Prophylaxis of acute respiratory infections via improving the immune system in late preterm newborns with E. coli strain Nissle 1917: a controlled pilot trial

Mykola L Aryayev, Liudmyla I Senkivska, Nataliya K Bredeleva, Irina V Talashova, Mykola L Aryayev, Liudmyla I Senkivska, Nataliya K Bredeleva, Irina V Talashova

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory infections (ARIs), caused by the high level of immaturity of the immune system, are a major cause of morbidity in preterm newborns. The probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 (EcN) is well known for its immuno-modulatory properties and may therefore enhance the immune competence. Thus, EcN administration may provide a promising possibility to decrease the risk of ARIs in this vulnerable group of children. However, clinical data supporting or refuting this hypothesis are, to our knowledge, not available. Therefore, the aim of the presented pilot trial was to collect first data on the efficacy and safety of EcN treatment to prevent ARIs in late preterm newborns.

Methods: Right after birth, 62 late preterm newborns were included into an open-labeled, controlled 4-week trial with two parallel groups and a follow-up phase until the age of 1 year. All children of the treatment group received an EcN suspension orally for 3 weeks, whereas the control group was only observed. Primary efficacy variable was the number of participants with at least one ARI during the first 28 days of life. Secondary efficacy variables were the number of ARIs and the number and duration of hospitalizations caused by ARIs during the first year of life.

Results: The number of participants with at least one ARI during the first 28 days of life was significantly lower in the group treated with EcN compared to that in the control group. Although only of exploratory nature, analyses of secondary efficacy variables suggest that EcN treatment may also reduce the average number of ARIs, the average number of hospitalizations caused by ARIs, and the mean duration of such hospitalizations. There is also some evidence that early EcN treatment may have long-term benefits on newborns' health status.

Conclusion: The present pilot trial provides first evidence that EcN is able to reduce the incidence of ARIs in the neonatal period of late preterm newborns. Additionally, EcN is characterized by an excellent individual biocompatibility in the absence of adverse drug reactions. Limitations of the current trial are discussed and recommendations for future confirmatory studies are made.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01540162; retrospectively registered on 16 February 2012.

Keywords: Acute respiratory infection; E. coli Nissle; Immunity improvement; Late preterm newborn; Prophylaxis.

Conflict of interest statement

The trial protocol and informed consent were approved by the Ukraine national competent authority (Expert Center of Health Care Ministry of Ukraine) and central and local bioethics commissions. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice. Written informed consent of the participants’ legal guardian(s) was obtained prior to enrollment in the trial.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart showing the timeline of the trial and the measurement schedule. ARI acute respiratory infection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart showing the allocation of subjects
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Result of primary efficacy measure. Shown are the numbers of participants with at least one ARI during the first 28 days of life for the EcN and the control group, respectively
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Exploratory results of secondary efficacy measures. Shown are the mean numbers of ARIs (a), the mean numbers of hospitalizations due to ARIs (b), and the mean durations of hospitalizations due to ARIs (c) after 28 days, 6 months, and 12 months for the EcN and the control group, respectively. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. As statistical analyses of secondary efficacy variables are only performed for explorative purposes, given p values are not corrected for α-error inflation

References

    1. Kusel MM, de Klerk NH, Holt PG, et al. Role of respiratory viruses in acute upper and lower respiratory tract illness in the first year of life: a birth cohort study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25(8):680–686. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000226912.88900.a3.
    1. Underwood MA, Danielsen B, Gilbert WM. Cost causes and rates of rehospitalization of preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2007;27(10):614–619. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211801.
    1. Volodin NN. Neonatology: national guideline. short edition, GEOTAR Media. 2014.
    1. Aryayev NL, Tsiunchik YG, Varbanetz DA, et al. Clinical significance of probiotics in prophylactics and treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children. Zdorovie Rebenka. 2007;4(7):10–18.
    1. Nyankovsky SL. Prebiotics and probiotics—possibilities of prophylactic and therapeutic use. Dytyachyi Likar. 2010;4(6):5–9.
    1. Maynard CL, Elson CO, Hatton RD, et al. Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system. Nature. 2012;489(7415):231–241. doi: 10.1038/nature11551.
    1. Gao J, Wu H, Liu J. Importance of gut microbiota in health and diseases of new born infants. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(1):28–32. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3253.
    1. FAO/WHO Working Group, 2002. Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. FAO/WHO Working Group 1–11 London Ontario, Canada, Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN and World Health Organization Available at: . Accessed 17 Aug 2016.
    1. Hatakka K, Savilahti E, Pönkä A, et al. Effect of long term consumption of probiotic milk on infections in children attending day care centres: double blind, randomised trial. BMJ. 2001;322(7298):1–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1327.
    1. de Vrese M, Winkler P, Rautenberg P, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus gasseri PA 16/8, Bifidobacterium longum SP 07/3, B. bifidum MF 20/5 on common cold episodes: a double blind, randomized, controlled trial. ClinNutr. 2005;24(4):481–491.
    1. Rautava S, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Specific probiotics in reducing the risk of acute infections in infancy—a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Br J Nutr. 2009;101(11):1722–1726. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508116282.
    1. Hojsak I, Abdović S, Szajewska H, et al. Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of nosocomial gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections. Pediatrics. 2010;125(5):e1171–e1177. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2568.
    1. Maldonado J, Cañabate F, Sempere L, et al. Human milk probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 reduces the incidence of gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tract infections in infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54(1):55–61. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182333f18.
    1. Thapar N, Sanderson IR. Diarrhoea in children: an interface between developing and developed countries. Lancet. 2004;363(9409):641–653. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15599-2.
    1. Weizman Z, Asli G, Alsheikh A. Effect of a probiotic infant formula on infections in child care centers: comparison of two probiotic agents. Pediatrics. 2005;115(1):5–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1815.
    1. Blum G, Marre R, Hacker J. Properties of Escherichia coli strains of serotype O6. Infection. 1995;23:234–236. doi: 10.1007/BF01781204.
    1. Blum-Oehler G, Oswald S, Eiteljorge K, et al. Development of strain-specific PCR reactions for the detection of the probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 in fecal samples. Res Microbiol. 2003;154(1):59–66. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2508(02)00007-4.
    1. Grozdanov L, Raasch C, Schulze J, et al. Analysis of the genome structure of the nonpathogenic probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(16):5432–5441. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.16.5432-5441.2004.
    1. Schiemann M, Sonnenborn U, Schulze J, et al. E.coli: Bedeutung in Forschung und Medizin. 3. Hagen: ANG; 2015.
    1. Joeres-Nguyen-Xuan TH, Boehm SK, Joeres L, et al. Survival of the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) in the gastrointestinal tract given in combination with oral mesalamine to healthy volunteers. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16(2):256–262. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21042.
    1. Sonnenborn U, Greinwald R. Beziehungen zwischen Wirtsorganismus und Darmflora unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Physiologie und Funktion der normalen Escherichia-coli-Flora. 2. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1991.
    1. Schröder H. Entwicklung der aeroben Darmflora bei Neugeborenen nach Kolonisierung mit dem E.-coli-Stamm Nissle 1917. Der Kinderarzt. 1992;23:1618–1625.
    1. Lodinová-Zádníková R, Tlaskalová-Hogenová H, Sonnenborn U. Einfluss der gezielten Darmbesiedlung mit dem Escherichia-coli-Stamm Nissle 1917 auf die Immunantwort bei ausgetragenen und frühgeborenen Kindern. Der Kinderarzt. 1994;3:265–272.
    1. Lodinová-Zádníková R, Sonnenborn U. Effect of preventive administration of a non-pathogenic Escherichia coli strain on the colonization of the intestine with microbial pathogens in newborn infants. Biol Neonate. 1997;71:224–232. doi: 10.1159/000244421.
    1. Arribas B, Rodriguez-Cabezas ME, Camuesco D, et al. A probiotic strain of Escherichia coli, Nissle 1917, given orally exerts local and systemic anti-inflammatory effects in lipopolysaccharide-induced sepsis in mice. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;157(6):1024–1033. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00270.x.
    1. Hancock V, Dahl M, Klemm P. Probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 outcompetes intestinal pathogens during biofilm formation. J Med Microbiol. 2010;59(4):392–399. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.008672-0.
    1. Cukrowska B, Lodinová-Zádníková R, Enders C, et al. Specific proliferative and antibody response of premature infants to intestinal colonization with nonpathogenic probiotic E. coli strain Nissle 1917. Scand J Immunol. 2002;55:204–209. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2002.01005.x.
    1. Lodinová-ZádníkováR, Tlaskalová-Hogenová H, Sonnenborn U Local and serum antibody response in fullterm and premature infants after artificial colonization of the intestine with. E coli strain Nissle 1917 (Mutaflor®) Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1992;3:43–48.
    1. Sonnenborn U, Schulze J. The non-pathogenic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 features of a versatile probiotic. Microbial Ecol Health Dis. 2009;21:122–158. doi: 10.3109/08910600903444267.
    1. Manzhalli E, Hornuss D, Stremmel W. Intestinal-borne dermatoses significantly improved by oral application of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(23):5415–5421. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i23.5415.
    1. Heikkinen T, Ruohola A, Ruuskanen O, et al. Intranasally administered immunoglobulin for the prevention of rhinitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17(5):367–372. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199805000-00004.
    1. Stegmann BJ, Carey JC. TORCH Infections. Toxoplasmosis, Other (syphilis, varicella-zoster, parvovirus B19), Rubella, Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Herpes infections. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2002;2(4):253–258.
    1. National Report on implementation of the decisions of the final outcome document of the United Nations General Assembly Special Session on children and action plan "A World Fit for Children. Ministry of Family, Youth and Sport of Ukraine State Institute for Family and Youth Development, 2007 Available at: ; Accessed 17 Aug 2016
    1. Bo L, Li J, Tao T, et al. Probiotics for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD009066. 10.1002/14651858.CD009066.pub2.
    1. Hao Q, Dong BR, Wu T. Probiotics for preventing acute upper respiratory tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD006895. 10.1002/14651858.CD006895.pub2.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi