Long-term safety and efficacy of eculizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis

Srikanth Muppidi, Kimiaki Utsugisawa, Michael Benatar, Hiroyuki Murai, Richard J Barohn, Isabel Illa, Saiju Jacob, John Vissing, Ted M Burns, John T Kissel, Richard J Nowak, Henning Andersen, Carlos Casasnovas, Jan L de Bleecker, Tuan H Vu, Renato Mantegazza, Fanny L O'Brien, Jing Jing Wang, Kenji P Fujita, James F Howard Jr, Regain Study Group

Abstract

Introduction: Eculizumab is effective and well tolerated in patients with antiacetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG; REGAIN; NCT01997229). We report an interim analysis of an open-label extension of REGAIN, evaluating eculizumab's long-term safety and efficacy.

Methods: Eculizumab (1,200 mg every 2 weeks for 22.7 months [median]) was administered to 117 patients.

Results: The safety profile of eculizumab was consistent with REGAIN; no cases of meningococcal infection were reported during the interim analysis period. Myasthenia gravis exacerbation rate was reduced by 75% from the year before REGAIN (P < 0.0001). Improvements with eculizumab in activities of daily living, muscle strength, functional ability, and quality of life in REGAIN were maintained through 3 years; 56% of patients achieved minimal manifestations or pharmacological remission. Patients who had received placebo during REGAIN experienced rapid and sustained improvements during open-label eculizumab (P < 0.0001).

Discussion: These findings provide evidence for the long-term safety and sustained efficacy of eculizumab for refractory gMG. Muscle Nerve 2019.

Keywords: MG-ADL; MG-QOL15; MGC; QMG; eculizumab; myasthenia gravis.

© 2019 The Authors. Muscle & Nerve published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. *Interim data are reported from the December 31, 2017 data cutoff point. †During the blinded induction phase of the open‐label study, patients received eculizumab (1,200 mg; 4 vials) at day 1 and week 2 and received placebo (4 vials) at weeks 1 and 3 (eculizumab/eculizumab group) or placebo (1 vial) plus eculizumab (900 mg; 3 vials) each week (placebo/eculizumab group). ‡Patients who withdrew or discontinued after receiving any amount of eculizumab were required to complete a safety follow‐up visit 8 weeks after their last eculizumab dose. SOC, standard of care.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient disposition through December 31, 2017. In total, 117 patients enrolled in the open‐label study, of whom 56 had received eculizumab and 61 had received placebo during REGAIN. As of December 31, 2017, twenty‐seven patients had discontinued, 5 patients had completed the study, and 85 patients were continuing in the study.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Treatment effects on event rates for all reported exacerbations (A), rescue therapy administration (exacerbation events requiring rescue therapy (B), and MG‐related hospitalization (exacerbation events requiring rescue therapy (C). Model‐based event rate per 100 patient‐years is based on a generalized estimating equation Poisson regression repeated‐measures model with the number of events as the dependent variable, the logarithm of patient‐years as the offset variable, and the study phase indicator (prestudy, placebo, or eculizumab) as the factors assuming a compound symmetry correlation structure. *Patient‐year for prestudy accounted for a maximum of 365 days for each patient prior to screening. |Changes in event rates in this group reflect the response to placebo that was observed during REGAIN. PY, patient‐year.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Change from REGAIN baseline to week 130 in the open‐label extension study in MG‐ADL (A), QMG (B), MGC (C), and MG‐QOL15 (D) total scores (mean [95% CI]) by treatment arm over time (full analysis set). Patient numbers were not the same for each assessment. BL, baseline; CI, confidence interval; MG‐ADL, Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living; MGC, Myasthenia Gravis Composite scale; MG‐QOL15, Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15; QMG, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis scale.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Change from open‐label baseline in MG‐ADL to week 4 (double‐blind induction phase only; A1), MG‐ADL to week 130 (A2), QMG to week 4 (B1), QMG to week 130 (B2), MGC to week 4 (C1), MGC to week 130 (C2), MG‐QOL15 to week 4 (D1), and MG‐QOL15 to week 130 (D2); total scores (LS mean [95% CI]) by treatment group over time (full analysis set). Patient numbers were not the same for each assessment. The stability of scores during the open‐label study in the eculizumab/eculizumab group is evidence of the maintenance of improvements achieved during eculizumab treatment in REGAIN in these patients. The rapid and significant improvements in the placebo/eculizumab group are evidence of these patients’ response to commencing eculizumab at the start of the open‐label study, including during the initial 4‐week blinded induction phase. *P ≤ 0.05, †P ≤ 0.01, ‡P ≤ 0.0001 compared with open‐label baseline, repeated‐measures analysis. BL, baseline; CI, confidence interval; LS, least‐squares; MG‐ADL, Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living; MGC, Myasthenia Gravis Composite scale; MG‐QOL15, Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15; QMG, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis scale.

References

    1. Conti‐Fine BM, Milani M, Kaminski HJ. Myasthenia gravis: past, present, and future. J Clin Invest 2006;116:2843–2854.
    1. Lindstrom JM, Seybold ME, Lennon VA, Whittingham S, Duane DD. Antibody to acetylcholine receptor in myasthenia gravis. Prevalence, clinical correlates, and diagnostic value. Neurology 1976;26:1054–1059.
    1. Mantegazza R, Pareyson D, Baggi F, Romagnoli P, Peluchetti D, Sghirlanzoni A, et al Anti‐AChR antibody: relevance to diagnosis and clinical aspects of myasthenia gravis. Ital J Neurol Sci 1988;9:141–145.
    1. Vincent A, McConville J, Farrugia ME, Bowen J, Plested P, Tang T, et al Antibodies in myasthenia gravis and related disorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003;998:324–335.
    1. Vincent A, Newsom‐Davis J. Acetylcholine receptor antibody as a diagnostic test for myasthenia gravis: results in 153 validated cases and 2967 diagnostic assays. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985;48:1246–1252.
    1. Oh SJ, Kim DE, Kuruoglu R, Bradley RJ, Dwyer D. Diagnostic sensitivity of the laboratory tests in myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 1992;15:720–724.
    1. Somnier FE. Clinical implementation of anti‐acetylcholine receptor antibodies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:496–504.
    1. Biesecker G, Gomez CM. Inhibition of acute passive transfer experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis with Fab antibody to complement C6. J Immunol 1989;142:2654–2659.
    1. Christadoss P. C5 gene influences the development of murine myasthenia gravis. J Immunol 1988;140:2589–2592.
    1. Karachunski PI, Ostlie NS, Monfardini C, Conti‐Fine BM. Absence of IFN‐γ or IL‐12 has different effects on experimental myasthenia gravis in C57BL/6 mice. J Immunol 2000;164:5236–5244.
    1. Piddlesden SJ, Jiang S, Levin JL, Vincent A, Morgan BP. Soluble complement receptor 1 (sCR1) protects against experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis. J Neuroimmunol 1996;71:173–177.
    1. Fumagalli G, Engel AG, Lindstrom J. Ultrastructural aspects of acetylcholine receptor turnover at the normal end‐plate and in autoimmune myasthenia gravis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1982;41:567–579.
    1. Conti‐Tronconi B, Tzartos S, Lindstrom J. Monoclonal antibodies as probes of acetylcholine receptor structure. 2. Binding to native receptor. Biochemistry 1981;20:2181–2191.
    1. Howard JF Jr., Utsugisawa K, Benatar M, Murai H, Barohn RJ, Illa I, et al Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti‐acetylcholine receptor antibody‐positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol 2017;16:976–986.
    1. Suh J, Goldstein JM, Nowak RJ. Clinical characteristics of refractory myasthenia gravis patients. Yale J Biol Med 2013;86:255–260.
    1. Buzzard KA, Meyer NJ, Hardy TA, Riminton DS, Reddel SW. Induction intravenous cyclophosphamide followed by maintenance oral immunosuppression in refractory myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 2015;52:204–210.
    1. Silvestri NJ, Wolfe GI. Treatment‐refractory myasthenia gravis. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis 2014;15:167–178.
    1. Sanders DB, Wolfe GI, Benatar M, Evoli A, Gilhus NE, Illa I, et al International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis: executive summary. Neurology 2016;87:419–425.
    1. Howard JF Jr. Myasthenia gravis: the role of complement at the neuromuscular junction. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2018;1412:113–128.
    1. Engel‐Nitz NM, Boscoe AN, Wolbeck R, Johnson J, Silvestri NJ. Burden of illness in patients with treatment refractory myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 2018;58:99–105.
    1. Jani‐Acsadi A, Lisak RP. Myasthenic crisis: guidelines for prevention and treatment. J Neurol Sci 2007;261:127–133.
    1. Rother RP, Rollins SA, Mojcik CF, Brodsky RA, Bell L. Discovery and development of the complement inhibitor eculizumab for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:1256–1264.
    1. McNamara LA, Topaz N, Wang X, Hariri S, Fox L, MacNeil JR. High risk for invasive meningococcal disease among patients receiving eculizumab (Soliris) despite receipt of meningococcal vaccine. Am J Transplant 2017;17:2481–2484.
    1. Wolfe GI, Herbelin L, Nations SP, Foster B, Bryan WW, Barohn RJ. Myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile. Neurology 1999;52:1487–1489.
    1. Barohn RJ, McIntire D, Herbelin L, Wolfe GI, Nations S, Bryan WW. Reliability testing of the quantitative myasthenia gravis score. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998;841:769–772.
    1. Burns TM, Conaway M, Sanders DB; MG‐Qol Study Group . The MG Composite: a valid and reliable outcome measure for myasthenia gravis. Neurology 2010;74:1434–1440.
    1. Burns TM, Grouse CK, Conaway MR, Sanders DB; MG‐QOL15 Study Group. Construct and concurrent validation of the MG‐QOL15 in the practice setting. Muscle Nerve 2010;41:219–226.
    1. Muppidi S. The myasthenia gravis–specific activities of daily living profile. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012;1274:114–119.
    1. Katzberg HD, Barnett C, Merkies IS, Bril V. Minimal clinically important difference in myasthenia gravis: outcomes from a randomized trial. Muscle Nerve 2014;49:661–665.
    1. Muppidi S, Wolfe GI, Conaway M, Burns TM, the MG Composite and MG‐QOL15 Study Group. MG‐ADL: still a relevant outcome measure. Muscle Nerve 2011;44:727–731.
    1. Jaretzki A 3rd, Barohn RJ, Ernstoff RM, Kaminski HJ, Keesey JC, Penn AS, et al Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Task Force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America. Neurology 2000;55:16–23.
    1. Hillmen P, Young NS, Schubert J, Brodsky RA, Socie G, Muus P, et al The complement inhibitor eculizumab in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1233–1243.
    1. Zuber J, Fakhouri F, Roumenina LT, Loirat C, Fremeaux‐Bacchi V, French Study Group for a HCG . Use of eculizumab for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathies. Nat Rev Nephrol 2012;8:643–657.
    1. Zuber J, Le Quintrec M, Krid S, Bertoye C, Gueutin V, Lahoche A, et al Eculizumab for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome recurrence in renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2012;12:3337–3354.
    1. Gajdos P, Tranchant C, Clair B, Bolgert F, Eymard B, Stojkovic T, et al Treatment of myasthenia gravis exacerbation with intravenous immunoglobulin: a randomized double‐blind clinical trial. Arch Neurol 2005;62:1689–1693.
    1. Zhou Y, Gong B, Lin F, Rother RP, Medof ME, Kaminski HJ. Anti‐C5 antibody treatment ameliorates weakness in experimentally acquired myasthenia gravis. J Immunol 2007;179:8562–8567.
    1. Kusner LL, Satija N, Cheng G, Kaminski HJ. Targeting therapy to the neuromuscular junction: proof of concept. Muscle Nerve 2014;49:749–756.
    1. Huda R, Tuzun E, Christadoss P. Complement C2 siRNA mediated therapy of myasthenia gravis in mice. J Autoimmun 2013;42:94–104.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi