Management of diabetic foot disease and amputation in the Irish health system: a qualitative study of patients' attitudes and experiences with health services

Sarah Delea, Claire Buckley, Andrew Hanrahan, Gerald McGreal, Deirdre Desmond, Sheena McHugh, Sarah Delea, Claire Buckley, Andrew Hanrahan, Gerald McGreal, Deirdre Desmond, Sheena McHugh

Abstract

Background: Diabetes is an increasingly prevalent chronic illness that places a huge burden on the individual, the health system and society. Patients with active foot disease and lower limb amputations due to diabetes have a significant amount of interaction with the health care services. The purpose of this study was to explore the attitudes and experiences of foot care services in Ireland among people with diabetes and active foot disease or lower limb amputations.

Methods: A purposive sample of individuals who had either active foot disease or a lower limb amputation as a result of diabetes were recruited from the Prosthetic, Orthotic and Limb Absence Rehabilitation (POLAR) Unit of an Irish hospital. One-to-one interviews were conducted in the POLAR unit using a semi-structured topic guide. Thematic analysis was used to identify, analyse and describe patterns within the data.

Results: Ten males participated in the study. Most participants expressed a need for emotional support alongside the medical management of their condition. There were substantial differences between participants with regard to the level of education and information they appeared to have received regarding their illness. There were also variations in levels of service received. Transport and medication costs were considered barriers. Having a medical card, which entitles the holder to free medical care, eased the burden of the patient's illness. A number of participants attributed some of the problems they faced with services to the health care system as a whole rather than health care professionals.

Conclusion: Results suggest that rehabilitation services should place a strong focus on psychological as well as physical adjustment to active foot disease or lower limb amputations. The delivery of services needs to be standardised to ensure equal access to medical care and supplies among people with or at risk of lower extremity amputations. The wider social circumstances of patients should be taken into consideration by health care professionals to provide effective support while patients adjust to this potentially life changing complication. The patient's perspective should also be used to inform health service managers and health professionals on ways to improve services.

References

    1. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2010. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1047–53. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047.
    1. International Diabetes Federation (Europe): Diabetes: The Policy Puzzle: Is Europe Making Progress? P.71. Third Edition; European Coalition for Diabetes; 2012.
    1. World Health Organisation (WHO). Fact sheet no. 312; WHO Media centre; 2013.
    1. Institute of Public Health (IPH) Diabetes briefing. Chronic Conditions Hub. .
    1. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Health at a Glance 2009: OECD Indicators. Avoidable admissions: diabetes complications.
    1. Pecoraro R, Reiber GE, Burgess EM. Pathway to diabetic limb amputation. Diabetes Care. 1990;13:513–21. doi: 10.2337/diacare.13.5.513.
    1. Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. Cellular and molecular basis of wound healing in diabetes. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(5):1219–22. doi: 10.1172/JCI32169.
    1. Diabetes Ireland. (2013). Footcare Services.
    1. Diabetes Ireland. (2013). Diabetes in Ireland.
    1. Liu F, William RM, Lie HE, Chien NH. The loved experience of persons with lower extremity amputations. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19:2152–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03256.x.
    1. Murray CD, Forshaw MJ. The experience of amputations and prosthesis use for adults: a metasynthesis. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2013;35(14):1133-1142.
    1. Ostler C, Ellis-Hill C, Donovan-Hill M. Expectations of rehabilitation following lower-limb amputations: a qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2014;36(14):1169-75.
    1. Livingstone W, van de Mortel TF, Taylor B. A path of perpetual resistance: exploring the experiences of diabetes- related amputations through grounded theory. Contemp Nurse. 2011;39(1):20–30. doi: 10.5172/conu.2011.39.1.20.
    1. Gale L, Vedhara K, Searle A, Kemple T, Campbell R. Patients’ perspectives on foot complications in type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58(553):555–63. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X319657.
    1. Johnson M, Newton P, Jiwa M, Goyder E. Meeting the educational needs of people at risk of diabetes-related amputation: a vignette study with patients and professionals. Health Expect. 2005;8(4):324–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00344.x.
    1. Aliasgharpour M, Nayeri ND. The care process of diabetic foot ulcer patients: a qualitative study in Iran. J Diabetes Metabol Disord. 2012;11(1):27. doi: 10.1186/2251-6581-11-27.
    1. Searle A, Gale L, Campbell R, Wetherell M, Dawke N, Dayan C, Tarlton J, Miles J, Vedhara K. Reducing the burden of chronic wounds: prevention and management of the diabetic foot in the context of clinical guidelines. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;3:82–91. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008011.
    1. Wong M, Haswell-Elkins M, Tamwoy E, McDermott R, d’Abbs P. Perspectives on clinica attendance, medication and foot-care among people with diabetes in the Torres Strait Islands and Northern Peninsula Area. Aust J Rural Health. 2005;13(3):172–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1854.2005.00678.x.
    1. Sjödahl C, Gard G, Jarnlo GB. Transfemoral amputees’ experiences of the first meeting and subsequent interactions with hospital staff. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;30(16):1192–203. doi: 10.1080/09638280701521683.
    1. Wellard SJ, Rennie S, King R. Perceptions of people with type 2 diabetes about self-management and the efficacy of community based services. Contemp Nurse. 2008;29(2):218–26. doi: 10.5172/conu.673.29.2.218.
    1. Ribu L, Wahl A. Living with diabetic foot ulcers: a life of fear, restrictions and pain. Ostomy Wound Manag. 2004;50(2):57–67.
    1. Mc Hugh S, O’Keeffe J, Fitzpatrick A, de Siún A, O’Mullane M, Perry I, Bradley C, National Diabetes Register Project (NDRP) Diabetes care in Ireland: a survey of general practitioners. Prim Care Diabetes. 2009;3(4):225–31. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2009.09.002.
    1. O’Donnell M, de Siún A, O’Mullane M, Smith D, Bradley C, Finucane FM, Dinneen SF. Differences in the structure of outpatient care between endocrinologist- led and general physician- led services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:493. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-493.
    1. National Diabetes Programme, Clinical Strategy and Programmes Directorate: Model of Care for the Diabetic Foot. HSE; 2011.
    1. Robson C. Real world research. Third. West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2011.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Morse JM. Data were saturated…”. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(5):587–8. doi: 10.1177/1049732315576699.
    1. Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inf. 2004;22:63–75.
    1. Health Service Executive. (2009). Review of Diabetes Structured Education.
    1. Deakin TA, Cade JE, Williams R, Greenwood DC. Structured patient education: the diabetes X-PERT Programme makes a difference. Diabet Med: J Br Association. 2006;23(9):944–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01906.x.
    1. Loveman E, Frampton GK, Clegg AJ. The clinical effectiveness of diabetes education models for Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12(9):1–116. doi: 10.3310/hta12090.
    1. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE): Type 2 diabetes: Prevention and management of foot problems. Clinical Guideline 2004:10;3-29.
    1. Van Acker K, Léger P, Hartemann A, Chawla A, Siddiqui MK. Burden of diabetic foot disorders, guidelines for management and disparities in implementation in Europe: a systematic literature review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014;30(8):635–45. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2523.
    1. Krishnan S, Nash F, Baker N, Fowler D, Rayman G. Reduction in diabetic amputations over 11 years in a defined UK population: Benefits of multi-disciplinary team work and continuous prospective audit. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(1):99–101. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1178.
    1. Buckley CM, Perry IJ, Bradley CP, Kearney PM. Does contact with a podiatrist prevent the occurrence of a lower extremity amputation in people with diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2012, 3(5).doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002331
    1. Feinglass J, Shively VP, Martin GJ, Huang ME, Soriano RH, Rodriguez HE, Pearce WH, Gordon EJ. How preventable are lower extremity amputations? A qualitative study of patient perceptions of precipitating factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(25):2158–65. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.677936.
    1. Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J. 2009;204(6):291–5. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2008.192.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi