- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT01106001
Study to Test the Efficacy of Periarticular Levo Bupivicaine Injection Following Primary Hip Arthroplasty
16 de abril de 2010 atualizado por: Orthopaedic Research and Innovation Foundation, Ireland
A Double Blind Randomized Control Trial on the Efficacy of Periarticular Levo Bupivicaine Injection Following Primary Hip Arthroplasty
The hypothesis of this study is that isolated use of local periarticular levobupivicaine injection during primary hip arthroplasty would improve post-operative pain control.
Patients were randomised in the operating room to receive either a periarticular infiltration, or a placebo consisting of Saline.
Morphine and analgesic consumption was recorded for each patient, while the modified McGill pain scale was used to determine the adequacy of analgesia and the benefit of the peri-articular infiltration.
91 patients were recruited, with 45 patients in the treatment group and 46 controls.
The results were assessed after one year, once all the information from both treatment groups was collected.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
The efficacy of periarticular injections during total knee arthroplasty is well established but there is little published data on their effect in primary hip arthroplasty.
We hypothesized that isolated use of local periarticular levobupivicaine injection during primary hip arthroplasty would improve post-operative pain control.
A double blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial on patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty was performed.
Patients were randomised in theatre to receive either a periarticular infiltration of 150mg levobupivicaine in 60mls of 0.9% Saline, or a placebo consisting of 60mls 0.9% Saline.
Morphine and analgesic consumption was recorded for each patient, while the modified McGill pain scale was used to determine the adequacy of analgesia and the benefit of the peri-articular infiltration.
91 patients were recruited, with 45 patients in the treatment group and 46 controls.
The results were assessed after one year, once all the information from both treatment groups was collected.
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
91
Estágio
- Fase 4
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
Finglas
-
Dublin, Finglas, Irlanda, Dublin 11
- Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital
-
-
Santry
-
Dublin, Santry, Irlanda, Dublin 9
- Orthopaedic Research and Innovation Foundation
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Consecutive patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis only were included in this study after giving informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with cognitive impairment, neurological disorders, advanced liver or renal impairment, known ischemic heart disease, a previous diagnosis of a pain syndrome or any post-operative surgical or medical complications were excluded.
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Dobro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
---|---|
Comparador Ativo: Levobupivacaine
Levobupivacaine is indicated for local anaesthesia including infiltration, nerve block, ophthalmic, epidural and intrathecal anaesthesia in adults; and infiltration analgesia in children
|
The treatment group received 150mg of levobupivicaine in 60mls of 0.9% saline.
This was injected intra-operatively through the medial and anterior capsular spaces in the region of the obturator and femoral nerves and also around the short rotators and gluteus maximus in the region of the inferior and superior gluteal nerves.
The timing of this was after insertion of the acetabular component.
10mls was then infiltrated around the tensor fascia lata and subcutaneously prior to closing the wound.
|
Comparador de Placebo: Saline
Saline (also saline solution) is a general term referring to a sterile solution of sodium chloride (NaCl, more commonly known as salt) in water but is only sterile when it is placed intravenously, otherwise, a saline solution is a salt water solution.
|
The placebo group received 60mls of 0.9% saline injected intra-operatively through the medial and anterior capsular spaces in the region of the obturator and femoral nerves and also around the short rotators and gluteus maximus in the region of the inferior and superior gluteal nerves.
The timing of this was after insertion of the acetabular component.
10mls was then infiltrated around the tensor fascia lata and subcutaneously prior to closing the wound.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
---|---|---|
To determine a significant difference (p>0.05) in morphine consumption between the two treatment groups post-operatively.
Prazo: 1 year
|
The modified McGill pain scale was administered to determine the adequacy of analgesia and the benefit of the peri-articular infiltration.
In addition, morphine and analgesic consumption was recorded for each patient.
The results were assessed after one year, once all the information from both treatment groups was collected.
|
1 year
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Prazo |
---|---|
To analyse the length of stay for between both treatment groups
Prazo: Average 6 days (based on precise day of discharge)
|
Average 6 days (based on precise day of discharge)
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Kevin J Mulhall, Orthopaedic Research and Innovation Foundation, Ireland
Publicações e links úteis
A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.
Publicações Gerais
- Andersen KV, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Haraldsted V, Soballe K. Reduced hospital stay and narcotic consumption, and improved mobilization with local and intraarticular infiltration after hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial of an intraarticular technique versus epidural infusion in 80 patients. Acta Orthop. 2007 Apr;78(2):180-6. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013654.
- Parvataneni HK, Shah VP, Howard H, Cole N, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Controlling pain after total hip and knee arthroplasty using a multimodal protocol with local periarticular injections: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6 Suppl 2):33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.034. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
- Toftdahl K, Nikolajsen L, Haraldsted V, Madsen F, Tonnesen EK, Soballe K. Comparison of peri- and intraarticular analgesia with femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Orthop. 2007 Apr;78(2):172-9. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013645.
- Maheshwari AV, Blum YC, Shekhar L, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Multimodal pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty at the Ranawat Orthopaedic Center. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1418-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0728-7. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
- Busch CA, Shore BJ, Bhandari R, Ganapathy S, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, McCalden RW. Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 May;88(5):959-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00344.
- Essving P, Axelsson K, Kjellberg J, Wallgren O, Gupta A, Lundin A. Reduced hospital stay, morphine consumption, and pain intensity with local infiltration analgesia after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2009 Apr;80(2):213-9. doi: 10.3109/17453670902930008.
- Fu P, Wu Y, Wu H, Li X, Qian Q, Zhu Y. Efficacy of intra-articular cocktail analgesic injection in total knee arthroplasty - a randomized controlled trial. Knee. 2009 Aug;16(4):280-4. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.12.012. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
- Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Mallory TH, Dodds KL, Adams JB. Soft tissue and intra-articular injection of bupivacaine, epinephrine, and morphine has a beneficial effect after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):125-30. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000147701.24029.cc.
- Nechleba J, Rogers V, Cortina G, Cooney T. Continuous intra-articular infusion of bupivacaine for postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2005 Jul;18(3):197-202. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248181.
- Andersen LJ, Poulsen T, Krogh B, Nielsen T. Postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled study on peroperative and postoperative ropivacaine, ketorolac, and adrenaline wound infiltration. Acta Orthop. 2007 Apr;78(2):187-92. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013663.
- Chen DW, Hsieh PH, Huang KC, Hu CC, Chang YH, Lee MS. Continuous intra-articular infusion of bupivacaine for post-operative pain relief after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Eur J Pain. 2010 May;14(5):529-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.08.008. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
- Fischer HB, Simanski CJ. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for analgesia after total hip replacement. Anaesthesia. 2005 Dec;60(12):1189-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04382.x.
- Foster RH, Markham A. Levobupivacaine: a review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic. Drugs. 2000 Mar;59(3):551-79. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059030-00013.
- Gristwood RW, Greaves JL. Levobupivacaine: a new safer long acting local anaesthetic agent. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 1999 Jun;8(6):861-76. doi: 10.1517/13543784.8.6.861.
- Gwilym SE, Pollard TC, Carr AJ. Understanding pain in osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Mar;90(3):280-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B3.20167.
- Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, Silver W. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2002 Jul;20(4):287-90. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.33778.
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo
1 de setembro de 2008
Conclusão Primária (Real)
1 de setembro de 2009
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
1 de setembro de 2009
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
12 de abril de 2010
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
16 de abril de 2010
Primeira postagem (Estimativa)
19 de abril de 2010
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)
19 de abril de 2010
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
16 de abril de 2010
Última verificação
1 de julho de 2008
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- KM-042008-014
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .