Ultra-Early Combination Antiplatelet Therapy with Cilostazol for the Prevention of Branch Atheromatous Disease: A Multicenter Prospective Study
Teruo Kimura, Adam Tucker, Toshihide Sugimura, Toshitaka Seki, Shin Fukuda, Satoru Takeuchi, Shiro Miyata, Tsutomu Fujita, Akira Hashizume, Naoto Izumi, Kazutsune Kawasaki, Makoto Katsuno, Masaaki Hashimoto, Kazuhiro Sako, Teruo Kimura, Adam Tucker, Toshihide Sugimura, Toshitaka Seki, Shin Fukuda, Satoru Takeuchi, Shiro Miyata, Tsutomu Fujita, Akira Hashizume, Naoto Izumi, Kazutsune Kawasaki, Makoto Katsuno, Masaaki Hashimoto, Kazuhiro Sako
Abstract
Background and purpose: The optimal use of antiplatelet therapy for intracranial branch atheromatous disease (BAD) is not known.
Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter, single-group trial of 144 consecutive patients diagnosed with probable BAD. All patients were treated within 12 h of symptom onset to prevent clinical progression using dual antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol plus one oral antiplatelet drug (aspirin or clopidogrel). Endpoints of progressive BAD in the dual therapy group at 2 weeks were compared with a matched historical control group of 142 patients treated with single oral antiplatelet therapy using either cilostazol, aspirin, or clopidogrel.
Results: Progressive motor paresis occurred in 14 patients (9.7%) in the aggressive antiplatelet group, compared with 48 (33.8%) in the matched single antiplatelet group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the following variables to be associated with a better prognosis for BAD: baseline modified Rankin Scale score, dual oral antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol, and dyslipidemia (odds ratios of 0.616, 0.445, and 0.297, respectively). Hypertension was associated with a worse prognosis for BAD (odds ratio of 1.955).
Conclusions: Our trial showed that clinical progression of BAD was significantly reduced with the administration of ultra-early aggressive combination therapy using cilostazol compared to treatment with antiplatelet monotherapy.
Keywords: Branch atheromatous disease; Cilostazol; Dual antiplatelet therapy; Progressive stroke.
© 2016 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Figures
References
- Caplan LR. Intracranial branch atheromatous disease: a neglected, understudied, and underused concept. Neurology. 1989;39:1246–1250.
- Ryoo S, Lee MJ, Cha J, Bang OY. Differential vascular pathophysiologic types of intracranial atherosclerotic stroke: a high-resolution wall magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke. 2015;46:2815–2821.
- Adachi T, Kobayashi S. Data 2015 Stroke Bank (in Japanese) Tokyo: Nakayama Shoten; 2015. p. 116.
- Hoshino H, Takagi M, Yamamoto Y, Ishibashi Y, Terayama Y, Takeda H, et al. Neurological progression and clinical outcome of branch atheromatous disease (in Japanese) Jpn J Stroke. 2011;33:37–44.
- Umemura T, Matsui K, Niimi Y, Umemura K, Terao S, Hirayama M. Clinical analysis of related factors for progression and prognosis in branch atheromatous disease (BAD) (in Japanese) Jpn J Stroke. 2008;30:462–470.
- Kim BJ, Kim JS. Ischemic stroke subtype classification: an Asian viewpoint. J Stroke. 2014;16:8–17.
- Chung JW, Kim BJ, Sohn CH, Yoon BW, Lee SH. Branch atheromatous plaque: a major cause of lacunar infarction (high-resolution MRI study) Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2012;2:36–44.
- Petrone L, Nannoni S, Del Bene A, Palumbo V, Inzitari D. Branch atheromatous disease: a clinically meaningful, yet unproven concept. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;41:87–95.
- Special report from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Classification of cerebrovascular diseases III. Stroke. 1990;21:637–676.
- Adams HP, Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993;24:35–41.
- Steinke W, Ley SC. Lacunar stroke is the major cause of progressive motor deficits. Stroke. 2002;33:1510–1516.
- Takagi M. Branch atheromatous disease (in Japanese) Neurol Med. 2008;69:542–549.
- Tanaka H, Saito J, Isoe K, Watanabe Y, Fukada M. Clinical characteristics of pontine infarction due to occlusion of the mouth of the paramedian branches (in Japanese) Jpn J Stroke. 1995;17:51–57.
- Yamamoto Y, Oiwa K, Hayashi M, Imai K, Nakamura T. Coagulation and fibrinolytic activation in lacunar infarct patients (in Japanese) Clin Neurol. 1999;39:1104–1108.
- Caplan LR. Penetrating and branch artery disease. In: Caplan LR, editor. Caplan's Stroke: A Clinical Approach. ed 4. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier Health Sciences; 2009. pp. 291–315.
- Yamamoto Y. Topic of branch atheromatous disease (in Japanese) Pharma Medica. 2008;26:160–165.
- Yamada K, Kato B, Takaishi S, Hirayama T, Hasegawa Y. Early neurological progression of acute small vessel infarction (in Japanese) Jpn J Stroke. 2008;30:50–54.
- Hoshino H, Takagi M, Yamamoto Y, Ishibashi Y, Terayama Y, Takeda H, et al. Neurological progression and clinical outcome of branch atheromatous disease (result from the J-BAD registry) (in Japanese) Clin Neurol. 2010;50:919–920.
- Amareco P, Labreuche J. Lipid management in the prevention of stroke: review and updated meta-analysis of statins for stroke prevention. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:453–463.
- Brugts JJ, Yetgin T, Hoeks SE, Gotto AM, Shepherd J, Westendorp RG, et al. The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ. 2009;339:26–29.
- Castillo J, Leira R. Predictors of deteriorating cerebral infarct: role of inflammatory mechanisms. Would its early treatment be useful? Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;11(suppl 1):40–48.
- Fukuuchi Y, Tohgi H, Shinohara Y, Kobayashi S, Fujishima Y, Tazaki N, et al. A controlled clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of argatroban in treating acute cerebral thrombosis in comparison to sodium ozagrel (in Japanese) Neurol Ther. 2001;18:273–282.
- Diener HC, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM, Cimminiello C, Csiba L, Kaste M, et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:331–337.
Source: PubMed