Robot-assisted gait training for balance and lower extremity function in patients with infratentorial stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial

Ha Yeon Kim, Joon-Ho Shin, Sung Phil Yang, Min A Shin, Stephanie Hyeyoung Lee, Ha Yeon Kim, Joon-Ho Shin, Sung Phil Yang, Min A Shin, Stephanie Hyeyoung Lee

Abstract

Background: Balance impairments are common in patients with infratentorial stroke. Although robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) exerts positive effects on balance among patients with stroke, it remains unclear whether such training is superior to conventional physical therapy (CPT). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of RAGT combined with CPT and compared them with the effects of CPT only on balance and lower extremity function among survivors of infratentorial stroke.

Methods: This study was a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with a crossover design conducted at a single rehabilitation hospital. Patients (n = 19; 16 men, three women; mean age: 47.4 ± 11.6 years) with infratentorial stroke were randomly allocated to either group A (4 weeks of RAGT+CPT, followed by 4 weeks of CPT+CPT) or group B (4 weeks of CPT+CPT followed by 4 weeks of RAGT+CPT). Changes in dynamic and static balance as indicated by Berg Balance Scale scores were regarded as the primary outcome measure. Outcome measures were evaluated for each participant at baseline and after each 4-week intervention period.

Results: No significant differences in outcome-related variables were observed between group A and B at baseline. In addition, no significant time-by-group interactions were observed for any variables, indicating that intervention order had no effect on lower extremity function or balance. Significantly greater improvements in secondary functional outcomes such as lower extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA-LE) and scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) were observed following the RAGT+CPT intervention than following the CPT+CPT intervention.

Conclusion: RAGT produces clinically significant improvements in balance and lower extremity function in individuals with infratentorial stroke. Thus, RAGT may be useful for patients with balance impairments secondary to other pathologies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02680691. Registered 09 February 2016; retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Balance; Gait impairment; Robot-assisted gait training; Stroke.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Left: BBS scores between RAGT+CPT and CPT+CPT groups before and after intervention. Right: Four weeks BBS score change from baseline. The error bars means standard errors. BBS: Berg Balance Scale; CPT: conventional physical therapy; RAGT: robot-assisted gait training
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Left: COP-based variables during FSEO, FSEC, FTEO, and FTEC in the RAGT+CPT and CPT+CPT groups. Right: Four weeks COP-based variables change from baseline during FSEO, FSEC, FTEO, and FTEC. (A) COP VelML, (B) COP VelAP, and (C) COP area. The error bars mean standard errors. COP: center of pressure; CPT: conventional physical therapy; FSEC: feet separated, eyes closed; FSEO: feet separated, eyes open; FTEC: feet together, eyes closed; FTEO: feet together, eyes open; RAGT: robot-assisted gait training; VelAP: velocity in the anteroposterior direction; VelML: velocity in the mediolateral direction

References

    1. Harris JE, Eng JJ, Marigold DS, Tokuno CD, Louis CS. Relationship of balance and mobility to fall incidence in people with chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2005;85:150–158.
    1. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Stroke. 2016;47:e98–e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098.
    1. Diringer MN. Intracerebral hemorrhage: pathophysiology and management. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:1591–1603. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199310000-00032.
    1. van den Bos GA, Smits JP, Westert GP, van Straten A. Socioeconomic variations in the course of stroke: unequal health outcomes, equal care? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:943–948. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.12.943.
    1. Emsley HC. Posterior circulation stroke: still a Cinderella disease. BMJ. 2013;346:f3552. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3552.
    1. Schmahmann JD. Disorders of the cerebellum: ataxia, dysmetria of thought, and the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004;16:367–378. doi: 10.1176/jnp.16.3.367.
    1. Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain. 1998;121:561–579. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.4.561.
    1. Morton SM, Bastian AJ. Cerebellar control of balance and locomotion. Neuroscientist. 2004;10:247–259. doi: 10.1177/1073858404263517.
    1. Thach WT, Bastian AJ. Role of the cerebellum in the control and adaptation of gait in health and disease. Prog Brain Res. 2004;143:353–366. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(03)43034-3.
    1. Prosperini L, Kouleridou A, Petsas N, Leonardi L, Tona F, Pantano P, et al. The relationship between infratentorial lesions, balance deficit and accidental falls in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2011;304:55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.02.014.
    1. Sale P, Franceschini M, Waldner A, Hesse S. Use of the robot assisted gait therapy in rehabilitation of patients with stroke and spinal cord injury. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;48:111–121.
    1. Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:S225–S239. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/018).
    1. Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M, Elsner B. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5:CD006185.
    1. Tong RK, Ng MF, Li LS. Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2006;87:1298–1304. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.016.
    1. Mayr A, Kofler M, Quirbach E, Matzak H, Fröhlich K, Saltuari L. Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehab Neural Repair. 2007;21:307–314. doi: 10.1177/1545968307300697.
    1. Pohl M, Werner C, Holzgraefe M, Kroczek G, Wingendorf I, Hoölig G, et al. Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS) Clinical Rehab. 2007;21:17–27. doi: 10.1177/0269215506071281.
    1. Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist-versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke. Stroke. 2008;39:1786–1792. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.504779.
    1. Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehab Neural Repair. 2009;23:5–13. doi: 10.1177/1545968308326632.
    1. Peurala SH, Airaksinen O, Huuskonen P, Jäkälä P, Juhakoski M, Sandell K, et al. Effects of intensive therapy using gait trainer or floor walking exercises early after stroke. J Rehab Med. 2009;41:166–173. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0304.
    1. Hesse S, Bardeleben A, Werner C, Waldner A. Robot-assisted practice of gait and stair climbing in nonambulatory stroke patients. J Rehab Res Devel. 2012;49:613. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2011.08.0142.
    1. Taveggia G, Borboni A, Mulé C, Villafañe JH, Negrini S. Conflicting results of robot-assisted versus usual gait training during postacute rehabilitation of stroke patients: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Rehab Res. 2016;39:29–35. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000137.
    1. Swinnen E, Beckwée D, Meeusen R, Baeyens JP, Kerckhofs E. Does robot-assisted gait rehabilitation improve balance in stroke patients? A systematic review. Topics Stroke Rehab. 2014;21:87–100. doi: 10.1310/tsr2102-87.
    1. Kim SY, Yang L, Park IJ, Kim EJ, Park MS, You SH, et al. Effects of innovative WALKBOT robotic-assisted locomotor training on balance and gait recovery in hemiparetic stroke: a prospective, randomized, experimenter blinded case control study with a four-week follow-up. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng. 2015;23:636–642. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2404936.
    1. Bang DH, Shin WS. Effects of robot-assisted gait training on spatiotemporal gait parameters and balance in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Neurorehabilitation. 2016;38:343–349. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161325.
    1. Cifu DX. Braddom’s physical medicine & rehabilitation, fifth ed. chapter 44 stroke syndromes. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016. pp. 999–1016.
    1. Berg KO, Wood-Duaphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992;83(Suppl 2):S7–11.
    1. de Oliveira CB, de Medeiros IR, Frota NA, Greters ME, Conforto AB. Balance control in hemiparetic stroke patients: main tools for evaluation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:1215–1226. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2007.09.0150.
    1. Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg balance scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88:559–566. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070205.
    1. Liston RA, Brouwer BJ. Reliability and validity of measures obtained from stroke patients using the balance master. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:425–430. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90028-3.
    1. Mao HF, Hsueh IP, Tang PF, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke. 2002;33:1022–1027. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000012516.63191.C5.
    1. Van Criekinge Tamaya, Truijen Steven, Schröder Jonas, Maebe Zoë, Blanckaert Kyra, van der Waal Charlotte, Vink Marijke, Saeys Wim. The effectiveness of trunk training on trunk control, sitting and standing balance and mobility post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2019;33(6):992–1002. doi: 10.1177/0269215519830159.
    1. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Mertin J, Preger R, Kiekens C, de Weerdt W. The trunk impairment scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:326–334. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr733oa.
    1. Verheyden G, Vereeck L, Truijen S, Troch M, Herregodts I, Lafosse C, et al. Trunk performance after stroke and the relationship with balance, gait and functional ability. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:451–458. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr955oa.
    1. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Stegline S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.
    1. Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, Meissner D, Pohl M. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1314–1319. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.764.
    1. Kim SJ, Lee HJ, Hwang SW, Pyo H, Yang SP, Lim MH, et al. Clinical characteristics of proper robot-assisted gait training group in non-ambulatory subacute stroke patients. Ann Rehab Med. 2016;40:183–189. doi: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.2.183.
    1. Ng SS, Ng PC, Lee CY, Ng ES, Tong MH. Walkway lengths for measuring walking speed in stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:43–46. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0906.
    1. Tinetti ME, Richman D, Powell L. Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. J Gerontol. 1990;45:239–243. doi: 10.1093/geronj/45.6.P239.
    1. Schmitz-Hubsch T, du Montcel ST, Baliko L, Berciano J, Boesch S, Depondt C, Giunti P, Globas C, Infante J, Kang JS, et al. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale. Neurology. 2006;66:1717–1720. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92.
    1. Stevenson TJ. Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg balance scale. Aus J Physiother. 2001;47:29–38. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60296-8.
    1. Yoshimoto T, Shimizu I, Hiroi Y, Kawaki M, Sato D, Nagasawa M. Feasibility and efficacy of high-speed gait training with a voluntary driven exoskeleton robot for gait and balance dysfunction in patients with chronic stroke: nonrandomized pilot study with concurrent control. Int J Rehab Res. 2015;38:338–343. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000132.
    1. Pandian S, Arya KN, Kumar D. Minimal clinically important difference of the lower-extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment in chronic-stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;68:233–239. doi: 10.1179/1945511915Y.0000000003.
    1. Banala SK, Kim SH, Agrawal SK, Scholz JP. Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX) IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng. 2009;17:2–8. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2008.2008280.
    1. Robinovitch SN, Feldman F, Yang Y, Schonnop R, Leung PM, Sarraf J, et al. Video capture of the circumstances of falls in elderly people residing in long-term care: an observational study. Lancet. 2013;381:47–54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61263-X.
    1. Pizzigalli L, Miceheletti Cremasco M, Mulasso A, Rainoldi A. The contribution of postural balance analysis in older adult fallers: a narrative review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016;20:409–417. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.12.008.
    1. Finch L, Barbeau H, Arsenault Influence of body weight support on normal human gait: development of a gait retraining strategy. Phys Ther. 1991;71:842–855. doi: 10.1093/ptj/71.11.842.
    1. Klarner T, Chan HK, Wakeling JM, andLam T. Patterns of muscle coordination vary with stride frequency during weight assisted treadmill walking. Gait Posture. 2010;31:360–365. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.01.001.
    1. Chisari C, Bertolucci F, Monaco V, Venturi M, Simonella C, Micera S, et al. Robot-assisted gait training improves motor performances and modifies motor unit firing in poststroke patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51:59–69.
    1. Mudge S, Rochester L, Recordon A. The effect of treadmill training on gait, balance and trunk control in a hemiplegic subject: a single system design. Disability Rehab. 2003;25:1000–1007. doi: 10.1080/0963828031000122320.
    1. Combs SA, Dugan EL, Passmore M, Riesner C, Whipker D, Yingling E, et al. Balance, balance confidence, and health-related quality of life in persons with chronic stroke after body weight–supported treadmill training. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2010;91:1914–1919. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.025.
    1. Sherrington C, Whitney JC, Lord SR, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Close JC. Effective exercise for the prevention of falls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatric Society. 2008;56:2234–2243. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02014.x.
    1. Winstein CJ, Gardner ER, McNeal DR, Barto PS, Nicholson D. Standing balance training: effect on balance and locomotion in hemiparetic adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70:755–762.
    1. Dean CM, Shepherd RB. Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:722–728. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.28.4.722.
    1. Bultmann U, Pierscianek D, Gizewski ER, Schoch B, Fritsche N, Timmann D, et al. Functional recovery and rehabilitation of postural impairment and gait ataxia in patients with acute cerebellar stroke. Gait Posture. 2014;39:563–569. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.09.011.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi