Lesinurad in combination with allopurinol: results of a phase 2, randomised, double-blind study in patients with gout with an inadequate response to allopurinol

Fernando Perez-Ruiz, John S Sundy, Jeffrey N Miner, Matthew Cravets, Chris Storgard, RDEA594-203 Study Group, Fernando Perez-Ruiz, John S Sundy, Jeffrey N Miner, Matthew Cravets, Chris Storgard, RDEA594-203 Study Group

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of lesinurad, an oral selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor, in combination with allopurinol versus allopurinol alone in patients with gout and an inadequate response to allopurinol.

Methods: Patients (N=227) with an inadequate response to allopurinol, defined as serum urate (sUA) ≥6 mg/dL on ≥2 occasions ≥2 weeks apart despite ≥6 weeks of allopurinol, were randomised 2:1 to 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with lesinurad (200, 400 or 600 mg/day) or matching placebo in combination with their prestudy allopurinol dose (200-600 mg/day). Colchicine prophylaxis for gout flares was required. The primary end point was percent reduction from baseline sUA levels at 4 weeks. A pharmacokinetic substudy was also conducted. Safety was assessed throughout.

Results: Patients (n=208) received ≥1 dose of blinded medication. Lesinurad 200, 400 and 600 mg in combination with allopurinol produced significant mean percent reductions from baseline sUA of 16%, 22% and 30%, respectively, versus a mean 3% increase with placebo (p<0.0001, all doses vs placebo). Similar results were observed in patients with mild or moderate renal insufficiency (estimated creatinine clearance 30 to <90 mL/min). The incidence of ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event was 46%, 48% and 54% with lesinurad 200, 400 and 600 mg, respectively, and 46% with placebo (most frequent, gout flares, arthralgia, headache and nasopharyngitis), with no deaths or serious adverse events.

Conclusions: Lesinurad achieves clinically relevant and statistically significant reductions in sUA in combination with allopurinol in patients who warrant additional therapy on allopurinol alone.

Trial registration number: NCT01001338.

Keywords: Gout; Inflammation; Pharmacokinetics; Treatment.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. Patients received lesinurad 200 mg daily or placebo for 28 days, 400 mg daily (200 mg for 7 days followed by 400 mg for 21 days) or 600 mg daily (200 mg for 7 days followed by 400 mg for 7 days and 600 mg for 14 days). LESU, lesinurad.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Arithmetic mean (SD) percent change from baseline in sUA concentration at 4 weeks (ITT population). LS mean differences compare each lesinurad treatment group with the pooled placebo group with an analysis of covariance model with effects for treatment group and baseline sUA. *p

Figure 3

Proportion of patients achieving sUA…

Figure 3

Proportion of patients achieving sUA

Figure 3
Proportion of patients achieving sUA
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2008. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:3136–41. 10.1002/art.30520 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang W, Doherty M, Pascual E, et al. . EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part I: diagnosis. Report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:1301–11. 10.1136/ard.2006.055251 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Terkeltaub R. Update on gout: new therapeutic strategies and options. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2010;6:30–8. 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.236 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doherty M. New insights into the epidemiology of gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48(Suppl 2):ii2–8. 10.1093/rheumatology/kep086 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khanna D, Fitzgerald JD, Khanna PP, et al. . 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:1431–46. 10.1002/acr.21772 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Show all 25 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Full text links [x]
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportion of patients achieving sUA

References

    1. Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2008. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:3136–41. 10.1002/art.30520
    1. Zhang W, Doherty M, Pascual E, et al. . EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part I: diagnosis. Report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:1301–11. 10.1136/ard.2006.055251
    1. Terkeltaub R. Update on gout: new therapeutic strategies and options. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2010;6:30–8. 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.236
    1. Doherty M. New insights into the epidemiology of gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48(Suppl 2):ii2–8. 10.1093/rheumatology/kep086
    1. Khanna D, Fitzgerald JD, Khanna PP, et al. . 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:1431–46. 10.1002/acr.21772
    1. Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T, et al. . EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:1312–24. 10.1136/ard.2006.055269
    1. Perez-Ruiz F, Calabozo M, Pijoan JI, et al. . Effect of urate-lowering therapy on the velocity of size reduction of tophi in chronic gout. Arthritis Rheum 2002;47:356–60. 10.1002/art.10511
    1. Perez-Ruiz F, Herrero-Beites AM. Evaluation and treatment of gout as a chronic disease. Adv Ther 2012;29:935–46. 10.1007/s12325-012-0059-z
    1. Sherman MR, Saifer MG, Perez-Ruiz F. PEG-uricase in the management of treatment-resistant gout and hyperuricemia. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008;60:59–68. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.06.011
    1. KRYSTEXXA. Pegloticase Bridgewater, NJ: Savient Pharmaceuticals, 2012.
    1. Becker MA, Schumacher HR Jr, Wortmann RL, et al. . Febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with hyperuricemia and gout. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2450–61. 10.1056/NEJMoa050373
    1. Becker MA, Schumacher HR, Espinoza LR, et al. . The urate-lowering efficacy and safety of febuxostat in the treatment of the hyperuricemia of gout: the CONFIRMS trial. Arthritis Res Ther 2010;12:R63 10.1186/ar2978
    1. Annemans L, Spaepen E, Gaskin M, et al. . Gout in the UK and Germany: prevalence, comorbidities and management in general practice 2000–2005. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:960–6. 10.1136/ard.2007.076232
    1. Girardet JL, Miner JN. Urate crystal deposition disease and gout—new therapies for an old problem. In: Desai MC. Annual reports in medicinal chemistry. Burlington: Elsevier, 2014:151–64.
    1. Diaz-Torné C, Perez-Herrero N, Perez-Ruiz F. New medications in development for the treatment of hyperuricemia of gout. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2015;27: 164–9. 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000146
    1. Wallace SL, Robinson H, Masi AT, et al. . Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthritis Rheum 1977;20:895–900. 10.1002/art.1780200320
    1. Sundy JS, Baraf HS, Yood RA, et al. . Efficacy and tolerability of pegloticase for the treatment of chronic gout in patients refractory to conventional treatment: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2011;306:711–20. 10.1001/jama.2011.1169
    1. AFT. Probenecid. Auckland, New Zealand: AFT Pharmaceuticals, 2009.
    1. Fam AG. Gout: excess calories, purines, and alcohol intake and beyond. Response to a urate-lowering diet. J Rheumatol 2005;32:773–7.
    1. Sarawate CA, Brewer KK, Yang W, et al. . Gout medication treatment patterns and adherence to standards of care from a managed care perspective. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:925–34. 10.4065/81.7.925
    1. Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Comorbidities of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: NHANES 2007–2008. Am J Med 2012;125:679–87. e671 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.09.033
    1. Müller FO, Schall R, Groenewoud G, et al. . The effect of benzbromarone on allopurinol/oxypurinol kinetics in patients with gout. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1993;44:69–72. 10.1007/BF00315283
    1. Iwanaga T, Kobayashi D, Hirayama M, et al. . Involvement of uric acid transporter in increased renal clearance of the xanthine oxidase inhibitor oxypurinol induced by a uricosuric agent, benzbromarone. Drug Metab Dispos 2005;33:1791–5. 10.1124/dmd.105.006056
    1. Colin JN, Farinotti R, Fredj G, et al. . Kinetics of allopurinol and oxipurinol after chronic oral administration. Interaction with benzbromarone. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1986;31:53–8. 10.1007/BF00870986
    1. Borstad GC, Bryant LR, Abel MP, et al. . Colchicine for prophylaxis of acute flares when initiating allopurinol for chronic gouty arthritis. J Rheumatol 2004;31:2429–32.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi