Electromyographic characteristics of pelvic floor muscles in women with stress urinary incontinence following sEMG-assisted biofeedback training and Pilates exercises

Daria Chmielewska, Magdalena Stania, Katarzyna Kucab-Klich, Edward Błaszczak, Krystyna Kwaśna, Agnieszka Smykla, Dominika Hudziak, Patrycja Dolibog, Daria Chmielewska, Magdalena Stania, Katarzyna Kucab-Klich, Edward Błaszczak, Krystyna Kwaśna, Agnieszka Smykla, Dominika Hudziak, Patrycja Dolibog

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of pelvic floor muscle training with surface electromyographic (sEMG) biofeedback (BF group) and Pilates exercises (P group) on the bioelectrical activity of pelvic floor muscles in women with stress urinary incontinence. The other aim aim was to compare changes in voiding diaries and scores on quality of life questionnaire against baseline values and between the groups. Women in the BF group (n = 18) participated in pelvic floor muscle training with sEMG biofeedback; the P group (n = 13) participated in basic level Pilates workouts. Both protocols were continued for eight weeks. Voiding diary, quality of life and electromyographic characteristics of the pelvic floor muscles were assessed at the three-time points: at baseline, after eight weeks' training, and at month six post-training. The sEMG activity of the pelvic floor muscles was tested during five trials in two positions. There was no marked improvement in bioelectrical activity of the pelvic floor muscles during contraction following training with sEMG biofeedback or Pilates exercises. Following eight weeks of sEMG biofeedback training, a decrease was noted in resting bioelectrical activity of pelvic floor muscles and during relaxation after sustained contraction but only in supine-lying. No such effect was observed in the Pilates group. In the BF group, the number of incontinence episodes after end of treatment (timpepoints: 1vs. 2) and at six month follow-up (timpepoints: 1vs. 3) decreased by 68.5% and 89.3%, respectively. The respective values in the P group were 78.6%, and 86.4%. The intergroup differences did not reach the level of statistical significance. As regards the quality of life, the questionnaire demonstrated that Pilates exercises had significantly better effects compared to biofeedback training both at the end of the eight-week exercise program and (p = 0.003) and at six month follow-up (p = 0.0009). The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ- SF) showed comparable efficacy of Pilates exercises and training with sEMG biofeedback. Intragroup improvements in micturition frequency, incontinence (leakage) episodes, and nocturia frequency were comparable. Alleviation of urinary incontinence symptoms was comparable in both groups, whereas the improvement in the quality of life was more notable in the Pilates group. The obtained results failed to demonstrate the superiority of any of the two methods regarding the bioelectrical activity of pelvic floor muscles in patients with stress urinary incontinence.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Intra- and intergroup analysis of…
Fig 1. Intra- and intergroup analysis of sEMG mean %MVC amplitudes of the resting activity of pelvic floor muscles; p* Post-hoc Friedman's rank sum test; p** Mann- Whitney U test.
Fig 2. Intra- and intergroup analysis of…
Fig 2. Intra- and intergroup analysis of sEMG average peak %MVC amplitudes of the resting activity of pelvic floor muscles; p* Post-hoc Friedman's rank sum test; p** Mann- Whitney U test.
Fig 3. Intra- and intergroup analysis of…
Fig 3. Intra- and intergroup analysis of sEMG average peak %MVC amplitudes of the short contraction of the pelvic floor muscles; p* Post-hoc Friedman's rank sum test.
Fig 4. Intra- and intergroup analysis of…
Fig 4. Intra- and intergroup analysis of sEMG mean %MVC amplitudes of the short contraction of the pelvic floor muscles; p* Post-hoc Friedman's rank sum test.
Fig 5. Intra- and intergroup analysis of…
Fig 5. Intra- and intergroup analysis of sEMG mean %MVC amplitudes of the 5 repetitions of 10-second voluntary contraction of pelvic floor muscles; p* Post-hoc Friedman's rank sum test; p** Mann- Whitney U test.
Fig 6. Intra- and intergroup analysis of…
Fig 6. Intra- and intergroup analysis of sEMG average peak %MVC amplitudes of the 5 repetitions of 10-second voluntary contraction of pelvic floor muscles; p* Post-hoc Friedman's rank sum test; p** Mann- Whitney U test.
Fig 7. Intra- and intergroup analysis of…
Fig 7. Intra- and intergroup analysis of sEMG mean %MVC amplitudes of the relaxation of the pelvic floor muscles; p* Post-hoc Friedman's rank sum test.
Fig 8. Intra- and intergroup analysis of…
Fig 8. Intra- and intergroup analysis of sEMG average peak %MVC amplitudes of the relaxation of the pelvic floor muscles; p* Post-hoc Friedman's rank sum test.
Fig 9
Fig 9
a-d. Intra- and intergroup analysis the number of women with an increase (>0 (n)) in the resting activity and 10-second relaxation sEMG; p Chi square test (χ2).

References

    1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. Standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003;61(1):37–49. 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02243-4
    1. Pullman SL, Goodin DS, Marquinez AI, Tabbal S, Rubin M. Clinical utility of surface EMG: report of the therapeutics and technology assessment subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;25,55:171–177. 10.1212/wnl.55.2.171
    1. Resende AP, Petricelli CD, Bernardes BT, Alexandre SM, Nakamura MU, Zanetti MR. Electromyographic evaluation of pelvic floor muscles in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(8):1041–1045. 10.1007/s00192-012-1702-6
    1. Zhang Q, Wang L, Zheng W. Surface electromyography of pelvic floor muscles in stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95(2):177–178. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.07.006
    1. Hacad CR, Glazer HI, Zambon JP, Burti JS, Almeida FG. Is there any change in pelvic floor electromyography during the first 6 months after radical retropubic prostatectomy? Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2015;40(1):9–15. 10.1007/s10484-015-9271-3
    1. Vodusek DB. The role of electrophysiology in the evaluation of incontinence and prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;14(5):509–514. 10.1097/00001703-200210000-00012
    1. Haslam J. (2008). “Biofeedback” in therapeutic management of incontinence and pelvic pain: pelvic organ disorders (2nd ed.). eds Haslam J. & Laycock J. (London: Springer-Verlag Ltd; ), 105–110.
    1. Grape HH, Dedering A, Jonasson AF. Retest reliability of surface electromyography on the pelvic floor muscles. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(5):395–9. 10.1002/nau.20648
    1. Capson AC, Nashed J, Mclean L. The role of lumbopelvic posture in pelvic floor muscle activation in continent women. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011;21(1):166–177. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.017
    1. Aukee P, Penttinen J, Airaksinen O. The effect of aging on the electromyographic activity of pelvic floor muscles: a comparative study among stress incontinent patients and asymptomatic women. Maturitas. 2003;44(4):253–257. 10.1016/s0378-5122(03)00044-6
    1. Dannecker Ch, Wolf V, Raab R, Hepp H, Anthuber Ch. EMG–biofeedback-assisted PF muscle training is an effective therapy of stress or mixed urinary incontinence: a 7 year experience with 390 patients. Arch Gynecol Obtset. 2005;273,2:93–97 10.1007/s00404-005-0011-4
    1. Bertotto A, Schvartzman R, Uchôa S, Wender MCO. Effect of electromyographic biofeedback as an add-on to pelvic floor muscle exercises on neuromuscular outcomes and quality of life in postmenopausal women with stress urinary incontinence: A randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(8):2142–2147. 10.1002/nau.23258
    1. Aukee P, Immonen P, Penttinen J, Laippala P, Airaksinen O. Increase in pelvic floor muscle activity after 12 weeks' training: a randomized prospective pilot study. Urology. 2002;60,6:1020–1023. 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02125-8
    1. Aukee P, Immonen P, Laaksonen DE, Laippala P, Penttinen J, Airaksinen O. The effect of home biofeedbackk training on stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83,10:973–977, 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00559.x
    1. Capelini MV, Riccetto CL, Dambros M, Tamanini JT, Herrmann V, Muller V. Pelvic floor exercises with biofeedback for stress urinary incontinence. Int Braz J Urol. 2006; 32,4:462–468.
    1. Szumilewicz A, Dornowski M, Piernicka M, Worska A, Kuchta A, Kortas J. et al. High-low impact exercise program including pelvic floor muscle exercises improves pelvic floor muscle function in healthy pregnant women—a randomized control trial. Front Physiol. 2019;30;9:1867 10.3389/fphys.2018.01867
    1. Herderschee R, Hay-Smith EJ, Herbison GP, Roovers JP, Heineman MJ. Feedback or biofeedback to augment pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;6;(7):CD009252 10.1002/14651858.CD009252
    1. Neumann PB, Grimmer KA, Deenadayalan Y. Pelvic floor muscle training and adjunctive therapies for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review. BMC Womens Health. 2006;6:11–14. 10.1186/1472-6874-6-11
    1. Culligan PJ, Scherer J, Dyer K, Priestley JL, Guingon-White G, Delvecchio D, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing pelvic floor muscle training to a Pilates exercise program for improving pelvic muscle strength. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(4):401–408. 10.1007/s00192-009-1046-z
    1. Pölzer GR. Pilates matwork. Das komplette Kompedium–Band 1. Skriptum von National Fitness Academy Austria, Wien; 2009, pp: 97–108.
    1. Thompson JA, O'Sullivan PB, Briffa NK, Neumann P. Differences in muscle activation patterns during pelvic floor muscle contraction and Valsalva maneuver. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(2):148–55. 10.1002/nau.20203
    1. Baessler K., Bell BE. Alternative methods to pelvic floor muscle awareness and training [In] Pelvic Floor re-education, ed. Baessler K et al. Springer; 2008, pp:208–212
    1. Bø K, Herbert RD. There is not yet strong evidence that exercise regimens other than pelvic floor muscle training can reduce stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2013;59(3):159–168. 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70180-2
    1. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23,4:322–330, 10.1002/nau.20041
    1. Bristol Urological Institute (2014)
    1. Johnson JL, King BT. Biofeedback versus verbal instruction for pelvic floor training in the treatment of urinary incontinence. J Womens Health Phys Therap. 2000;24(3):7–13.
    1. Burns PA, Pranikoff K, Nochajski TH, Hadley EC, Levy KJ, Ory MG. A comparison of effectiveness of biofeedback and pelvic muscle exercise treatment of stress incontinence in older community-dwelling women. J Gerontol. 1993;48(4):M167–74. 10.1093/geronj/48.4.m167
    1. British Society of Urogynecology
    1. Yoo EH, Kim YM, Kim D. Factors predicting the response to biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112,3:179–181, 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.09.016
    1. Henderson JW, Wang S, Egger MJ, Masters M, Nygaard I. Can women correctly contract their pelvic floor muscles without formal instruction? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19,1:8–12, 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31827ab9d0
    1. Surface ElectroMyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles
    1. Madil S, McLean L Quantification of abdominal and pelvic floor muscle synergies in response to voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18(6):955–64. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.05.001
    1. Burden A, Bartlett R. Normalisation of EMG amplitude: an evaluation and comparison of old and new methods. Med Eng Phys.1999;21,4;247–257. 10.1016/s1350-4533(99)00054-5
    1. Glazer HI, Romanzi L, Polaneczky M. Pelvic floor muscle surface electromyography. Reliability and clinical predictive validity. J Reprod Med. 1999;44(9):779–782.
    1. Pedraza R, Nieto J, Ibarra S, Haas EM. Pelvic muscle rehabilitation: a standardized protocol for pelvic floor dysfunction. Adv Urol. 2014:487436 10.1155/2014/487436
    1. Chmielewska D, Stania M, Sobota G, Kwaśna K, Błaszczak E, Taradaj J, et al. Impact of different body positions on bioelectrical activity of the pelvic floor muscles in nulliparous continent women. Biomed Res Int. 2015:905897 10.1155/2015/905897
    1. McLean L, Normandeau C, Hodder J. The impact of state of bladder fullness on tonic and phasic activation of the pelvic floor muscles in women. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2016;13,27:60–65. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.01.009
    1. Rett MT, Simoes JA, Herrmann V, Pinto CL, Marques AA, Morais SS. Management of stress urinary incontinence with surface electromyography-assisted biofeedback in women of reproductive age. Phys. Ther. 2007;87,2:136–142. 10.2522/ptj.20050318
    1. Özlü A, Yıldız N, Öztekin Ö. Comparison of the efficacy of perineal and intravaginal biofeedback assisted pelvic floor muscle exercises in women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(8):2132–2141. 10.1002/nau.23257
    1. Bø K, Sherburn M. Evaluation of female pelvic–floor muscle function and strength. Phys Ther. 2005;85,3:269–282
    1. Dumoulin C, Glazener C, Jenkinson D. Determining the optimal pelvic floor muscle training regimen for women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(5):746–753. 10.1002/nau.21104
    1. Zanetti MR, Castro Rde A, Rotta AL, Santos PD, Sartori M, Girão MJ. Impact of supervised physiotherapeutic pelvic floor exercises for treating female stress urinary incontinence. Sao Paulo Med J. 2007;6;125(5):265–259. 10.1590/s1516-31802007000500003
    1. Borello-France DF, Zyczynski HM, Downey PA, Rause CR, Wister JA. Effect of pelvic-floor muscle exercise position on continence and quality-of-life outcomes in women with stress urinary incontinence. Phys Ther. 2006;86(7):974–986.
    1. Lehman GJ, McGill SM. The importance of normalization in the interpretation of surface electromyography: a proof of principle. J Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 1999;22(7):444–446. 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70032-1
    1. Naess I, Bø K. Can maximal voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction reduce vaginal resting pressure and resting EMG activity? Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(11):1623–1627, 10.1007/s00192-018-3599-1
    1. Ferla L, Paiva LL, Darki C, Vieira A. Comparison of the functionality of pelvic floor muscles in women who practice the Pilates method and sedentary women: a pilot study. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(1):123–128. 10.1007/s00192-015-2801-y
    1. Bø K, Bratland-Sanda S, Sundgot-Borgen J. Urinary incontinence among group fitness instructors including yoga and pilates teachers. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(3):370–373, 10.1002/nau.21006
    1. Coleman TJ, Nygaard IE, Holder DN, Egger MJ, Hitchcock R. Intra-abdominal pressure during Pilates: unlikely to cause pelvic floor harm. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26 (8):1123–1130. 10.1007/s00192-015-2638-4
    1. Lausen A, Marsland L, Head S, Jackson J, Lausen B. Modified Pilates as an adjunct to standard physiotherapy care for urinary incontinence: a mixed methods pilot for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2018;12;18(1):16 10.1186/s12905-017-0503-y
    1. Dias NT, Ferreira LR, Fernandes MG, Resende APM., Pereira-Baldon VS. A Pilates exercise program with pelvic floor muscle contraction: Is it effective for pregnant women? A randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(1):379–384. 10.1002/nau.23308
    1. Amorim AC, Cacciari LP, Passaro AC, Silveira SRB, Amorim CF, Loss JF, Sacco ICN. Effect of combined actions of hip adduction/abduction on the force generation and maintenance of pelvic floor muscles in healthy women. PLoS One. 2017; 24,12(5):e0177575 10.1371/journal.pone.0177575

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi