Correlation between clinical and MRI assessment of depth of invasion in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma

H A Alsaffar, D P Goldstein, E V King, J R de Almeida, D H Brown, R W Gilbert, P J Gullane, O Espin-Garcia, W Xu, J C Irish, H A Alsaffar, D P Goldstein, E V King, J R de Almeida, D H Brown, R W Gilbert, P J Gullane, O Espin-Garcia, W Xu, J C Irish

Abstract

Background: Neck metastasis is the most important prognostic factor in oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Apart from the T- stage, depth of invasion has been used as a highly predictable factor for microscopic neck metastasis, despite the controversy on the exact depth cut off point. Depth of invasion can be determined clinically and radio logically. However, there is no standard tool to determine depth of invasion preoperatively. Although MRI is used widely to stage the head and neck disease, its utility in depth evaluation has not formally been assessed.

Objective: To compare preoperative clinical and radiological depth evaluation in oral tongue SCC using the standard pathological depth. To compare clinical and radiological accuracy between superficial (<5 mm) vs. deep invaded tumor (≥5 mm) METHODS: This prospective study used consecutive biopsy-proven oral tongue invasive SCC that presented to the University health network (UHN), Toronto. Clinical examination, radiological scan and appropriate staging were determined preoperatively. Standard pathology reports postoperatively were reviewed to determine the depth of invasion from the tumor specimen.

Results: 72 tumour samples were available for analysis and 53 patients were included. For all tumors, both clinical depth (r = 0.779; p < 0.001) and radiographic depth (r =0.907; p <0.001) correlated well with pathological depth, with radiographic depth correlating slightly better. Clinical depth also correlated well with radiographic depth (r = 0.731; p < 0.001). By contrast, for superficial tumors (less than 5 mm on pathological measurement) neither clinical (r = 0.333, p = 0.34) nor radiographic examination (r = - 0.211; p = 0.56) correlated with pathological depth of invasion.

Conclusion: This is the first study evaluating the clinical assessment of tumor thickness in comparison to radiographic interpretation in oral cavity cancer. There are strong correlations between pathological, radiological, and clinical measurements in deep tumors (≥5 mm). In superficial tumors (<5 mm), clinical and radiological examination had low correlation with pathological thickness.

Keywords: Clinical depth; Depth of invasion; MRI; Oral tongue SCC; Pathological depth.

References

    1. Patel SC, Carpenter WR, Tyree S, Couch ME, Weissler M, Hackman T. Increasing incidence of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma in young white women, age 18 to 44 years. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(11):1488-94. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.31.7883. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
    1. Johnson NW, Jayasekara P, Amarasinghe AA. Squamous cell carcinoma and precursor lesions of the oral cavity: epidemiology and aetiology. Periodontol 2000. 2011;57(1):19–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00401.x.
    1. Layland MK, Sessions DG, Lenox J. The influence of lymph node metastasis in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx: N0 versus N+ Laryngoscope. 2005;115(4):629–639. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000161338.54515.b1.
    1. Fukano H, Matsuura H, Hasegawa Y, Nakamura S. Depth of invasion as a predictive factor for cervical lymph node metastasis in tongue carcinoma. Head Neck. 1997;19(3):205–210. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199705)19:3<205::AID-HED7>;2-6.
    1. Yayci E, Güzin K, Suer N. Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012;33(5):480–484.
    1. Lwin CT, Hanlon R, Lowe D, Brown JS, Woolgar JA, Triantafyllou A, Rogers SN, Bekiroglu F, Lewis-Jones H, Wieshmann H, Shaw RJ. Accuracy of MRI in prediction of tumour thickness and nodal stage in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Shaw Oral Oncology. 2012;48(2):149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.11.002.
    1. Park JO, Jung SL, Joo YH, Jung CK, Cho KJ, Kim MS. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of tumor invasion depth inoral/oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2011;47(5):381–386. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.03.012.
    1. Patel RS, Clark JR, Dirven R, Wyten R, Gao K, O’Brien CJ. Prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of patients with oral carcinoma. ANZ J Surg. 2009;79(1–2):19–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04791.x.
    1. Preda L, Chiesa F, Calabrese L, Latronico A, Bruschini R, Leon ME, Renne G, Bellomi M. Relationship between histologic thickness of tongue carcinoma and thickness estimated from preoperative MRI. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:2242–2248. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0263-9.
    1. Yuen AP, Ng RW, Lam PK, Ho A. Preoperative measurement of tumor thickness of oral tongue carcinoma with intraoral ultrasonography. Head Neck. 2008;30(2):230–234. doi: 10.1002/hed.20678.
    1. Almangush A, Bello IO, Keski-Säntti H, Mäkinen LK, Kauppila JH, Pukkila M, Hagström J, Laranne J, Tommola S, Nieminen O, Soini Y, Kosma VM, Koivunen P, Grénman R, Leivo I, Salo T. Depth of invasion, tumor budding, and worst pattern of invasion: Prognostic indicators in early-stage oral tongue cancer. Head Neck. 2013;21. doi:10.1002/hed.23380.
    1. Chone CT, Magalhes RS, Etchehebere E, Camargo E, Altemani A, Crespo AN. Predictive value of sentinel node biopsy in head and neck cancer. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008;128:920–924. doi: 10.1080/00016480701760114.
    1. Stoeckli SJ, Alkureishi LW, Ross GL. Sentinel node biopsy for early oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266:787–793. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-0955-2.
    1. Kuriakose MA, Trivedi NP. Sentinel node biopsy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;17:100–110. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283293631.
    1. Sagheb K, Sagheb K, Rahimi-Nedjat R, Taylor K, Al-Nawas B, Walter C. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in T1/T2 squamous cell carcinomas of the tongue: A prospective study. Oncol Lett. 2016;11(1):600–604.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi