ARCHES: A Randomized, Phase III Study of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Enzalutamide or Placebo in Men With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Andrew J Armstrong, Russell Z Szmulewitz, Daniel P Petrylak, Jeffrey Holzbeierlein, Arnauld Villers, Arun Azad, Antonio Alcaraz, Boris Alekseev, Taro Iguchi, Neal D Shore, Brad Rosbrook, Jennifer Sugg, Benoit Baron, Lucy Chen, Arnulf Stenzl, Andrew J Armstrong, Russell Z Szmulewitz, Daniel P Petrylak, Jeffrey Holzbeierlein, Arnauld Villers, Arun Azad, Antonio Alcaraz, Boris Alekseev, Taro Iguchi, Neal D Shore, Brad Rosbrook, Jennifer Sugg, Benoit Baron, Lucy Chen, Arnulf Stenzl

Abstract

Purpose: Enzalutamide, a potent androgen-receptor inhibitor, has demonstrated significant benefits in metastatic and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

Methods: ARCHES (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02677896) is a multinational, double-blind, phase III trial, wherein 1,150 men with mHSPC were randomly assigned 1:1 to enzalutamide (160 mg/day) or placebo, plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), stratified by disease volume and prior docetaxel chemotherapy. The primary end point was radiographic progression-free survival.

Results: As of October 14, 2018, the risk of radiographic progression or death was significantly reduced with enzalutamide plus ADT versus placebo plus ADT (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.50; P < .001; median not reached v 19.0 months). Similar significant improvements in radiographic progression-free survival were reported in prespecified subgroups on the basis of disease volume and prior docetaxel therapy. Enzalutamide plus ADT significantly reduced the risk of prostate-specific antigen progression, initiation of new antineoplastic therapy, first symptomatic skeletal event, castration resistance, and reduced risk of pain progression. More men achieved an undetectable prostate-specific antigen level and/or an objective response with enzalutamide plus ADT (P < .001). Patients in both treatment groups reported a high baseline level of quality of life, which was maintained over time. Grade 3 or greater adverse events were reported in 24.3% of patients who received enzalutamide plus ADT versus 25.6% of patients who received placebo plus ADT, with no unexpected adverse events.

Conclusion: Enzalutamide with ADT significantly reduced the risk of metastatic progression or death over time versus placebo plus ADT in men with mHSPC, including those with low-volume disease and/or prior docetaxel, with a safety analysis that seems consistent with the safety profile of enzalutamide in previous clinical trials in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram. (*) Randomization 1:1 was stratified by volume of disease (low v high) and prior docetaxel therapy for prostate cancer (no cycles, one to five cycles, or six cycles); high volume of disease was defined as presence of metastases involving the viscera, or in the absence of visceral lesions, four or more bone lesions, one or more of which must have been in a bony structure beyond the vertebral column and pelvic bone, per CHAARTED (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00309985) criteria. (†) Progressive disease types are not mutually exclusive; the same patient may be reported in multiple categories. ADT, androgen deprivation therapy; ITT, intent-to-treat.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Kaplan-Meier estimate of (A) radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and (B) forest plot of rPFS for prespecified subgroups (intent-to-treat population). The dashed line at the 50th percentile indicates the median. Crosses indicate censored data. (*) For patients with no documented progression event, rPFS was censored on the date of the last radiologic assessment performed before the cutoff date. (†) 95% CIs provided are not adjusted for the number of subgroups summarized. ADT, androgen deprivation therapy; E, No. of events; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HR, hazard ratio; NR, not reached; PSA, prostate-specific antigen.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to (A) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, (B) initiation of new antineoplastic therapy, and (C) first symptomatic skeletal event (intent-to-treat population). The dashed line at the 50th percentile indicates the median. Crosses indicate censored data. (*) In patients with no PSA progression, time to PSA progression was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Patients without PSA progression before two or more consecutive missed PSA assessments were censored on the date of last PSA assessment before the assessments missed. (†) In patients with no new antineoplastic therapy initiated for prostate cancer after randomization, time to start of new antineoplastic therapy was censored on the last visit date or the date of randomization, whichever occurred last. The median for the enzalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) group was not a reliable estimate because it resulted from an event observed in the only remaining patient at risk at approximately 30 months, leading to the vertical drop at the end of the Kaplan-Meier curve. The hazard ratio (HR; 95% CI) is a more accurate depiction of the differences between treatment arms. (‡) In patients with no symptomatic skeletal event by the time of the data cutoff point, time to symptomatic skeletal event was censored on the last visit date or the date of randomization, whichever occurred last. HR, hazard ratio; NR, not reached.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Multiplicity adjustment strategy. (*) Overall survival will be tested at 0.05 only if all the other five secondary end points analyses are statistically significant at 0.01, otherwise it will be tested at 0.04. N, no; Y, yes.

References

    1. Fitzmaurice C, Akinyemiju TF, Al Lami FH, et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1553–1568.
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.
    1. Helgstrand JT, Røder MA, Klemann N, et al. Diagnostic characteristics of lethal prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2017;84:18–26.
    1. Scher HI, Solo K, Valant J, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer clinical states and mortality in the United States: Estimates using a dynamic progression model. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139440.
    1. Fizazi K, Jenkins C, Tannock IF. Should docetaxel be standard of care for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer? Pro and contra. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1660–1667.
    1. Sweeney CJ, Chen YH, Carducci M, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:737–746.
    1. Gravis G, Fizazi K, Joly F, et al. Androgen-deprivation therapy alone or with docetaxel in non-castrate metastatic prostate cancer (GETUG-AFU 15): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:149–158.
    1. James ND, Sydes MR, Clarke NW, et al. Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): Survival results from an adaptive, multiarm, multistage, platform randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1163–1177.
    1. de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, et al. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1995–2005.
    1. Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, et al. Abiraterone plus prednisone in metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:352–360.
    1. James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, et al. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:338–351.
    1. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al: EAU Guidelines. Presented at the EAU Annual Congress Copenhagen, Denmark, March 16 to 20, 2018 (ed 2018). Arnhem, The Netherlands, EAU Guidelines Office, 2018. .
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Prostate cancer. Version 4. .
    1. Zytiga (abiraterone acetate) highlights of prescribing information. .
    1. Zytiga (abiraterone acetate) summary of product characteristics. .
    1. Tran C, Ouk S, Clegg NJ, et al. Development of a second-generation antiandrogen for treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Science. 2009;324:787–790.
    1. Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf DE, et al. Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:424–433.
    1. Scher HI, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1187–1197.
    1. Shore ND, Chowdhury S, Villers A, et al. Efficacy and safety of enzalutamide versus bicalutamide for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (TERRAIN): A randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:153–163.
    1. Penson DF, Armstrong AJ, Concepcion R, et al. Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in castration-resistant prostate cancer: The STRIVE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2098–2106.
    1. Hussain M, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2465–2474.
    1. Tombal B, Borre M, Rathenborg P, et al. Long-term antitumor activity and safety of enzalutamide monotherapy in hormone naïve prostate cancer: 3-year open label followup results. J Urol. 2018;199:459–464.
    1. Tombal B, Borre M, Rathenborg P, et al. Enzalutamide monotherapy in hormone-naive prostate cancer: Primary analysis of an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:592–600.
    1. Tombal B, Borre M, Rathenborg P, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of enzalutamide monotherapy in hormone-naïve prostate cancer: 1- and 2-year open-label follow-up results. Eur Urol. 2015;68:787–794.
    1. Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I, et al. Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: Recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1148–1159.
    1. Skaltsa K, Longworth L, Ivanescu C, et al. Mapping the FACT-P to the preference-based EQ-5D questionnaire in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Value Health. 2014;17:238–244.
    1. van Andel G, Bottomley A, Fosså SD, et al. An international field study of the EORTC QLQ-PR25: A questionnaire for assessing the health-related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:2418–2424.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–247.
    1. Braun DP, Gupta D, Staren ED. Predicting survival in prostate cancer: The role of quality of life assessment. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:1267–1274.
    1. Tombal B, Saad F, Penson D, et al: Patient-reported outcomes following enzalutamide or placebo in men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PROSPER): A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20:556-569, 2019.
    1. Basch E. Patient-related outcomes for metastatic prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:477–478.
    1. Endocyte announces FDA acceptance of radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) as an alternative primary endpoint of the VISION trial in addition to overall survival (OS). .
    1. Beaver JA, Kluetz PG, Pazdur R. Metastasis-free survival – A new end point in prostate cancer trials. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2458–2460.
    1. Rathkopf DE, Beer TM, Loriot Y, et al. Radiographic progression-free survival as a clinically meaningful end point in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: The PREVAIL randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:694–701.
    1. Morris MJ, Molina A, Small EJ, et al. Radiographic progression-free survival as a response biomarker in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: COU-AA-302 results. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1356–1363.
    1. Halabi S, Vogelzang NJ, Ou SS, et al. Progression-free survival as a predictor of overall survival in men with castrate-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2766–2771.
    1. : Enzalutamide in first line androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer (ENZAMET). .
    1. Gravis G, Boher JM, Joly F, et al. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus docetaxel versus ADT alone in metastatic non castrate prostate cancer: Impact of metastatic burden and long-term survival analysis of the randomized phase 3 GETUG-AFU15 trial. Eur Urol. 2016;70:256–262.
    1. Kyriakopoulos CE, Chen YH, Carducci MA, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: Long-term survival analysis of the randomized phase III E3805 CHAARTED trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1080–1087.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi