Daily liquorice consumption for two weeks increases augmentation index and central systolic and diastolic blood pressure

Miia H Leskinen, Elina J Hautaniemi, Anna M Tahvanainen, Jenni K Koskela, Marika Päällysaho, Antti J Tikkakoski, Mika Kähönen, Tiit Kööbi, Onni Niemelä, Jukka Mustonen, Ilkka H Pörsti, Miia H Leskinen, Elina J Hautaniemi, Anna M Tahvanainen, Jenni K Koskela, Marika Päällysaho, Antti J Tikkakoski, Mika Kähönen, Tiit Kööbi, Onni Niemelä, Jukka Mustonen, Ilkka H Pörsti

Abstract

Background: Liquorice ingestion often elevates blood pressure, but the detailed haemodynamic alterations are unknown. We studied haemodynamic changes induced by liquorice consumption in 20 subjects versus 30 controls with average blood pressures of 120/68 and 116/64 mmHg, respectively.

Methods: Haemodynamic variables were measured in supine position before and after two weeks of liquorice consumption (daily glycyrrhizin dose 290-370 mg) with tonometric recording of radial blood pressure, pulse wave analysis, and whole-body impedance cardiography. Thirty age-matched healthy subjects maintaining their normal diet were studied as controls.

Results: Two weeks of liquorice ingestion elevated peripheral and central systolic and diastolic blood pressure (by 7/4 and 8/4 mmHg, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 2-11/1-8 and 3-13/1-8, respectively, P<0.05), and increased extracellular volume by 0.5 litres (P<0.05 versus controls). Also augmentation index adjusted to heart rate 75/min (from 7% to 11%, 95% CI for change 0.3-7.5, P<0.05) and aortic pulse pressure (by 4 mmHg, 95% CI 1-7, P<0.05) were elevated indicating increased wave reflection from the periphery. In contrast, peripheral (-3/-0.3 mmHg) and central blood pressure (-2/-0.5 mmHg), aortic pulse pressure (-1 mmHg), and augmentation index adjusted to heart rate 75/min (from 9% to 7%) decreased numerically but not statistically significantly without changes in extracellular volume in the control group. Heart rate, systemic vascular resistance, cardiac output, and pulse wave velocity did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions: Two weeks of daily liquorice consumption increased extracellular volume, amplified pressure wave reflection from the periphery, and elevated central systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

Trial registration: EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT 2006-002065-39 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01742702.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The funding from the commercial source (Astra Zeneca Plc.) was a relatively small personal research grant to author Miia Leskinen (5000 ). Application to this funding by Astra Zeneca Plc was open nation-wide in Finland for all Ph.D. students doing biomedical research, and the funds were granted on the basis of the present study protocol. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1. Flow diagram of the study.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the study.
Figure 2. Radial and aortic blood pressure,…
Figure 2. Radial and aortic blood pressure, liquorice diet versus normal diet.
Grey lines represent each individual, thick black line represents mean values of each variable. SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; P values between graphs are for the difference in the change of each variable between liquorice diet versus normal diet, P values in brackets are for the change within each group, n = 20 and 30 in the liquorice and normal diet groups, respectively.
Figure 3. Aortic pulse pressure, augmentation index,…
Figure 3. Aortic pulse pressure, augmentation index, and pulse wave velocity, liquorice diet versus normal diet.
Grey lines represent each individual, thick black line represents mean values of each variable. P values are for the difference in the change of each variable between liquorice diet versus normal diet, P values in brackets are for the change within each group, n = 20 and 30 in the liquorice and normal diet groups, respectively.
Figure 4. Heart rate, cardiac index, systemic…
Figure 4. Heart rate, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance index, liquorice diet versus normal diet.
Grey lines represent each individual, thick black line represents mean change of each variable. P values are for the difference in the change of each variable between liquorice diet versus normal diet, P values in brackets are for the change within each group, n = 20 and 30 in the liquorice and normal diet groups, respectively.

References

    1. Funder JW (2010) Aldosterone and mineralocorticoid receptors in the cardiovascular system. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 52: 393–400.
    1. Funder JW, Pearce PT, Smith R, Campbell J (1989) Vascular type I aldosterone binding sites are physiological mineralocorticoid receptors. Endocrinology 125: 2224–2226.
    1. Funder JW, Pearce PT, Smith R, Smith AI (1988) Mineralocorticoid action: target tissue specificity is enzyme, not receptor, mediated. Science 242: 583–585.
    1. Edwards CR, Stewart PM, Burt D, Brett L, McIntyre MA, et al. (1988) Localisation of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase—tissue specific protector of the mineralocorticoid receptor. Lancet 2: 986–989.
    1. Ploeger B, Mensinga T, Sips A, Seinen W, Meulenbelt J, et al. (2001) The pharmacokinetics of glycyrrhizic acid evaluated by physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. Drug Metab Rev 33: 125–147.
    1. Stewart PM, Wallace AM, Valentino R, Burt D, Shackleton CH, et al. (1987) Mineralocorticoid activity of liquorice: 11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency comes of age. Lancet 2: 821–824.
    1. Frey FJ, Odermatt A, Frey BM (2004) Glucocorticoid-mediated mineralocorticoid receptor activation and hypertension. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 13: 451–458.
    1. Conn JW, Rovner DR, Cohen EL (1968) Licorice-induced pseudoaldosteronism. Hypertension, hypokalemia, aldosteronopenia, and suppressed plasma renin activity. JAMA 205: 492–496.
    1. Hatakeyama H, Inaba S, Takeda R, Miyamori I (2000) 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in human vascular cells. Kidney Int 57: 1352–1357.
    1. Mahmud A, Feely J (2005) Aldosterone-to-renin ratio, arterial stiffness, and the response to aldosterone antagonism in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens 18: 50–55.
    1. Lombes M, Alfaidy N, Eugene E, Lessana A, Farman N, et al. (1995) Prerequisite for cardiac aldosterone action. Mineralocorticoid receptor and 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in the human heart. Circulation 92: 175–182.
    1. Sigurjonsdottir HA, Manhem K, Axelson M, Wallerstedt S (2003) Subjects with essential hypertension are more sensitive to the inhibition of 11 β-HSD by liquorice. J Hum Hypertens 17: 125–131.
    1. Stormer FC, Reistad R, Alexander J (1993) Glycyrrhizic acid in liquorice—evaluation of health hazard. Food Chem Toxicol 31: 303–312.
    1. Blomberg K, Hallikainen A (1993) Glycyrrhizic acid levels in liquorice confectionery. Finnish National Food Administration: Reserach Notes 10: 1–12.
    1. Chen CH, Nevo E, Fetics B, Pak PH, Yin FC, et al. (1997) Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. Validation of generalized transfer function. Circulation 95: 1827–1836.
    1. Kööbi T, Kaukinen S, Ahola T, Turjanmaa VM (1997) Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: whole-body impedance cardiography in simultaneous comparison with thermodilution and direct oxygen Fick methods. Intensive Care Med 23: 1132–1137.
    1. Tahvanainen AM, Tikkakoski AJ, Leskinen MH, Nordhausen K, Kähönen M, et al. (2012) Supine and upright haemodynamic effects of sublingual nitroglycerin and inhaled salbutamol: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Journal of Hypertension 30: 297–306.
    1. Koskela JK, Tahvanainen A, Haring A, Tikkakoski AJ, Ilveskoski E, et al. (2013) Association of resting heart rate with cardiovascular function: a cross-sectional study in 522 Finnish subjects. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 13: 102.
    1. Tahvanainen A, Koskela J, Tikkakoski A, Lahtela J, Leskinen M, et al. (2009) Analysis of cardiovascular responses to passive head-up tilt using continuous pulse wave analysis and impedance cardiography. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 69: 128–137.
    1. Lund-Johansen P (1991) Twenty-year follow-up of hemodynamics in essential hypertension during rest and exercise. Hypertension 18: III54–61.
    1. Franklin SS, Gustin Wt, Wong ND, Larson MG, Weber MA, et al. (1997) Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 96: 308–315.
    1. Armanini D, Calo L, Semplicini A (2003) Pseudohyperaldosteronism: pathogenetic mechanisms. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 40: 295–335.
    1. Draper N (2005) 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and the pre-receptor regulation of corticosteroid hormone action. J Endocrinol 186: 251–271.
    1. Hatakeyama H, Inaba S, Miyamori I (1999) 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in cultured human vascular cells. Possible role in the development of hypertension. Hypertension 33: 1179–1184.
    1. Walker BR, Connacher AA, Webb DJ, Edwards CR (1992) Glucocorticoids and blood pressure: a role for the cortisol/cortisone shuttle in the control of vascular tone in man. Clin Sci 83: 171–178.
    1. Epstein MT, Espiner EA, Donald RA, Hughes H (1977) Liquorice toxicity and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis in man. Br Med J 1: 209–210.
    1. Farese RV Jr, Biglieri EG, Shackleton CH, Irony I, Gomez-Fontes R (1991) Licorice-induced hypermineralocorticoidism. N Engl J Med 325: 1223–1227.
    1. Darne B, Girerd X, Safar M, Cambien F, Guize L (1989) Pulsatile versus steady component of blood pressure: a cross-sectional analysis and a prospective analysis on cardiovascular mortality. Hypertension 13: 392–400.
    1. Williams B, Lacy PS, Thom SM, Cruickshank K, Stanton A, et al. (2006) Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study. Circulation 113: 1213–1225.
    1. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Lee ET, Galloway JM, et al. (2007) Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension 50: 197–203.
    1. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, O'Rourke MF, Safar ME, Baou K, et al. (2010) Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with central haemodynamics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 31: 1865–1871.
    1. O'Rourke MF, Hashimoto J (2007) Mechanical factors in arterial aging: a clinical perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol 50: 1–13.
    1. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, et al. (2006) Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 27: 2588–2605.
    1. Mynard JP, Penny DJ, Davidson MR, Smolich JJ (2012) The reservoir-wave paradigm introduces error into arterial wave analysis: a computer modelling and in-vivo study. J Hypertens 30: 734–743.
    1. Schillaci G, Pucci G, Pirro M, Settimi L, Hijazi R, et al. (2011) Combined effects of office and 24-h blood pressure on aortic stiffness in human hypertension. J Hypertens 29: 869–875.
    1. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, et al. (2013) 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 31: 1281–1357.
    1. Law MR, Wald NJ, Morris JK, Jordan RE (2003) Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials. BMJ 326: 1427.
    1. Sweetman SC (2009) Martindale: the complete drug reference. London: Pharmaceutical Press. 3694 p.
    1. Hu Y, Block G, Norkus EP, Morrow JD, Dietrich M, et al.. (2006) Relations of glycemic index and glycemic load with plasma oxidative stress markers. Am J Clin Nutr 84: : 70–76; quiz 266–267.
    1. Li YJ, Chen J, Li Y, Li Q, Zheng YF, et al. (2011) Screening and characterization of natural antioxidants in four Glycyrrhiza species by liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr 1218: 8181–8191.
    1. Sigurjonsdottir HA, Axelson M, Johannsson G, Manhem K, Nyström E, et al. (2006) The liquorice effect on the RAAS differs between the genders. Blood Press 15: 169–172.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi