of 0.9% saline injected intra-operatively through the medial and anterior capsular spaces in the region of the obturator and femoral nerves and also around the short rotators and gluteus maximus in the region of the inferior and superior gluteal nerves.
The timing of this was after insertion of the acetabular component.
10mls was then infiltrated around the tensor fascia lata and subcutaneously prior to closing the wound.
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
To determine a significant difference (p>0.05) in morphine consumption between the two treatment groups post-operatively.
Lasso di tempo: 1 year
|
The modified McGill pain scale was administered to determine the adequacy of analgesia and the benefit of the peri-articular infiltration.
In addition, morphine and analgesic consumption was recorded for each patient.
The results were assessed after one year, once all the information from both treatment groups was collected.
|
1 year
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|
|
To analyse the length of stay for between both treatment groups
Lasso di tempo: Average 6 days (based on precise day of discharge)
|
Average 6 days (based on precise day of discharge)
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Kevin J Mulhall, Orthopaedic Research and Innovation Foundation, Ireland
Pubblicazioni e link utili
La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.
Pubblicazioni generali
- Andersen KV, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Haraldsted V, Soballe K. Reduced hospital stay and narcotic consumption, and improved mobilization with local and intraarticular infiltration after hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial of an intraarticular technique versus epidural infusion in 80 patients. Acta Orthop. 2007 Apr;78(2):180-6. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013654.
- Parvataneni HK, Shah VP, Howard H, Cole N, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Controlling pain after total hip and knee arthroplasty using a multimodal protocol with local periarticular injections: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6 Suppl 2):33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.034. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
- Toftdahl K, Nikolajsen L, Haraldsted V, Madsen F, Tonnesen EK, Soballe K. Comparison of peri- and intraarticular analgesia with femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Orthop. 2007 Apr;78(2):172-9. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013645.
- Maheshwari AV, Blum YC, Shekhar L, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Multimodal pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty at the Ranawat Orthopaedic Center. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1418-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0728-7. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
- Busch CA, Shore BJ, Bhandari R, Ganapathy S, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, McCalden RW. Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 May;88(5):959-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00344.
- Essving P, Axelsson K, Kjellberg J, Wallgren O, Gupta A, Lundin A. Reduced hospital stay, morphine consumption, and pain intensity with local infiltration analgesia after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2009 Apr;80(2):213-9. doi: 10.3109/17453670902930008.
- Fu P, Wu Y, Wu H, Li X, Qian Q, Zhu Y. Efficacy of intra-articular cocktail analgesic injection in total knee arthroplasty - a randomized controlled trial. Knee. 2009 Aug;16(4):280-4. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.12.012. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
- Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Mallory TH, Dodds KL, Adams JB. Soft tissue and intra-articular injection of bupivacaine, epinephrine, and morphine has a beneficial effect after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):125-30. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000147701.24029.cc.
- Nechleba J, Rogers V, Cortina G, Cooney T. Continuous intra-articular infusion of bupivacaine for postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2005 Jul;18(3):197-202. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248181.
- Andersen LJ, Poulsen T, Krogh B, Nielsen T. Postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled study on peroperative and postoperative ropivacaine, ketorolac, and adrenaline wound infiltration. Acta Orthop. 2007 Apr;78(2):187-92. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013663.
- Chen DW, Hsieh PH, Huang KC, Hu CC, Chang YH, Lee MS. Continuous intra-articular infusion of bupivacaine for post-operative pain relief after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Eur J Pain. 2010 May;14(5):529-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.08.008. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
- Fischer HB, Simanski CJ. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for analgesia after total hip replacement. Anaesthesia. 2005 Dec;60(12):1189-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04382.x.
- Foster RH, Markham A. Levobupivacaine: a review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic. Drugs. 2000 Mar;59(3):551-79. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059030-00013.
- Gristwood RW, Greaves JL. Levobupivacaine: a new safer long acting local anaesthetic agent. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 1999 Jun;8(6):861-76. doi: 10.1517/13543784.8.6.861.
- Gwilym SE, Pollard TC, Carr AJ. Understanding pain in osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Mar;90(3):280-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B3.20167.
- Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, Silver W. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2002 Jul;20(4):287-90. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.33778.
Studiare le date dei record
Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio
1 settembre 2008
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
1 settembre 2009
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
1 settembre 2009
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
12 aprile 2010
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
16 aprile 2010
Primo Inserito (Stima)
19 aprile 2010
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Stima)
19 aprile 2010
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
16 aprile 2010
Ultimo verificato
1 luglio 2008
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- KM-042008-014
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .