Tralokinumab Efficacy and Safety, with or without Topical Corticosteroids, in North American Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Subanalysis of Phase 3 Trials ECZTRA 1, 2, and 3

Andrew Blauvelt, Melinda Gooderham, Neal Bhatia, Richard G Langley, Shannon Schneider, John Zoidis, Azra Kurbasic, April Armstrong, Jonathan I Silverberg, Andrew Blauvelt, Melinda Gooderham, Neal Bhatia, Richard G Langley, Shannon Schneider, John Zoidis, Azra Kurbasic, April Armstrong, Jonathan I Silverberg

Abstract

Introduction: In pivotal phase 3 tralokinumab monotherapy (ECZTRA 1/2) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) combination (ECZTRA 3) trials in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), tralokinumab significantly improved signs and symptoms of AD. Geographic region may impact treatment response due to potential differences in race and ethnicity, and based on findings in other therapy areas. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in the ECZTRA 1/2/3 North American population at week 16, as well as maintenance of responses over time, and compared these data side-by-side with those of the ECZTRA 1/2/3 non-North American population.

Methods: Primary endpoints were Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1; clear or almost clear) or at least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) at week 16. At week 16, tralokinumab-treated IGA 0/1 or EASI-75 responders were re-randomized 2:2:1 to tralokinumab 300 mg q2w, or q4w, or placebo (ECZTRA 1/2) and 1:1 to tralokinumab 300 mg q2w or q4w (ECZTRA 3).

Results: Overall, 559/1596 (35%) and 160/380 (42.1%) patients randomized in ECZTRA 1/2 and ECZTRA 3 were from North America, respectively. At week 16, IGA 0/1 and EASI-75 response rates were greater with tralokinumab versus placebo in ECZTRA 1/2 (IGA 0/1: 25.3% vs 15.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0, 17.3; p = 0.012; EASI-75, 40.1% vs 19.4%; 95% CI 12.6, 28.7; p < 0.001) and ECZTRA 3 (IGA 0/1, 40.0% vs 25.9%; 95% CI - 0.5, 28.3; p = 0.074; EASI-75: 58.1% vs 37.0%; 95% CI 4.9, 37.0; p = 0.012) and tralokinumab was well tolerated in the North American population. Patients with IGA 0/1 or EASI-75 response at week 16 demonstrated sustained responses at week 52 and week 32 in ECZTRA 1/2 and ECZTRA 3, respectively. Similar findings were observed in the non-North American trial populations.

Conclusions: Tralokinumab, with or without TCS, displayed similar efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe AD across the North American population, and was comparable to the non-North American population.

Clinical trial registration: NCT03131648 (registered 27-Apr-2017); NCT03160885 (registered 19-May-2017); NCT03363854 (registered 6-Dec-2017).

Keywords: Atopic dermatitis; Geographic region; North America; Patients; Tralokinumab.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Achievement of a IGA score of 0/1 and b EASI-75 response in the ECZTRA 1/2 and ECZTRA 3 North American population at week 16. Patients who received rescue medication prior to week 16 or with missing data were considered non-responders. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test was used to test risk difference, stratified by baseline IGA and study identification for ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2, and baseline IGA for ECZTRA 3. Based on the full analysis set. *p < 0.05 vs placebo; ***p < 0.001 vs placebo. EASI-75 at least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index, IGA Investigator’s Global Assessment, q2w every 2 weeks, TCS topical corticosteroid
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative amount of TCS used in the ECZTRA 3 North American population by visit, assuming no TCS used from non-returned tubes, initial treatment period, full analysis set. Data collected after permanent discontinuation of investigational medicinal product or initiation of rescue medication not included. Repeated measurements model: log[cumulative TCS amount + 1] (g) = Treatment*Week + Baseline IGA. *p < 0.05 vs tralokinumab. IGA Investigator’s Global Assessment, q2w every 2 weeks, SE standard error, TCS topical corticosteroid
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Achievement of EASI-90 in the ECZTRA 1/2 and ECZTRA 3 North American population at week 16. Patients who received rescue medication prior to week 16 or with missing data were considered non-responders. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test was used to test risk difference, stratified by baseline IGA and study identification for ECZTRA 1/2, and by baseline IGA for ECZTRA 3. Based on the full analysis set. ***p < 0.001 vs placebo. EASI-90 at least 90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index, IGA Investigator’s Global Assessment, q2w every 2 weeks, TCS topical corticosteroid
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Change in a SCORAD score, b DLQI, and c percentage change in weekly average worst daily pruritus NRS score in the ECZTRA 1/2 and ECZTRA 3 North American population at week 16. Data collected after permanent discontinuation of investigational medicinal product or initiation of rescue medication not included. Repeated measures model: ECZTRA 1/2, Change from baseline = Treatment*Week + Baseline*Week + Baseline IGA + Study Identification*Week; ECZTRA 3, Change from baseline = Treatment*Week + Baseline*Week + Baseline IGA. Based on the full analysis set. ***p < 0.001 vs placebo. DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index, IGA Investigator’s Global Assessment, NRS numeric rating scale, q2w every 2 weeks, SCORAD SCORing Atopic Dermatitis, SE standard error, TCS topical corticosteroids
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Reduction in pruritus NRS ≥ 4 in the ECZTRA 1/2 and ECZTRA 3 North American population at week 16. Patients who received rescue medication prior to week 16 or with missing data were considered non-responders. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test was used to test risk difference, stratified by baseline IGA and study identification for ECZTRA 1/2, and by baseline IGA for ECZTRA 3. Based on the full analysis set with a baseline pruritus NRS average of ≥ 4. **p < 0.01 vs placebo. IGA Investigator’s Global Assessment, NRS numeric rating scale, q2w every 2 weeks, TCS topical corticosteroid
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Efficacy outcomesa in patients achieving IGA 0/1 or EASI-75 response without rescue medication at week 16 in the ECZTRA 1/2 and ECZTRA 3 North American population, maintenance treatment period, full analysis set. aAt week 52 in ECZTRA 1/2 and week 32 in ECZTRA 3. Patients who received rescue medication or were transferred to open-label treatment or with missing data were considered non-responders. EASI-75 at least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index, IGA Investigator’s Global Assessment, q2w every 2 weeks, TCS topical corticosteroid

References

    1. Weidinger S, Novak N. Atopic dermatitis. Lancet. 2016;387(10023):1109–1122. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00149-X.
    1. Bieber T. How to define atopic dermatitis? Dermatol Clin. 2017;35(3):275–281. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2017.02.001.
    1. Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, Papp KA, Pangan AL, Blauvelt A, et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (measure up 1 and measure up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2151–2168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00588-2.
    1. Simpson EL, Bieber T, Guttman-Yassky E, Beck LA, Blauvelt A, Cork MJ, et al. Two phase 3 trials of dupilumab versus placebo in atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(24):2335–2348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610020.
    1. Simpson EL, Sinclair R, Forman S, Wollenberg A, Aschoff R, Cork M, et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (JADE MONO-1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10246):255–266. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30732-7.
    1. Brunner PM, Guttman-Yassky E. Racial differences in atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;122(5):449–455. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.11.015.
    1. Yew YW, Thyssen JP, Silverberg JI. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the regional and age-related differences in atopic dermatitis clinical characteristics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(2):390–401. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.09.035.
    1. Torrelo A. Atopic dermatitis in different skin types. What is to know? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(Suppl 3):2–4.
    1. Hartmann B, Bramlage P, Lanzinger S, Danne T, Hummel M, Kaltheuner M, et al. Regional differences in type 2 diabetes treatment and outcomes in Germany—an analysis of the German DPV and DIVE registries. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2018;34(8):e3049. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3049.
    1. Krupp LB, Pohl D, Ghezzi A, Boyko A, Tenembaum S, Chen L, et al. Subcutaneous interferon β-1a in pediatric patients with multiple sclerosis: regional differences in clinical features, disease management, and treatment outcomes in an international retrospective study. J Neurol Sci. 2016;363:33–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.01.023.
    1. Popovic B, Breed J, Rees DG, Gardener MJ, Vinall LMK, Kemp B, et al. Structural characterisation reveals mechanism of IL-13-neutralising monoclonal antibody tralokinumab as inhibition of binding to IL-13Ra1 and IL-13Ra2. J Mol Biol. 2017;429(2):208–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.12.005.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Adtralza (tralokinumab) European Public Assessment Report. 19 August 2021. . Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
    1. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Public Assessment Report: Adtralza 150 mg solution for injection in pre-filled syringe. August 2021. . Accessed 7 Feb 2022.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Drugs@FDA: FDA-approved drugs. . Accessed 7 February 2022.
    1. Health Canada. Adtralza product information. 3 November 2021. . Accessed 9 Nov 2021.
    1. Wollenberg A, Blauvelt A, Guttman-Yassky E, Worm M, Lynde C, Lacour JP, et al. Tralokinumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from two 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase III trials (ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2) Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(3):437–449. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19574.
    1. Silverberg JI, Toth D, Bieber T, Alexis AF, Elewski BE, Pink AE, et al. Tralokinumab plus topical corticosteroids for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from the double-blind, randomized, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase III ECZTRA 3 trial. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(3):450–463. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19573.
    1. Blauvelt A, de Bruin-Weller M, Gooderham M, Cather JC, Weisman J, Pariser D, et al. Long-term management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with dupilumab and concomitant topical corticosteroids (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS): a 1-year, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10086):2287–2303. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31191-1.
    1. Wei W, Ghorayeb E, Andria M, Walker V, Schnitzer J, Kennedy M, et al. A real-world study evaluating adeQUacy of Existing Systemic Treatments for patients with moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (QUEST-AD): Baseline treatment patterns and unmet needs assessment. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;123(4):381–8.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.07.008.
    1. Ong PY, Leung DYM. The infectious aspects of atopic dermatitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2010;30(3):309–321. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2010.05.001.
    1. Wollenberg A, Beck LA, de Bruin WM, Simpson EL, Imafuku S, Boguniewicz M, et al. Conjunctivitis in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from five tralokinumab clinical trials. Br J Dermatol. 2022;186(3):453–465. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20810.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi