Perioperative factors associated with pressure ulcer development after major surgery

Jeong Min Kim, Hyunjeong Lee, Taehoon Ha, Sungwon Na, Jeong Min Kim, Hyunjeong Lee, Taehoon Ha, Sungwon Na

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pressure ulcers are important indicators of perioperative care quality, and are serious and expensive complications during critical care. This study aimed to identify perioperative risk factors for postoperative pressure ulcers.

Methods: This retrospective case-control study evaluated 2,498 patients who underwent major surgery. Forty-three patients developed postoperative pressure ulcers and were matched to 86 control patients based on age, sex, surgery, and comorbidities.

Results: The pressure ulcer group had lower baseline hemoglobin and albumin levels, compared to the control group. The pressure ulcer group also had higher values for lactate levels, blood loss, and number of packed red blood cell (pRBC) units. Univariate analysis revealed that pressure ulcer development was associated with preoperative hemoglobin levels, albumin levels, lactate levels, intraoperative blood loss, number of pRBC units, Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, Braden scale score, postoperative ventilator care, and patient restraint. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, only preoperative low albumin levels (odds ratio [OR]: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.05-0.82; P < 0.05) and high lactate levels (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.07-2.71; P < 0.05) were independently associated with pressure ulcer development. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the predictive power of the logistic regression model, and the area under the curve was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.79-0.97; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The present study revealed that preoperative low albumin levels and high lactate levels were significantly associated with pressure ulcer development after surgery.

Keywords: Albumin; Lactate; Perioperative risk factors; Pressure ulcer.

Figures

Fig. 1. Patient flow chart.
Fig. 1. Patient flow chart.
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of no…
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of no pressure ulcer group (straight line, n = 86) and pressure ulcer group (dotted line, n = 43) postoperative pressure ulcer. Patient in the pressure ulcer group had a significantly lower survival rate (90-day predictive mortality rate, 33.6% vs. 4.7%; 1-year predictive mortality rate, 40.3% vs. 8.6%; both P
Fig. 3. Nomogram to predict the probability…
Fig. 3. Nomogram to predict the probability of postoperative pressure ulcer (Top). Points are obtained according to the prognostic contribution of parameters (Bottom). Points are translated to the probability of requiring postoperative pressure ulcer. Predictor points are found on the uppermost point scale that corresponds to each individual variable. The reader then manually sums the points, and the predicted values can be read at the bottom of the nomogram. The total projected on the bottom scale indicates the probability of postoperative pressure ulcer. For example, a patient is admitted to the ICU after major surgery. Preoperative laboratory data shows that albumin is 3.0 g/dl and lactate is 4.0 mmol/L. During the surgery, 20 units of packed RBC units are transfused. Postoperatively, he is transferred to ICU and needed a mechanical ventilator support for a while. At that time, Braden scale assessed by a nurse is 20. In this case, the incidence of postoperative pressure ulcer is expected as much as 60% by using this nomogram. Therefore, clinician and nursing practioners should be more concerned to prevent pressure ulcer for this patient.
Fig. 4. Internal validation of the nomogram…
Fig. 4. Internal validation of the nomogram to predict postoperative pressure ulcer. Predictive accuracy of the model (nomogram): the frequencies of predicted and actual incidence of postoperative pressure ulcer are plotted as observations. Logistic calibration for the training set: calibration plot P = 1; E, difference in predicted and calibrated probabilities between calibration and AUC; E average = 3.02%.

References

    1. Kandilov AM, Coomer NM, Dalton K. The impact of hospital-acquired conditions on Medicare program payments. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014;4
    1. Nilsson UG. Intraoperative positioning of patients under general anesthesia and the risk of postoperative pain and pressure ulcers. J Perianesth Nurs. 2013;28:137–143.
    1. He W, Liu P, Chen HL. The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2012;58:34–40.
    1. O'Brien DD, Shanks AM, Talsma A, Brenner PS, Ramachandran SK. Intraoperative risk factors associated with postoperative pressure ulcers in critically ill patients: a retrospective observational study. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:40–47.
    1. González-Ruiz JM, Sebastián-Viana T, Losa-Iglesias ME, Lema-Lorenzo I, Crespo FJ, Martín-Merino G, et al. Braden Scale and Norton Scale modified by INSALUD in an acute care hospital: validity and cutoff point. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2014;27:506–511.
    1. Hyun S, Vermillion B, Newton C, Fall M, Li X, Kaewprag P, et al. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units. Am J Crit Care. 2013;22:514–520.
    1. Edsberg LE, Black JM, Goldberg M, McNichol L, Moore L, Sieggreen M. Revised national pressure ulcer advisory panel pressure injury staging system: revised pressure injury staging system. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016;43:585–597.
    1. Berman AJ, Snyder S, Kozier BJ, Erb G. Fundamentals of nursing: concepts, process, and practice. 8th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education; 2008. pp. 905–907.
    1. Graesslin O, Abdulkarim BS, Coutant C, Huguet F, Gabos Z, Hsu L, et al. Nomogram to predict subsequent brain metastasis in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2032–2037.
    1. Hayes RM, Spear ME, Lee SI, Krauser Lupear BE, Benoit RA, Valerio R, et al. Relationship between time in the operating room and incident pressure ulcers: a matched case-control study. Am J Med Qual. 2015;30:591–597.
    1. Tschannen D, Bates O, Talsma A, Guo Y. Patient-specific and surgical characteristics in the development of pressure ulcers. Am J Crit Care. 2012;21:116–125.
    1. Hayes RM, Spear ME, Lee SI, Krauser Lupear BE, Benoit RA, Valerio R, et al. Relationship between time in the operating room and incident pressure ulcers: a matched case-control study. Am J Med Qual. 2015;30:591–597.
    1. Engels D, Austin M, McNichol L, Fencl J, Gupta S, Kazi H. Pressure ulcers: factors contributing to their development in the OR. AORN J. 2016;103:271–281.
    1. Lindgren M, Unosson M, Fredrikson M, Ek AC. Immobility--a major risk factor for development of pressure ulcers among adult hospitalized patients: a prospective study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004;18:57–64.
    1. Coleman S, Nixon J, Keen J, Wilson L, McGinnis E, Dealey C, et al. A new pressure ulcer conceptual framework. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70:2222–2234.
    1. Roberts S, Chaboyer W, Leveritt M, Banks M, Desbrow B. Nutritional intakes of patients at risk of pressure ulcers in the clinical setting. Nutrition. 2014;30:841–846.
    1. Liu P, He W, Chen HL. Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for surgery-related pressure ulcers: a meta-analysis. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012;39:495–499.
    1. van Stijn MF, Korkic-Halilovic I, Bakker MS, van der Ploeg T, van Leeuwen PA, Houdijk AP. Preoperative nutrition status and postoperative outcome in elderly general surgery patients: a systematic review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013;37:37–43.
    1. Mistrík E, Dusilová-Sulková S, Bláha V, Sobotka L. Plasma albumin levels correlate with decreased microcirculation and the development of skin defects in hemodialyzed patients. Nutrition. 2010;26:880–885.
    1. Yatabe MS, Taguchi F, Ishida I, Sato A, Kameda T, Ueno S, et al. Mini nutritional assessment as a useful method of predicting the development of pressure ulcers in elderly inpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61:1698–1704.
    1. Hülshoff A, Schricker T, Elgendy H, Hatzakorzian R, Lattermann R. Albumin synthesis in surgical patients. Nutrition. 2013;29:703–707.
    1. Litchford MD, Dorner B, Posthauer ME. Malnutrition as a precursor of pressure ulcers. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2014;3:54–63.
    1. Revision TJSPUG: Japanese society of pressure ulcers: guidelines for the prevention and management of pressure ulcerr. 3rd ed. Tokyo: shorinsha; 2014. pp. 12–90.
    1. Vernon C, Letourneau JL. Lactic acidosis: recognition, kinetics, and associated prognosis. Crit Care Clin. 2010;26:255–283.
    1. Cain SM. Oxygen delivery and uptake in dogs during anemic and hypoxic hypoxia. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1977;42:228–234.
    1. Friedman G, De Backer D, Shahla M, Vincent JL. Oxygen supply dependency can characterize septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24:118–123.
    1. Okorie ON, Dellinger P. Lactate: biomarker and potential therapeutic target. Crit Care Clin. 2011;27:299–326.
    1. Kjelland CB, Djogovic D. The role of serum lactate in the acute care setting. J Intensive Care Med. 2010;25:286–300.
    1. Haidl F, Brabrand M, Henriksen DP, Lassen AT. Lactate is associated with increased 10-day mortality in acute medical patients: a hospitalbased cohort study. Eur J Emerg Med. 2015;22:282–284.
    1. Lumbley JL, Ali SA, Tchokouani LS. Retrospective review of predisposing factors for intraoperative pressure ulcer development. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26:368–374.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi