Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab and Adjuvant Nivolumab in Localized Deficient Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability-High Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma: The GERCOR NEONIPIGA Phase II Study

Thierry André, David Tougeron, Guillaume Piessen, Christelle de la Fouchardière, Christophe Louvet, Antoine Adenis, Marine Jary, Christophe Tournigand, Thomas Aparicio, Jérôme Desrame, Astrid Lièvre, Marie-Line Garcia-Larnicol, Thomas Pudlarz, Romain Cohen, Salomé Memmi, Dewi Vernerey, Julie Henriques, Jérémie H Lefevre, Magali Svrcek, Thierry André, David Tougeron, Guillaume Piessen, Christelle de la Fouchardière, Christophe Louvet, Antoine Adenis, Marine Jary, Christophe Tournigand, Thomas Aparicio, Jérôme Desrame, Astrid Lièvre, Marie-Line Garcia-Larnicol, Thomas Pudlarz, Romain Cohen, Salomé Memmi, Dewi Vernerey, Julie Henriques, Jérémie H Lefevre, Magali Svrcek

Abstract

Purpose: In patients with resectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, surgery plus perioperative platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care. Perioperative chemotherapy remains debatable for gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H).

Patients and methods: NEONIPIGA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04006262) phase II study evaluated neoadjuvant nivolumab 240 mg once every two weeks ×6 and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every six weeks ×2, followed by surgery and adjuvant nivolumab 480 mg once every four weeks (nine injections) in patients with locally advanced resectable dMMR/MSI-H, clinical (c) tumor (T)2-T4 node (N)x metastasis (M)0 gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The primary end point was a pathological complete response (pCR) rate.

Results: Between October 2019 and June 2021, 32 patients with dMMR/MSI-H gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma were enrolled. The median age was 65.5 years (range, 40-80). Clinical stages were cT2-T3N0 (n = 9), cT2-T3N1 (n = 22), and cT3N1M1 (n = 1, wrongly included). With a median follow-up of 14.9 months (95% CI, 10.6 to 17.6), 32 patients received neoadjuvant immunotherapy (27 patients completed all cycles). Neoadjuvant therapy-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in six patients (19%). Twenty-nine patients underwent surgery; three did not have surgery and had complete endoscopic response with tumor-free biopsies and a normal computed tomography scan (two refused surgery and one had metastasis at inclusion). The rate of surgical morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification) was 55% (one postoperative death occurred). All 29 patients had an R0 resection, and 17 (58.6%; 90% CI, 41.8 to 74.1) had pCR (pathological T0N0). Becker tumor regression grades 1a, 1b, 2, and 3 were observed in 17 patients, three (including two pathological T0N1), two, and seven patients, respectively. Of the 29 patients with surgery, 23 received adjuvant nivolumab. At database lock, no patient had relapse and one died without relapse.

Conclusion: Nivolumab and ipilimumab-based neoadjuvant therapy is feasible and associated with no unexpected toxicity and a high pCR rate in patients with dMMR/MSI-H resectable gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Conflict of interest statement

Magali Svrcek

Honoraria: Sanofi/Aventis, MSD Oncology, Owkin, BMS, Astellas Pharma

Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas Pharma

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
(A) Flow chart. (B) Swimmer plot showing patients' current situation and treatment status in the ITT population (N = 32). dMMR/MSI-H, DNA mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability–high; ITT, intent-to-treat; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; PP, per protocol; TRG, tumor regression grade.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Kaplan-Meier plots for (A) OS and (B) EFS in the per-protocol population (n = 31). EFS, event-free survival; OS, overall survival.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. : Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394-424, 2018
    1. Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, et al. : Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27:v38-v49, 2016
    1. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. : Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:11-20, 2006
    1. Al-Batran S-E, Homann N, Pauligk C, et al. : Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): A randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet 393:1948, 19572019
    1. Choi YY, Bae JM, An JY, et al. : Is microsatellite instability a prognostic marker in gastric cancer?: A systematic review with meta-analysis: MSI and gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 110:129-135, 2014
    1. Smyth EC, Wotherspoon A, Peckitt C, et al. : Mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability, and survival: An exploratory analysis of the Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) trial. JAMA Oncol 3:1197, 2017
    1. Tran-Minh M-L, Lehmann-Che J, Lambert J, et al. : Prevalence and prognosis of microsatellite instability in oesogastric adenocarcinoma, NORDICAP 16-01. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 45:101691, 2021
    1. Pietrantonio F, Miceli R, Raimondi A, et al. : Individual patient data meta-analysis of the value of microsatellite instability as a biomarker in gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 37:3392-3400, 2019
    1. Nie RC, Chen GM, Yuan SQ, et al. : Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients with mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite instability: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 29:2324-2331, 2022
    1. Polom K, Marrelli D, Roviello G, et al. : Molecular key to understand the gastric cancer biology in elderly patients—The role of microsatellite instability: MSI and elderly gastric cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 115:344-350, 2017
    1. Lordick F: Chemotherapy for resectable microsatellite instability-high gastric cancer? Lancet Oncol 21:203, 2020
    1. Eads JR: Is it time yet for adjuvant immunotherapy for patients with DNA mismatch repair deficient gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 29:2141-2143, 2022
    1. Le DT, Durham JN, Smith KN, et al. : Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade. Science 357:409-413, 2017
    1. Chalabi M, Fanchi LF, Dijkstra KK, et al. : Neoadjuvant immunotherapy leads to pathological responses in MMR-proficient and MMR-deficient early-stage colon cancers. Nat Med 26:566-576, 2020
    1. Chao J, Fuchs CS, Shitara K, et al. : Assessment of pembrolizumab therapy for the treatment of microsatellite instability–high gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer among patients in the KEYNOTE-059, KEYNOTE-061, and KEYNOTE-062 clinical trials. JAMA Oncol 7:895, 2021
    1. Janjigian YY, Shitara K, Moehler M, et al. : First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 398:27-40, 2021
    1. Mandard A-M, Dalibard F, Mandard J-C, et al. : Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 73:2680-2686, 1994
    1. Becker K, Mueller JD, Schulmacher C, et al. : Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Response of gastric carcinoma to chemotherapy. Cancer 98:1521-1530, 2003
    1. Becker K, Langer R, Reim D, et al. : Significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinomas: A summary of 480 cases. Ann Surg 253:934-939, 2011
    1. Mansour JC, Tang L, Shah M, et al. : Does graded histologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict survival for completely resected gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 14:3412-3418, 2007
    1. Fujitani K, Mano M, Hirao M, et al. : Posttherapy nodal status, not graded histologic response, predicts survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1936-1943, 2012
    1. Blackham AU, Greenleaf E, Yamamoto M, et al. : Tumor regression grade in gastric cancer: Predictors and impact on outcome: TRG in gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 114:434-439, 2016
    1. Mariette C, Balon JM, Maunoury V, et al. : Value of endoscopic ultrasonography as a predictor of long-term survival in oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 90:1367-1372, 2003
    1. Noiret B, Branche J, Piessen G: Uselessness and danger of dilating obstructive esophageal for staging purpose: A confirmation. Ann Thorac Surg 114:357-358, 2022
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services: National Cancer Institute : Common Terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) (version 5.0). Index of ()
    1. Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, et al. : Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 36:1714-1768, 2018
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A: Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205-213, 2004
    1. A'Hern RP: Sample size tables for exact single-stage phase II designs. Stat Med 20:859-866, 2001
    1. Tahara M, Ohtsu A, Hironaka S, et al. : Clinical impact of criteria for complete response (CR) of primary site to treatment of esophageal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 35:316-323, 2005
    1. Haag GM, Czink E, Ahadova A, et al. : Prognostic significance of microsatellite-instability in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Cancer 144:1697-1703, 2019
    1. Li Z, Wang Y, Ying X, et al. : Prognostic and predictive value of mismatch repair deficiency in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol 124:1356-1364, 2021
    1. Al-Batran S-E, Hofheinz RD, Pauligk C, et al. : Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): Results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17:1697-1708, 2016
    1. Al-Batran S-E, Lorenzen S, Homann N, et al. : Pathological regression in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI) receiving perioperative atezolizumab in combination with FLOT vs. FLOT alone for resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: Results from the DANTE trial of the German Gastric Group at the AIO and SAKK. Ann Oncol 32, 2021. (suppl 5; abstr 1069)
    1. Marrelli D, Polom K, Pascale V, et al. : Strong prognostic value of microsatellite instability in intestinal type non-cardia gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23:943-950, 2016
    1. Baiocchi GL, Giacopuzzi S, Reim D, et al. : Incidence and grading of complications after gastrectomy for cancer using the GASTRODATA Registry: A European Retrospective Observational Study. Ann Surg 272:807-813, 2020
    1. Challine A, Voron T, Dousset B, et al. : Postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. A national cohort study of 10,343 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 47:1985-1995, 2021
    1. Joharatnam-Hogan N, Shiu KK, Khan K: Challenges in the treatment of gastric cancer in the older patient. Cancer Treat Rev 85:101980, 2020
    1. Shen Y, Hao Q, Zhou J, et al. : The impact of frailty and sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing gastrectomy surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 17:188, 2017
    1. Kwon M, An M, Klempner SJ, et al. : Determinants of response and intrinsic resistance to PD-1 blockade in microsatellite instability-high gastric cancer. Cancer Discov 11:2168-2185, 2021

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi