Association of Pregnancy With Recurrence of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Among Women With Prior Coronary Artery Dissection

Marysia S Tweet, Kathleen A Young, Patricia J M Best, Meredith Hyun, Rajiv Gulati, Carl H Rose, Sharonne N Hayes, Marysia S Tweet, Kathleen A Young, Patricia J M Best, Meredith Hyun, Rajiv Gulati, Carl H Rose, Sharonne N Hayes

Abstract

Importance: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a notable cause of acute coronary syndrome in women of childbearing age.

Objective: To test the hypothesis that pregnancy after SCAD is associated with recurrent SCAD.

Design, setting, and participants: Three study designs were implemented: a case series of women with pregnancy after SCAD; a nested case-control study comparing patients with recurrent SCAD to matched controls without recurrent SCAD; and a cohort study. Women with SCAD who were of childbearing potential and enrolled into the Mayo Clinic SCAD Registry from August 30, 2011, to April 4, 2019, were included in the study. Patients with coronary dissections associated with iatrogenesis, trauma, or atherosclerosis were not enrolled.

Exposures: Pregnancy after SCAD.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was SCAD recurrence, defined as an acute coronary syndrome or cardiac arrest due to new SCAD. Other demographic measures collected included age, year of SCAD occurrence, and comorbidities.

Results: The cohort included 636 women of childbearing potential. Twenty-three of those women had a total of 32 pregnancies after SCAD. The median (interquartile range) age of women with pregnancy after SCAD was 38 years (34-40 years), and 20 (87%) were White. In the nested case-control study, 92 cases of recurrent SCAD were matched to 158 controls. There was no significant difference in exposure to subsequent pregnancies in the women with recurrent SCAD as compared with matched controls (2 of 92 [2%] vs 13 of 158 [8%]; P = .06). In the overall cohort of 636 patients, recurrent SCAD was present in 122 patients with a Kaplan-Meier 5-year SCAD recurrence estimate of 14.8%. The Cox analysis showed no significant association between subsequent pregnancy and SCAD recurrence with a nonsignificant hazard ratio of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.09-1.6) when controlling for age at first SCAD, year of first SCAD, and fibromuscular dysplasia.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that most women tolerated pregnancy and lactation after SCAD without evidence for increased risk of SCAD recurrence when compared with women with a history of SCAD who did not experience pregnancy. Although this study is reassuring and indicates complex contributors to SCAD recurrence, the results need to be interpreted prudently because of study selection bias and the small total number of women who became pregnant after SCAD. The notable hemodynamic changes that occur with pregnancy and severe presentation of pregnancy-associated SCAD are reasons for concern when considering pregnancy after SCAD.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Tweet reported receiving a grant from the National Institutes of Health Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health Award during the conduct of the study. Dr Hayes reported receiving funding for research costs from the Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Research Inc during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.. Study Participants
Figure.. Study Participants
Identification of participants for the 3 analyses as described in the methodology. SCAD indicates spontaneous coronary artery dissection. aCohort analysis. bCase series analysis. cCase-control analysis.

References

    1. Hayes SN, Kim ESH, Saw J, et al. ; American Heart Association Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine; and Stroke Council . Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: current state of the science: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(19):e523-e557. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000564
    1. Adlam D, Alfonso F, Maas A, Vrints C; Writing Committee . European Society of Cardiology, acute cardiovascular care association, SCAD study group: a position paper on spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(36):3353-3368. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy080
    1. Lobo AS, Cantu SM, Sharkey SW, et al. . Revascularization in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(10):1290-1300. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.065
    1. Elkayam U, Jalnapurkar S, Barakkat MN, et al. . Pregnancy-associated acute myocardial infarction: a review of contemporary experience in 150 cases between 2006 and 2011. Circulation. 2014;129(16):1695-1702. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002054
    1. Smilowitz NR, Gupta N, Guo Y, et al. . Acute myocardial infarction during pregnancy and the puerperium in the United States. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93(10):1404-1414. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.04.019
    1. Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, et al. . Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circulation. 2012;126(5):579-588. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105718
    1. Tweet MS, Gulati R, Hayes SN. What clinicians should know αbout spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(8):1125-1130. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.05.010
    1. Saw J, Starovoytov A, Humphries K, et al. . Canadian spontaneous coronary artery dissection cohort study: in-hospital and 30-day outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(15):1188-1197. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz007
    1. Kok SN, Hayes SN, Cutrer FM, et al. . Prevalence and clinical factors of migraine in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(24):e010140. doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.010140
    1. Eleid MF, Guddeti RR, Tweet MS, et al. . Coronary artery tortuosity in spontaneous coronary artery dissection: angiographic characteristics and clinical implications. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(5):656-662. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001676
    1. Prasad M, Tweet MS, Hayes SN, et al. . Prevalence of extracoronary vascular abnormalities and fibromuscular dysplasia in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(12):1672-1677. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.011
    1. Liang JJ, Prasad M, Tweet MS, et al. . A novel application of CT angiography to detect extracoronary vascular abnormalities in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8(3):189-197. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2014.02.001
    1. Anderson RD, Petersen JW, Mehta PK, et al. . Prevalence of coronary endothelial and microvascular dysfunction in women with symptoms of ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease is confirmed by a new cohort: the NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD). J Interv Cardiol. 2019;2019:7169275. doi:10.1155/2019/7169275
    1. Henkin S, Negrotto SM, Tweet MS, et al. . Spontaneous coronary artery dissection and its association with heritable connective tissue disorders. Heart. 2016;102(11):876-881. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308645
    1. Kaadan MI, MacDonald C, Ponzini F, et al. . Prospective cardiovascular genetics evaluation in spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018;11(4):e001933. doi:10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.117.001933
    1. Goel K, Tweet M, Olson TM, Maleszewski JJ, Gulati R, Hayes SN. Familial spontaneous coronary artery dissection: evidence for genetic susceptibility. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(5):821-826. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8307
    1. Turley TN, Theis JL, Sundsbak RS, et al. . Rare missense variants in TLN1 are associated with familial and sporadic spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2019;12(4):e002437. doi:10.1161/CIRCGEN.118.002437
    1. Adlam D, Olson TM, Combaret N, et al. ; DISCO Consortium; CARDIoGRAMPlusC4D Study Group . Association of the PHACTR1/EDN1 genetic locus with spontaneous coronary artery dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(1):58-66. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.085
    1. Saw J, Humphries K, Aymong E, et al. . Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: clinical outcomes and risk of recurrence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(9):1148-1158. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.053
    1. Tweet MS, Olin JW. Insights into spontaneous coronary artery dissection: can recurrence be prevented? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(9):1159-1161. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.726
    1. Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Codsi E, Gulati R, Rose CH, Best PJM. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection associated with pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(4):426-435. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.055
    1. Tweet MS, Miller VM, Hayes SN. The evidence on estrogen, progesterone, and spontaneous coronary artery dissection. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(5):403-404. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0774
    1. “Virtual” Multicenter Mayo Clinic SCAD Registry. identifier: NCT01429727. Updated July 30, 2020. Accessed August 21, 2020.
    1. Genetic Investigations in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection identifier: NCT01427179. Updated July 31, 2020. Accessed August 21, 2020.
    1. Tweet MS, Gulati R, Aase LA, Hayes SN. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a disease-specific, social networking community-initiated study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(9):845-850. doi:10.4065/mcp.2011.0312
    1. Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Gulati R, Rose CH, Best PJM. Pregnancy after spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a case series. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(8):598-600. doi:10.7326/L14-0446
    1. Kim ESH, Tweet MS. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a call for consensus and research advancement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(10):1301-1303. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.019
    1. Regitz-Zagrosek V, Roos-Hesselink JW, Bauersachs J, et al. ; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(34):3165-3241. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy340
    1. Thorne S, MacGregor A, Nelson-Piercy C. Risks of contraception and pregnancy in heart disease. Heart. 2006;92(10):1520-1525. doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.095240

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi