Ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block: a randomized trial on the influence of femoral nerve catheter orifice configuration (six-hole versus end-hole) on post-operative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

Alessandra Novello-Siegenthaler, Mehdi Hamdani, Irène Iselin-Chaves, Roxane Fournier, Alessandra Novello-Siegenthaler, Mehdi Hamdani, Irène Iselin-Chaves, Roxane Fournier

Abstract

Background: Multiorifice catheters have been shown to provide superior analgesia and significantly reduce local anesthetic consumption compared with end-hole catheters in epidural studies. This prospective, blinded, randomized study tested the hypothesis that, in continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) under ultrasound guidance, multiorifice catheter would reduce local anesthetic consumption at 24 h compared with end-hole catheter.

Methods: Eighty adult patients (aged ≥18 years) scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty under a combination of CFNB, sciatic nerve block and general anesthesia were randomized to CFNB using either a 3-pair micro-hole (Contiplex, BRAUN®, 20G - 400 mm) or an end-hole (Silverstim VYGON®, 20G - 500 mm) catheter. Once the femoral catheter was sited, a bolus of 20 mL lidocaine 1% was injected. An electronic pump then delivered an automated 5 mL bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% hourly, with 10 mL self-administered patient controlled analgesia boluses.

Results: There was no inter-group difference in either median number of ropivacaine boluses on demand during the first 24 h (4(2-7) vs. 4(2-8) in six-hole and end-hole groups, respectively; P = 0.832) or median ropivacaine consumption at 48 h (365(295-418) vs. 387(323-466); P = 0.452). No significant differences were recorded between the groups at 24 h regarding median average verbal rate pain scale (2(0-3) vs. 2(0-4); P = 0.486) or morphine consumption (0(0-20) vs. 0(0-20); P = 0.749). Quadriceps muscle strength declined to 7% (0-20) and 10% (0-28) in the six-hole and end-hole groups, respectively, at 24 h after surgery (P = 0.733).

Conclusions: In this superiority trial, catheter orifice configuration did not influence the effectiveness of CFNB in this setting: quality of analgesia was similar, with no reduction in either local anesthetic or morphine consumption, and equivalent postoperative quadriceps weakness.

Trial registration: Retrospectively registered at ( NCT03376178 ). Date: 21 November 2017.

Keywords: Catheter orifice configuration; Continuous femoral block; Local anesthetic consumption; Total knee arthroplasty.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee (University of Geneva, Switzerland) with the number of Approval 12–269 and the Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flow through the study. One patient1 in the end-hole group had incorrect programming of the study pump. Three patients2 in the end-hole group and four patients in the six-hole group experienced catheter dislodgment on day of surgery

References

    1. Paul JE, Arya A, Hurlburt L, Cheng J, Thabane L, Tidy A, Murthy Y. Femoral nerve block improves analgesia outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1144–1162. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f4b18.
    1. Lang SA. Postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty: a study comparing spinal anesthesia and combined sciatic femoral 3-in-1 block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:97. doi: 10.1016/S1098-7339(99)90176-1.
    1. Farr J, Jaggers R, Lewis H, Plackis A, Sim SB, Sherman SL. Evidence-based approach of treatment options for postoperative knee pain. Phys Sportsmed. 2014;42(2):58–70. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.05.2058.
    1. Mizner RL, Snyder-Mackler L. Altered loading during walking and sit-to-stand is affected by quadriceps weakness after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1083–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.01.021.
    1. Ilfeld BM, Duke KB, Donohue MC. The association between lower extremity continuous peripheral nerve blocks and patient falls after knee and hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1552–1554. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fb9507.
    1. Brodner G, Buerkle H, Van Aken H, Lambert R, Schweppe-Hartenauer ML, Wempe C, Gogarten W. Postoperative analgesia after knee surgery: a comparison of three different concentrations of ropivacaine for continuous femoral nerve blockade. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:256–262. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000265552.43299.2b.
    1. Bauer M, Wang L, Onibonoje OK Parrett C, Sessler DI, Mounir-Soliman L, Zaky S, Krebs V, Buller LT, Donohue MC, Stevens-Lapsley JE, Ilfeld BM. Continuous femoral nerve blocks: decreasing local anesthetic concentration to minimize quadriceps femoris weakness. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:665–672. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182475c35.
    1. Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo CE. A comparison of a basal infusion with automated mandatory boluses in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor. Anesth Analg. 2007;(3):673–8.
    1. Taboada M, Rodriguez J, Bermudez M, Valiño C, Ulloa B, Aneiros F, Gude F, Cortés J, Alvarez J, Atanassoff PG. A “new” automated bolus technique for continuous popliteal block: a prospective, randomized comparison with a continuous infusion technique. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1433–1437. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181824164.
    1. Frederickson MJ, Abeysekera A, Price DJ, Wong AC. Patient-initiated mandatory boluses for ambulatory continuous interscalene analgesia: an effective strategy for optimizing analgesia and minimizing side-effects. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:239–245. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq320.
    1. Charous MT, Madison SJ, Suresh PJ, Sandhu NS, Loland VJ, Mariano ER, Donohue MC, Dutton PH, Ferguson EJ, Ilfeld BM. Continuous femoral nerve blocks: varying local anesthetic delivery method (bolus versus basal) to minimize quadriceps motor block while maintaining sensory block. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:774–781. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182124dc6.
    1. Michael S, Richmond MN, Birks RJ. A comparison between open-end (single hole) and closed-end (three lateral holes) epidural catheters. Complications and quality of sensory blockade. Anaesthesia. 1989;44:578–580. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11446.x.
    1. Dickson MA, Moores C, McClure JH. Comparison of single, end-holed and multi-orifice extradural catheters when used for continuous infusion of local anaesthetic during labour. Br J Anaesth. 1997;79:297–300. doi: 10.1093/bja/79.3.297.
    1. D’Angelo R, Foss ML, Livesay CH. A comparison of multiport and uniport epidural catheters in laboring patients. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:1276–1279. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199706000-00019.
    1. Fredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ. Catheter orifice configuration influences the effectiveness of continuous peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:470–475. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318228d4ce.
    1. Fredrickson MJ. Randomised comparison of an end-hole, triple-hole and novel six-hole catheter for continuous interscalene analgesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014;42:37–42.
    1. Fegley AJ, Lerman J, Wissler R. Epidural multiorifice catheters function as single-orifice catheters: an in vitro study. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1079–1081. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f1fc2.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
    1. Bohannon RW. Measuring knee extensor muscle strength. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:13–18. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200101000-00004.
    1. Gandhi K, Lindenmuth DM, Hadzic A, Xu D, Patel VS, Maliakal TJ, Gadsden JC. The effect of stimulating versus conventional perineural catheters on postoperative analgesia following ultrasound-guided femoral nerve localization. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23:626–631. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.04.006.
    1. Wong CA, Ratliff JT, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Toledo P, McCarthy RJ. A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:904–909. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000197778.57615.1a.
    1. Ueda K, Ueda W, Manabe M. A comparative study of sequential epidural bolus technique and continuous epidural infusion. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:126–129. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00019.
    1. Kaynar AM, Shankar KB. Epidural infusion: continuous or bolus? Anesth Analg. 1999;89:534.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi