Natural history and prognostic factors in 305 Swedish patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

U Broomé, R Olsson, L Lööf, G Bodemar, R Hultcrantz, A Danielsson, H Prytz, H Sandberg-Gertzén, S Wallerstedt, G Lindberg, U Broomé, R Olsson, L Lööf, G Bodemar, R Hultcrantz, A Danielsson, H Prytz, H Sandberg-Gertzén, S Wallerstedt, G Lindberg

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS--The course of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is highly variable and unpredictable. This study describes the natural history and outcome of PSC. These data were used to construct a prognostic model for patients with PSC. METHODS--A total of 305 Swedish patients with PSC were studied. The median follow up time was 63 (1-194) months and all patients could be traced for follow up. Some 79 patients died or had a liver transplant. The prognostic significance of clinical, biochemical, and histological findings at the time of diagnosis were evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS--The estimated median survival from time of diagnosis to death or liver transplantation was 12 years. Cholangiocarcinoma was found in 24 (8%) of the patients and 134 (44%) of the patients were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. The estimated survival rate was significantly higher in the asymptomatic group (p < 0.001). However, 29 (22%) of the asymptomatic patients became symptomatic during the study period. It was found that age, serum bilirubin concentration, and histological stage at the time of diagnosis were independent predictors of a bad prognosis. These variables were used to construct a prognostic model. CONCLUSIONS--This prognostic model developed from a large homogeneous population of PSC patients should be of value for the timing of transplantation and patient counselling in PSC.

References

    1. Gut. 1965 Aug;6(4):311-24
    1. Gastroenterology. 1995 Mar;108(3):870-8
    1. Gastroenterology. 1980 Aug;79(2):200-6
    1. Gut. 1980 Oct;21(10):870-7
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1981 Sep;26(9):778-82
    1. Hepatology. 1981 Nov-Dec;1(6):632-40
    1. Gastroenterology. 1987 Jun;92(6):1869-75
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1987 Aug;22(6):655-64
    1. Mayo Clin Proc. 1989 Jan;64(1):84-94
    1. Hepatology. 1989 Oct;10(4):430-6
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Jan;85(1):1-8
    1. N Engl J Med. 1990 Jun 28;322(26):1842-4
    1. Ann Surg. 1991 Jan;213(1):21-5
    1. Hepatology. 1991 Jan;13(1):129-33
    1. Gastroenterology. 1991 May;100(5 Pt 1):1319-23
    1. Gastroenterology. 1991 Jun;100(6):1710-7
    1. Gut. 1991 Nov;32(11):1369-73
    1. Gut. 1992 Jul;33(7):942-6
    1. Hepatology. 1992 Nov;16(5):1290-9
    1. Gastroenterology. 1992 Dec;103(6):1893-901
    1. Gastroenterology. 1993 Dec;105(6):1865-76
    1. Gastroenterology. 1994 Jan;106(1):160-7
    1. Gut. 1994 Jan;35(1):84-9
    1. J Hepatol. 1994 May;20(5):654-9
    1. Gastroenterology. 1975 Apr;68(4 Pt 1):627-35

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi