Rehab on Wheels: A Pilot Study of Tablet-Based Wheelchair Training for Older Adults

Edward Mark Giesbrecht, William C Miller, Boyang Tom Jin, Ian M Mitchell, Janice J Eng, Edward Mark Giesbrecht, William C Miller, Boyang Tom Jin, Ian M Mitchell, Janice J Eng

Abstract

Background: Alternative and innovative strategies such as mHealth and eLearning are becoming a necessity for delivery of rehabilitation services. For example, older adults who require a wheelchair receive little, if any, training for proficiency with mobility skills. This substantive service gap is due in part to restricted availability of clinicians and challenges for consumers to attend appointments. A research team of occupational therapists and computer scientists engaged clinicians, consumers, and care providers using a participatory action design approach. A tablet-based application, Enhancing Participation In the Community by improving Wheelchair Skills (EPIC Wheels), was developed to enable in-chair home training, online expert trainer monitoring, and trainee-trainer communication via secure voice messaging.

Objective: Prior to undertaking a randomized controlled trial (RCT), a pilot study was conducted to determine the acceptability and feasibility of administering an mHealth wheelchair skills training program safely and effectively with two participants of different skill levels. The findings were used to determine whether further enhancements to the program were indicated.

Methods: The program included two in-person sessions with an expert trainer and four weeks of independent home training. The EPIC Wheels application included video instruction and demonstration, self-paced training activities, and interactive training games. Participants were provided with a 10-inch Android tablet, mounting apparatus, and mobile Wi-Fi device. Frequency and duration of tablet interactions were monitored and uploaded daily to an online trainer interface. Participants completed a structured evaluation survey and provided feedback post-study. The trainer provided feedback on the training protocol and trainer interface.

Results: Both participants perceived the program to be comprehensive, useful, and easily navigated. The trainer indicated usage data was comprehensive and informative for monitoring participant progress and adherence. The application performed equally well with multiple devices. Some initial issues with log-in requests were resolved via tablet-specific settings. Inconsistent Internet connectivity, resulting in delayed data upload and voice messaging, was specific to individual Wi-Fi devices and resolved by standardizing configuration. Based on the pilot results, the software was updated to make content download more robust. Additional features were also incorporated such as check marks for completed content, a more consumer-friendly aesthetic, and achievement awards. The trainer web interface was updated to improve usability and provides both a numerical and visual summary of participant data.

Conclusions: The EPIC Wheels pilot study provided useful feedback on the feasibility of a tablet-based home program for wheelchair skills training among older adults, justifying advancement to evaluation in an RCT. The program may be expanded for use with other rehabilitation interventions and populations, particularly for those living in rural or remote locations. Future development will consider integration of built-in tablet sensors to provide performance feedback and enable interactive training activities.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01644292; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01644292 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6XyvYyTUf).

Keywords: aged; pilot projects; self-efficacy; telemedicine; wheelchairs.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Edward Mark Giesbrecht, William C. Miller, Boyang Tom Jin, Ian M. Mitchell, Janice J. Eng. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (http://rehab.jmir.org), 30.04.2015.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study components and timeline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Tablet and mounting platform for in-chair training.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Trainee interface pre- and post-pilot versions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Participant progress display pre- and post-pilot versions.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Award pop-up with Awards Earned windows in post-pilot version.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Training activity window with timer pre- and post-pilot versions.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Trainer website pre- and post-pilot testing.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Trainer website features.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Trainer voice-messaging applet.

References

    1. Sama PR, Eapen ZJ, Weinfurt KP, Shah BR, Schulman KA. An evaluation of mobile health application tools. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014;2(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3088.
    1. O'Connor E, Farrow M, Hatherly C. Randomized comparison of mobile and web-tools to provide dementia risk reduction education: use, engagement and participant satisfaction. JMIR Mental Health. 2014 Dec 22;1(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/mental.3654.
    1. Watkins I, Xie B. eHealth literacy interventions for older adults: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(11):e225. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3318.
    1. Murray E. Web-based interventions for behavior change and self-management: potential, pitfalls, and progress. Med 2.0. 2012 Aug;1(2):e3. doi: 10.2196/med20.1741.
    1. Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1376.
    1. Rini C, Porter LS, Somers TJ, McKee DC, Keefe FJ. Retaining critical therapeutic elements of behavioral interventions translated for delivery via the Internet: recommendations and an example using pain coping skills training. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(12):e245. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3374.
    1. Rietdijk R, Togher L, Power E. Supporting family members of people with traumatic brain injury using telehealth: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2012 Nov;44(11):913–921. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1058.
    1. Kumar S, Nilsen WJ, Abernethy A, Atienza A, Patrick K, Pavel M, Riley WT, Shar A, Spring B, Spruijt-Metz D, Hedeker D, Honavar V, Kravitz R, Lefebvre RC, Mohr DC, Murphy SA, Quinn C, Shusterman V, Swendeman D. Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):228–236. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.017.
    1. Hoenig H, Sanford JA, Butterfield T, Griffiths PC, Richardson P, Hargraves K. Development of a teletechnology protocol for in-home rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(2):287–298.
    1. Tousignant M, Boissy P, Corriveau H, Moffet H. In home telerehabilitation for older adults after discharge from an acute hospital or rehabilitation unit: A proof-of-concept study and costs estimation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006 Sep;1(4):209–216.
    1. Smith E, Miller W, Giesbrecht E. A description of wheelchair users in Canada. Investing in our Futures: CRDCN National Conference 2014; October 29-31, 2014; Winnipeg. 2014.
    1. Smith E, Miller W. Demographics of older community dwelling Canadian wheelchair users. 43rd Annual conference of the Canadian Association on Gerontology; Oct; 2014; Niagara Falls, ON. 2014. pp. 16–18.
    1. Karmarkar AM, Collins DM, Kelleher A, Ding D, Oyster M, Cooper RA. Manual wheelchair-related mobility characteristics of older adults in nursing homes. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):428–437. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2010.481346.
    1. Smith C, Kirby RL. Manual wheelchair skills capacity and safety of residents of a long-term-care facility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Apr;92(4):663–669. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.024.
    1. Best KL, Routhier F, Miller WC. A description of manual wheelchair skills training: current practices in Canadian rehabilitation centers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Apr 7; doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.907367.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
    1. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
    1. Phang S, Martin Ginis KA, Routhier F, Lemay V. The role of self-efficacy in the wheelchair skills-physical activity relationship among manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(8):625–632. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.613516.
    1. Jordan JL, Holden MA, Mason EJ, Foster NE. Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD005956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005956.pub2.
    1. Knowles M. The modern practice of adult education: from pedagogy to andragogy. New York: Cambridge, the Adult Education Company; 1980.
    1. Merriam S, Caffarella R, Baumgartner L. Learning in adulthood: a comprehensive guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2007.
    1. Friedman L, Furberg C, DeMets D. Fundamentals of clinical trials. New York: Springer; 1998.
    1. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Goldsmith CH. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.
    1. Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Lancaster GA. What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-67.
    1. Protheroe J, Blakeman T, Bower P, Chew-Graham C, Kennedy A. An intervention to promote patient participation and self-management in long term conditions: development and feasibility testing. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:206. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-206.
    1. Waller A, Franklin V, Pagliari C, Greene S. Participatory design of a text message scheduling system to support young people with diabetes. Health Informatics J. 2006 Dec;12(4):304–318. doi: 10.1177/1460458206070023.
    1. Giesbrecht EM, Miller WC, Mitchell IM, Woodgate RL. Development of a wheelchair skills home program for older adults using a participatory action design approach. Biomed Res Int. 2014:172434. doi: 10.1155/2014/172434.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, Medical Research Council Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
    1. Rodriguez A, Gonzalez-Rothi L. Principles in conducting rehabilitation research. In: Stuss DT, Winocur G, Robertson I, editors. Cognitive neurorehabilitation: evidence and application. 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008. pp. 79–90.
    1. Johnston MV, Case-Smith J. Development and testing of interventions in occupational therapy: toward a new generation of research in occupational therapy. Occup Ther J Res. 2009 Jan 01;29(1):4–13. doi: 10.1177/153944920902900102.
    1. Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009.
    1. Wheelchair Skills Program. Dalhousie University; [2015-04-22]. .
    1. Rushton PW, Miller WC, Lee KR, Eng JJ, Yip J. Development and content validation of the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale: a mixed-methods study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(1):57–66. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2010.512970.
    1. Zauszniewski JA. Intervention development: assessing critical parameters from the intervention recipient's perspective. Appl Nurs Res. 2012 Feb;25(1):31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2010.06.002.
    1. Tate DG. The state of rehabilitation research: art or science? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Feb;87(2):160–166. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.013.
    1. Pew Research Center. [2015-04-22]. Older Adults and Technology Use .
    1. Schmidt R. Motor learning & performance: from principles to practice. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics Books; 1991.
    1. Sakakibara BM, Miller WC, Eng JJ, Backman CL, Routhier F. Preliminary examination of the relation between participation and confidence in older manual wheelchair users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Apr;94(4):791–794. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.016.
    1. EPIC Wheels Program. ShawTV Winnipeg; [2015-04-26]. .
    1. Giesbrecht EM, Miller WC, Eng JJ, Mitchell IM, Woodgate RL, Goldsmith CH. Feasibility of the Enhancing Participation In the Community by improving Wheelchair Skills (EPIC Wheels) program: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:350. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-350.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi