Development of the Tardivo Algorithm to Predict Amputation Risk of Diabetic Foot

João Paulo Tardivo, Maurício S Baptista, João Antonio Correa, Fernando Adami, Maria Aparecida Silva Pinhal, João Paulo Tardivo, Maurício S Baptista, João Antonio Correa, Fernando Adami, Maria Aparecida Silva Pinhal

Abstract

Diabetes is a chronic disease that affects almost 19% of the elderly population in Brazil and similar percentages around the world. Amputation of lower limbs in diabetic patients who present foot complications is a common occurrence with a significant reduction of life quality, and heavy costs on the health system. Unfortunately, there is no easy protocol to define the conditions that should be considered to proceed to amputation. The main objective of the present study is to create a simple prognostic score to evaluate the diabetic foot, which is called Tardivo Algorithm. Calculation of the score is based on three main factors: Wagner classification, signs of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), which is evaluated by using Peripheral Arterial Disease Classification, and the location of ulcers. The final score is obtained by multiplying the value of the individual factors. Patients with good peripheral vascularization received a value of 1, while clinical signs of ischemia received a value of 2 (PAD 2). Ulcer location was defined as forefoot, midfoot and hind foot. The conservative treatment used in patients with scores below 12 was based on a recently developed Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) protocol. 85.5% of these patients presented a good outcome and avoided amputation. The results showed that scores 12 or higher represented a significantly higher probability of amputation (Odds ratio and logistic regression-IC 95%, 12.2-1886.5). The Tardivo algorithm is a simple prognostic score for the diabetic foot, easily accessible by physicians. It helps to determine the amputation risk and the best treatment, whether it is conservative or surgical management.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Wagner Classification for diabetic foot.
Fig 1. Wagner Classification for diabetic foot.
Grade 1, superficial ulcer; Grade 2, Deep ulcer; Grade 3, osteitis-infection and Grade 4, forefoot gangrene.
Fig 2. Location of foot injuries.
Fig 2. Location of foot injuries.
FF, forefoot; MF, midfoot; HF, hindfoot. The localization sites showed at the figure are important to define the grades to calculate the algorithm.
Fig 3. Strategic diagram of Tardivo Algorithm.
Fig 3. Strategic diagram of Tardivo Algorithm.
The diagram indicates the parameters significantly important to evaluate diabetic foot and obtain the score values.

References

    1. National Diabetes Statistics Report. In. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
    1. Portal Brasil. In. Brasil Governo Federal.
    1. Mills JL, Conte MS, Armstrong DG, Pomposelli FB, Schanzer A, Sidawy NA, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System: risk stratification based on wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI). J Vasc Surg 2014; 59: 220–234.e221–222. 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.003
    1. Chung J, Modrall JG, Ahn C, Lavery LA, Valentine RJ. Multidisciplinary care improves amputation-free survival in patients with chronic critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61: 162–169. 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.101
    1. Tardivo JP, Adami F, Correa JA, Pinhal MA, Baptista MS A clinical trial testing the efficacy of PDT in preventing amputation in diabetic patients. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2014; 11: 342–350. 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.04.007
    1. Lowe J, Sibbald RG, Taha NY, Lebovic G, Martin C, Bhoj I, et al. (2015) The Guyana Diabetes and Foot Care Project: A Complex Quality Improvement Intervention to Decrease Diabetes-Related Major Lower Extremity Amputations and Improve Diabetes Care in a Lower-Middle-Income Country. PLoS Med 12(4): e1001814 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001814
    1. Beckert S, Witte M, Wicke C, Königsrainer A, Coerper S. A new wound-based severity score for diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective analysis of 1,000 patients. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 988–992.
    1. Barberán J, Granizo JJ, Aguilar L, Alguacil R, Sainz F, Menéndez MA, et al. Predictive model of short-term amputation during hospitalization of patients due to acute diabetic foot infections. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2010; 28: 680–684. 10.1016/j.eimc.2009.12.017
    1. Lipsky BA, Weigelt JA, Sun X, Johannes RS, Derby KG, Tabak YP Developing and validating a risk score for lower-extremity amputation in patients hospitalized for a diabetic foot infection. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1695–1700. 10.2337/dc11-0331
    1. Jeffcoate WJ Stratification of foot risk predicts the incidence of new foot disease, but do we yet know that the adoption of routine screening reduces it? Diabetologia 2011; 54: 991–993. 10.1007/s00125-011-2075-y
    1. Apelqvist J, Elgzyri T, Larsson J, Löndahl M, Nyberg P, Thörne J. Factors related to outcome of neuroischemic/ischemic foot ulcer in diabetic patients. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53: 1582–1588.e1582. 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.02.006
    1. Tardivo JP, Baptista MS Treatment of osteomyelitis in the feet of diabetic patients by photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy. Photomed Laser Surg 2009; 27: 145–150. 10.1089/pho.2008.2252
    1. Maisch T. A new strategy to destroy antibiotic resistant microorganisms: antimicrobial photodynamic treatment. Mini Rev Med Chem 2009; 9: 974–983.
    1. Bisland SK, Chien C, Wilson BC, Burch S. Pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo studies to examine the potential use of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of osteomyelitis. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2006; 5: 31–38.
    1. Goodney PP, Travis LL, Brooke BS, DeMartino RR, Goodman DC, Fisher ES, et al. Relationship between regional spending on vascular care and amputation rate. JAMA Surg 2014; 149: 34–42. 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4277
    1. Elgzyri T, Larsson J, Nyberg P, Thörne J, Eriksson KF, Apelqvist J. Early revascularization after admittance to a diabetic foot center affects the healing probability of ischemic foot ulcer in patients with diabetes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 48: 440–446. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.06.041
    1. Chung J, Modrall JG, Ahn C, Lavery LA, Valentine RJ. Multidisciplinary care improves amputation-free survival in patients with chronic critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61: 162–169. 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.101
    1. Prompers L, Schaper N, Apelqvist J, Edmonds M, Jude E, Mauricio D, et al. Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study. Diabetologia 2008; 51: 747–755. 10.1007/s00125-008-0940-0
    1. Brechow A, Slesaczeck T, Münch D, Nanning T, Paetzold H, Schwanebeck U, et al. Improving major amputation rates in the multicomplex diabetic foot patient: focus on the severity of peripheral arterial disease. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2013; 4: 83–94. 10.1177/2042018813489719
    1. Albayati MA, Shearman CP. Peripheral arterial disease and bypass surgery in the diabetic lower limb. Med Clin North Am 2013; 97: 821–834. 10.1016/j.mcna.2013.03.009
    1. Tardivo JP, Baptista MS Osteomyelitis. Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of osteomyelitis. InTech 2012; 121–130.
    1. Wainwright M. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998; 42:13–28.
    1. Henke PK, Blackburn SA, Wainess RW, et al. Osteomyelitis of the foot and toe in adults is a surgical disease: conservative management worsens lower extremity salvage. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 885–892.
    1. Wukich DK, Armstrong DG, Attinger CE, Boulton AJ, Burns PR, Frykberg RG et al. Inpatient Management of Diabetic Foot Disorders: A Clinical Guide. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(9): 2862–2871. 10.2337/dc12-2712
    1. Trignano E, Fallico N, Chen HC, Faenza M, Bolognini A, Armenti A, et al. Evaluation of peripheral microcirculation improvement of foot after tarsal tunnel release in diabetic patients by transcutaneous oximetry. Microsurgery 2015; 10.1002/micr.22378

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi