Older adult experience of online diagnosis: results from a scenario-based think-aloud protocol

Tana M Luger, Thomas K Houston, Jerry Suls, Tana M Luger, Thomas K Houston, Jerry Suls

Abstract

Background: Searching for online information to interpret symptoms is an increasingly prevalent activity among patients, even among older adults. As older adults typically have complex health care needs, their risk of misinterpreting symptoms via online self-diagnosis may be greater. However, limited research has been conducted with older adults in the areas of symptom interpretation and human-computer interaction.

Objective: The intent of the study was to describe the processes that a sample of older adults may use to diagnose symptoms online as well as the processes that predict accurate diagnosis.

Methods: We conducted a series of "think-aloud" protocols with 79 adults aged 50 years or older. Participants received one of two vignettes that depicted symptoms of illness. Participants talked out loud about their thoughts and actions while attempting to diagnose the symptoms with and without the help of common Internet tools (Google and WebMD's Symptom Checker). Think-aloud content was categorized using an adapted Q-sort and general inductive approach. We then compared the think-aloud content of participants who were accurate in their diagnosis with those who were not.

Results: Nineteen descriptive codes were identified from the think-aloud content. The codes touched upon Web navigation, attempts to organize and evaluate online health information, and strategies to diagnose symptoms. Participants most frequently relied on a strategy where they reviewed and then rejected the online diagnoses if they contained additional symptoms than those that were depicted in the vignette. Finally, participants who were inaccurate in their diagnosis reported being confused by the diagnosis task, lacking confidence in their diagnosis, and using their past experiences with illness to guide diagnosis more frequently than those participants who accurately diagnosed the symptoms.

Conclusions: Older adult participants tended to rely on matching strategies to interpret symptoms, but many still utilized existing medical knowledge and previous illness experiences as a guide for diagnosis. Many participants also had difficulty navigating the Internet tools, which suggests an increased need for navigation aids in Web design. Furthermore, participants who were inaccurate in their diagnosis had more difficulty with the Internet tools and confusion with the task than those who were accurate. Future work in this area may want to utilize additional study design such as eye-tracking to further understand the coordination between Web navigation, online symptom information processing, and diagnostic strategies.

Keywords: Internet; age factors; information seeking behavior.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
WebMD symptom checker.

References

    1. Campbell RJ. Internet-based health information seeking among low-income, minority seniors living in urban residential centers. Home Health Care Management & Practice. 2008 Jul 08;21(3):195–202. doi: 10.1177/1084822308322648.
    1. Macias W, McMillan S. The return of the house call: the role of Internet-based interactivity in bringing health information home to older adults. Health Commun. 2008 Jan;23(1):34–44. doi: 10.1080/10410230701805174.
    1. Zickuhr K, Madden M. Older adults and Internet use. [2013-08-29]. 2012 .
    1. McMillan SJ, Avery EJ, Macias W. From have nots to watch dogs. Information, Communication & Society. 2008 Aug;11(5):675–697. doi: 10.1080/13691180802126745.
    1. Hilt ML, Lipschultz JH. Elderly Americans and the Internet: E-mail, TV news, information and entertainment websites. Educational Gerontology. 2004 Jan;30(1):57–72. doi: 10.1080/03601270490249166.
    1. Fox S, Duggan M. 2013. [2013-08-29]. Health Online 2013 .
    1. Ahmad F, Hudak PL, Bercovitz K, Hollenberg E, Levinson W. Are physicians ready for patients with Internet-based health information? J Med Internet Res. 2006 Sep;8(3):e22. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e22.
    1. Ryan A, Wilson S. Internet healthcare: do self-diagnosis sites do more harm than good? Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2008 May;7(3):227–9. doi: 10.1517/14740338.7.3.227.
    1. Sommerhalder K, Abraham A, Zufferey MC, Barth J, Abel T. Internet information and medical consultations: experiences from patients' and physicians' perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Nov;77(2):266–71. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.028.
    1. Wald HS, Dube CE, Anthony DC. Untangling the Web--the impact of Internet use on health care and the physician-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Nov;68(3):218–24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.016.
    1. Eysenbach G, Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):573–7.
    1. Cashen MS, Dykes P, Gerber B. eHealth technology and Internet resources: barriers for vulnerable populations. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;19(3):209–14; quiz 215. doi: 10.1097/00005082-200405000-00010.
    1. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Viera A, Crotty K, Holland A, Brasure M, Lohr KN, Harden E, Tant E, Wallace I, Viswanathan M. Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2011 Mar;(199):1–941.
    1. Leventhal H, Safer MA, Panagis DM. The impact of communications on the self-regulation of health beliefs, decisions, and behavior. Health Educ Q. 1983;10(1):3–29. doi: 10.1177/109019818301000101.
    1. Leventhal H, Cameron L. Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance. Patient Education and Counseling. 1987 Oct;10(2):117–138. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(87)90093-0.
    1. Leventhal H, Leventhal EA, Contrada RJ. Self-regulation, health, and behavior: A perceptual-cognitive approach. Psychology & Health. 1998 Jul;13(4):717–733. doi: 10.1080/08870449808407425.
    1. Cameron LD, Leventhal H. The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour. London: Routledge; 2003.
    1. Pennebaker JW. The psychology of physical symptoms. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1982.
    1. Patel VL, Groen GJ. Knowledge based solution strategies in medical reasoning. Cognitive Science. 1986;10(1):91–116. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1001_4.
    1. Coderre S, Mandin H, Harasym PH, Fick GH. Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success. Med Educ. 2003 Aug;37(8):695–703. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01577.x.
    1. Elstein A, Schulman L, Sprafka S, Allal L. Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1978.
    1. Sharit J, Hernández MA, Czaja SJ, Pirolli P. Investigating the roles of knowledge and cognitive abilities in older adult information seeking on the Web. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact. 2008 May;15(1):3. doi: 10.1145/1352782.1352785.
    1. Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Psychol Aging. 2006 Jun;21(2):333–52. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333.
    1. McKeown B, Thomas D. Q methodology. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1988.
    1. Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation. 2006 Jun 01;27(2):237–246. doi: 10.1177/1098214005283748.
    1. Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1993.
    1. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975 Oct;23(10):433–41.
    1. Mayo Clinic. [2013-08-29].
    1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. [2013-08-29]. .
    1. Google. [2013-08-29]. .
    1. WebMD Symptom Checker. [2013-08-29].
    1. Site Info. [2013-08-29]. .
    1. Google. [2013-08-29]. About the Company - Google
    1. Larsen RJ. Neuroticism and selective encoding and recall of symptoms: evidence from a combined concurrent-retrospective study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Mar;62(3):480–8. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.480.
    1. Pecoraro RE, Inui TS, Chen MS, Plorde DK, Heller JL. Validity and reliability of a self-administered health history questionnaire. Public Health Rep. 1979 Jun;94(3):231–8.
    1. Scott SE, Walter FM, Webster A, Sutton S, Emery J. The model of pathways to treatment: conceptualization and integration with existing theory. Br J Health Psychol. 2013 Feb;18(1):45–65. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02077.x.
    1. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Subjective probability: a judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology. 1972;3(3):430–454. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-2288-0_3.
    1. Eastin MS. Credibility assessments of online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2001;6(4) doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00126.x.
    1. Kules B, Xie B. Older adults searching for health information in MedlinePlus - an exploratory study of faceted online search interfaces. Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech. 2012 Jan 11;48(1):1–10. doi: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801137.
    1. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Feb;53(2):105–11. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.2.105.
    1. Fritch JW. Heuristics, tools, and systems for evaluating Internet information: helping users assess a tangled Web. Online Information Review. 2003;27(5):321–327. doi: 10.1108/14684520310502270.
    1. Fox S. 2011. [2013-08-29]. Health Topics .

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi