Personality, socioeconomic status, and all-cause mortality in the United States

Benjamin P Chapman, Kevin Fiscella, Ichiro Kawachi, Paul R Duberstein, Benjamin P Chapman, Kevin Fiscella, Ichiro Kawachi, Paul R Duberstein

Abstract

The authors assessed the extent to which socioeconomic status (SES) and the personality factors termed the "big 5" (neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness) represented confounded or independent risks for all-cause mortality over a 10-year follow-up in the Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS) cohort between 1995 and 2004. Adjusted for demographics, the 25th versus 75th percentile of SES was associated with an odds ratio of 1.43 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11, 1.83). Demographic-adjusted odds ratios for the 75th versus 25th percentile of neuroticism were 1.38 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.73) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.84) for conscientiousness, the latter evaluated at high levels of agreeableness. Modest associations were observed between SES and the big 5. Adjusting each for the other revealed that personality explained roughly 20% of the SES gradient in mortality, while SES explained 8% of personality risk. Portions of SES and personality risk were explained by health behaviors, although some residual risk remained unexplained. Personality appears to explain some between-SES strata differences in mortality risk, as well as some individual risk heterogeneity within SES strata. Findings suggest that both sociostructural inequalities and individual disposition hold public health implications. Future research and prevention aimed at ameliorating SES health disparities may benefit from considering the risk clustering of social disadvantage and dispositional factors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Conceptual model in which observed associations between personality and socioeconomic status at baseline are presumed to reflect bidirectional influences over the life course, MIDUS Study, 1995–2004. MIDUS, Midlife Development in the United States.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Marginal probabilities of membership in the top quintile of each “big 5” dimension (agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism, openness) across SES centiles, MIDUS Study, 1995–2004. Results are from demographic-adjusted ordinal logit models with covariates evaluated at the means. SES, socioeconomic status; MIDUS, Midlife Development in the United States.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Impact of adjusting the SES odds ratio for 32 possible combinations of the “big 5” personality factors (agreeableness (A), conscientiousness (C), extraversion (E), neuroticism (N), openness (O)), MIDUS Study, 1995–2004. All estimates were also adjusted for demographics. MIDUS, Midlife Development in the United States; SES, socioeconomic status.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Absolute risk of all-cause mortality over a 10-year follow-up period from model 4 for different personality and SES risk-factor profiles, MIDUS Study, 1995–2004. +, the factor is at the 75th population percentile; −, the factor is at the 25th percentile. All other personality traits and demographic factors were held at sample means. A, agreeableness; C, conscientiousness; N, neuroticism; SES, socioeconomic status; MIDUS, Midlife Development in the United States.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi