Efficacy and Safety of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomised, Controlled Study

Ling Ding, Cong He, Xueyang Li, Xin Huang, Yupeng Lei, Huajing Ke, Hongyan Chen, Qinyu Yang, Yan Cai, Yuanhang Liao, Wenhua He, Liang Xia, Huifang Xiong, Nonghua Lu, Yin Zhu, Ling Ding, Cong He, Xueyang Li, Xin Huang, Yupeng Lei, Huajing Ke, Hongyan Chen, Qinyu Yang, Yan Cai, Yuanhang Liao, Wenhua He, Liang Xia, Huifang Xiong, Nonghua Lu, Yin Zhu

Abstract

Aims: We investigated whether faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) decreases intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and improves gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction and infectious complications in acute pancreatitis (AP). Methods: In this first randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, controlled study, we recruited and enrolled consecutive patients with AP complicated with GI dysfunction. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive faecal transplant (n = 30) or normal saline (n = 30) via a nasoduodenal tube once and then again 2 days later. The primary endpoint was the rate of IAP decline; secondary endpoints were GI function, infectious complications, organ failure, hospital stay and mortality. Analyses were based on intention to treat. Results: We enrolled 60 participants and randomly assigned them to the FMT (n = 30) or control (n = 30) group. Baseline characteristics and disease severity were similar for both groups. IAP decreased significantly 1 week after intervention in both groups, with no difference in the IAP decline rate between FMT and Control group [0.1 (-0.6, 0.5) vs. 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6); P = 0.27]. Normal gastrointestinal failure (GIF) scores were achieved in 12 (40%) patients in the FMT group and 14 (47%) in the control group, with no significant difference (P = 0.60). However, D-lactate was significantly elevated in the FMT group compared to the control group, as calculated by the rate of decline [-0.3 (-3.7, 0.8) vs. 0.4 (-1.1, 0.9); P = 0.01]. Infectious complications occurred in 15 (50%) and 16 (53.33%) patients in the FMT and control groups, respectively (P = 0.80). However, interleukin-6 (IL-6) was significantly elevated in the FMT group compared to the control group, as calculated by the rate of decline [0.4 (-3.6, 0.9) vs. 0.8 (-1.7, 1.0); P = 0.03]. One participant experienced transient nausea immediately after FMT, but no serious adverse events were attributed to FMT. Conclusion: FMT had no obvious effect on IAP and infectious complications in AP patients, though GI barrier indictors might be adversely affected. Further multi-centre studies are needed to confirm our findings. The study was registered at https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02318134" title="See in ClinicalTrials.gov">NCT02318134).

Keywords: acute pancreatitis; faecal microbiota transplantation; gastrointestinal dysfunction; gut microbiota dysbiosis; infected pancreatic necrosis.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Ding, He, Li, Huang, Lei, Ke, Chen, Yang, Cai, Liao, He, Xia, Xiong, Lu and Zhu.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of patients included and excluded from analysis according to CONSORT 2010. CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; GI, gastrointestinal; AP, acute pancreatitis; FMT, faecal microbiota transplantation. *GI dysfunction was defined as intra-abdominal hypertension and GI symptoms or signs including obvious abdominal distention, abdominal rumbling sound weakening or disappearance and no self-defecation. †Multiple organ failure was defined as two or more organ failures of the respiratory, cardiovascular and renal systems, which were defined according to the 2012 Atlanta Classification criterion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Gastrointestinal function and inflammatory indicators were examined and compared before and at 1 week after intervention in the two groups. The decline rate of those indicators was also compared between the FMT group and the control group. Gastrointestinal function indicators included IAP (A), the level of DAO (B), the level of D-lactate (C), and the level of endotoxin (D); inflammatory indictors included the level of CRP (E), the level of PCT (F), the level of THF-α (G), and the level of IL-6 (H). FMT, faecal microbiota transplantation; IAP, intra-abdominal pressure; DAO, D-amino acid oxidase; CRP, C-reactive protein; PCT, procalcitonin; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α; IL-6, interleukin-6; ns, not significant. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

References

    1. Krishna SG, Kamboj AK, Hart PA, Hinton A, Conwell DL. The changing epidemiology of acute pancreatitis hospitalizations: a decade of trends and the impact of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. (2017) 46:482–8. 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000783
    1. Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, Lund JL, Dellon ES, Williams JL, et al. . Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: update 2018. Gastroenterology. (2019) 156:254–272.e11. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.063
    1. Trikudanathan G, Wolbrink DRJ, van Santvoort HC, Mallery S, Freeman M, Besselink MG. Current concepts in severe acute and necrotizing pancreatitis: an evidence-based approach. Gastroenterology. (2019) 156:1994–2007.e3. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.269
    1. Cen ME, Wang F, Su Y, Zhang WJ, Sun B, Wang G. Gastrointestinal microecology: a crucial and potential target in acute Pancreatitis. Apoptosis. (2018) 23:377–87. 10.1007/s10495-018-1464-9
    1. Van Leeuwen PA, Boermeester MA, Houdijk AP., Ferwerda CC, Cuesta MA, Meyer S, et al. . Clinical significance of translocation. Gut. (1994) 35:S28–34. 10.1136/gut.35.1_Suppl.S28
    1. Agarwala R, Rana SS, Sharma R, Kang M, Gorsi U, Gupta R. Gastrointestinal failure is a predictor of poor outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. (2020) 65:2419–26. 10.1007/s10620-019-05952-5
    1. Zhu Y, He C, Li X, Cai Y, Hu J, Liao Y, et al. . Gut microbiota dysbiosis worsens the severity of acute pancreatitis in patients and mice. J Gastroenterol. (2019) 54:347–58. 10.1007/s00535-018-1529-0
    1. Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Buskens E, Boermeester MA, van Goor H., Timmerman HM, et al. . Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. (2008) 371:651–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60207-X
    1. Gou S, Yang Z, Liu T, Wu H, Wang C. Use of probiotics in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. (2014) 18:R57. 10.1186/cc13809
    1. Bongaerts GP, Severijnen RS. A reassessment of the PROPATRIA study and its implications for probiotic therapy. Nat Biotechnol. (2016) 34:55–63. 10.1038/nbt.3436
    1. Kelly CR, Khoruts A, Staley C, Sadowsky MJ, Abd M, Alani M, et al. . Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on recurrence in multiply recurrent clostridioides difficile infection: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. (2016) 165:609–616. 10.7326/M16-0271
    1. Hvas CL, Dahl Jørgensen SM, Jørgensen SP, Storgaard M, Lemming L, Hansen MM, et al. . Fecal microbiota transplantation is superior to fidaxomicin for treatment of recurrent clostridioides difficile infection. Gastroenterology. (2019) 156:1324–32.e3. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.019
    1. WeiY, Yang J, Wang J, Yang Y, Huang J, Gong H, et al. . Successful treatment with fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and diarrhea following severe sepsis. Crit Care. (2016) 20:332. 10.1186/s13054-016-1491-2
    1. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al. . Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. (2013) 62:102–111. 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779
    1. Reintam Blaser A, Malbrain ML, Starkopf J, Fruhwald S, Jakob SM, De Waele J, et al. . Gastrointestinal function in intensive care patients: terminology, definitions and management. Recommendations of the ESICM working group on abdominal problems. Intensive Care Med. (2012) 38:384–394. 10.1007/s00134-011-2459-y
    1. Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV, Bernard GR, Sprung CL, Sibbald WJ. Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med. (1995) 23:1638–52. 10.1097/00003246-199510000-00007
    1. Kelly CR, Kunde SS, Khoruts A. Guidance on preparing an investigational new drug application for fecal microbiota transplantation studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2014) 12:283–8. 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.060
    1. Crockett SD, Wani S, Gardner TB, Falck-Ytter Y, Barkun AN, American Gastroenterological Association Institute Clinical Guidelines Committee. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on initial management of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. (2018) 154:1096–101. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.032
    1. Reintam A, Parm P, Kitus R, Starkopf J, Kern H. Gastrointestinal failure score in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. (2008) 12:R90. 10.1186/cc6958
    1. Malbrain ML, Cheatham ML, Kirkpatrick A, Sugrue M, Parr M, De Waele J, et al. . Results from the international conference of experts on intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. I. Definitions. Intensive Care Med. (2006) 32:1722–32. 10.1007/s00134-006-0349-5
    1. Li X, He C, Li N, Ding L, Chen H, Wan J, et al. . The interplay between the gut microbiota and NLRP3 activation affects the severity of acute pancreatitis in mice. Gut Microbes. (2020) 11:1774–89. 10.1080/19490976.2020.1770042
    1. Kassam Z, Lee CH, Hunt RH. Review of the emerging treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection with fecal microbiota transplantation and insights into future challenges. Clin Lab Med. (2014) 34:787–98. 10.1016/j.cll.2014.08.007
    1. Nazli A, Yang PC, Jury J., Howe K, Watson JL, Söderholm JD, et al. . Epithelia under metabolic stress perceive commensal bacteria as a threat. Am J Pathol. (2004) 164:947–57. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63182-3
    1. Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Renooij W, de Smet MB, Boermeester MA, Fischer K, et al. . Intestinal barrier dysfunction in a randomized trial of a specific probiotic composition in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg. (2009) 250:712–9. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bce5bd
    1. Smillie CS, Sauk J, Gevers D, Friedman J, Sung J, Youngster I, et al. . Strain tracking reveals the determinants of bacterial engraftment in the human gut following fecal microbiota transplantation. Cell Host Microbe. (2018) 23:229–240.e5. 10.1016/j.chom.2018.01.003
    1. Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Kelly CR, Mullish BH, Allegretti JR, Kassam Z, et al. . International consensus conference on stool banking for fecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut. (2019) 68:2111–21. 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319548
    1. Fritz S, Hackert T, Hartwig W, Rossmanith F, Strobel O, Schneider L, et al. . Bacterial translocation and infected pancreatic necrosis in acute necrotizing pancreatitis derives from small bowel rather than from colon. Am J Surg. (2010) 200:111–7. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.019
    1. Gupta A, Ananthakrishnan AN. Economic burden and cost-effectiveness of therapies for Clostridiodes difficile infection: a narrative review. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. (2021) 14:17562848211018654. 10.1177/17562848211018654
    1. You JHS, Jiang X, Lee WH, Chan PKS, Ng SC. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2020) 35:1515–23. 10.1111/jgh.15002
    1. Marcella C, Cui B, Kelly CR, Ianiro G, Cammarota G, Zhang F. Systematic review: the global incidence of faecal microbiota transplantation-related adverse events from 2000 to 2020. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2021) 53:33–42. 10.1111/apt.16148
    1. Zhang T, Lu G, Zhao Z, Liu Y, Shen Q, Li P, et al. . Washed microbiota transplantation vs. manual fecal microbiota transplantation: clinical findings, animal studies and in vitro screening. Protein Cell. (2020) 11:251–66. 10.1007/s13238-019-00684-8
    1. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation-standardization Study Group . Nanjing consensus on methodology of washed microbiota transplantation. Chin Med J. (2020) 133:2330–2. 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000954

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi